Skip to main content

Constructed Rice Tracers Identify the Major Virulent Transcription Activator-Like Effectors of the Bacterial Leaf Blight Pathogen


Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) injects major transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) into plant cells to activate susceptibility (S) genes for promoting bacterial leaf blight in rice. Numerous resistance (R) genes have been used to construct differential cultivars of rice to identify races of Xoo, but the S genes were rarely considered. Different edited lines of rice cv. Kitaake were constructed using CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing, including single, double and triple edits in the effector-binding elements (EBEs) located in the promoters of rice S genes OsSWEET11a, OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14. The near-isogenic lines (NILs) were used as tracers to detect major TALEs (PthXo1, PthXo2, PthXo3 and their variants) in 50 Xoo strains. The pathotypes produced on the tracers determined six major TALE types in the 50 Xoo strains. The presence of the major TALEs in Xoo strains was consistent with the expression of S genes in the tracers, and it was also by known genome sequences. The EBE editing had little effect on agronomic traits, which was conducive to balancing yield and resistance. The rice-tracers generated here provide a valuable tool to track major TALEs of Xoo in Asia which then shows what rice cultivars are needed to combat Xoo in the field.


Plants possess a two-tiered innate immune system that includes pattern-triggered (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI), which contribute to plant defense against pathogens (Minhang Yuan et al. 2021). Some pathogens deliver effectors into plant cells to evade or inhibit PTI and elicit effector-triggered susceptibility (ETS); as a countermeasure, plants utilize resistance (R) genes to intercept pathogen effectors and activate ETI. Collectively, the complex interaction between PTI, ETS and ETI has been summarized in a "zig-zag" model (Ngou et al. 2022; Jones and Dangl 2006).

Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo), which causes bacterial leaf blight (BB) in rice, can induce the expression of target S genes in host plants by secreting transcription activator-like effector (TALE) proteins (Boch and Bonas 2010). TALEs are transcription factors containing repetitive domains that recognize and bind to effector-binding elements (EBEs) that are specific DNA sequences in the promoter regions of S genes (Boch et al. 2009; Moscou and Bogdanove 2009; Timilsina et al. 2020). Breeding plant varieties resistant to pathogens is the most effective and economical approach to control disease. To date, 47 genes conferring resistance to Xoo have been identified, and 13 cloned R genes are associated with TALEs (Jiang et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2020; Ji et al. 2020; Chen et al. 2021; Huang et al. 2023; Lu et al. 2022). Unfortunately, the constant evolution in pathogen populations weakens the effectiveness of race-specific R genes (Li et al. 2020b).

In contrast to R genes, only three S genes have been identified in rice for bacterial blight susceptibility in the field. These susceptibility genes are sugar transport genes. The sugars will eventually be exported transporter (SWEET) genes encode sugar transporters that are needed for both growth and development in plants; however, these genes are often hijacked by pathogens for nutritional needs, which leads to successful infections (Gupta 2020). Five of the 21 OsSWEET genes described in rice are known to be induced by major virulence TALEs (major TALEs), and only three OsSWEET genes are known to be targeted in the field (Chen et al. 2010; Streubel et al. 2013; Yang and White 2004; Yuan and Wang 2013). Traditionally, differential cultivars of rice containing different R genes have been used to identify races of Xoo (Ogawa 1993; Nugroho et al. 2022), but the number of R genes is much higher than the number of S genes. Therefore, S genes are more suitable for constructing near-isogenic lines (NILs) to monitor the variations of Xoo, which is critical for successful breeding and deployment of resistant varieties.

Ten major TALEs have been identified in Xoo and are known to target EBEs in the promoters of three OsSWEET genes. PthXo1 and AvrXa27A are major TALEs that induce the expression of OsSWEET11a (Os8N3/Xa13) (B. Yang et al. 2006; Xu et al. 2023), whereas PthXo2 and PthXo2-like TALEs (PthXo2A/B/C, PthXo2.1/PthXo2.2, PthXo2K74, PthXo2PXO61 and Tal5LN18) induce the expression of OsSWEET13 (Os12N3/Xa25) (Zhou et al. 2015; Xu et al. 2019). PthXo3, AvrXa7, TalC and TalF are known to induce the expression of OsSWEET14 (Os11N3), (Oliva et al. 2019; Tran et al. 2018; Antony et al. 2010). Furthermore, TalC and TalF only exist in African strains. DNA polymorphisms in EBEs can prevent TALE binding to target promoters. An analysis of 4,726 rice varieties revealed an A/G variation in the EBE recognized by PthXo1, which had a polymorphism frequency of 0.2% and an adenosine insertion in the PthXo3/AvrXa7 EBE occurred with a frequency of 7.7% (Eom et al. 2019). There were ten variations in the PthXo2 EBE with frequencies ranging from 0.03 to 51.16% and these variations complicate the identification of PthXo2-like TALEs (Xu et al. 2019).

