Open Access

Isolation of a novel mutant gene for soil-surface rooting in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

  • Eiko Hanzawa1,
  • Kazuhiro Sasaki1, 2, 3,
  • Shinsei Nagai1,
  • Mitsuhiro Obara3,
  • Yoshimichi Fukuta3,
  • Yusaku Uga4,
  • Akio Miyao4,
  • Hirohiko Hirochika4,
  • Atsushi Higashitani1,
  • Masahiko Maekawa5 and
  • Tadashi Sato1, 6Email author
Rice20136:30

https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-8433-6-30

Received: 19 April 2013

Accepted: 15 November 2013

Published: 20 November 2013

Abstract

Background

Root system architecture is an important trait affecting the uptake of nutrients and water by crops. Shallower root systems preferentially take up nutrients from the topsoil and help avoid unfavorable environments in deeper soil layers. We have found a soil-surface rooting mutant from an M2 population that was regenerated from seed calli of a japonica rice cultivar, Nipponbare. In this study, we examined the genetic and physiological characteristics of this mutant.

Results

The primary roots of the mutant showed no gravitropic response from the seedling stage on, whereas the gravitropic response of the shoots was normal. Segregation analyses by using an F2 population derived from a cross between the soil-surface rooting mutant and wild-type Nipponbare indicated that the trait was controlled by a single recessive gene, designated as sor1. Fine mapping by using an F2 population derived from a cross between the mutant and an indica rice cultivar, Kasalath, revealed that sor1 was located within a 136-kb region between the simple sequence repeat markers RM16254 and 2935-6 on the terminal region of the short arm of chromosome 4, where 13 putative open reading frames (ORFs) were found. We sequenced these ORFs and detected a 33-bp deletion in one of them, Os04g0101800. Transgenic plants of the mutant transformed with the genomic fragment carrying the Os04g0101800 sequence from Nipponbare showed normal gravitropic responses and no soil-surface rooting.

Conclusion

These results suggest that sor1, a rice mutant causing soil-surface rooting and altered root gravitropic response, is allelic to Os04g0101800, and that a 33-bp deletion in the coding region of this gene causes the mutant phenotypes.

Keywords

Root system architecture Gene isolation Soil-surface rooting Shallow rooting Gravitropic response

Background

Root system architecture is an important trait for plant growth and crop yield because it affects the uptake of nutrients and water, which are unevenly distributed in the soil. Diversity of the vertical distribution of the root systems of different species allows efficient maximization of plant growth and crop yields in unfavorable environments with poor resource mobility, such as infertile or arid fields (Hodge et al. 2009; Rich and Watt 2013). Shallow root systems enhance phosphorus acquisition in common bean (Ge et al. 2000; Liao et al. 2004; Lynch 2011) and wheat (Manske et al. 2000). Phosphorus-efficient bean cultivars have shallower basal roots and more adventitious rooting in the topsoil than other bean cultivars (Lynch and Brown 2001). In teosintes, adventitious root formation at the soil surface may provide an alternative growth strategy to cope with soil flooding or waterlogging (Mano et al. 2005). Therefore, shallower root systems preferentially take up nutrients from the topsoil and help to avoid unfavorable environments in deeper soil layers.

When submerged, Indonesian rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars that belong to the Bulu ecotype develop thick primary roots above and near the soil surface (Lafitte et al. 2001; Ueno and Sato 1989, 1992). These authors suggested that soil-surface and shallow roots contribute to the avoidance of hypoxic soils in rice. Rice superficial roots develop near the soil surface from the beginning of the spikelet differentiation stage to the fully ripe stage (Morita and Yamazaki 1993). The fresh weight of superficial roots is positively correlated with yields in paddy fields (Morita and Yamazaki 1993). Thus, soil-surface and shallow roots may contribute to the avoidance of hypoxic environments and promote rice growth.

Genetic analyses of root system architecture have been performed in a variety of rice lines; however, no genes controlling soil-surface rooting have been isolated by using natural variation. A study of 81 diverse genotypes in rice revealed two DNA molecular markers associated with shallow and deep rooting on chromosomes 9 and 10, respectively (Chaitra et al. 2006). Uga et al. (2012) identified four quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for soil-surface rooting on chromosomes 3, 4, 6, and 7 by using recombinant inbred lines derived from a cross between an Indonesian rice cultivar with soil-surface roots and a Japanese cultivar without such roots. The use of mutants is an alternative approach to isolate causal genes for traits of interest. Rice mutants have been isolated for the following root morphological characteristics: inhibition of root growth, absence of crown roots, short lateral roots or absence of lateral roots, short root hairs, and hairless roots (Chhun et al. 2003; Debi et al. 2003, 2005; Hao and Ichii 1999; Ichii and Ishikawa 1997; Inukai et al. 2001; Iwao et al. 2005; Kim et al. 2007; Suzuki et al. 2003; Yuo et al. 2009, 2011). Although many rice mutants for the above traits have been reported, no causal genes for soil-surface rooting have been cloned. Here, we describe a rice mutant with thick primary roots that develop above and immediately under the soil surface. The purpose of this study was to isolate and characterize the mutant gene responsible for soil-surface rooting.

