- Original article
- Open Access
Development and validation of allele-specific SNP/indel markers for eight yield-enhancing genes using whole-genome sequencing strategy to increase yield potential of rice, Oryza sativa L.
Rice volume 9, Article number: 12 (2016)
Rice is one of the major staple foods in the world, especially in the developing countries of Asia. Its consumption as a dietary source is also increasing in Africa. To meet the demand for rice to feed the increasing human population, increasing rice yield is essential. Improving the genetic yield potential of rice is one ideal solution. It is imperative to introduce the identified yield-enhancing gene(s) into modern rice cultivars for the rapid improvement of yield potential through marker-assisted breeding.
We report the development of PCR-gel-based markers for eight yield-related functional genes (Gn1a, OsSPL14, SCM2, Ghd7, DEP1, SPIKE, GS5, and TGW6) to introduce yield-positive alleles from the donor lines. Six rice cultivars, including three each of donor and recipient lines, respectively, were sequenced by next-generation whole-genome sequencing to detect DNA polymorphisms between the genotypes. Additionally, PCR products containing functional nucleotide polymorphism (FNP) or putative FNPs for yield-related genes were sequenced. DNA polymorphisms discriminating yield-positive alleles and non-target alleles for each gene were selected through sequence analysis and the allele-specific PCR-gel-based markers were developed. The markers were validated with our intermediate breeding lines produced from crosses between the donors and 12 elite indica rice cultivars as recipients. Automated capillary electrophoresis was tested and fluorescence-labeled SNP genotyping markers (Fluidigm SNP genotyping platform) for Gn1a, OsSPL14, Ghd7, GS5, and GS3 genes were developed for high-throughput genotyping.
The SNP/indel markers linked to yield related genes functioned properly in our marker-assisted breeding program with identified high yield potential lines. These markers can be utilized in local favorite rice cultivars for yield enhancement. The marker designing strategy using both next generation sequencing and Sanger sequencing methods can be used for suitable marker development of other genes associated with useful agronomic traits.
Food security is threatened by the growing human population and decreasing agricultural resources, including crop land and labor, through urbanization and industrialization. Current global yield increase rates (0.9-1.3% per year) of the four major crops (rice, maize, wheat, and soybean) are insufficient to meet food demand for the estimated nine billion people in 2050 (Khush 2005; Ray et al. 2013). Rice is a major staple food in the world, especially in the developing countries of Asia. In Africa, it is the most rapidly growing food source and, according to a conservative estimate, about 30 million tons more rice will be needed by 2035 (Seck et al. 2012). Within existing agricultural lands, the genetic improvement of yield potential in rice could be the ideal way to increase yield.
Three major traits (grain size, grain number per panicle, and panicle number per plant) are directly associated with rice grain productivity, and these traits strongly depend on the genetic potential of rice. However, these traits are complex and quantitative in nature. Through quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis with fine mapping or positional cloning using rice mutants, about 20 genes that are involved in yield-related traits have been isolated in rice (Wang and Li 2005; Xing and Zhang 2010; Miura et al. 2011; Huang et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2015). In regards to the genes controlling grain size, six genes can be considered in rice breeding programs. The GW2 encoding RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase regulates grain width. The loss of GW2 function by a premature stop codon caused by a 1-bp deletion on the fourth exon increased grain width, resulting in increased yield (Song et al. 2007). The GS3 gene encoding a putative transmembrane protein functions as a negative regulator for grain size. The nucleotide substitution from C to A on the second exon resulted in the stop codon (TGA) and eventually caused C-terminal truncated GS3 protein. This mutated allele increased grain size (Fan et al. 2006). The qSW5/GW5 gene encoding a nuclear-localized unknown protein is involved in the regulation of grain width. The loss-of-function allele by a 1.2-kb deletion including coding DNA sequence (CDS) of the gene increases grain width, and this allele is common in japonica varieties (Shomura et al. 2008; Weng et al. 2008). The GS5 gene encoding a putative serine carboxypeptidase regulates grain size. Different expression level of GS5 based on promoter sequences is associated with grain width (Li et al. 2011). OsSPL16/qGW8, encoding SQUAMOSA promoter binding protein-like (SPL) 16, controls grain width, and higher expression in young panicle promotes grain width (Wang et al. 2012). The TGW6 gene encoding a novel protein having indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)-glucose hydrolase activity regulates grain weight. The mutant allele (1-bp deletion in CDS) showed increased thousand-grain weight (Ishimaru et al. 2013). Among the genes regulating grain number per panicle, several seem useful in a rice breeding program. The Gn1a gene encoding cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase2 (OsCKX2) regulates grain number per panicle. The non-functional allele of Gn1a increased grain number per panicle, resulting in increased yield (Ashikari et al. 2005). The Ghd7 encoding a CCT domain protein is involved in the regulation of heading date, plant height, and grain number per panicle. Fully functional alleles Ghd7-1 and Ghd7-3 showed delayed heading date and increased plant height and yield (Xue et al. 2008). The DEP1 gene encoding a phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein-like domain protein regulates panicle architecture. The mutant allele produced short panicle with high grain number per panicle, resulting in increased yield (Huang et al. 2009). The SPIKE/NAL1 gene encoding an unknown function protein regulates grain number per panicle. Either transcription level or three amino acids changes on NAL1 protein are associated with phenotype (Fujita et al. 2013). The SCM2/APO1 encoding F-box-containing protein controls grain number per panicle and culm diameter. Abundant transcripts of SCM2 in developing panicles increased grain number (Ookawa et al. 2010). Higher expression of OsSPL14/WFP/IPA1 gene encoding OsSPL14, in young panicle is associated with higher grain number per panicle (Jiao et al. 2010; Miura et al. 2010). Regarding the genes regulating panicle number per plant, several have been identified through positional cloning from the rice monoculm mutant moc1 and rice dwarf mutants with higher tiller number (Jeon et al. 2011). However, the reported alleles of these genes may not be desirable in actual breeding programs because of too much reduction in tiller number of moc1 mutant or dwarfism in the high tiller number mutants.
Some PCR markers for the yield-related genes were developed and used for marker-assisted breeding and gene function study. In the GS3 gene, the C/A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) on the second exon regarded as a functional nucleotide polymorphism (FNP) is directly associated with the phenotype, and it can be discriminated by digestion of PCR product with PstI restriction enzyme. Cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers for C/A SNP were reported (Fan et al. 2009; Yan et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2011). Additionally, Wang et al (2011) developed gene-tagged markers using the difference in repeat number of di- or tri-nucleotides within GS3 for marker-assisted selection (MAS). In the GW2 gene, the 1-bp deletion on the fourth exon is the FNP. This mutation was detected by the CAPS marker using HpaI restriction enzyme (Yan et al. 2009; Yan et al. 2011). For qSW5/GW5 gene, three alleles (Nipponbare type, Kasalath type, and indica II type) were discriminated by the N1212 marker, which used the difference in PCR product sizes among the alleles (Shomura et al. 2008; Yan et al. 2011). For the genes regulating grain number per panicle, the markers of Gn1a, OsSPL14, and DEP1 genes were reported. Yan et al (2009) developed the Gn1a-M1 marker for the detection of Gn1a-Habataki allele, which has a 16-bp deletion in the 5’-untranslated region (5’UTR), and the Gn1a-M2 marker for the detection of Gn1a-5150 allele, which has an 11-bp deletion on the third exon. Xu et al (2014) developed the CAPS marker using SduI restriction enzyme to select OsSPL14-Ri22 allele, which transcribes OsmiR156-resistant OsSPL14 transcripts caused by the nucleotide substitution at the OsmiR156 target site. They also developed the gene-tagged PCR marker of DEP1 gene using the 625-bp gap on the fifth exon between the yield-positive allele and non-target allele.