Although the intricacies of rice/Xoo interactions have been deciphered in many studies (Oliva et al. 2019; Xu et al. 2022, 2019), it remains inconvenient and inefficient to detect major TALEs in Xoo. Southern blot hybridization can determine the number and size of putative TALE genes (Khojasteh et al. 2020) but is inaccurate because the comparison is based on size and is not precise. Whole genome sequencing can predict putative TALEs in Xoo, however, the quality of the match between two repeat variable di-residues (RVDs) and the EBE nucleotide is confusing and the final pathotype determination still depended on plant materials. NILs based on rice R genes have been used to classify races of Xoo, but the large number of R genes makes it difficult to establish a complete set of materials (Mondal et al. 2014). Translational fusions between OsSWEET gene promoters and β-glucuronidase were used to monitor SWEET protein accumulation (Eom et al. 2019), but the identification procedure was complicated, and these materials cannot be used for breeding. The OsSWEET genes knockout rice lines were used to determine which OsSWEET genes were targeted by specific Xoo strains (Eom et al. 2019), however it ignored the role of OsSWEET genes in plant growth and development. A simple, rapid method for monitoring Xoo and major TALEs remains elusive and is urgently needed.

To identify major TALEs of Xoo in Asia, we used CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing to develop a set of rice lines with single, double and triple mutations in the EBEs of OsSWEET11a, OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14. These mutant rice lines can be used to determine Xoo major TALEs by phenotyping after inoculation, thus providing a rapid and strategic screen for resistant varieties that can be utilized in the field.


Generation of EBE-Edited Rice Lines

In order to detect major TALEs in virulent Xoo strains that cause disease in rice, we generated single, double and triple mutations in the EBEs of OsSWEET11a, OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14 using CRISPR–Cas9 technology (Fig. 1A and B). When considered along with wild-type Kitaake rice and mutants previously obtained by our lab (MS14K, Xu et al. 2019; MS1K, Xu et al. 2023), the mutants constitute a set of differential varieties. Regardless of whether the edited site was homozygous, heterozygous or wild-type, it was easily identified by PCR and Sanger sequencing. Homozygous mutants were obtained in the T0 to T3 generations, and mutant lines containing 2–10 nucleotide deletions in EBEs were selected for further study (Additional file 1: Table S1 and Fig. 1C). Mutants with a single edited EBE included MS1K, MS3K and MS4K. MS1K contained a 10-bp deletion in the OsSWEET11a EBE, MS3K contained a 5-bp deletion in the OsSWEET13 EBE, and MS4K contained a 5-bp deletion and an extra adenine nucleotide in the overlapping loci of target EBEs for PthXo3 and AvrXa27 in the OsSWEET14 promoter (Fig. 1C). Rice lines containing two edited EBEs included mutants MS13K, MS14K and MS34K, whereas MS134K contained mutations in all three EBEs recognized by PthXo1/ PthXo1* (variants of PthXo1, including AvrXa27), PthXo2B/C (here represent PthXo2-like TALEs that are compatible with Kitaake) and PthXo3/PthXo3* (variants of PthXo3, including AvrXa7). For MS134K in this study, we chose a different line with from that reported in Xu et al. 2019 (MS134K-18 and MS134K-19). The line used in the current study contained the appropriate number of base deletions (−5) in OsSWEET13 EBE (Additional file 1: Table S1). These rice lines constitute a potential series of differential varieties for identification of Xoo strains harboring different major TALEs. We speculated that infection of the seven EBE-mutant lines by Xoo strains would activate a subset of the OsSWEET genes and lead to resistant or susceptible phenotypes, thus identifying what major TALEs were present in a given Xoo strain.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Edited OsSWEET EBEs in rice. A Schematics of edited EBE sequences recognized by the major virulence TALEs PthXo1/AvrXa27A, PthXo2B/C, PthXo3 and AvrXa7. The PAM region (NGG) is shown in red font. B Schematic structures showing Cas9 and guide RNAs for EBE editing in seven mutant lines of cv. Kitaake. The sgRNA target sites are shown in different colors. C Nucleotide sequences of OsSWEET11, OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14 promoters and EBEs in cv. Kitaake and seven edited lines. The EBEs recognized by PthXo1, PthXo2B/C and PthXo3 are highlighted in yellow, and the AvrXa7 EBE is underscored