Results

Evaluation of the mutant phenotype

To evaluate the soil-surface rooting phenotype of the mutant, we used four different methods: the pot method, the cup method, the glass tube method, and the basket method. Under submerged conditions, the roots of all mutant plants elongated on or just below the soil surface in plant pots (Figure 1A); however, no wild-type Nipponbare plants (WT) had such roots during the seedling stage (Figure 1B). The cup method showed that mutant plants had many soil-surface roots (Figure 1C); however, WT had very few such roots (Figure 1D). The glass tube method showed that mutant plants had many primary roots elongated on the upper side of the agar surface (Figure 1E); however, WT had no such roots (Figure 1F). The basket method showed that mutant plants had many soil-surface roots (Figure 1G); however, WT had few soil-surface roots (Figure 1H). These results revealed that our mutant is a novel mutant for soil-surface rooting.
Figure 1

Differences in rooting between the sor1 mutant (A, C, E, and G) and wild-type Nipponbare (B, D, F, and H). Plants were grown in pots under waterlogged conditions (A and B), by the cup method (C and D), by the glass tube method (E and F), or by the basket method (G and H). White arrowheads in (A) indicate soil-surface roots.

Distribution of primary roots assessed by basket method

The primary roots of the mutant plants tended to be distributed horizontally at the third (Figure 2A and D), fifth (Figure 2B and E), and seventh leaf stages (Figure 2C and F). More than 88% of the primary roots in the mutant (Figure 2A–C), but less than 45% in the WT (Figure 2D–F) had a vertical growth angle of < 30° (soil surface = vertical angle of 0°) at any of the examined leaf stages. These results suggest that the primary roots of the mutants elongated on or near the soil surface from early seedling stages on, whereas those of WT tended to elongate toward the direction of gravity.
Figure 2

Distribution of primary roots between vertical-angle zones in the sor1 mutant (A, B, and C) and wild-type Nipponbare (D, E, and F), grown under waterlogged conditions by using the basket method. The percentages of primary roots in each angle category were assessed at the third (A and D), fifth (B and E), and seventh (C and F) leaf stages (n = 9), and are shown in parentheses. Error bars indicate SE.

Gravitropic responses of roots and shoots

The gravitropic responses of seminal roots in WT and mutant seeds were evaluated in an agar tray assay (Figure 3A–C). Prior to rotation, the mutant roots were growing in random directions, whereas WT roots elongated along the direction of gravity (Figure 3D). After the trays were rotated 90°, the mutant roots continued to extend randomly, whereas those of WT bent in the direction of gravity within 10 h (Figure 3E). Although the direction of the seminal roots of the mutants was irregular before and after rotation, their shoots grew normally against the direction of gravity (Figure 3F). Furthermore, the mutant crown roots extended randomly, whereas the WT crown roots grew in the direction of gravity. These results suggest that the primary roots of the mutant lack a gravitropic response from the seedling stage on, whereas the shoots show normal gravitropic response.
Figure 3

Gravitropic response assay for shoots and primary roots at the seedling stage. A diagram illustrating the assay is shown in A–C. Germinated seeds are sown just under the surface of 1.5% agar in plastic trays with the embryo placed upward (A). Trays were set on their short sides 18 h after sowing (B) and rotated 90° clockwise 10 h later (C). Differences in root gravitropic responses in mutant and Nipponbare seedlings 10 h after setting the tray on a short edge (D), 10 h after rotation (E), and 76 h after rotation (F). Black dots in D–F mark the location of seminal root tips just before the rotation. Scale bars, 2 cm. The direction of gravity (G) is indicated by arrows.

Relationship between soil-surface rooting and gravitropic response

To determine whether the soil-surface rooting and the lack of root gravitropic response observed in the mutant are controlled by the same gene, we performed segregation analyses by using 85 F2 plants derived from a cross between the mutant and WT Nipponbare (Table 1). The gravitropic responses of seminal roots of each F2 plant were evaluated in the agar tray assay (Figure 3A–C). The primary roots of 60 F2 plants responded to gravity similarly to WT Nipponbare roots. In contrast, the primary roots of the remaining 25 plants showed gravity-insensitivity that was similar to that of the mutant. The ratio of gravity-sensitive plants to insensitive plants was not significantly different from 3:1 (χ 2  = 0.797, P = 0.372).
Table 1

Segregation of gravitropic responses of primary roots and the ratio of soil-surface roots to total roots in the F 2 population

Plants

Number of plants

Soil-surface root ratio (%)*

Mean ± S.D.

Minimum

Maximum

Mutant line

9

64.4 ± 17.3

26.5

82.7

Gravity-insensitive F2 plants

25

69.1 ± 10.1

52.6

85.0

Gravity-sensitive F2 plants

60

2.8 ± 3.0

0.0

11.4

Nipponbare

9

5.1 ± 4.4

0.0

14.1

*The soil-surface rooting ratio was calculated as (the number of primary roots emerged at x < 0° / the total number of primary roots) × 100.

In the 60 F2 plants that had gravity-sensitive roots, the soil-surface rooting ratio was 11.4% or less (Table 1). In contrast, the remaining 25 plants had a soil-surface rooting ratio of 52.6% or more. These results suggest that soil-surface rooting at the seedling stage is controlled by a single recessive gene that also controls the lack of response to gravity beginning at germination. We designated the recessive mutant gene as sor1 (soil-surface rooting 1) and the corresponding locus as SOR1.