The allele-specific gene-tagged markers for the target genes are more effective than the genomic random markers surrounding the target gene (from several kb to a few Mb distance) because some markers will not show polymorphism in some recipient backgrounds and sometimes a false-positive allele can be selected by recombination between the target gene and the genomic random marker. However, allele-specific markers for yield-enhancing genes have not been developed yet for some major yield-enhancing genes or the existing markers need to be improved for an effective marker-assisted breeding program. The allele-specific gene-tagged markers were well developed for GS3, GW2, and qSW5/GW5 genes as mentioned above. But, for GS5, TGW6, SCM2, Ghd7, and SPIKE genes, PCR markers for selecting the yield-positive alleles have not been developed yet. Additionally, the marker that can select the yield-positive OsSPL14-ST12 allele, which is different from the OsSPL14-Ri22 allele, has not been reported. For the Gn1a gene, a 16-bp deletion in 5’UTR is common in indica rice varieties (54.3%) (Yan et al. 2009), suggesting that the Gn1a-M1 marker may not function in many indica varieties. For the DEP1 marker (Xu et al. 2014), the intensity of the non-target allele band was very weak compared with that of the target allele in the heterozygous plants. To obtain clear genotype data, the previous DEP1 marker needs to be improved.
Although around 20 yield-related genes have been identified in rice, their evaluation and use are still limited for rice breeding programs. These studies are very important for improving the genetic yield potential of rice effectively. To evaluate and use the yield enhancing genes, in this study we report allele-specific gene-tagged markers for eight yield-related genes. For effective screening of DNA polymorphisms of yield-enhancing genes, we employed both next-generation sequencing as well as Sanger sequencing methods. For easy access and user-friendly markers, we developed PCR-gel-based markers without restriction enzyme digestion. In addition, for high-throughput genotyping using a fluorescence detection system, we also developed Fluidigm SNP genotyping markers. Moreover, the allele-specific PCR-gel based markers were validated through its application in our marker-assisted selection (MAS) breeding program.
Results and Discussion
Development of allele-specific markers for eight yield-enhancing genes was conducted as a part of our breeding program for increasing genetic yield potential in 12 elite indica varietal backgrounds (Table 1). For determination of alleles of yield-enhancing genes in 12 recipient cultivars and effective screening of polymorphisms between the donor and the recipient, we sequenced the whole genomes of three donors (Habataki, ST6, and ST12) and three recipients (NSIC Rc158, NSIC Rc222, and NSIC Rc238) using next-generation sequencing technique. In addition, the target yield-enhancing genes were also sequenced from the 12 recipients and the donors using Sanger sequencing method.
Generally, several DNA polymorphisms such as indel and/or SNP were found between the two parental alleles as a result of fine mapping of major QTLs. Among polymorphisms, the FNP was identified in some yield-enhancing genes such as GS3, GW2, DEP1, and TGW6 genes but not in some other genes. For marker designing, firstly we targeted FNP or putative FNPs of yield-related genes. Secondly, we selected the donor-specific polymorphisms within the target gene to select the donor allele easily. Actually, when breeders have the original donor source which was used for QTL/fine-mapping analysis, any DNA polymorphisms within or near the target gene between the donor and the recipient can be used to design a marker for MAS (Usually indel polymorphisms are preferred to design markers because of convenience to marker designing and clear genotype results by the markers). The selected polymorphisms for each yield-related gene and its corresponding markers were described below one by one. Finally, the markers we developed were validated through its application in our MAS breeding lines.
Yield-positive Gn1a allele was originally isolated from the high-yielding rice variety Habataki through QTL analysis with positional cloning (Ashikari et al. 2005) and Gn1a-Habataki allele was also found in cultivar ST12 (Miura et al. 2010). These two materials were used as a Gn1a donor in our marker-assisted breeding program. We screened DNA variations in the Gn1a gene, including in the 5-kb upstream region from the start codon and 2-kb downstream region from the stop codon, using IGV software (Robinson et al. 2011) with WGS data. Within this range, the sequences were the same among Habataki, ST6, ST12, and NSIC Rc222, indicating that these four accessions have the yield-positive Gn1a allele. Three SNPs in the promoter region were found based on WGS analysis (Additional file 1: Figure S1A) and the sequences of three SNPs were confirmed by Sanger sequencing of PCR products from Gn1a donors and 12 recipients (Fig. 1a). Based on the sequence analysis, all genotypes were divided into three groups (Types 1-3; Fig. 1a). NSIC Rc222, IR05N412, CT5805, and Irga427 among the 12 recipients have Gn1a-Habataki allele (Type 3). First, we developed the Gn1a-indel1 marker to detect a 16-bp indel in 5’UTR as identified by Ashikari et al (2005). Except for Parao, all genotypes showed the same band size as Habataki (Fig. 1b bottom), indicating that this marker is available only for Gn1a MAS in a Parao background. Next, we developed the Gn1a-17 SNP marker using the tetra-primer PCR method (Additional file 2: Figure S2A) to discriminate G/A SNP in the promoter region (Fig. 1a). The marker discriminated G/A SNP clearly in the parents (Fig. 1b top) as well as in intermediate breeding lines that contained heterozygous plants (Fig. 1c). This marker is available to introduce Gn1a-Habataki allele (Type 3) into both Gn1a-Type 1 and Gn1a-Type 2 backgrounds. Additionally, we developed an indel-type marker, the Gn1a-indel3 marker, based on WGS data analysis, which showed approximately 70-bp indel polymorphism near 3’UTR (Additional file 1: Figure S1B). This marker was tested in the parental varieties, and the result was consistent with the Gn1a-17 SNP marker analysis, except for Parao (Fig. 1b middle), indicating that the marker is available to introduce Gn1a-Habataki allele into Gn1a-Type 2 backgrounds but not Parao background. The Gn1a-indel3 marker was also applied to intermediate breeding lines and the genotyping results were consistent with those of the Gn1a-17 SNP marker (Fig. 1c). Based on the Gn1a sequence context of the background varieties, a suitable marker among the Gn1a-indel1, Gn1a-indel3, and Gn1a-17 SNP markers can be used to select the yield-positive Gn1a allele.
Reduced expression of Gn1a in inflorescence meristem of Habataki elevates cytokinin content, resulting in high grain number per panicle. Therefore, we tried to find polymorphisms in the Gn1a promoter region, which is the regulatory region for gene transcription. Through WGS and PCR product sequencing of the Gn1a gene, we found three SNPs in the promoter region. It was presumed that any of the three SNPs were associated with Gn1a expression level. Based on the combination of the three SNPs and 16-bp indel in the Gn1a promoter region, we assigned rice accessions into three Gn1a alleles (Types 1-3) (Fig. 1a). Earlier the effect of the Gn1a-Habataki allele was evaluated in only japonica backgrounds (Type 1) (Ashikari et al. 2005; Ohsumi et al. 2011). When 35 indica varieties were analyzed by the Gn1a-M1 marker that discriminates the 16-bp indel in the 5’UTR, 19 accessions (54.3%) showed a Habataki band pattern (Yan et al. 2009), suggesting that these lines are Type 2 or Type 3 alleles. In our analysis, 11 out of 12 recipients showed 16-bp deletion in the 5’UTR like Habataki. This suggested that many indica varieties belong to Type 2 or Type 3 alleles, unlike japonica varieties. However, the effect of the Gn1a-Habataki allele (Type 3) needs to be tested in Type 2 backgrounds through the development of near-isogenic lines (NILs). If the Type 3 allele is functionally the same as the Type 2 allele (i.e., no grain number difference between the recipient variety and NIL-Type 3), rice breeders do not need to introduce the Gn1a-Habataki allele into Type 2 cultivars. The previous Gn1a-M1 marker is not available to introduce the Habataki allele in Type 2 backgrounds because it cannot discriminate the Type 2 allele and Type 3 allele. The Gn1a-17SNP marker and three Fluidigm SNP markers (Gn1a-17SNP-FD, Gn1a-18SNP-FD, and Gn1a-19SNP-FD) are effective for introducing the Gn1a-Habataki allele into Gn1a-Type 1 background as well as Type 2 background. Regarding detection of the 16-bp indel, we newly designed the Gn1a-indel1 marker, which enhanced the band separation in agarose gel by reducing PCR product sizes (99 bp and 115 bp) compared with those of the Gn1a-M1 marker (113 bp and 129 bp). The Gn1a-indel3 marker located near the 3’UTR was developed for obtaining clear genotype data. The marker showed clear band separation in agarose gel and similar PCR efficiency between the two alleles in heterozygotes (Fig. 1c). Although the Gn1a-indel3 marker was not associated with the phenotype, it will be helpful for MAS of the Gn1a gene in many indica cultivar backgrounds.