Pathotypes of Xoo Strains on EBE-Edited Rice Lines

To estimate major TALE prevalence and variation in geographically diverse Xoo strains, a collection of 50 Xoo strains of Asian (Additional file 1: Table S2) was screened for virulence on cv. Kitaake and its NILs. A tip-cutting method (Ji et al. 2016) was used to identify resistant and susceptible phenotypes in rice lines inoculated with Xoo (Fig. 2A, Additional file 1: Table S3 and Table 1). Four of the 50 Xoo strains (Xoo JS137-1, Zhe173, JX21, 6503) were not virulent on cv. Kitaake or the EBE-edited lines. We speculate that these four strains may contain PthXo2B*, variant of PthXo2B/C that is incompatible with cv. Kitaake, including PthXo2 (Oliva et al. 2019; Xu et al. 2019). In the remaining 46 Xoo strains, PXO99A was avirulent on MS1K, which was defective in the OsSWEET11a EBE targeted by PthXo1/PthXo1* (or PthXo1/PthXo1* + PthXo2B*). Twenty-eight strains were avirulent on MS4K, which is defective in the OsSWEET14 EBEs recognized by PthXo3/PthXo3* (or PthXo3/PthXo3* + PthXo2B*). Xoo IXO221 was virulent on the single EBE-edited lines MS1K, MS3K and MS4K, but was avirulent on MS14K, which suggests that IXO221 contains PthXo1/PthXo1* and PthXo3/PthXo3* (or PthXo1/PthXo1* + PthXo3/PthXo3* + PthXo2B*). Twelve strains were virulent on single EBE-edited lines, but were avirulent on MS34K, suggesting that these strains harbor both PthXo2B/C and PthXo3/PthXo3*. Four strains (Xoo 7914, LN18, LN2, LN4) were virulent on single and double EBE-edited lines and were avirulent on MS134K, which harbors mutant alleles of OsSWEET11a, OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14; this result indicates that these four strains harbor PthXo1/PthXo1*, PthXo2B/C and PthXo3/PthXo3*. The four Xoo strains that were unable to cause disease on cv. Kitaake (JS137-1, Zhe173, JX21, 6503) were further studied on the spontaneous mutant lines of OsSWEET13. We speculated that these strains may harbor PthXo2B*. We inoculated five other rice varieties (IR4, ZS97, Minghui63, American Huangkedao, and Xiangdao; Additional file 1: Table S4) with these four strains using the tip-cutting method. Xoo JS137-1, Zhe173 and JX21 induced longer lesions on cv. Xiangdao (S) as compared to cv. Kitaake (Additional file 1: Table S5, Fig. 2B and C), and expression analysis indicated that OsSWEET13 was induced in Xiangdao after inoculation with these three strains (Fig. 2E). When compared to cv. Kitaake, Xiangdao exhibits a single base change in the EBE (Fig. 2D), which confers susceptibility to Xoo JS137-1, Zhe173 and JX21 but still resistance to Xoo 6503 (Additional file 1: Table S5). An OsSWEET13 allele compatible with Xoo 6503 was not observed in this study, possibly because we have not collected enough alleles or because Xoo 6503 is a weakly-virulent strain that is only susceptible under certain environmental conditions.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Identification of Xoo strains containing only PthXo2B*. A Inoculation phenotypes of Xoo strains on cv. Kitaake and the edited lines. B Disease symptoms on rice cv. Xiangdao inoculated with Xoo JS137-1, Zhe173, JX21, and 6503. C Mean lesion lengths (cm) induced by Xoo JS137-1, Zhe173, JX21, and 6503 on Xiangdao rice (n = 10). D Polymorphism of OsSWEET13 EBEs in rice cultivars IR24, Kitaake, and Xiangdao. Hyphens indicate that a single nucleotide was missing in the EBE sequence. E, Expression of OsSWEET13 in rice cv. Xiangdao inoculated with Xoo JS137-1, Zhe173, JX21, and 6503 (n = 4)

Table 1 Pathotypes of X. oryzae pv. oryzae strains on EBE-edited lines

Estimating TALE Diversity Via Genome Analysis

Based on the presence of putative major TALEs, the 50 Xoo strains were grouped into six races (Table 1). Of these 50 strains, nine had known genome sequences, fortunately, there were strains with known genomes in each group, and the major TALEs predicted by genome sequencing corresponded roughly to phenotypes (Additional file 1: Table S6 and Fig. 3). For example, Xoo PXO99A in race 1 encodes only PthXo1, Xoo PXO86 in race 5 encodes only PthXo3* (AvrXa7); however, Xoo AH28 (race 5) presumably harbors both PthXo2 and PthXo3 based on the genome sequences, but the inoculation phenotype elicited by PthXo2 is not expressed in cv. Kitaake or the NILs. Xoo IXO221 in race 2 contains PthXo1* and PthXo3* (Fig. 3). Interestingly, PthXo1* and PthXo3* have not been reported in IXO221, and PthXo1* differs from PthXo1 by only 1 RVD and PthXo3* differs from PthXo3 by 8 RVDs. The predicted target of PthXo3* is different from the EBEs of OsSWEET14, so the final phenotype cannot be determined by genomic prediction alone. We then conducted Southern blot analysis on the 50 strains, since this approach has been used to classify fragment of pthXo1 from Xoo PXO99A (Ji et al. 2014). Strains Xoo PH (pthXo1), PH (pthXo2) and PH (avrXa7) containing pthXo1, pthXo2 or avrXa7, respectively, but lacking other TALEs were used as controls to identify bands encoding pthXo1, pthXo2 or avrXa7 (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Southern blotting indicated that 47 Xoo strains contained putative fragments of pthXo1, 46 contained possible fragments of pthXo2, 22 contained putative fragments of pthXo3, and 23 strains contained fragments of avrXa7. Although both PthXo3 and AvrXa7 activated OsSWEET14, these two TALEs were rarely present in the same strain. In total, 18 Xoo strains contained putative fragments of pthXo1, pthXo2 and pthXo3, and 19 strains contained potential fragments of pthXo1, pthXo2 and avrXa7, which suggests these strains have the capability to activate OsSWEET11a, OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14 simultaneously. It is important to mention that Southern blot results did not correspond to the inoculation phenotypes, possibly because the presence of hybridizing bands in major TALEs indicated the presence of a TALE of similar size that remained unidentified.