Mapping of the mutant sor1 gene

We used the cup method to determine the soil-surface rooting ratio of F2 plants derived from a cross between the mutant and Kasalath, which has a soil-surface rooting ratio similar to that of Nipponbare (data not shown). Among 103 F2 plants, 19 had soil-surface rooting ratios similar to those of the mutant, and the remaining 84 plants were normal. The ratio of Nipponbare-type (normal) to SOR-type (soil-surface rooting) plants was not significantly different from 3:1 (χ 2  = 2.359, P = 0.125). Rough mapping was carried out by using the 19 SOR-type plants and 70 DNA markers known to be polymorphic between Nipponbare and Kasalath (Additional file 1). RM551 in the terminal region of the short arm of chromosome 4 (Figure 4A) was the only marker for which the Nipponbare allele was detected in all SOR-type plants. This result indicated that the Nipponbare allele of RM551 co-segregated with the sor1 mutant allele.
Figure 4

Map position and complementation of the candidate gene for soil-surface rooting. (A) Fine mapping of the SOR1 locus, carried out by using SOR-type plants, indicated that the DNA marker RM551 on chromosome 4 co-segregated with soil-surface rooting. The SOR1 locus was identified in a 136-kb region between markers RM16254 and 29356. The Os04g0101800 gene is shown as a black arrow, with white boxes indicating the exons. The second exon of the sor1 mutant allele contains a 33-bp genomic deletion. FW and RV, specific primers used to confirm the deletion. (B) Alignment of SOR1 (wild-type and mutant) amino acid sequences. The positions of the zinc finger (RING finger) domain (aa124–170) and the vWFA (von Willebrand factor type A) domain (aa279–460) are indicated above the sequences. The 11-aa deletion (aa332–342) in the vWFA domain of the mutant is shown with dashes (-). (C) Confirmation of the genomic deletion in the mutant by analysis of the PCR amplicon size in wild-type (WT), mutant (MT), and transgenic plants (Tg1–3). Tg1 and Tg2 were transformed with a6677-bp genomic fragment containing Os04g0101800; Tg3 was transformed with an empty vector. M, DNA marker. (D) Phenotyping of soil-surface rooting by the glass tube method (top line) and ratio of soil-surface rooting (SOR) by the basket method (bottom line) in the mutant, wild-type, and transgenic plants.

To narrow the candidate region for sor1, 647 F2 plants were used for fine mapping. The phenotype of each F2 plant was evaluated individually by the glass tube method (which is less labor-intensive than the cup method). As in previous experiments (Figure 1E), the mutant roots elongated on the agar surface and extended against the direction of gravity, whereas the roots of Kasalath elongated into the agar along the direction of gravity (data not shown). A total of 498 and 149 plants were of the Nipponbare-type and SOR-type, respectively, and the segregation ratio was not significantly different from 3:1 (χ 2  = 1.340, P = 0.247). Fine-mapping analyses with seven markers on chromosome 4 (RM16254, 442–9, RM551, 442–5, 2935–6, R2373, and RM335; Additional file 2) were performed to identify the markers flanking the sor1 gene. Six recombination events were detected between RM16254 and 4429, and one recombination event was detected between 4425 and 29356 (Figure 4A). The Nipponbare alleles of markers 4429, RM551, and 4425 co-segregated with the sor1 mutant. These results indicated that sor1 is located between markers RM16254 and 29356. The interval defined by RM16254 and 29356 spans approximately 136 kb, according to the Nipponbare genome sequence (IRGSP build 5; International Rice Genome Sequencing Project 2008 (http://rgp.dna.affrc.go.jp/E/IRGSP/Build5/build5.html).

Sequence analysis of SOR1

According to the Rice Annotation Project Database (http://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/), a total of 13 putative ORFs are located in the 136-kb sor1 candidate genomic region. To determine whether any of these genes are mutated relative to wild-type Nipponbare, we sequenced the genomic DNAs of all 13 candidate genes from Nipponbare and the mutant. A 33-bp deletion was detected in the Os04g0101800 ORF, whereas no polymorphisms were detected in the other 12 genes. The protein encoded by Os04g0101800, which we named SOR1, has two domains: a zinc finger (RING) domain (aa124–170) and a von Willebrand factor type A (vWFA) domain (aa279–460) (Figure 4B). The deletion in sor1 resulted in a loss of 11 amino acids (aa332–342) in the vWFA domain (Figure 4B). On the basis of these data, we concluded that Os04g0101800 was the most likely candidate for the gene mutated in sor1.

Complementation of the candidate gene for sor1

To verify that the deletion in Os04g0101800 was responsible for the sor1 mutant phenotype, we carried out a complementation test. We generated transgenic lines by transformation of the mutant with a 6677-bp genomic DNA fragment from WT Nipponbare containing the entire Os04g0101800 coding region. The presence of the Os04g0101800 transgene was confirmed in two independent transgenic lines, Tg1 and Tg2, by detecting PCR fragments of the same length as in WT (Figure 4C). These lines showed normal seminal root direction when assessed by the glass tube method, and their soil-surface rooting (assessed by the basket method) was similar to that of Nipponbare (Figure 4D). In contrast, transgenic lines created by using an empty vector showed the sor1 phenotype for both seminal root direction and soil-surface rooting (Tg3 in Figure 4C and D). Thus, the complementation analysis demonstrated that the 33-bp deletion in Os04g0101800 is responsible for the mutant phenotypes.

Phylogenetic analysis of SOR1

We constructed a phylogenetic tree of rice and Arabidopsis proteins homologous to SOR1 (Figure 5). Phylogenetic analysis showed that rice SOR1 and Arabidopsis WAV3, EDA40, WAVH1, and WAVH2 form a single monophyletic group (Group I), whereas other proteins form a separate cluster (Group II; Figure 5).
Figure 5

Phylogenetic relationship of rice and Arabidopsis proteins containing both RING and vWFA domains. Multiple amino acid sequence alignment was carried out and the phylogenetic tree was constructed by using MEGA v. 5.10 (http://www.megasoftware.net) (Tamura et al. 2011). Bootstrap values (1,000 replicates) are shown for each node. Scale bar, number of substitutions per site.