The QTL WFP (WEALTHY FARMER’S PANICLE) encoding OsSPL14 negatively regulates the number of tillers in the vegetative stage and positively controls the number of rachis in the reproductive stage. Higher expression of OsSPL14 in young panicles increased panicle branching and grain number per panicle, resulting in increased yield. Two different yield-positive alleles (OsSPL14-ST12 and OsSPL14-Aikawa1) showed higher expression in inflorescence with different mechanisms. In the line ST12, OsSPL14 transcripts were abundant by less DNA methylation in the OsSPL14 promoter region compared with that of Nipponbare rather than by DNA sequence differences (Miura et al. 2010). The OsSPL14-ST12 allele belongs to epigenetic alleles that show heritable gene expression difference which is caused not by DNA sequence variations but by DNA methylation or chromatin status (Kakutani 2002). In contrast, the OsSPL14-Aikawa1 allele expressed OsmiR156-resistant OsSPL14 transcripts because of the nucleotide substitution (C to A) at the OsmiR156 target site located on the third exon of OsSPL14, resulting in higher expression in panicles (Miura et al. 2010). The same alleles with Aikawa1 were isolated through fine mapping of QTL IPA1 (Ideal Plant Architecture 1) from the japonica lines Shaoniejing and Ri22 (Jiao et al. 2010). Through WGS data analysis, we found a putative ST12-specific SNP (C/T) in the OsSPL14 promoter region (Additional file 3: Figure S3). Finally, this was confirmed by direct sequencing of PCR product from line ST12 and 12 recipients (Fig. 2a). The SNP was selected for developing the SPL14-04SNP marker which consists of two PCRs: the C-allele primer set (SPL14-04SNP-F/CR) and the T-allele primer set (SPL14-04SNP-F/TR). The SPL14-04SNP marker showed allele-specific PCR amplification in parental lines (Fig. 2b) and in intermediate breeding lines harboring heterozygous plants (Fig. 2c). The Aikawa1-specific SNP located at OsmiR156 target site was confirmed by Sanger sequencing from Aikawa1 and 12 recipients (Fig. 2a). The SNP was used for developing the SPL14-12 SNP marker to select OsSPL14-Aikawa1 allele. The non-Aiakawa1 allele and Aikawa1 allele were amplified with SPL14-12SNP-CF/R primer set and SPL14-12SNP-F/AR primer set, respectively. The marker discriminated the alleles clearly from the parents (Fig. 2b) and intermediate breeding lines (Fig. 2d).
The OsSPL14-ST12 allele is an epigenetic allele. Less DNA methylation in OsSPL14 promoter in ST12 increased its transcription, resulting in high grain number per panicle. However, we can introduce the OsSPL14-ST12 allele using DNA polymorphism within or near the OsSPL14 gene between ST12 and the recipient instead of checking the status of DNA methylation. Among the six varieties analyzed by WGS, Habataki had many unique DNA polymorphisms (18 SNPs and one 2-bp deletion) in the OsSPL14 gene located on chromosome 8 (data not shown). But, the new OsSPL14 allele, Habataki allele, may not be a new yield-positive allele because the QTL controlling grain number per panicle was not detected on chromosome 8 (Ashikari et al. 2005). However, we found an ST12-specific C/T SNP in the promoter region, which was about 4.2 kb distance from the start codon. This nucleotide was identical to the border nucleotide of the 2.6-kb WFP candidate region (Miura et al. 2010), indicating that the SNP can be an FNP of the OsSPL14-ST12 allele. In plants, DNA methylation occurs through the addition of a methyl group to the cytosine bases of DNA in the context of CG, CHG, and CHH (H = A, C, or T) (He et al. 2011). The nucleotide substitution from C to T resulted in CCC (other varieties) and TCC (ST12) sequence context, respectively (Fig. 2a). If this C base is a target site of methylation, the T base of ST12 can avoid methylation, indicating higher OsSPL14 expression. Miura et al (2010) tested DNA methylation levels in the 2.6-kb WFP candidate region using bisulfite sequencing and the result showed some differences in the region between ST12 and Nipponbare, which is about 1070-bp distance from the C/T SNP locus. Further study is needed to show that this SNP has some function.
The marker for the OsSPL14-ST12 allele has not been reported. We developed the SPL14-04SNP marker using the ST12-specific SNP to select the OsSPL14-ST12 allele. This marker will be available for most indica and japonica background varieties because the SNP is quite unique in ST12. To select OsSPL14-Aikawa1/Shaoniejing/Ri22 allele, Xu et al. (2014) developed the CAPS marker using SduI restriction enzyme. Here, we introduced the allele-specific PCR-gel-based marker, the SPL14-12SNP marker. This marker will be effective for MAS to most of rice varieties because the OsSPL14-Aikawa1 allele is rare.
ABERRANT PANICLE ORGANIZATION1 (APO1) encodes an F-box-containing protein and is involved in controlling rachis branching in panicle, tiller outgrowth, and culm diameter. The apo1 mutant formed smaller inflorescences with reduced numbers of branches and spikelets (Ikeda et al. 2007). In contrast, the APO1-overexpressing mutant, Undulate rachi1 (Ur1) and APO1-overexpressing transgenic plants showed dramatic increment of grain number per panicle but tiller number per plant reduced remarkably (Murai and Iizawa 1994; Ikeda-Kawakatsu et al. 2009). STRONG CULM2 (SCM2) is a mild allele of APO1 found in variety Habataki (2-3 times higher expression of APO1 in inflorescence than that of Koshihikari) and the allele increased culm diameter and grain number per panicle without a reduction in tiller number (Ookawa et al. 2010; Terao et al. 2010). This SCM2-Habataki allele is regarded as a useful allele of APO1 gene for increasing yield and lodging resistance in a breeding program. Through WGS data analysis, we tried to find Habataki-specific DNA variations in the SCM2 gene (-5 kb from start codon and +2 kb from stop codon) among the six cultivars. However, no sequence difference was found among the five genotypes (Habataki, ST12, NSIC Rc158, NSIC Rc222, and NSIC Rc238). To determine the APO1 allele from 12 recipients, we sequenced two promoter regions and the third exon (Fig. 3a), which showed some DNA variations between genotypes of mapping bi-parents (Habataki and Koshihikari) (Ookawa et al. 2010). Except for Parao, 11 recipients had the same sequence as Habataki. However, the 12-bp indel in the promoter region (Fig. 3a) was selected for marker development to introduce the SCM2-Habataki allele into Parao. We developed the SCM2-indel1 marker and tested it in the parental lines. As expected, only Parao showed a different band size (Fig. 3b). The marker was also applied in intermediate breeding lines that were BC3F2 plants derived from a Parao x Habataki cross and it distinguished the genotypes clearly (Fig. 3c). For automated high-throughput electrophoresis, the same PCR product was analyzed using Fragment Analyzer (Fig. 3d).