Fig. 3
figure 3

TALE diversity in Xoo strains. A Predicted major virulence TALEs in the genomes of representative Xoo strains from six races. AnnoTALE software was used for TALE prediction. The genomic sequences of PXO99A (race 1), IXO221 (race 2), LN18 (race 4), PXO86 (race 5) and PXO61 (race 6) were obtained from NCBI, and the genomic sequence of JS137-1 (race 3) was generated in our laboratory (unpublished data). B Alignment of PthXo1, PthXo3 and PthXo2 in TALE RVD sequences (no gaps allowed) with the DNAsequence of EBEs in the OsSWEET11, OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14 promoters. Background colors indicate the quality of the match between the RVDs and the EBE nucleotides (

Induction of OsSWEET Genes in Rice

To investigate the accuracy of predicted major TALEs, the junctions between diseased and healthy leaves infected with six Xoo strains were sampled and OsSWEET gene expression was measured (Fig. 4). These six strains were Xoo PXO99A (race 1), IXO221 (race 2), JS137-1 (race 3), LN18 (race 4), PXO86 (race 5) and PXO61 (race 6). Xoo PXO99A was the sole representative strain in race 1, and only OsSWEET11a was significantly expressed in wild-type Kitaake infected with this strain. This finding was consistent with previous studies where PthXo1 was shown to be the only major TALE in PXO99A (Eom et al. 2019). Similarly, only OsSWEET14 was expressed significantly in cv. Kitaake rice infected with Xoo PXO86 (race 5); this result suggests that either PthXo3 or AvrXa7 was the major TALE in race 5 strains. When cv. Kitaake was infected with Xoo IXO221 (race 2), both OsSWEET11a and OsSWEET14 were expressed. IXO221 also activated expression of OsSWEET14 in MS13K and OsSWEET11a in MS34K, suggesting that there were two major TALEs in these strains, namely, PthXo1/ PthXo1* and PthXo3/ PthXo3*. When cv. Kitaake was infected with Xoo PXO61 (race 6), both OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14 were expressed. PXO61 also activated.

Fig. 4
figure 4

OsSWEET11, OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14 induction triggered by PthXo1 (PthXo1*), PthXo2B/C and PthXo3 (PthXo3*) TALEs. qRT–PCR was conducted in rice cv. Kitaake and the edited lines MS13K, MS14K, and MS34K inoculated with Xoo PXO99A (race 1), IXO221 (race 2), JS137-1 (race 3), LN18 (race 4), PXO86 (race 5) and PXO61 (race 6). Means and SDs of gene expression relative to a water control were computed from five biological replicates (n = 5). Values with the same lowercase letters did not differ significantly at P < 0.05 based on ANOVA

OsSWEET14 expression in MS13K and OsSWEET13 in MS14K, suggesting the presence of two major TALEs in race 6 strains, namely PthXo2B/C and PthXo3/ PthXo3*. The race 3 strain, Xoo JS137-1, failed to activate expression of the three OsSWEET genes, suggesting that race 3 strains either lack major TALEs or perhaps harbor a variant of PthXo2B* which incompatible with cv. Kitaake. In contrast, all three OsSWEET genes were activated by Xoo strains in race 4, suggesting that these strains contain all three categories of major TALEs, namely, PthXo1(PthXo1*), PthXo2B/C and PthXo3(PthXo3*). This speculation was verified by phenotypic analysis (Fig. 2A) where all rice lines (except the triply-edited line MS134K) were susceptible to race 4 strains. Although we cannot accurately identify the presence or absence of PthXo2B*-like TALEs, our results indicate that OsSWEET gene expression correlates with the disease phenotype (resistant vs. susceptible) in inoculation tests, thus indicating that the identity of major TALE(s) of japonica rice can be predicted based on the inoculation phenotype of cv. Kitaake and its NILs.