Discussion

The sor1 mutant loses the root-specific gravitropic response at an early growth stage. Consequently, the mutant shows soil-surface rooting under a variety of experimental conditions. A 33-bp deletion in the sor1 mutant gene compromises the gravitropic response; the results of our complementation analysis indicate that the gravitropic response can be restored by a functional SOR1 gene. The protein encoded by this gene contains the RING and vWFA domains (Figure 4B). Proteins containing the RING domain are involved in auxin signaling (Xie et al. 2002), photomorphogenesis (Hardtke et al. 2002; Holm et al. 2002), plant defense (Serrano and Guzman 2004), brassinosteroid and pathogen responses (Molnȧr et al. 2002), light signaling (Hu et al. 2002), secretory pathways (Matsuda et al. 2001), seed development (Xu and Li 2003), and cellular regulation (Stone et al. 2005). Proteins containing the vWFA domain are involved in transcription, DNA repair, ribosomal and membrane transport, and proteasome regulation (Whittaker and Hynes 2002). The vWFA and RING domains are conserved in yeast, plants, and animals. However, proteins that contain both RING and vWFA domains have been found only in plants, and their physiological functions are unclear. Recently, wavy growth 3 (WAV3), which encodes a protein containing both RING and vWFA domains, was isolated as the causal gene for the wav3 mutant of Arabidopsis (Sakai et al. 2012). The roots of the wav3 mutant show a short-pitch pattern on inclined agar media and a positive gravitropic response. A total of eight genes encoding proteins with both RING and vWFA domains found in the Arabidopsis genome were classified into two subfamilies. Four of these genes, EMBRYO SAC DEVELOPMENT ARREST 40 (EDA40), WAV3, WAV3 HOMOLOG 1 (WAVH1), and WAV3 HOMOLOG 2 (WAVH2), belong to the same group. Surprisingly, although the wav3wavh1wavh2 triple mutant had abnormal root gravitropic response, the single and double mutants were comparatively normal. In the present study, mutation of a single gene in rice, sor1, led to the observed deficiency in root gravitropic response (Figures 1, 2, 3). The molecular mechanisms that control root gravitropism are likely to be considerably different between rice and Arabidopsis; this difference may be caused by the functional redundancy between the Arabidopsis proteins that contain both RING and vWFA domains. In rice, six genes encoding proteins containing both RING and vWFA domains were found (Figure 5). Only one of these proteins, SOR1, belongs to the same group as WAV3, WAVH1, and WAVH2 (Figure 5). Thus, in rice, the control of abnormal gravitropic responses by a single gene (sor1) differs from that in Arabidopsis, in which three related genes control this response.

Other rice mutants with altered root gravitropic responses have been isolated: RM109 (Hao and Ichii 1999) and aem1 (Debi et al. 2003, 2005). In the RM109 mutant, root elongation to slantwise direction differs from that in WT. The seminal roots of aem1 elongate normally, but respond more slowly to gravity than WT. The root gravitropic response likely depends on the difference in auxin concentration between the upper and lower cells due to amyloplast sedimentation in the columella cells of the root tip. Morita and Kyozuka (2007) demonstrated that the auxin transport–related gene OsPID is associated with the gravitropic response in rice roots. Ge et al. (2004) identified a regulator of auxin distribution, OsRAA, that controls the direction of root growth in rice. The Arabidopsis WAV3 family, which has high sequence similarity with rice SOR1, controls the root growth pattern, in particular the gravitropic response, via mechanisms that involve auxin transport and/or signaling (Stone et al. 2005). Further functional studies are needed to determine the relationship between sor1, root gravitropism, and hormones.

The sor1 mutant has relatively thick roots (data not shown) that elongate above and just below the soil surface beginning at the seedling stage. In recent years, root research in cereals has focused on designing root system architecture to optimize nutrient acquisition and enable sustainable production (Hodge et al. 2009; King et al. 2003; Lynch and Brown 2012; Lynch 2013; Rich and Watt 2013). Shallow root systems contribute to efficient absorption and accumulation of nutrients from the soil surface; they are able to reach shallow soil horizons, thus enhancing phosphorus acquisition (Ge et al. 2000; Lynch 2011). Untilled fields gradually accumulate fertilizers and nutrients from decomposing crop residue near the soil surface (Boone 1988). In over-fertilized fields, phosphorus significantly accumulates in the topsoil (Phupaibul et al. 2004). In paddy fields in reclaimed tidal flats, more than 10% of the nutrients supplied by chemical fertilizers are lost due to surface runoff (Cho et al. 2008). Excessive Fe2+ content in the reduced layer is produced by waterlogging (Ponnamperuma et al. 1967; Yoshida 1981). The oxidation-reduction potential decreases in paddy soils, because gaseous oxygen is not supplied under swamp condition (Kohno et al. 1995). When oxygen is used up, Fe is reduced; consequently excess Fe2+ toxicity is produced in paddy soil solution (Kohno et al. 1995). There is less Fe2+ in the upper layers of submerged paddy soils, and soil-surface roots decrease the uptake of iron. Therefore, the mutant sor1 gene and other genes for soil-surface rooting may be useful for increasing the efficiency of absorption of nutrients accumulated at the soil surface in untilled culture systems and for increasing tolerance to some of the problematic soil types.