The WGS and PCR product sequencing showed that the SCM2-Habataki allele was detected in most of our donors and recipients. These results indicate that the high-yielding and lodging-resistant SCM2-Habataki allele is widely dispersed in indica varieties. In contrast, temperate japonica varieties Nipponbare, Koshihikari, Sasanishiki, and Aikawa1 had the non-yield-positive SCM2 allele, suggesting that the SCM2-Habataki allele will be effective in many temperate japonica varieties. The SCM2-indel1 marker may be helpful for MAS in japonica backgrounds. The SCM2 sequence of ST6 was almost the same as that of Nipponbare but two 2-bp deletions in the promoter region (3.4-kb and 5.8-kb regions from the start codon) were found in only the line ST6 among the six lines in the WGS analysis carried out. The new allele, SCM2-ST6, needs to be tested if the ST6 allele is superior to the Habataki allele through checking SCM2 expression level in stem, young panicle, and phenotypes in NIL-ST6 because the grain number per panicle and culm diameter of ST6 were higher than those of Habataki as observed at IRRI during the 2013-2015 experiments.
Grain number, plant height, and heading date7 (Ghd7) encoding a CCT domain protein is involved in multiple yield-related traits, including heading date, plant height, and grain number per panicle (Xue et al. 2008). Nine Ghd7 alleles (Ghd7-0 ~ 7 and Ghd7-0a) were identified based on the predicted protein sequences from about 120 genotypes (Xue et al. 2008; Lu et al. 2012). To know the allele type of Ghd7 from our breeding materials, we analyzed the genomic sequence (protein coding regions and an intron) of Ghd7 using WGS data of six genotypes. ST6 variety had Ghd7-6 allele and the others had exactly the same DNA sequences as variety Minghui63, which had the fully functional yield-positive Ghd7-1 allele. Additionally, we sequenced PCR products containing Ghd7 coding sequences from Habataki, ST12, ST6, and 12 recipients, resulting in that all lines (except for ST6 and Parao) had the Ghd7-1 allele. These results indicated that 11 out of 12 recipients already have the yield-positive Ghd7-1 allele. However, we selected the A/T SNP (521st nucleotide from ATG in CDS) and developed the Ghd7-05SNP marker detecting the SNP to introduce the Ghd7-1 allele into Parao which had the Ghd7-2 allele (a functional but weaker allele). Genotyping results from parental lines through this marker were consistent with DNA sequencing data, indicating that the marker discriminated A (non-target allele) and T (Ghd7-1 allele) clearly (Fig. 4a). To replace the Ghd7-2 allele with the Ghd7-1 allele in the Parao background, this marker was used in intermediate breeding lines derived from a Parao x Habataki cross (Fig. 4b).
Based on our sequencing data analyses of Ghd7, the Ghd7-1 allele is common in indica rice varieties. This result was consistent with the previous reports (Xue et al. 2008; Lu et al. 2012) that Ghd7-1 and Ghd7-2 alleles were popular in indica and japonica varieties, respectively. So, the fully functional Ghd7-1 allele may be effective for increasing yield potential in many japonica varieties which are growing in long-day condition. The Ghd7-05SNP marker will be helpful to introduce Ghd7-1 allele into japonica backgrounds.
DENSE AND ERECT PANICLE1 (DEP1) encodes a phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein-like domain protein and regulates panicle architecture. The natural DEP1 mutant allele (625-bp deletion on the fifth exon) encoding C-terminal truncated DEP1 protein increased grain number per panicle, resulting in increased yield, although panicle length decreased. This allele might be derived from Italian landrace Balilla and was distributed to many high-yielding Chinese japonica varieties (Huang et al. 2009). In order to detect FNP, the forward primer and the reverse primer of the DEP1-indel1 marker were located upstream and downstream of the 625-bp deletion on the fifth exon, respectively (Fig. 5a). As a result, the difference in PCR product sizes will be 625 bp between the yield-positive allele and the non-target allele. The Turkish high-yielding variety Osmancik-97 was used as the donor of DEP1. The DEP1-indel1 marker was tested in the donor and 12 recipients, and it discriminated DEP1 alleles clearly (Fig. 5b). But, when it was applied to intermediate breeding lines, the band intensity of the non-target allele (1031 bp) was markedly lower than that of the positive allele (406 bp) in heterozygotes (plant #2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, and 12 in Fig. 5d). To solve the problem of the marker, we developed the tri-primer PCR method, which contained the two primers of DEP1-indel1 marker (DEP1-indel1-F/R) and additional non-target allele-specific primer (DEP1-indel1-625F) (Fig. 5a). As a consequence, the band size of the non-target allele decreased from 1031 bp to 310 bp. The new marker (DEP1-indel1P) worked well in parental lines (Fig. 5c) as well as in heterozygotic plants from intermediate breeding lines (Fig. 5e).
Like our DEP1-indel1 marker, the previously reported DEP1 marker (Xu et al. 2014) also showed similar results: that the marker was no problem in homozygous plants but the PCR band intensity was quite different between two alleles in heterozygotes. This phenomenon was caused by the difference in PCR amplification efficiency between two different PCR products in the same reaction tube during PCR cycling. Usually, this occurs when the gap between two PCR products is large (several hundred base pairs) such as the DEP1-indel1 marker (625-bp gap) or the indel region contains difficult PCR sequences such as high G-C sequence or inverted repeat sequence. Generally, the longer PCR product and the difficult PCR region show lower amplification efficiency, resulting in a weaker band in agarose gel. To achieve similar PCR efficiency between non-target allele and yield-positive allele, we reduced the gap from 625 bp to 96 bp by adding DEP1-indel1-625F primer (Fig. 5a), resulting in a tri-primer PCR system (DEP1-indel1-F/R/625F). Eventually, the DEP1-indel1P marker generated similar band intensity between non-target allele and positive-allele bands in heterozygotes (Fig. 5e). The marker will be more effective for MAS of the DEP1 gene than previous marker.
SPIKELET NUMBER (SPIKE), LSCHL4, and GPS are allelic to Narrow leaf1 (NAL1) encoding a plant-specific protein with unknown biochemical function (Qi et al. 2008; Fujita et al. 2013; Takai et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2014). The NAL1 gene was originally identified through characterization of a classic rice dwarf mutant, nal1 (Qi et al. 2008), and the other alleles were characterized by QTLs with map-based cloning by independent research groups. The SPIKE allele from tropical japonica landrace Daringan and the LSCHL4 allele from temperate japonica variety Nipponbare increased grain number per panicle and grain yield in indica backgrounds (Fujita et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2014). The protein coding sequences of NAL1 were identical among japonica varieties (Daringan, Nipponbare, and Koshikari) and among indica varieties (IR64, 93-11, and Takanari), respectively. The NAL1-japonica allele and the NAL1-indica allele were distinguished by three SNPs causing amino acid change in CDS (Fujita et al. 2013; Takai et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2014). Based on the sequence analysis of NAL1 gene, 16 cultivars were classified into five haplotypes (Takai et al. 2013). Our WGS data showed that Habataki, NSIC Rc222, and NSIC Rc238 had the same DNA sequences as the NAL1-Takanari allele (Type 1) (Additional file 4: Figure S4). In the case of NSIC Rc158, several SNPs were newly found but the deduced amino acids were the same as those of the NAL1-Takanari allele (Type 1). So, these three recipients may need the NAL1- japonica allele to increase yield potential. We developed three allele-specific PCR markers: the SPIKE-01SNP marker detecting G/A SNP on the third exon, the SPIKE-03SNP marker detecting G/A SNP on the fifth exon, and the SPIKE-indel3 marker detecting a 20-bp indel in the promoter region (1.9 kb distance from the start codon). These three markers were tested in the donor line and 12 recipients (Fig. 6a-c). Among the 12 recipients, CT5805 and Parao showed the same band pattern as the SPIKE donor line (YP9), suggesting that the two varieties had the yield positive NAL1- japonica allele (Type 5). Therefore, we need to introduce the NAL1-Type 5 allele into 10 recipients. The breeding line (BC2F1) derived from a PSB Rc82 x YP9 cross was analyzed by the three SPIKE markers (Fig. 6d-f). As expected, the three markers showed the same results among markers. In conclusion, the SPIKE markers are effective for introducing a Type 5 allele in an indica background.