Prediction of Major TALEs in Xoo and Deployment of Rice Varieties

A major TALE prediction table was developed based on the pathotypes observed when rice cv. Kitaake and the NILs were inoculated with different Xoo strains (Fig. 5A). The major TALEs in Xoo strains could be derived by analyzing the inoculation pathotypes on cv. Kitaake and the NILs, and the results help inform strategies for the effective distribution of disease-resistant varieties. For example, to identify suitable varieties of rice resistant to bacterial blight in different regions of China, we analyzed the geographic distribution of 50 Xoo strains and their probable OsSWEET targets. Based on results obtained from induction of OsSWEET genes, 45 Xoo strains contained major TALEs that could potentially activate OsSWEET14 (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Major TALEs prediction and distribution of Xoo strains. A major TALE prediction table. The assignment of the major TALEs in Xoo strains was based on the inoculation phenotype observed in rice cv. Kitaake and the OsSWEET EBE edited lines. B Geographical distribution of Xoo strains and potential induction of OsSWEET genes. The heat map indicates whether OsSWEET genes were induced (gray rectangles) or not induced (white rectangles) by TALEs in Xoo strains. A parsimony tree (top) was generated based on NTSYS software and confirmed the resistant (R) and susceptible (S) phenotypes and clustered the strains into six clades (1–6, blue numbers)

There were six and 16 Xoo strains that could possibly activate OsSWEET11a and OsSWEET13, respectively. Eight Xoo strains from Liaoning and five from Jilin activated OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14, and three Liaoning strains activated all three OsSWEET genes. Most Xoo strains (26/30) originating from southern China activated OsSWEET14 but not OsSWEET11a or OsSWEET13. Our findings suggest that EBE editing of OsSWEET14 could be used in southern China to combat Xoo, and EBE editing of OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14 could be used in northeastern China.

OsSWEET11a and OsSWEET14 may Impair Rice Pollen Viability and Setting Rate

The three OsSWEET genes are pluripotent and regulate susceptibility to Xoo in addition to participating in other physiological functions. For example, OsSWEET11a is presumably involved in another development, whereas OsSWEET14 may function in grain filling (Chu et al. 2006; Sosso et al. 2015). Since EBE editing of OsSWEET genes could potentially impact other physiological functions in rice, we measured key agronomic traits in paddy experiments (Fig. 6A). Agronomic assessments and multivariant analysis of plant height, stem diameter, panicle numbers and grain weight indicated that most of the edited lines performed similarly to wild-type cv. Kitaake (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Compared with other lines, MS4K was taller, which implied that editing the OsSWEET14 EBE may impact growth. The edited lines MS14K and MS134K had fewer grain numbers than cv. Kitaake, but MS14K had the highest grain weight. These results suggest that editing the EBEs in OsSWEET11a and OsSWEET14 may reduce grain numbers but allow for a more concentrated distribution of energy among individual grains. The pollen viability of MS14K and MS134K was lower than the other rice lines, and the setting rates for these two lines correlated with pollen viability (Fig. 6B–D). Collectively, these results suggest that editing the EBEs may reduce the impact on rice growth and development, it still negatively affects pollen viability and setting rates, which warrants further investigation.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Pollen viability and setting rate of rice cv. Kitaake and EBE-edited lines. A Growth and development of Kitaake and homozygous, EBE-edited rice lines in the field. B Representative images of pollen viability tests from Kitaake and edited lines. Viable and sterile pollen grains stained dark and light yellow. C, D Statistical analysis of pollen viability (n = 10) and setting rates (n = 10) of Kitaake and EBE-edited lines. The percentage of pollen viability was calculated relative to total pollen counts obtained from eight microscopic images. The seed setting rate was calcuated as the percentage of solid grains relative to the total number of grains


The coevolution of pathogens and host plants is dynamic and can lead to the emergence of novel pathogens with increased host range and diversity. A common situation is the introduction of new varieties with novel resistance genes, which exerts pressure on the pathogen population to evolve new virulence factors. Consequently, developing plant varieties with durable, broad-spectrum resistance is imperative. If pathogen strains and virulence factors are monitored in a timely fashion, the severity of disease can be mitigated. In this report, we developed a specific set of near-isogenic rice materials using CRISPR–Cas9 technology. To facilitate the application of this set of rice materials, we developed a major TALE prediction table based on the different pathotypes of cv. Kitaake and its NILs after inoculation with different Xoo strains (Fig. 5A). This table contains all observed pathotypes of cv. Kitaake and its NILs and can be used to deduce the putative major TALEs in Xoo strains. This set of differential rice lines include single, double and triple edits of EBE sequences in the promoters of three OsSWEET genes in rice cv. Kitaake. This set of rice materials can effectively predict the major TALEs in Xoo strains via plant inoculation and phenotypic monitoring and does not rely on genomic sequencing. The effectiveness of this set of materials was verified through genomic prediction and expression of susceptibility genes (OsSWEET11a, OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14). The collection of Xoo strains from different geographical regions, inoculation to edited rice lines and utilization of the TALE prediction table can provide insight into more intelligent breeding for bacterial blight resistance in rice.