Earlier, we identified four QTLs for soil-surface rooting on chromosomes 3, 4, 6, and 7 in three field evaluations (Uga et al. 2012). The major QTL on chromosome 7 was detected in all three field evaluations and by the cup method. The QTL on the terminal region of the short arm chromosome 4 was detected only at the heading stage in 2009. Furthermore, the QTL on chromosome 4 could not be detected by the cup method, so we have been unable to carry out fine-mapping of this QTL. Although further analyses are necessary to determine whether the QTL on chromosome 4 is the same as SOR1, this mutant sor1 gene may be useful for breeding cultivars with enhanced soil-surface rooting.

Conclusion

The primary roots of the soil-surface rooting mutant lose the root-specific gravitropic response at an early growth stage. The sor1 (soil-surface rooting 1), a rice mutant causing soil-surface rooting and altered root gravitropic response, is allelic to Os04g0101800 on the terminal region of the short arm of chromosome 4. The 33-bp deletion in Os04g0101800 is responsible for the mutant phenotypes.

Methods

Plant materials

A mutant with primary roots distributed at the soil surface was detected in an M2 mutant population regenerated from seed calli of the japonica rice (O. sativa L.) cultivar ‘Nipponbare’ (Hirochika 1997). This population was grown in 2004 in the paddy field of the Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University (Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan). To confirm soil-surface rooting in the mutant line, 15 M3 progeny from a mutant plant were cultivated in the paddy field of the Experimental Farm Station, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University (Kashimadai, Osaki, Miyagi, Japan) in 2005. The seeds of mutant plants with confirmed soil-surface rooting (M4) were used for further studies.

For genetic analysis, we used F2 populations derived from crosses between the mutant and the indica rice cultivar ‘Kasalath’ or between the mutant and WT ‘Nipponbare’. All seeds were soaked in water at 60°C for 10 min and then washed with running tap water for 20 min. Washed seeds were soaked in 0.2% (v/v) plant preservative mixture (PPM; Plant Cell Technology, Inc., Washington, DC, USA) in a 6-cm glass Petri dish. Seeds were incubated at 30°C for 2 d to promote uniform germination.

Root vertical growth angle

We measured the vertical growth angle of primary roots by using the basket method (Oyanagi et al. 1993; Nakamoto and Oyanagi 1994). Soil containing chemical fertilizer (Nursery culture soil No. 3; Mitsui-Toatsu, Tokyo, Japan: N, 0.7 g · kg–1; P, 1.2 g · kg–1; K, 0.6 g · kg–1) and soil without fertilizer (Shibanome-tsuchi; Kikuchi Industry Co., Ltd., Tochigi, Japan) were mixed in a 1:1 ratio and placed into plastic pots (11 cm diameter × 15 cm height, with a 1-cm diameter hole in the bottom) to a depth of 4 cm. A stainless steel wire basket (6 cm diameter × 3 cm depth; Figure 1G and H) was buried just under the soil surface (open side up) in each pot. The pots were placed inside a plastic container (35 × 60 × 20 cm), and one germinated seed was placed at the center of each basket with the embryo facing upward on the soil in each plant pot. The soil in each pot was watered to maintain a sufficient level of moisture, and the seeds were embedded at a depth of 1 cm. The pots were covered with a vinyl sheet to prevent desiccation until the shoot tip emerged. From the second leaf stage on, the water level in each plastic container was maintained at the soil surface level by using tap water. The plants were grown in a greenhouse at 20–30°C under natural light.

The baskets were dug out when the plants were at the third, fifth, and seventh leaf stages (Figure 1G and H). The soil attached to the baskets was removed carefully without cutting the primary roots. Each basket was divided into four angle areas: < 0°, 0–30°, 30–60°, and 60–90°. The gravitropic and horizontal directions were 90° and 0°, respectively. We counted the number of primary roots emerging from the basket in each angle area.

Direction of elongation of the primary roots and shoots during seedling development

The direction of elongation was determined by using a bending method. Germinated seeds were sown just beneath the surface of 1.5% agar (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka) in plastic trays (22 × 14 × 4 cm) with the embryos facing upward (Figure 3A). The trays were placed in a growth chamber (Biotron, Nippon Medical & Chemical Instruments Co., Ltd., Osaka) under white light (photosynthetically active radiation equal to 100 μmol/m2∙s-1) at 25°C and 90% relative humidity. After 18 h, the trays were set on their short sides (Figure 3B). After an additional 10 h, the trays were rotated 90° clockwise (Figure 3C). The direction of seminal root elongation was photographed and measured using Image J software (Wayne Rasband, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/docs/faqs.html).

Soil-surface rooting at the seedling stage

For the cup method (Uga et al. 2012), each F2 plant was grown in a cylindrical plastic cup (3.7 cm diameter and 4 cm depth; Beaker PP, AS ONE Corporation, Osaka, Japan) (Figure 1C and D). Small holes were made in the bottom of each cup for supplying water. The cups were filled with soil (Rice nursery culture soil No. 3). Forty cups were placed in a stainless steel tray (32 × 25 × 5.3 cm) with drainage holes. Each germinated seed was sown at the center of a cup in a randomized complete block design, and covered with a 1-cm layer of soil without fertilizer (Shibanome-tsuchi). The tray was placed in a large plastic container (44.5 × 32.5× 7 cm). Until the second leaf stage, the water level was maintained at 2 cm above the soil surface from a supply beneath the tray. From the second leaf stage to the time of rooting assessment, the water level was maintained at the level of the soil surface. The plants were grown in a greenhouse at 20–30°C under natural day length. At the third leaf stage, the top layer of soil covering the cups was removed carefully without cutting primary roots that had grown over the edges of cups, and the cups were removed from the tray. The primary roots that had elongated past the edge of the cup were counted as soil-surface roots (Figure 1C and D). The plants were then removed from the cups, and the soil attached to the roots was washed away. The total number of roots was counted for each plant. The soil-surface root ratio for each plant was defined as the number of soil-surface roots divided by the total number of primary roots, and was expressed as a percentage.