The yield-positive NAL1 allele originated from japonica-type varieties and this allele increased yield in several indica-type cultivars (Fujita et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2014). In the 12 recurrent parents, only two lines (CT5805 and Parao) had the yield-positive NAL1 allele. This result indicates that the NAL1-japonica allele will be effective in many indica cultivars for increasing yield. Here, we developed three gene-tagged markers, SPIKE-01SNP marker, SPIKE-03SNP marker, and SPIKE-indel3 marker, discriminating the japonica allele and indica allele. These markers will be useful for MAS of NAL1 alleles. Through WGS data analysis, we found new two haplotypes (Type 6 and Type 7) to the NAL1 gene (Additional file 4: Figure S4). Line ST6 producing high grain number per panicle needs to be tested to determine whether it is superior to or has the same allele as the japonica allele because an additional amino acid change was found on the fifth exon in ST6.
Abundant transcripts of GS5, encoding a putative serine carboxypeptidase, in the hull (palea/lemma) before heading and in the developing endosperm enhanced grain width and grain weight. Through sequence analysis of the GS5 promoter (2 kb upstream from the start codon) from 35 cultivars, the sequences were divided into three groups: wide grain (WG) allele, medium grain (MG) allele, and narrow grain (NG) allele (Li et al. 2011). First, we checked the GS5 alleles using WGS data analysis. The sequences of GS5 of Habataki, ST12, NSIC Rc222, and NSIC Rc238 were the same as those of GS5-NG allele. NSIC Rc158 and ST6 belonged to the GS5-MG allele and GS5-WG allele, respectively. Through PCR product sequencing of GS5 promoter region, GS5 alleles were determined from 12 recipients. Parao belonged to the GS5-WG allele and NSIC Rc158, PR38012, CT5803, CT5805, and Irga427 belonged to the GS5-MG allele. Based on the sequence alignment of GS5 promoter, we selected the MG-specific 4-bp indel and the WG-specific C/T SNP to design the GS5-indel1 marker and the GS5-03SNP marker, respectively (Fig. 7a). The GS5-indel1 marker produced a 63-bp band (MG allele) and a 67-bp band (WG or NG). The 4-bp difference could not be separated properly in agarose gel. After PCR amplification from the parental lines, the PCR products were analyzed by high-resolution electrophoresis such as PAGE (data not shown) or capillary electrophoresis using Fragment Analyzer (Fig. 7b). The genotyping result was consistent with the DNA sequencing data. To select the WG allele, we developed the GS5-03SNP marker. Genotyping PCR was performed with four primers (GS5-03SNP-OPF/OPR/TF/CR) from the parental lines and electrophoresis was done in agarose gel (Fig. 7c). The genotype result was consistent with sequencing data, indicating that the marker data were reliable. The marker was also validated in intermediate breeding line and discriminated SNPs properly (Fig. 7d).
The GS5 promoter sequences of our parental lines were classified into the existing three GS5 alleles (WG, MG, and NG) (Li et al. 2011). In the 12 recurrent parent lines, the numbers of WG, MG, and NG alleles were one, five, and six accessions, respectively. This result indicated that many indica varieties had MG or NG alleles. To increase grain size, WG or MG alleles of GS5 need to be introduced in indica cultivars. The GS5-indel1 marker and the GS5-03SNP marker will be helpful for this purpose. For the GS5-03SNP marker, the largest band (499 bp) generated by common outer primers was weaker than the allele-specific bands (257 bp and 291 bp) (Fig. 7c-d). This could be caused by the difference in PCR efficiency between/among bands in one tube. However, this is not a problem because there was no band intensity difference between two allele-specific bands in heterozygotes (Fig. 7d).
TGW6, encoding a novel protein having hydrolase activity from IAA-glucose into IAA and glucose, regulates grain weight through controlling both source ability and sink size. TGW6 is a single-exon gene and the loss-of-function allele caused by a 1-bp deletion in CDS in Kasalath increased grain weight (Ishimaru et al. 2013). We developed the TGW6-1d marker detecting FNP (1-bp deletion) to select a yield-positive allele (TGW6-Kasalath allele). The marker consisted of two sets of primers (TGW6-1d-F/NR for the non-target allele and TGW6-1d-F/PR for the yield-positive allele) and it was tested in the donor line (Kasalath) and 12 recipients. All genotypes were determined clearly by this marker and only Kasalath had the yield-positive TGW6 allele among our breeding materials (Fig. 8a). The marker also functioned properly in intermediate breeding lines (Fig. 8b).
The loss-of-function allele of the TGW6 gene caused by a 1-bp deletion enhanced grain weight. Among the 69 cultivars, only four varieties had the TGW6-Kasalath allele, suggesting that the yield-positive allele is a rare allele (Ishimaru et al. 2013). A similar result was observed in our study. All 12 recipients had the non-yield-positive TGW6 allele. Therefore, the TGW6-Kasalath allele may be effective for increasing grain weight in most cultivars throughout indica- and japonica-type varieties. The TGW6-1d marker detecting the FNP will be useful for introducing the TGW6-Kasalath allele through MAS.
High-throughput Genotyping Markers Using Fluidigm SNP Genotyping Platform
Currently, several high-throughput genotyping platforms using a fluorescence detection system are available in rice (Thomson 2014). We also developed fluorescence-labeled allele-specific markers using Fluidigm SNP genotyping platform for high-throughput MAS of yield-related genes. For the Gn1a gene, three SNPs in the promoter region (Fig. 1a) were discriminated by Gn1a-19SNP-FD, Gn1a-18SNP-FD, and Gn1a-17SNP-FD markers (Fig. 9). For the OsSPL14 gene, the ST12-specific SNP in the promoter region and the Aikawa1-specific SNP on the third exon (Fig. 2a) were detected by SPL14-04SNP-FD marker and SPL14-12SNP-FD marker, respectively. In the Ghd7 gene, the 521st nucleotide (A/T) in CDS was used for developing the Ghd7-05SNP-FD marker. We developed the GS5-01SNP-FD marker distinguishing T (NG allele)/C (MG or WG allele) SNP in the GS5 promoter region (1594-nucleotide upstream from the start codon of H94 line, GenBank accession no. JN256057). And, for selection of the GS5-WG allele, the GS5-03SNP-FD marker was developed. For the GS3 gene, FNP (C/A SNP) on the second exon was used for developing the GS3-01SNP-FD marker. All markers were tested in 47 samples consisting of 39 accessions (Fig.9; Additional file 5: Table S1). Among these, ST12 and Aikawa1 were unique at the SPL14-04SNP-FD marker and SPL14-12SNP-FD marker, respectively (Fig. 9). The genotyping results were consistent with the DNA sequencing data as well as the PCR-gel-based allele-specific markers developed in this study.
In marker-assisted breeding, breeders sometimes handle several hundred samples and/or many markers. Usually, MAS should be finished before flowering to make a backcross or a cross between different gene sources for gene pyramiding. In this case, high-throughput genotyping systems are very helpful. Here, we employed Fluidigm SNP genotyping system. In this system, 24-192 samples can be analyzed with 24-96 customized markers simultaneously. After PCR, fluorescence from the allele-specific PCR products can be detected without gel electrophoresis, and data calling can be computed rapidly. We developed nine Fluidigm SNP markers for five yield-related genes. These markers will be useful for high-throughput genotyping of yield-related genes in rice.