The major resistance genes in rice interact with cognate avirulence genes in Xoo, and the compatibility of these interacting genes can confer disease resistance. However, the cultivation of rice varieties with a single resistance gene can be defeated by coevolving pathogen genes, and this often results in the defeat of resistance in a relatively short time. Xoo induces disease and host susceptibility by injecting TALEs into plant cells; this results in TALE binding to highly-conserved, cognate EBEs in the promoters of known OsSWEET genes. Traditional differential rice varieties for bacterial blight generally encode a series of resistance genes (Nugroho et al. 2022; Ogawa 1993); however, 47 R genes have been identified in rice for bacterial blight resistance (Lu et al. 2022), which makes it extremely difficult to construct NILs based on R genes. In contrast, susceptibility genes have limited diversity and only three S genes have been identified that are targeted by Xoo in nature; this suggests that effectors with new EBE-binding motifs may not evolve quickly (Oliva et al. 2019; Xu et al. 2019). The monitoring of bacterial blight races could be conducted more systematically based on S genes, which can detect Xoo strains with both single and multiple major TALEs. Based on the fact the OsSWEET genes have important physiological functions (Yang et al. 2018; Fei et al. 2021), we chose to edit the EBE sequences in the promoters rather than knocking out the OsSWEET genes to minimize the negative impacts on yields.

The five EBEs targeted by Xoo major TALEs include the following: PthXo1EBE in the OsSWEET11a promoter; PthXo2EBE and PthXo2-likeEBE in the OsSWEET13 promoter of indica and japonica rice; and PthXo3EBE and AvrXa7EBE region in the promoter of OsSWEET14 (This study focused on Asian strains, so TalC and TalF were not considered). There are more than five variants of PthXo2 that bind to different EBE sequences (Oliva et al. 2019; Xu et al. 2019). Consequently, we selected the japonica rice cultivar cv. Kitaake, which has the highest proportion of EBE type in 3000 sequenced rice lines (Xu et al. 2019). When the 50 Xoo strains were screened in inoculation tests, 46 strains incite disease on cv. Kitaake and its EBE-edited lines. Another possible scenario is that an Xoo strain could elicit a susceptible phenotype on cv. Kitaake and all seven edited lines; this would suggest that a new major TALE has emerged that can induce an unidentified susceptibility.

Plant host evolution, environmental selection pressure and antagonistic interactions among Xoo strains provide sources of diversity in the Xoo population. It is quite possible that bacterial blight may be incited by more than one Xoo race in a given geographical area. Our results confirmed that regional convergence occurred among Xoo stains, and there were notable differences in the diversity of Xoo races from different geographical areas. For example, in the northeastern rice cultivation areas of China, most Xoo strains have major TALEs that can activate OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14, but some strains can activate OsSWEET11a, OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14 simultaneously (e.g., Xoo LN2, LN4 and LN18). The phenomenon of regional differentiation is more common in the vast rice cultivation region in southern China, and most of the strains there only target the susceptibility gene OsSWEET14. In favorable environments with low selection pressure, the initial inoculum load in the environment develops and infects plants; moreover, genetic flow might play an important role in the dissemination of pathogens among different field populations. These results provide intriguing ideas for rice cultivation such as the development of rice cultivars with multiple mutations in EBEs, which may ultimately exhibit a form of broad-spectrum resistance. Furthermore, the expression of OsSWEET11a, OsSWEET13, and OsSWEET14 in response to Xoo combined with geographical origin can suggest effective editing variants for rice cultivation.

Interestingly, genomic analysis has shown that Xoo LN18 does not encode PthXo1; however, recently published results from our laboratory suggest that other major TALEs reside in Xoo LN18 that can activate OsSWEET11a (Xu et al. 2023). Our results also showed that the fragment used in Southern blot hybridizations could not accurately detect the presence or absence of the major TALEs in Xoo strains. For example, our results showed that 94% of strains contained bands in the same position as PthXo1, but only 14% were able to induce OsSWEET11a expression based on leaf clipping. This is because Southern blot analysis can only detect the size of TALEs but cannot identify the TALE. These results suggest that the final pathotype determination still depended on plant materials.

Previous studies focusing on whether EBE modification affects rice yield and agronomic traits have been controversial (Li et al. 2020a, b; Ma et al. 2017). Our results showed that deletion of EBE sites from the OsSWEET11a and OsSWEET14 promoters influenced the pollen viability and seed setting rates. Another study reported that single OsSWEET11a or OsSWEET11b mutants were fertile, but double mutants were infertile (Wu et al. 2022). In our study, single mutations in the OsSWEET11a and OsSWEET14 EBEs mutants were fertile; however, double mutants were less fertile, suggesting a synergistic, negative effect on pollen viability. It is unclear whether the changes in agronomic traits are related to the editing position and/or the number of deleted bases. It is encouraging to see that EBE editing in the OsSWEET13 promoter may have a positive impact on rice yield, which may reverse some of the negative effects caused by EBE-editing in OsSWEET11a and OsSWEET14.