For the glass tube method, one germinated seed was sown in a glass tube (1.8 × 18 cm) filled with 10 ml of 0.4% (w/v) agar, and the opening of the tube was covered with aluminum foil. Plants were cultured in a growth chamber as for the direction of elongation assay for 7 d. Plants with roots that elongated on the upper side of the agar surface were considered as the mutant type (Figure 1E), and those with roots that elongated in the agar as WT (Figure 1F).

After evaluating the gravitropic response of F2 seedlings from a cross between the sor1 mutant and WT Nipponbare, we transplanted the seedlings into the center of baskets, so that the coleoptilar node base was embedded into soil at a depth of 1 cm. At the seventh leaf stage, we counted the number of primary roots that emerged from the < 0° angle area (i.e., above the soil surface) and the total number of primary roots, and calculated the soil-surface rooting ratio from these values.

Mapping of the gene responsible for soil-surface rooting

Seventy DNA markers identified polymorphic between Nipponbare and Kasalath were used for rough mapping (Additional file 1). DNA markers were selected at an average interval of 24.7 cM. The primer sequences and PCR conditions were as described (Temnykh et al. 2000; McCouch et al. 2002).

Seven DNA markers located on the short arm of chromosome 4 were used for fine mapping (Additional file 2). The simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers RM16254, RM551, and RM335 were obtained from Gramene (http://www.gramene.org/). The cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence marker R2373 was obtained from the Rice Genome Research Program (http://rgp.dna.affrc.go.jp/E/index.html). The remaining three DNA markers were designed to detect insertions or deletions by comparison with the genomic sequence databases for Nipponbare (Rice Annotation Project Database; http://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/) and 93–11 (Rice Information System; http://rice.genomics.org.cn).

DNA was extracted from a leaf tip (2 cm) of each F2 plant. Each leaf tip was placed in a microcentrifuge tube containing extraction buffer (200 mMTris-HCl [pH 8.0], 250 mM NaCl, 25 mM EDTA, 0.5% [w/v] sodium dodecyl sulfate), and homogenized by using a TissueLyser (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands). DNA was precipitated with isopropanol and resuspended in 50 μl of TE buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA). The PCR profile involved an initial denaturation of 94°C for 2 min followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 30 sec, 72°C for 30 sec, and a final extension for 4 min at 72°C by using Taq polymerase (TaKaRa, Otsu, Japan). The amplified fragments and the products of their digestion by restriction enzymes were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1.5 or 3.0% agarose gels.

Complementation analysis of the candidate sor1 gene

We used a 6677-bp genomic DNA fragment of Nipponbare that contained the entire Os04g0101800 coding region, the 2052-bp upstream sequence, and the 1037-bp downstream sequence. The attB PCR products were cloned into the pDONR221 vector (Life Technologies, California, USA). The cloned fragment was recombined into pFAST-G01 (Inplanta Innovations, Yokohama, Japan) by using LR Clonase (Invitrogen). The construct was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105. Transgenic lines were generated by transformation of the mutant plants with a Sor1 (wild-type) allele or control empty vector. The seminal root direction of the T1 seeds was examined by using the glass tube method. T1 seedlings were transplanted into pots, and soil-surface rooting was analyzed by using the basket method.

The absence or presence of the 33-bp deletion in Os04g0101800 was determined by PCR with specific primers FW (5′-AGCACCTTGGTGGCCTTG-3′) and RV (5′-CCTCGTCATCGCCTCTCTC-3′). PCR was performed by using PrimeSTAR HS DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Otsu, Japan) in a volume of 10 μl that contained 1 × PrimeSTAR buffer, 200 μM of each dNTP, 0.3 μM of each primer, 0.5 U PrimeSTAR polymerase, and the template. The PCR program was 1 min at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles of 10 s at 98°C and 30 s at 68°C, with a final extension step of 5 min at 72°C. The PCR fragments were analyzed by electrophoresis on 3.0% agarose gels.

Phylogenetic analysis

Multiple amino acid sequence alignment was carried out and the phylogenetic tree was constructed by using MEGA v. 5.10 (http://www.megasoftware.net) (Tamura et al. 2011). Bootstrap values (1,000 replicates) are shown for each node, and the scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per site. Sequences of putative genes in rice and Arabidopsis encoding proteins that contain both vWFA and RING domains were obtained by searching the RAP-DB database (http://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/index.html) and TAIR (http://www.arabidopsis.org/index.jsp), respectively.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by KAKENHI #23380189 (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research [B]) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan. The authors thank Dr. Jun Hidema, Dr. Shusei Sato and Dr. Mika Teranishi (Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University) for their valuable suggestions.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University
(2)
Plant Breeding, Genetics and Biotechnology Division, International Rice Research Institute, DAPO
(3)
Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences
(4)
National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences
(5)
Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University
(6)
RIKEN Innovation Center, Ion Beam Breeding Laboratory