Here, we described the procedures of SNP/indel marker development for yield-enhancing genes, including allele determination of target genes in the recurrent parental lines, DNA polymorphism screening using WGS and Sanger sequencing techniques, the selection of DNA polymorphisms for marker designing, and marker validation. This procedure can be applied to designing markers for other agronomic traits. For rapid improvement of genetic yield potential in rice, we need to evaluate and use the previously identified yield-enhancing genes in local favorite cultivar backgrounds. The allele-specific markers for yield-enhancing genes shown in this study will be very helpful for MAS of yield-enhancing traits/genes. Through whole-genome sequencing, we identified some new haplotypes for some yield-enhancing genes such as the SCM2-ST6 allele and SPIKE-ST6 allele. For the same gene, the alleles superior to the previously identified alleles can be found. Therefore, if the new allele was found in an advanced phenotype line such as ST6, the effect of the new allele needs to be tested. To increase rice productivity, the identification of new yield-enhancing genes, isolation of superior alleles of previously identified genes, marker development of the genes for MAS, evaluation of the effect of the genes/alleles, and their use in actual breeding programs should be performed rapidly and updated continuously.
Habataki, ST12, ST6, Aikawa1, YP9, Osmancik-97, and Kasalath varieties were used as donors of yield-positive alleles of yield-related genes. In addition, 12 elite indica varieties originating from the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Philippines, and International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Colombia, were used as recipients to increase genetic yield potential through the introduction or pyramiding of yield-enhancing genes (Table 1). Seeds of the donor lines Habataki, ST12, ST6, Aikawa1, and Kasalath were obtained from the Bioscience and Biotechnology Center, Nagoya University, Japan, and seeds of Osmancik-97 were obtained from Trakya Agricultural Research Institute, Edirne, Turkey. The plants were grown in the IRRI paddy field, Laguna, Philippines, in 2012-2015. To introduce the yield-positive alleles of yield-related genes, crosses were made between the donor lines and recipients followed by selfing, backcrossing, and crossing with other cross combinations in the same background, based on the breeding plan. The markers we developed were applied to intermediate breeding lines for MAS.
Whole-genome Sequencing and Comparative Sequence Analysis
In order to identify nucleotide polymorphisms of yield-enhancing genes between the donors and recipients, WGS was performed using Illumina HiSeq 2000 by the Yale Genomics Center (Connecticut, USA) for three donors (Habataki, ST6, and ST12) and three recipients (NSIC Rc158, NSIC Rc222, and NSIC Rc238). The sequencing results yielded 609,301,492 reads in all. Total mapped reads ranged from 47.65 % to 57.69 % and from 50.29 % to 58.42 % against Nipponbare and 93-11 genomes, respectively. Uniquely mapped reads were on average 42.01 % (Additional file 6: Table S2). The short reads were aligned against the Nipponbare genome (MSU v7). The SNP and indel polymorphisms were screened using IGV software (Robinson et al. 2011; https://www.broadinstitute.org/igv/).
PCR Product Sequencing
To confirm DNA polymorphisms obtained by WGS and to determine the alleles of yield-related genes from 12 recipients, the PCR products containing putative FNPs or donor-specific polymorphisms for yield-related genes were sequenced by the Sanger method. Genomic DNAs were extracted from 12 recipients and four donors (Habataki, ST12, ST6, and Aikawa1) using the CTAB method (Kim et al. 2011) and PCR amplification was performed for Gn1a, OsSPL14, SCM2, Ghd7, and GS5 genes. The primers for preparation of PCR product and DNA sequencing are listed in Additional file 7: Table S3. DNA sequencing reactions were performed with BigDye terminator sequencing kit v3.1 (Applied Biosystems, www.appliedbiosystems.com/), and then the sequences were determined by Applied Biosystems 3730xl DNA analyzer by Macrogen Inc., Republic of Korea (www.macrogen.com/).
Development of Allele-specific Markers
The DNA sequences of yield-related genes were obtained from NCBI GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) using the accession codes presented in the original papers (Ashikari et al. 2005; Ikeda et al. 2007; Xue et al. 2008; Huang et al. 2009; Miura et al. 2010; Li et al. 2011; Ishimaru et al. 2013; Takai et al. 2013). To find DNA polymorphsims between the donors and recipients, multiple sequence alignments were performed using BioEdit software (Hall 1999). Special DNA variations such as FNP, putative FNP, donor-specific polymorphisms, and polymorphisms between the donors and recipients were selected for marker designing. For indel variation, the forward and reverse primers covered the indel region. When the gap was small (less than 20 bp), we reduced PCR product size (<120 bp) to increase the degree of band separation in agarose gel. To discriminate SNP-type DNA polymorphisms, first we used the tetra-primer PCR method (Ye et al. 2001). This type of marker can reveal a SNP by one PCR reaction with four primers. The Gn1a-17 SNP marker and GS5-03 SNP marker were developed based on this method. Secondly the separated allele-specific PCR method was used to design the other markers. This method requires two separate PCR reactions with allele-1-specific primer and allele-2-specific primer, respectively, to define the SNP. Actually, we tried the tetra-primer PCR method for all SNP polymorphisms because of its convenience, but the results from some testing markers were unstable among trials. So, we accepted the separated allele-specific PCR method. To increase allele-specific primer annealing, an artificial-mismatched nucleotide was given near the 3’ end of the allele-specific primer (Hayashi et al. 2004). For better understanding, the designing of the Gn1a-17 SNP marker and the SPIKE-01 SNP marker are shown in Additional file 2: Figure S2. The primer information for allele-specific markers is presented in Table 2.
DNA Preparation, PCR with Allele-specific Markers, and Electrophoresis
Leaf samples were collected from the intermediate breeding lines in the paddy field. Fresh or stored leaf (-20 °C) was cut at about 4 cm long and was placed into a 2-mL tube with a steel ball. Then, the tubes were frozen in liquid nitrogen and leaf tissues were ground with the 2010 Geno/Grinder (www.spexsampleprep.com). In each tube, 200 μL of DNA extraction buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.5, 1 M KCl, 10 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) was added and the samples were incubated at 65°C for 30 min. The samples were diluted by adding 1 mL of water and centrifuged for 10 min at the maximum speed. The supernatant was transferred into a 96-well plate and stored at 4 °C for further uses. All genotyping markers followed the PCR conditions mentioned below. The 20-μL PCR solution contained 1× PCR buffer, 200 μM of each dNTP, 0.25 μM of each primer, 1.5 μL of supernatant (template DNA), and 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase. Thermal cycles were programmed as follows: 94 °C, 3 min; 35 cycles of 95°C for 25 s; 55 °C for 25 s; and 72 °C for 35 s, concluding with 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products amplified with Gn1a-indel1 marker, SCM2-indel1 marker, and SPIKE-indel3 marker were electrophoresed in 4 % agarose gel and the others in 2.5 % agarose gel. In the case of GS5-indel1 marker, its PCR products (63 bp/67 bp) could not be separated properly in agarose gel. So, it was analyzed by 8 % polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) or capillary electrophoresis.
High-throughput Capillary Electrophoresis
Gel electrophoresis requires some labor and time because of manual gel preparation and hand loading of PCR products. Currently, automated high-throughput capillary electrophoresis instruments are available and are helpful for handling a huge number of samples. Here, we used Fragment Analyzer (Advanced Analytical Technologies Inc., www.aati-us.com/) that supports ready-to-use polymer (gel), automated sample loading, and data calling. The PCR products produced by the GS5-indel1 marker and the SCM2-indel1 marker were analyzed by Fragment Analyzer.
Fluidigm SNP Genotyping
We selected nine SNPs from five yield-related genes to design Fluidigm SNP genotyping markers. The sequences, including both 250-bp upstream and 250-bp downstream of the target SNP, were sent to Fluidigm (Assay_Design_Group@fluidigm.com) and the Fluidigm SNP genotyping markers consisting of specific target amplification (STA) primer, locus-specific (LS) primer, and two allele-specific primers were designed (Additional file 8: Table S4). Forty-seven genomic DNAs were prepared from 39 rice accessions using the CTAB method (Kim et al. 2011). Genotyping was performed following the Fluidigm SNP genotyping manual by the IRRI genotyping service laboratory (email@example.com). Briefly, the target region was amplified with STA primer and LS primer under a thermal cycler. The diluted PCR products from 47 samples, nine Fluidigm SNP markers, and PCR reagents were simultaneously mated in FR48.48 Dynamic array by IFC Controller. Then, PCR was performed in FC1™ Cycler, and finally the fluorescence signals from the end PCR products were read under EP1TM Reader.