In this study, editing the EBE regions of S gene promoters resulted in a relatively simple, rapid method for classifying pathogenic races of Xoo. This approach facilitates the identification of major pathogenic factors in Xoo strains that have not been sequenced and provides an opportunity for real-time surveillance of Xoo strains and deployment of resistant rice varieties. It is worth noting that, although there is not a single rice variety that can perfectly distinguish all PthXo2 variants on current technology measure, our study still provides an integrated technology or platform for combating bacterial blight disease in rice breeding and plantation. Moreover, because these rice materials balance yield and resistance, they can provide materials for scientific research and disease resistance breeding. Our future research efforts will extend to the identification of African Xoo strains, along with the development of homogeneous rice materials with more precise EBE editing. Due to the ongoing coevolution between pathogen effectors and rice, new major TALEs and target EBEs may be revealed in the future.


In summary, the EBE-edited near-isogenic rice lines described in this study can be used as differential varieties to detect Xoo major virulence TALEs. The monitoring of Xoo races can be conducted more systematically using S genes as compared to R genes. Our set of these tracers can detect Xoo strains harboring both single and multiple MVTs and detect the uncertain virulence TALEs of genomic prediction. Furthermore, the EBE-edited lines can guarantee an optimum balance in yield and resistance and provide clues on what rice cultivars are needed to combat the ongoing evolution of Xoo in the field.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains, Plasmids and Media

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Additional file 1: Table S7. Escherichia coli strains were grown in Luria Bertani (LB) medium supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics at 37 °C, and Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains were cultured in LB medium containing rifampicin at 28 °C. Forty-five of the Xoo strains used in this study were isolated from rice cultivated in 11 provinces in China, whereas the other five Xoo strains were collected from the Philippines and India (Additional file 1: Table S2). All Xoo strains were grown in nutrient broth (NB) at 28℃. The final concentrations of antibiotics were as follows: rifampicin, 75 μg ml−1; kanamycin, 25 μg ml−1; and spectinomycin, 100 μg ml−1.

Generation of Rice Mutant Lines with CRISPR/Cas9 Technology

Rice cv. Kitaake was used for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing of OsSWEET11a, OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14 as described (Zhou et al. 2014). Briefly, target sequences were selected within the promoter regions of OsSWEET11a, OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14, and sgRNAs were designed with CRISPR MultiTargeter ( The specificity of target sequences was verified using the BLAST function in NCBI (, Additional file 1: Table S8). The target sequences were synthesized by Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China), and double-stranded oligonucleotide DNA (dsOligo) was formed after annealing. The dsOligos corresponding to the three OsSWEET EBEs were individually inserted into BsaI- or BtgZI-digested pENTR4-gRNA4 to form vectors designed to mutant a single EBE in each of the three OsSWEET promoter regions (Additional file 1: Figure S3). Another dsOligo targeting a second OsSWEET EBE was inserted into an intermediate vector containing a different OsSWEET EBE to form a construct designed to mutant two EBEs simultaneously (Additional file 1: Figure S4), and the triple mutant rice line was obtained by a single mutation in the OsSWEET13 EBE of MS14K (Xu et al. 2019). Constructs containing single and double edits in the OsSWEET EBEs were transferred into pBY02-Cas9 using Gateway LR Clonase (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The guide RNA (gRNA) and CRISPR/Cas9 constructs were verified by BamHI digestion (Additional file 1: Figure S5) and Sanger sequencing (data not shown). pBY02-Cas9 constructs containing mutant forms of OsSWEET EBEs were transferred into Kitaake callus by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (Biorun, Wuhan, China). Individual rice transformants were selected and genomic DNA was isolated; PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing of the target region was used to select mutant lines MS1K, MS3K, MS4K, MS13K, MS34K, and MS134K in generations T0 to T3 (Additional file 1: Additional file 1: Table S1). The primers utilized to confirm the mutants are listed in Additional file 1: Table S9.

Plant Material, Growth Conditions and Pathogen Inoculation Assays

Seeds of rice cv. Kitaake and mutant lines were soaked in water for 48 h and planted in the field as two-week-old seedlings. Rice plants were randomly planted in fields with consistent monitoring at the Zhuanghang Comprehensive Experiment Station and Shanghai Jiao Tong University in Shanghai in the summers of 2021, 2022, and 2023. Leaves of eight-week-old rice plants were dissected with scissors previously immersed in suspensions of Xoo strains, and lesion lengths were measured 14 d after inoculation. Lesion length measurements ≤ 3 cm were scored as resistant (R), and ≥ 3 cm as susceptible (S). Disease assays were performed at least three times.