References

  1. Boone FR: Weather and other environmental factors influencing crop responses to tillage and traffic. Soil Tillage Res 1988, 11: 283–324.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaitra J, Vinod MS, Sharma N, Hittalmani S, Shashidhar HE: Validation of markers linked to maximum root length in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Curr Sci 2006, 90: 835–838.Google Scholar
  3. Chhun T, Taketa S, Tsurumi S, Ichii M: Interaction between two auxin-resistant mutants and their effects on lateral root formation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Exp Bot 2003, 54: 2701–2708.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cho JY, Son JG, Choi JK, Song CH, Chung BY: Surface and subsurface losses of N and P from salt-affected rice paddy fields of Saemangeum reclaimed land in South Korea. Paddy Water Environ 2008, 6: 211–219.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Debi BR, Mushika J, Taketa S, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Ichii M: Isolation and characterization of a short lateral root mutant in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Sci 2003, 165: 895–903.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Debi BR, Chhun T, Taketa S, Tsurumi S, Xia K, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Ichii M: Defects in root development and gravity response in the aem1 mutant of rice are associated with reduced auxin efflux. J Plant Physiol 2005, 162: 678–685.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ge Z, Rubio G, Lynch JP: The importance of root gravitropism for inter-root competition and phosphorus acquisition efficiency: results from a geometric simulation model. Plant Soil 2000, 218: 159–171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ge L, Chen H, Jian J-F, Zhao Y, Xu M-L, Xu Y-Y, Tan K-H, Xu Z-H, Chong K: Overexpression of OsRAA1 causes pleiotropic phenotypes in transgenic rice plants, including altered leaf, flower, and root development and root response to gravity. Plant Physiol 2004, 135: 1502–1513.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hao Z, Ichii M: A mutant RM109 of rice (Oryza sativa L.) exhibiting altered lateral root initiation and gravitropism. Jpn J Crop Sci 1999, 68: 245–252.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hardtke CS, Okamoto H, Stoop-Myer C, Deng XW: Biochemical evidence for ubiquitin ligase activity of the Arabidopsis COP1 interacting protein 8 (CIP8). Plant J 2002, 30: 385–394.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirochika H: Retrotransposons of rice: their regulation and use for genome analysis. Plant Mol Biol 1997, 35: 231–240.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hodge A, Berta G, Doussan C, Merchan F, Crespi M: Plant root growth, architecture and function. Plant Soil 2009, 321: 153–187.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Holm M, Ma LG, Qu LJ, Deng WX: Two interacting bZIP proteins are direct targets of COP1-mediated control of light-dependent gene expression in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 2002, 16: 1247–1259.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu J, Aguirre M, Peto C, Alonso J, Ecker J, Chory J: A role for peroxisomes in photomorphogenesis and development of Arabidopsis. Science 2002, 297: 405–409.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ichii M, Ishikawa M: Genetic analysis of newly induced short-root mutants in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Breed Sci 1997, 47: 121–125.Google Scholar
  16. Inukai Y, Miwa M, Nagato Y, Kitano H, Yamauchi A: Characterization of rice mutants deficient in the formation of crown roots. Breed Sci 2001, 51: 123–129.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Iwao MJ, You T, Taketa S, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Ichii M: Molecular genetic analysis of a Tos17 -tagged mutant line related to root morphology in rice. Breed Res 2005, 7: 171–178.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim CM, Park SH, Je BI, Park SH, Park SJ, Piao HL, Eun MY, Dolan L, Han CD: OsCSLD1, a cellulose synthase-like D1 gene, is required for root hair morphogenesis in rice. Plant Physiol 2007, 143: 1220–1230.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. King J, Gay A, Sylvester-Bradley R, Bingham I, Foulkes J, Gregory P, Robinson D: Modelling cereal root systems for water and nitrogen capture: Towards an economic optimum. Ann Bot 2003, 91: 383–390.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kohno E, Ogawa Y, Iwata S: Productivity of paddy fields. In Paddy fields in the world. Edited by: Tabuchi T, Hasegawa S. Drainage and Reclamation Engineering. Tokyo: The Japanese Society of Irrigation; 1995:341–349.Google Scholar
  21. Lafitte HR, Champoux MC, McLaren G, O’Toole JC: Rice root morphological traits are related to isozyme group and adaptation. Field Crops Res 2001, 71: 57–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Liao H, Yan X, Rubio G, Beebe SE, Blair MW, Lynch JP: Genetic mapping of basal root gravitropism and phosphorus acquisition efficiency in common bean. Funct Plant Biol 2004, 31: 959–970.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lynch JP: Root phenes for enhanced soil exploration and phosphorus acquisition: tools for future crops. Plant Physiol 2011, 156: 1041–1049.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lynch JP: Steep, cheap and deep: an ideotype to optimize water and N acquisition by maize root systems. Ann Bot 2013, 112: 347–357.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lynch JP, Brown KM: Topsoil foraging – an architectural adaptation of plants to low phosphorus availability. Plant Soil 2001, 237: 225–237.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lynch JP, Brown KM: New roots for agriculture: exploiting the root phenome. Phil Trans Royal Soc B Biolog Sci 2012, 367: 1598–1604.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Mano Y, Muraki M, Fujimori M, Takamizo T, Kindiger B: Identification of QTL controlling adventitious root formation during flooding conditions in teosinte (Zea mays ssp. huehuetenangensis) seedlings. Euphytica 2005, 142: 33–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Manske GGB, Ortiz-Monasterio JI, Ginkel MV, Gonzalez RM, Rajaram S, Molina E, Vlek PLG: Traits associated with improved P-uptake efficiency in CIMMYT’s semi dwarf spring bread wheat grown on an acid Andisol in Mexico. Plant Soil 2000, 221: 189–204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Matsuda N, Suzuki T, Tanaka K, Nakano A: Rma 1, a novel type of RING finger protein conserved from Arabidopsis to human, is a membrane-bound ubiquitin ligase. J Cell Sci 2001, 114: 1949–1957.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. McCouch SR, Teytelman L, Xu Y, Lobos KB, Clare K, Walton M, Fu B, Maghirang R, Li Z, Xing Y, Zhang Q, Kono I, Yano M, Fjellstrom R, DeClerck G, Schneider D, Cartinhour S, Ware D, Stein L: Development and mapping of 2240 new SSR markers for rice (Oryza sativa L.). DNA Res 2002, 9: 199–207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Molnảr G, Bancoṣ S, Nagy F, Szekeres M: Characterisation of BRH1, a brassinosteroid-responsive RING-H2 gene from Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 2002, 215: 127–133.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Morita Y, Kyozuka J: Characterization of OsPID, the rice ortholog of PINOID, and its possible involvement in the control of polar auxin transport. Plant Cell Physiol 2007, 48: 540–549.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Morita S, Yamazaki K: Root system. Morphology. In Science of the Rice Plant. Volume 1. Edited by: Matsuo T, Hoshikawa K. Tokyo: Food and Agriculture Policy Research Center; 1993:161–186.Google Scholar
  34. Nakamoto T, Oyanagi A: The direction of growth of seminal roots of Triticum aestivum L. and experimental modification thereof. Ann Bot 1994, 73: 363–367.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Oyanagi A, Nakamoto T, Morita S: The gravitropic response of roots and the shaping of the root system in cereal plants. Environ Exp Bot 1993, 33: 141–158.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Phupaibul P, Chitbuntanorm C, Chinoim N, Kangyawangha P, Matoh T: Phosphorus accumulation in soils and nitrate contamination in underground water under export-oriented asparagus farming in Nong Ngu Lauen village, Nakhon Pathom province, Thailand. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 2004, 50: 385–393.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Ponnamperuma FN, Tianco EM, Loy T: Redox equilibria in flooded soils: I. the iron hydroxide systems. Soil Sci 1967, 103: 374–382.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Rich SM, Watt M: Soil conditions and cereal root system architecture: review and considerations for linking Darwin and Weaver. J Exp Bot 2013, 64: 1193–1208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sakai T, Michizuki S, Haga K, Uehara Y, Suzuki A, Harada A, Wada T, Ishiguro S, Okada K: The wavy growth 3 E3 ligase family controls the gravitropic response in Arabidopsis roots. Plant J 2012, 70: 303–314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Serrano M, Guzmán P: Isolation and gene expression analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with constitutive expression of ATL2, an early elicitor-response RING-H2 zinc-finger gene. Genetics 2004, 167: 919–929.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Stone SL, Hauksdόttir H, Troy A, Herschleb J, Kraft E, Callis J: Functional analysis of the RING-type ubiquitin ligase family of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2005, 137: 13–30.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Suzuki N, Taketa S, Ichii M: Morphological and physiological characteristics of a root-hairless mutant in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Soil 2003, 255: 9–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011, 28: 2731–2739.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Temnykh S, Park WD, Ayres N, Cartinhour S, Hauck N, Lipovich L, Cho YG, Ishii T, McCouch SR: Mapping and genome organization of microsatellite sequences in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 2000, 100: 697–712.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Ueno K, Sato T: Aerial root formation in rice ecotype Bulu. Jpn J Trop Agr 1989, 33: 173–175.Google Scholar
  46. Ueno K, Sato T: Varietal difference in growth directions of rice crown roots and relation to gravitropic response and diameter of crown roots. Jpn J Breed 1992, 42: 779–786.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Uga Y, Hanzawa E, Nagai S, Sasaki K, Yano M, Sato T: Identification of qSOR1, a major rice QTL involved in soil surface rooting in paddy fields. Theor Appl Genet 2012, 124: 75–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Whittaker CA, Hynes RO: Distribution and evolution of von Willebrand/Integrin A domains: Widely dispersed domains with roles in cell adhesion and elsewhere. Mol Biol Cell 2002, 13: 3369–3387.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Xie Q, Guo HS, Dallman G, Fang SY, Weissman AM, Chua NH: SINAT5 promotes ubiquitin-related degradation of NAC1 to attenuate auxin signals. Nature 2002, 419: 167–170.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Xu R, Li QQ: A RING-H2 zinc-finger protein gene RIE1 is essential for seed development in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 2003, 53: 37–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Yoshida S: Fundamentals of rice crop science. The International Rice Research Institute. Philippines: Manila; 1981.Google Scholar
  52. Yuo T, Toyota M, Ichii M, Taketa S: Molecular cloning of a root hairless gene rth1 in rice. Breed Sci 2009, 59: 13–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Yuo T, Shiotani K, Shitsukawa N, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Ichii M, Taketa S: Root hairless 2 (rth2 ) mutant represents a loss-of-function allele of the cellulose synthase-like gene OsCSLD1 in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Breed Sci 2011, 61: 225–233.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hanzawa et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.