I confirm that we have followed the guide lines of the government of Philippines and the policies of IRRI for growing rice plants and carrying out research for this study.
Functional nucleotide polymorphism
Quantitative trait loci
Coding DNA sequence
Cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence
Single nucleotide polymorphism
Ashikari M, Sakakibara H, Lin S, Yamamoto T, Takashi T, Nishimura A, Angeles ER, Qian Q, Kitano H, Matsuoka M (2005) Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science 309(5735):741–745
Fan C, Xing Y, Mao H, Lu T, Han B, Xu C, Li X, Zhang Q (2006) GS3, a major QTL for grain length and weight and minor QTL for grain width and thickness in rice, encodes a putative transmembrane protein. Theor Appl Genet 112(6):1164–1171
Fan C, Yu S, Wang C, Xing Y (2009) A causal C-A mutation in the second exon of GS3 highly associated with rice grain length and validated as a functional marker. Theor Appl Genet 118(3):465–472
Fujita D, Trijatmiko KR, Tagle AG, Sapasap MV, Koide Y, Sasaki K, Tsakirpaloglou N, Gannaban RB, Nishimura T, Yanagihara S, Fukuta Y, Koshiba T, Slamet-Loedin IH, Ishimaru T, Kobayashi N (2013) NAL1 allele from a rice landrace greatly increases yield in modern indica cultivars. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(51):20431–20436
Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98
Hayashi K, Hashimoto N, Daigen M, Ashikawa I (2004) Development of PCR-based SNP markers for rice blast resistance genes at the Piz locus. Theor Appl Genet 108(7):1212–1220
He XJ, Chen T, Zhu JK (2011) Regulation and function of DNA methylation in plants and animals. Cell Res 21(3):442–465
Huang X, Qian Q, Liu Z, Sun H, He S, Luo D, Xia G, Chu C, Li J, Fu X (2009) Natural variation at the DEP1 locus enhances grain yield in rice. Nat Genet 41(4):494–497
Huang R, Jiang L, Zheng J, Wang T, Wang H, Huang Y, Hong Z (2013) Genetic bases of rice grain shape: so many genes, so little known. Trends Plant Sci 18(4):218–226
Ikeda K, Ito M, Nagasawa N, Kyozuka J, Nagato Y (2007) Rice ABERRANT PANICLE ORGANIZATION 1, encoding an F-box protein, regulates meristem fate. Plant J 51(6):1030–1040
Ikeda-Kawakatsu K, Yasuno N, Oikawa T, Iida S, Nagato Y, Maekawa M, Kyozuka J (2009) Expression level of ABERRANT PANICLE ORGANIZATION1 determines rice inflorescence form through control of cell proliferation in the meristem. Plant Physiol 150(2):736–747
Ishimaru K, Hirotsu N, Madoka Y, Murakami N, Hara N, Onodera H, Kashiwagi T, Ujiie K, Shimizu B, Onishi A, Miyagawa H, Katoh E (2013) Loss of function of the IAA-glucose hydrolase gene TGW6 enhances rice grain weight and increases yield. Nat Genet 45(6):707–711
Jiao Y, Wang Y, Xue D, Wang J, Yan M, Liu G, Dong G, Zeng D, Lu Z, Zhu X, Qian Q, Li J (2010) Regulation of OsSPL14 by OsmiR156 defines ideal plant architecture in rice. Nat Genet 42(6):541–544
Jeon JS, Jung KH, Kim HB, Suh JP, Khush GS (2011) Genetic and molecular insights into the enhancement of rice yield potential. J Plant Biol 54(1):1–9
Kakutani T (2002) Epi-alleles in plants: inheritance of epigenetic information over generations. Plant Cell Physiol 43(10):1106–1111
Khush GS (2005) What it will take to feed 5.0 billion rice consumers in 2030. Plant Mol Biol 59(1):1–6
Kim SR, Jeon JS, An G (2011) Development of an efficient inverse PCR method for isolating gene tags from T-DNA insertional mutants in rice. Methods Mol Biol 678:139–146
Li Y, Fan C, Xing Y, Jiang Y, Luo L, Sun L, Shao D, Xu C, Li X, Xiao J, He Y, Zhang Q (2011) Natural variation in GS5 plays an important role in regulating grain size and yield in rice. Nat Genet 43(12):1266–1269
Liu L, Tong H, Xiao Y, Che R, Xu F, Hu B, Liang C, Chu J, Li J, Chu C (2015) Activation of Big Grain1 significantly improves grain size by regulating auxin transport in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(35):11102–11107
Lu L, Yan W, Xue W, Shao D, Xing Y (2012) Evolution and association analysis of Ghd7 in rice. PLoS One 7(5):e34021
Miura K, Ikeda M, Matsubara A, Song XJ, Ito M, Asano K, Matsuoka M, Kitano H, Ashikari M (2010) OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nat Genet 42(6):545–549
Miura K, Ashikari M, Matsuoka M (2011) The role of QTLs in the breeding of high-yielding rice. Trends Plant Sci 16(6):319–326
Murai M, Iizawa M (1994) Effects of major genes controlling morphology of panicle in rice. Breed Sci 44(3):247–255
Ohsumi A, Takai T, Ida M, Yamamoto T, Arai-Sanoh Y, Yano M, Ando T, Kondo M (2011) Evaluation of yield performance in rice near isogenic lines with increased spikelet number. Field Crops Res 120(1):68–75
Ookawa T, Hobo T, Yano M, Murata K, Ando T, Miura H, Asano K, Ochiai Y, Ikeda M, Nishitani R, Ebitani T, Ozaki H, Angeles ER, Hirasawa T, Matsuoka M (2010) New approach for rice improvement using a pleiotropic QTL gene for lodging resistance and yield. Nat Comms 1:132. doi:10.1038/ncomms1132
Qi J, Qian Q, Bu Q, Li S, Chen Q, Sun J, Liang W, Zhou Y, Chu C, Li X, Ren F, Palme K, Zhao B, Chen J, Chen M, Li C (2008) Mutation of the rice Narrow leaf1 gene, which encodes a novel protein, affects vein patterning and polar auxin transport. Plant Physiol 147(4):1947–1959
Ray DK, Mueller ND, West PC, Foley JA (2013) Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLoS One 8(6):e66428
Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, Mesirov JP (2011) Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol 29(1):24–26
Seck PA, Diagne A, Mohanty S, Wopereis MCS (2012) Crops that feed the world 7: rice. Food Secur 4(1):7–24
Shomura A, Izawa T, Ebana K, Ebitani T, Kanegae H, Konishi S, Yano M (2008) Deletion in a gene associated with grain size increased yields during rice domestication. Nat Genet 40(8):1023–1028
Song XJ, Huang W, Shi M, Zhu MZ, Lin HX (2007) A QTL for rice grain width and weight encodes a previously unknown RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase. Nat Genet 39(5):623–630
Takai T, Adachi S, Taguchi-Shiobara F, Sanoh-Arai Y, Iwasawa N, Yoshinaga S, Hirose S, Taniguchi Y, Yamanouchi U, Wu J, Matsumoto T, Sugimoto K, Kondo K, Ikka T, Ando T, Kono I, Ito S, Shomura A, Ookawa T, Hirasawa T, Yano M, Kondo M, Yamamoto T (2013) A natural variant of NAL1, selected in high-yield rice breeding programs, pleiotropically increases photosynthesis rate. Sci Rep 3:2149. doi:10.1038/srep02149
Terao T, Nagata K, Morino K, Hirose T (2010) A gene controlling the number of primary rachis branches also controls the vascular bundle formation and hence is responsible to increase the harvest index and grain yield in rice. Theor Appl Genet 120(5):875–893
Thomson M (2014) High-throughput SNP genotyping to accelerate crop improvement. Plant Breed Biotechnol 2(3):195–212
Wang Y, Li J (2005) The plant architecture of rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Mol Biol 59(1):75–84
Wang C, Chen S, Yu S (2011) Functional markers developed from multiple loci in GS3 for fine marker-assisted selection of grain length in rice. Theor Appl Genet 122(5):905–913
Wang S, Wu K, Yuan Q, Liu X, Liu Z, Lin X, Zeng R, Zhu H, Dong G, Qian Q, Zhang G, Fu X (2012) Control of grain size, shape and quality by OsSPL16 in rice. Nat Genet 44(8):950–954
Weng J, Gu S, Wan X, Gao H, Guo T, Su N, Lei C, Zhang X, Cheng Z, Guo X, Wang J, Jiang L, Zhai H, Wan J (2008) Isolation and initial characterization of GW5, a major QTL associated with rice grain width and weight. Cell Res 18(12):1199–1209
Xing Y, Zhang Q (2010) Genetic and molecular bases of rice yield. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:421–442
Xu Q, Xu N, Xu H, Tang L, Liu J, Sun J, Wang J (2014) Breeding value estimation of the application of IPA1 and DEP1 to improvement of Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica in early hybrid generations. Mol Breed 34:1933–1942
Xue W, Xing Y, Weng X, Zhao Y, Tang W, Wang L, Zhou H, Yu S, Xu C, Li X, Zhang Q (2008) Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet 40(6):761–767
Yan CJ, Yan S, Yang YC, Zeng XH, Fang YW, Zeng SY, Tian CY, Sun YW, Tang SZ, Gu MH (2009) Development of gene-tagged markers for quantitative trait loci underlying rice yield components. Euphytica 169(2):215–226
Yan S, Zou G, Li S, Wang H, Liu H, Zhai G, Guo P, Song H, Yan C, Tao Y (2011) Seed size is determined by the combinations of the genes controlling different seed characteristics in rice. Theor Appl Genet 123(7):1173–1181
Ye S, Dhillon S, Ke X, Collins AR, Day IN (2001) An efficient procedure for genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nucleic Acids Res 29(17):E88–8
Zhang GH, Li SY, Wang L, Ye WJ, Zeng DL, Rao YC, Peng YL, Hu J, Yang YL, Xu J, Ren DY, Gao ZY, Zhu L, Dong GJ, Hu XM, Yan MX, Guo LB, Li CY, Qian Q (2014) LSCHL4 from japonica cultivar, which is allelic to NAL1, increases yield of indica super rice 93-11. Mol Plant 7(8):1350–1364
We thank Dr. Tsutomu Ishimaru for sharing the SPIKE donor line and Ms. Frances Nikki Borja for helping with IGV software analysis. We are grateful to Delyreen Alcachupas for helping with general laboratory work; to Eleazar Manalaysay, Mario Camalate, Fe Valencia, and Arby Perez for growing rice plants; and to the editorial team of IRRI commutation for editing the manuscript. This research was funded by the Global Rice Science Partnership program (Grant No.: DRPC 2011-134) of IRRI.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
KKJ, MA, PSV, EAT and EN conceived the research. SRK and KKJ wrote the manuscript. SRK developed the allele-specific markers. SRK and JR conducted experiments. SLH analyzed Fluidigm SNP markers and RM analyzed whole-genome sequence data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Screening of DNA polymorphisms in the Gn1a gene using WGS data. Sequencing reads were aligned to the reference genome sequence (IRGSP-1.0). Note that the Gn1a gene lay on the opposite strand of the reference sequence. Screen-captured images of IGV software showed nucleotide variations that were used for marker development. (A) Three SNPs located in the Gn1a promoter region were shown with their genomic location on chromosome 1. Chr1: 5276405, Chr1: 5276521, and Chr1: 5276591 SNPs were used for Gn1a-17SNP/Gn1a-17SNP-FD, Gn1a-18SNP-FD, and Gn1a-19SNP-FD markers, respectively. (B) About a 70-bp deletion (red circles) near the 3’ UTR of Gn1a was found in varieties NSIC Rc158 and NSIC Rc238. This indel was used for designing the Gn1a-indel3 marker. (DOC 178 kb)
Marker designing schemes for SNP-type polymorphisms. (A) Schematic presentation of the tetra-primer PCR method for designing Gn1a-17SNP marker. The target SNPs, G and A, are highlighted in each genome and its surrounding sequences are represented with the allele-specific primers (pink, G allele-specific primer; green, A allele-specific primer). Actually, the SNP is determined by the last nucleotide (filled triangle) of the allele-specific primer. Proper annealing of the last nucleotide of the primer (the 3’ end) is very important for PCR amplification because Taq DNA polymerase start polymerization at that nucleotide through adding dNTP. For instance, the A allele-specific primer (green) can be annealed to the G allele genome but the efficiency of DNA polymerization will be very low because of no annealing of the 3’ end of the primer, resulting in no PCR band or a very weak band. To increase allele specificity, we gave an artificial mismatched nucleotide near the 3’ end (second or third nucleotide from the 3’ end) of the allele-specific primer (lowercase with underlined nucleotide in Figure). Primer combination of the Gn1a-17SNP marker, its predicted band size, and deduced gel image depending on genotypes were presented. (B) Schematic presentation of the separated allele-specific PCR method for designing the SPIKE-01SNP marker. To discriminate G/A SNP, the SPIKE-01SNP marker consisted of two PCRs (PCR #1, SPIKE-01SNP-GF/R; PCR #2, SPIKE-01SNP-AF/R). Between the G allele-specific primer (pink) and A allele-specific primer (green), only the last nucleotide of each allele-specific primer (filled triangle) is different. To increase allele specificity, the artificial mismatched nucleotide near the 3’ end was given in the allele-specific primer. PCRs were performed with each allele-specific primer and common reverse primer. Primer combinations of the SPIKE-01SNP marker, its predicted band size, and deduced gel image depending on genotypes were presented. (C) The effect of artificial mismatched nucleotide near the 3’ end of the allele-specific primer. As an example, the SPIKE-01SNP marker was designed without the artificial mismatched nucleotide in allele-specific primers that were shown on the gel image. Non-allele-specific PCR amplifications were obtained with these primers. Using artificial mismatch, we obtained allele-specific PCR amplifications (Fig. 6a). (DOC 240 kb)
Screening of ST12-specific DNA variation in the OsSPL14 promoter region through WGS data analysis. Note that the OsSPL14 gene lay on the opposite strand of the reference sequence. The reference genome sequence was shown at the bottom of the image. Screen-captured image of IGV software showed an ST12-specific SNP located at the Chr 8: 25282790 nucleotide position (IRGSP-1.0). (DOC 77 kb)
Haplotype analysis of the NAL1 gene from six varieties using WGS data according to the previously analyzed NAL1 haplotypes (Takai et al. 2013). The nucleotide position was calculated based on the previous report (1 = the starting nucleotide of 5’ UTR in Takanari) and newly identified polymorphisms in this study were highlighted by red characters. The 1640-position nucleotide (G/A) and the 2884-position nucleotide (G/A) were used for designing the SPIKE-01SNP marker and SPIKE-03 SNP marker, respectively. S.S., synonymous nucleotide substitution. (DOC 78 kb)
Summary of Fluidigm SNP genotyping results. (DOC 90 kb)
Summary of whole-genome sequencing of six varieties. (DOC 47 kb)
Primers for preparation of PCR products and PCR product sequencing. (DOC 35 kb)
Markers for Fluidigm SNP genotyping platform. (DOC 36 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, SR., Ramos, J., Ashikari, M. et al. Development and validation of allele-specific SNP/indel markers for eight yield-enhancing genes using whole-genome sequencing strategy to increase yield potential of rice, Oryza sativa L.. Rice 9, 12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-016-0084-7
- Yield potential
- Yield-enhancing genes
- Allele-specific marker
- SNP genotyping