Evaluation of Rice Mutant Lines for Agronomic Traits and Pollen Viability

Plant height, stem diameter, panicle numbers, grain numbers and grain weight were assessed in cv. Kitaake and mutant lines under paddy conditions using a randomized block design with three replications. Setting rates (grain numbers/panicle numbers) were calculated, and pollen viability was evaluated as previously described (Chhun et al. 2007). Briefly, six anthers from cv. Kitaake and mutant lines were removed and crushed into powder; pollen grains were then stained with 10 μl I2-KI solution (1% I2, 3% KI) and observed using a light microscope. Fertile (dark) and infertile (yellow) pollen grains were counted, and the percentage of pollen viability was calculated in six microscopic images.

Southern Blotting

Genomic DNA of 50 Xoo strains was extracted using the HiPure Bacterial DNA Extraction Kit (Magen, Guangzhou, China). DNA samples (50 µl) were digested with BamHI for 4 h at 37℃. The resulting DNA fragments were separated in 1.3% agarose gels at 80 V for 22 h and transferred to Immobilon-Ny + membranes (Millipore, USA). A hybridization probe was made from a digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled 2892-bp fragment derived from an SphI-digest containing the repetitive sequence of pthXo1 (GenBank: AY495676). The Detection Starter Kit I (Roche, Switzerland) was used to visualize hybridizing fragments according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The TALE-free strain Xoo PH containing an introduced copy of pthXo1, pthXo2 or avrXa7 (Additional file 1: Table S6) was used to locate the major tal genes involved in virulence.

RNA Isolation and qRT–PCR

Fourteen days after inoculation, total RNA was isolated (TRIzol, Invitrogen, USA) by sampling the intersection of diseased and healthy tissues in rice leaves. Total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis with the EasyScript gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis Supermix (Transgen Biotech). Resulting cDNAs were used for qRT-PCR, which was performed using the TransStart Tip Green qPCR SuperMix (Transgen Biotech) and the ABI7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA). The 2−ΔΔCt method was used for calculating the relative expression of OsSWEET11aOsSWEET13 and OsSWEET14, and the primers used are listed in Additional file 1: Table S9. Gene expression was normalized using OsActin, and qRT–PCR experiments were repeated at least three times.

Statistical Analysis

TALEs were annotated for nine Xoo strains with known genomic sequences using AnnoTALE software (Grau et al. 2016). The nine strains and NCBI accession numbers were as follows: Xoo PXO61, accession no. NZ_CP033187.3; Xoo PXO86, NZ_CP007166.1; Xoo PXO99A, NC_010717.2; Xoo IXO221, NZ_CP059591.1; Xoo AH28, NZ_CP074076.1; Xoo HuN37, NZ_CP031456.1; Xoo LN4, CP045452.1; Xoo LN18, CP045238.1; and Xoo JS137-1, unpublished). Pathotype assignment and clustering were conducted using the unweighted pair group mean algorithm (UPGMA) implemented in NTSYS software (Rohlf et al. 2000), and boxplots were generated using ORIGIN 2018. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s honestly significant difference test was used for all measurements, and results were considered significant at P < 0.05.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets used and analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on request. Rice materials will be available for non-for-profit research by material transfer agreements issued by the corresponding author.


Xoo :

Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae


Transcription activator-like effectors

S gene:

Susceptibility gene

R gene:

Resistant gene


Effector-binding element


Near-isogenic lines


Pattern-triggered immunity


Effector-triggered immunity


Effector-triggered susceptibility


Sugars will eventually be exported transporter


Bacterial leaf blight


Repeat variable di-residues


Download references


We thank Dr. Lifang Ruan (Huazhong Agricultural University, China) for providing Xoo strain HuN37, Dr. Ramesh V. Sonti (CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, India) for providing Xoo strain IXO221, and Dr. Bing Yang (University of Missouri, USA) for providing the plasmids of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. We are also grateful to Prof. Carol Bender (Oklahoma State University, USA) for her critical view on this manuscript.


This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31830072 to G.C., 32102147 to Z.X., and 32202243 to X.X.), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M681309 to Z.X. and 2021M702156 to X.X.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



G. C. and Z. X. conceived the experimental design, L. L., Y. L., Q. W., X. X., J. Y., and Y. W. performed the experiments; L. L., Z. X. and S.M.A.S. analyzed the data; Y. P. and Z. Z. carried out the planting; L. L. and G. C wrote the paper. The manuscript was read and revised by all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhengyin Xu or Gongyou Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Supplementary Figures and Tables.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, L., Li, Y., Wang, Q. et al. Constructed Rice Tracers Identify the Major Virulent Transcription Activator-Like Effectors of the Bacterial Leaf Blight Pathogen. Rice 17, 30 (2024).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: