- Research
- Open access
- Published:
OsWRKY70 Plays Opposite Roles in Blast Resistance and Cold Stress Tolerance in Rice
Rice volume 17, Article number: 61 (2024)
Abstract
The transcription factor WRKYs play pivotal roles in the adapting to adverse environments in plants. Prior research has demonstrated the involvement of OsWRKY70 in resistance against herbivores and its response to abiotic stress. Here, we reported the functional analysis of OsWRKY70 in immunity against fungal diseases and cold tolerance. The results revealed that OsWRKY70 was induced by various Magnaporthe oryzae strains. Knock out mutants of OsWRKY70, which were generated by the CRISPR/Cas9 system, exhibited enhanced resistance to M. oryzae. This was consistent with fortifying the reactive oxygen species (ROS) burst after inoculation in the mutants, elevated transcript levels of defense-responsive genes (OsPR1b, OsPBZ1, OsPOX8.1 and OsPOX22.3) and the observation of the sluggish growth of invasive hyphae under fluorescence microscope. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) validations demonstrated that differentially expressed genes were related to plant-pathogen interactions, hormone transduction and MAPK cascades. Notably, OsbHLH6, a key component of the JA signaling pathway, was down-regulated in the mutants compared to wild type plants. Further investigation confirmed that OsWRKY70 bound to the promoter of OsbHLH6 by semi-in vivo chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). Additionally, the loss-function of OsWRKY70 impaired cold tolerance in rice. The enhanced susceptibility in the mutants characterized by excessive ROS production, elevated ion leakage rate and increased malondialdehyde content, as well as decreased activity of catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) under low temperature stress was, which might be attributed to down-regulation of cold-responsive genes (OsLti6b and OsICE1). In conclusion, our findings indicate that OsWRKY70 negatively contributes to blast resistance but positively regulates cold tolerance in rice, providing a strategy for crop breeding with tolerance to stress.
Introduction
Plant growth and development are greatly affected by biotic and abiotic stresses, including pathogen attacks, insect herbivory, extreme temperatures, high salinity and various other factors. To adapt to adverse environments, plants have evolved intricate regulatory mechanisms at the molecular, physiological, biochemical and metabolic levels (Nejat et al. 2017). For example, after perceiving the stimulation, plants promptly and effectively initiate extensive transcriptional reprogramming of gene expression, generating a variety of signaling molecules, including phytohormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS), calcium ions (Ca2+) (Buscaill et al. 2014; Ng et al. 2018; Chen et al. 2020). This stress-responsive reprograming requires the coordinated and precise timing of the involvement of different types of transcription factors (TFs) in both temporal and spatial dimensions (Khan et al. 2018). Genetic and molecular studies have elucidated the functional attributes of TF families such as WRKY, AP2/ERF, NAC, MYB and bHLH in plants (Ng et al. 2018; Kajla et al. 2023).
WRKY TFs are among the largest transcriptional regulatory families in plants. These proteins were divided into three subgroups, namely groups I, II and III, according to the number of WRKY domains and the type of zinc finger structure (Eulgem et al. 2000; Rushton et al. 2010). Up to now, WRKY TFs have been identified in different plant species, including Arabidopsis thaliana, Glycine max, Gossypium hirsutum, Oryza sativa, Solanum tuberosum, Triticum aestivum, Zea mays (Khoso et al. 2022; Song et al. 2023; Javed et al. 2023). For instance, there are 90 and 128 WRKYs in Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa, respectively (Tian et al. 2020). Some WRKY TFs have been evaluated for their pivotal roles in plant growth and development (Wang et al. 2023a). For example, AtWRKY10 and AtWRKY41 are involved in seed development and dormancy (Ding et al. 2014; Xi et al. 2021), while AtWRKY23 promotes lateral root growth in Arabidopsis (Grunewald et al. 2012). The functions of OsWRKY11, OsWRKY36 and OsWRKY53 have been separately demonstrated in the flowering process, plant height and grain size in rice, respectively (Cai et al. 2014; Lan et al. 2020; Tian et al. 2017).
WRKY TFs serve as critical regulators in plant immune response, specifically binding to W-box cis-element (T)(T)TGAC(C/T) in the promoter region of target genes to modulate transcription (Bakshi et al. 2014; Viana et al. 2018; Saha et al. 2023). In Arabidopsis, at least 20 WRKY genes have been identified as playing significant roles in diseases or insect resistance, including AtWRKY28/33/55/70/75 (Li et al. 2006; Chen et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2019, 2020; Zhou et al. 2020; Saha et al. 2023). In rice, overexpression of OsWRKY67 up-regulates defense-related genes (PR1a, PR1b, PR4, PR10a and PR10b), as well as leads to rapid induction of ROS upon stimulation with chitin and flg22 (Liu et al. 2018). The adaptation results from the interplay between WRKYs and a variety of plant hormones. For example, OsWRKY72 directly binds to the promoter of AOS1, which is the jasmonic acid (JA) biosynthesis enzyme gene, negatively regulates JA synthesis and resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv oryzae (Xoo) infection (Hou et al. 2019). OsWRKY42 is a negative regulator to M. oryzae via repressing JA signaling and OsWRKY45-2 directly activates OsWRKY13, whose encoding protein in turn transcriptionally suppresses OsWRKY42/OsWRKY45-2 to regulate blast resistance (Cheng et al. 2015). OsNPR1, a key regulator of salicylic acid (SA)-mediated resistance against fungal, bacterial disease and herbivores (Yuan et al. 2007; Feng et al. 2011), is downstream of OsWRKY03 (Liu et al. 2005). Previous research has documented that WRKY TFs play critical roles in plant immune response as one of the downstream substrates of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades. For instance, OsMKK10-2-OsMPK3/OsMPK6-OsWRKY31 module participates in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolite camalexin to regulate defense for rice blast pathogen (Wang et al. 2023c). OsWRKY53 is downstream of MAPK cascades, meanwhile, it functions as a negative feedback modulator of OsMPK3/OsMPK6 in response to striped stem borer (SSB) (Hu et al. 2015). Moreover, OsWRKY53 acts as an early suppressor of induced defenses to mediate the MAPK-regulated OsWRKY24/33/70 expression, as well as SSB-induced JA, JA-isoleucine (JA-Ile) and ethylene (ET) biosynthesis (Hu et al. 2015). Collectively, these studies confirm that WRKY genes might contribute to multiple biotic stresses through complex signaling cascades such as ROS, plant hormones and MAPKs.
In the past decades, WRKYs have gained extensive attention due to their functions in involving tolerance against abiotic stress (Khoso et al. 2022; Goyal et al. 2023). For example, AtWRKY25/26/33 positively mediates tolerance to heat stress in Arabidopsis (Li et al. 2011). OsWRKY10 negatively regulates thermotolerance in rice by modulating ROS homeostasis and hypersensitive response (Chen et al. 2022). Overexpression of OsWRKY76 up-regulates peroxidase gene OsPrx71 and lipid metabolism gene OsBURP13/OsRAFTIN1, thus alleviating the damage of low temperatures in rice (Yokotani et al. 2013). Some studies have highlighted the relationship of abiotic stress with WRKY genes by regulating the dehydrate-responsive element binding proteins (DREBs) or C-repeat binding factors (CBFs). In particular, the OsWRKY63-OsWRKY76-OsDREB1B signaling cascade module is involved in the regulation of chilling tolerance (Zhang et al. 2022b). OsWRKY28 confers salinity tolerance by directly activating OsDREB1B in rice (Zhang et al. 2023). Additionally, overexpression of OsWRKY55 reduced drought tolerance, is consistent with accelerated water loss and massive accumulation of ROS (Huang et al. 2021).
It has been confirmed that several OsWRKY TFs play multiple roles in the adaptation to both biotic and abiotic stress in rice. For instance, OsWRKY10 is involved in resistance to fungus and thermotolerance (Wang et al. 2023b; Chen et al. 2022). OsWRKY24 positively regulates fungal disease resistance, which has been identified as a potential candidate gene affecting cold sensitivity (Yokotani et al. 2018; Wu et al. 2023). OsWRKY53 acts as a negative modulator in resistance of bacterial blight, cold and salt tolerance (Xie et al. 2021; Tang et al. 2022b; Yu et al. 2023), as well as a positive regulator in blast resistance (Chujo et al. 2007). OsWRKY76 plays opposite roles in blast resistance and cold stress tolerance (Yokotani et al. 2013). Empirical evidence suggests that the adaption of a variety of stress is associated with the crosstalk between WRKYs and phytohormones. For example, overexpression of OsWRKY13 enhanced rice resistance to M. oryzae and Xoo, which was accompanied by the activation of SA signaling pathways and the suppression of JA signaling pathways (Qiu et al. 2007). OsWRKY45-1 and OsWRKY45-2 are involved in JA and SA signaling, whereas they play opposite roles in bacterial disease resistance (Tao et al. 2009). In addition, OsWRKY45-1 and OsWRKY45-2 act as negative and positive regulators in abscisic acid (ABA) signaling, respectively, while only the latter negatively regulates the tolerance of salt stress (Tao et al. 2011). Furthermore, knock out of OsWRKY53 mutants confer rice cold tolerance at the booting stage by repressing the anther gibberellin content (Tang et al. 2022b). Therefore, WRKY proteins are potentially important components in plant biotic and abiotic stress responses and are associated with an array of signaling crosstalk.
OsWRKY70 encodes a rice WRKY TF belonging to group I, characterized by the presence of two WRKY domains (Zhang et al. 2015; Li et al. 2023). The resistance to herbivores of OsWRKY70 in rice has been investigated (Li et al. 2015; Ye et al. 2019). However, whether and how OsWRKY70 affects rice immunity to fungal disease and its association with abiotic stress have not been reported. Our previous study has demonstrated that OsWRKY70 is induced by cold stress (Li et al. 2023). Here, we observed that the transcript level of OsWRKY70 was up-regulated by different strains of M. oryzae. The biological functions of OsWRKY70 were also investigated using knock out mutants of OsWRKY70. Our findings revealed that the loss-function of OsWRKY70 drastically enhanced resistance against M. oryzae, while attenuating cold tolerance in rice, demonstrating that OsWRKY70 plays opposite roles in immunity and cold stress response.
Results
OsWRKY70 is a Fungal Pathogen-Induced Gene
The previous finding that OsWRKY70 acts as an early regulator of plant response to herbivores (Li et al. 2015) inspired us to investigate its potential role in immunity against fungal diseases. We first assessed the expression level of OsWRKY70 by quantitative PCR (qPCR) after spray inoculation with M. oryzae strain 318-2. The results showed that the transcript level of OsWRKY70 was rapidly up-regulated upon infection, achieving a peak of 11.4-fold at 24 h post-inoculation (hpi) (Fig. 1A). To confirm whether the specific fungal pathogens, strains R01-1 and 110-2 were examined. Obviously, the expression of OsWRKY70 was significantly induced by these strains, resulting in an increase of 9.5-fold and 15.6-fold at 48 hpi, respectively (Fig. 1B, C). Overall, these results indicate that OsWRKY70 exhibits distinct responses to diverse fungal pathogens.
Generation and Characterization of OsWRKY70 Knock Out Mutants
To elucidate the function of OsWRKY70, two homozygous mutants, designated oswrky70-7 and oswrky70-10, were generated by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing. They exhibited a single base A and T insertion in the target sequence of OsWRKY70, respectively (Fig. 2A), resulting in the early termination of translation and thus loss of the conserved WRKY domain (Fig. 2B). Under field condition, our observations revealed that there was no significant difference between the mutants and wild type in terms of plant height, the tiller count, flag leaf and panicle length (Fig. 2C, D; Supplemental Table 2). Interestingly, the grain length of the mutants was notably greater than that of wild type, while the grain width exhibited a slight increase in oswrky70-10, resulting in a promotion in 1000-grain weight of mutants as compared to wild type (Fig. 2E-I). These results suggest that the loss-function of OsWRKY70 affects rice grain shape rather than its growth and development.
Loss-Function of OsWRKY70 Enhances Resistance Against M. Oryzae
To ascertain the involvement of OsWRKY70 in rice blast resistance, we first performed spray inoculation on 2-week-old seedlings with M. oryzae 318-2. At 5 days post-inoculation (dpi), the mutants exhibited a reduced overall severity blast compared to wild type (Fig. 3A), as determined by a decrease in the lesion numbers by approximately 47.2% (Fig. 3B). Next, measurement of fungal growth in planta, as revealed by analyzing the genomic DNA level of the MoPOT2 gene of M. oryzae, indicated that oswrky70-7 and oswrky70-10 supported less fungal growth, resulting in a reduction of 73.3% and 97.0%, respectively, as compared with that in wild type (Fig. 3C). Additionally, we conducted inoculation to detached leaves and punch-inoculated at 4-week-old seedings with strain 318-2. Consistent with previous findings, the mutants were less susceptible to rice blast than wild type, manifesting as significantly reduced disease lesions and lower fungal biomass (Fig. 3D-F; Figure S1). To further investigate the growth characteristics of M. oryzae spores, we infected rice leaf sheath with GFP-tagged strain RB22. At 24 hpi, we observed that almost no appressoria were formed in the leaf sheath cells of mutants, whereas maturing appressoria were found in those of wild type (Fig. 3G). At 48 hpi, only a limited number of invasive hyphae with no branch were present in the mutant cells, while numerous invasive hyphae freely spread to adjacent cells in wild type (Fig. 3H). Collectively, these results demonstrate that OsWRKY70 negatively regulates rice immune response against M. oryzae.
ROS Accumulation and Up-Regulated Defense Responsive Genes Enhance Resistance Against M. Oryzae in the Mutants
ROS bursts typically trigger plant defense responses (Li et al. 2021). Firstly, we conducted the analysis of ROS in the mutants and wild type after inoculation with M. oryzae by histochemical staining. The results showed that the presence of numerous reddish-brown spots on the leaves of mutants upon staining with 3, 3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB) and a significant increase in the number of blue dots were observed on the mutant leaves by nitro-blue tetrazolium (NBT) staining compared with those of wild type (Fig. 4A, B). The findings indicate that enhanced accumulation of H2O2 and superoxide anion probably contribute to resistance against rice blast disease. Subsequently, we investigated the expression patterns of defense-related genes. The results revealed that OsPBZ1, OsPOX8.1 and OsPOX22.3 were dramatically up-regulated in the mutants compared to wild type before inoculation, except for OsPR1b (Fig. 4C-F). Upon exposure M. oryzae strain 318-2, all four genes were a particularly notable up-regulation in the mutants compared with wild type (Fig. 4C-F). It suggests that loss-function of OsWRKY70 activate defense response, which might play a pivotal role in response to biotic stress in rice.
Transcriptome Analysis of OsWRKY70 Knock Out Mutant and qPCR Analysis
To further elucidate mechanisms underlying OsWRKY70-mediated immunity response in rice, we examined gene expression differences between oswrky70-7 (W7) and NIP (N) under normal condition and 48 h post-inoculation with M. oryzae using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Sample correlation and principal components analysis (PCA) of all genes showed that the three replicates of each treatment clustered together, suggesting good biological replicability (Supplemental Fig. 2). Rice genes whose transcript abundance showed a fold change (FC) ≥ 2 and false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.01 were defined as differentially expressed genes (DEGs). We observed significant clustering differences between W7 and N under normal condition, which identified 2210 DEGs, including 1205 up-regulated and 1005 down-regulated genes. The data revealed that knock out of OsWRKY70 led to different transcript profiles. Additionally, a comparison of W7 and N at 48 hpi revealed 968 DEGs, containing 482 up-regulated genes, as well as 486 down-regulated genes in the mutant (Supplemental Fig. 2). However, the differences were not significantly enlarged by biotic stress.
KEGG classification illuminated the functional roles of these DEGs were mainly enriched into such as plant-pathogen interaction, plant hormone signal transduction, MAPK signal cascade and other metabolic processes (Fig. 5A, B). Among them, several encoding putative NBS-LRR disease resistance protein genes, LOC_Os11g44960, LOC_Os11g45050 and LOC_Os11g45180, as well as the gene LOC_Os07g44130 in phenylpropanoids metabolism were significantly up-regulated in W7 (Fig. 5C). In addition, OsbHLH6, OsUGT74H4 and OsWRKY76 were negative regulators of disease resistance involved in JA, SA and MAPK cascade signaling, respectively (Yokotani et al. 2013; Meng et al. 2020; Wu et al. 2022), were also dramatically down-regulated in the mutant after inoculation (Fig. 5C). The findings indicate that complex regulatory networks are activated in timely manners, which is crucial for rice blast resistance. To further screen candidate downstream target genes associated with the immune response of OsWRKY70, the leaves of 2-week-old mutants and wild type were individually collected for qPCR analysis after inoculation. The results revealed that the expression level of hormone, MAPK signaling and metabolic process genes was consistent with the RNA-seq analysis (Fig. 5D-I).
OsWRKY70 Interacts with Promoter of OsbHLH6 in Vitro
Our finding revealed that the expression level of OsbHLH6 was down-regulated in the mutants (Fig. 5E). To further explore whether OsbHLH6 is the candidate target gene of OsWRKY70 in immune response, we initially analyzed the promoter region of OsbHLH6 and found ten W-box elements (Supplemental Table 3; Fig. 6A). Notably, the candidate fragments encompassed one or two core sequences (TGAC) characteristic of W-box. Then, we conducted a semi-in vivo chromosome immunoprecipitation qPCR (ChIP-qPCR) assay to verify the interaction, which employed the purified recombinant His-OsWRKY70 protein (Fig. 6B; Supplemental Fig. 3) and DNA fragments of rice genomic. The ChIP-qPCR results confirmed a significant approximately 4.0-fold enrichment of the P1 fragment in His-OsWRKY70 compared to the His control, while no enrichment was observed for the P2 fragment (Fig. 6C). These findings suggest that OsbHLH6 might serve as a downstream target gene for OsWRKY70.
Loss-Function of OsWRKY70 Impairs Cold Tolerance in Rice
Our previous study that OsWRKY70 was induced by cold stress (Li et al. 2023) prompted us to investigate whether OsWRKY70 is involved in cold tolerance. Consequently, 2-week-old seedlings were subjected to 4 °C for 3 days and returned to normal growth conditions for a recovery period of 7 days. The mutants exhibited pronounced leaf curling symptoms after cold stress and a significant proportion of them could not be recovered compared with wild type (Fig. 7A), demonstrating that OsWRKY70 is a positive regulator of cold tolerance in rice. This observation is consistent with the survival rate of oswrky70-7 and oswrky70-10, which were 25.3% and 3.3%, compared to 42.7% of wild type (Fig. 7B). Moreover, higher levels of electrolyte leakage and MDA content were in the mutants than that in wild type (Fig. 7C, D). We further performed histochemical staining to detect ROS bursts in rice plants. After cold treatment, deeper reddish brown and darker bluish-purple spots in the mutant leaves than that in wild type by DAB and NBT staining (Fig. 8A, B), reflecting excessive H2O2 and superoxide anion in the mutants, respectively. Subsequently, the activity of two antioxidant enzymes crucial for scavenging ROS was examined. A significant decrease in CAT activity was observed in the oswrky70-7 compared to wild type at 24 h after cold treatment (Fig. 8C). Especially, oswrky70-10 exhibited approximately 30% decline after 12 h of cold treatment compared to wild type (Fig. 8C). Similarly, POD activity significantly reduced after exposure to cold for 12 h in the mutants. These results indicate that an imbalance of ROS homeostasis contributes to cellular oxidative membrane damage in OsWRKY70-regulated cold tolerance in rice. To assess the potential downstream genes of OsWRKY70 in response to cold, we detected the expression level of OsLti6b, OsICE1 and OsCOLD1, which are cold-related genes (Kim et al. 2007; Ma et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2017). The results revealed that the mutants showed down-regulation of OsLti6b and OsICE1, while no significant difference in the expression of OsCOLD1 was observed (Fig. 8E-G), implying that knock out of OsWRKY70 attenuates cold tolerance in rice presumably due to the suppressed expression of OsLti6b and OsICE1.
Discussion
Transcription factor OsWRKY70, a member of WRKY group I, has been established to function as a transcriptional activator (Li et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2015). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that OsWRKY70 shares up to 52.43% and 62.87% amino acids identities with OsWRKY24 and OsWRKY53, respectively (Li et al. 2023). Repression of OsWRKY24 (Yokotani et al. 2018) and overexpression of OsWRKY53 (Chujo et al. 2007) confers blast resistance in rice. Our findings demonstrated that knock out of OsWRKY70 mutants enhanced resistance against M. oryzae (Fig. 3; Figure S1), implying that OsWRKY70 negatively regulates the fungal immunity in rice. However, it seems paradoxical that the increased transcriptional expression level of OsWRKY70 upon infection (Fig. 1). Similarly, this feedback-like has been reported in some rice TFs. For instance, OsbHLH6 and ONAC083, which are induced by inoculation with M. oryzae, act as negative regulators of disease resistance (Bi et al. 2023; Meng et al. 2020). Additionally, OsWRKY24, OsWRKY53 and OsWRKY70 may be functionally redundant in grain regulation (Tang et al. 2022a). Considering that predicted interactions of these proteins (data have no shown), we presume that up-regulated OsWRKY70 might be involved in adjusting the intensity of defense response by cooperating with OsWRKY24 or OsWRKY53 to protect the plant from biotic stress. Therefore, further generation of double and triple mutant plants for these genes will contribute to elucidating the molecular mechanism of blast resistance. Our KEGG analysis revealed that the altered genes are involved in plant-pathogen interactions, hormone signaling transduction, MAPK cascades and so on, indicating that OsWRKY70 is a key component of immunity response (Fig. 5). Plant NBS-LRR genes, a class of the resistance (R) genes, encode immune receptors that help defend against pathogens infection (Wang et al. 2023d). For instance, rice NBS-LRR protein Pit interacts with OsRac1 and induces the generation of ROS and hypersensitive response to resist the invasion of M. oryzae (Kawano et al. 2014). Pi63 encodes a typical NBS-LRR protein, whose expression level is closely related to disease resistance (Xu et al. 2014). In our study, LOC_Os11g44960, LOC_Os11g45050 and LOC_Os11g45180, which are assumed to encode NBS-LRR proteins, were up-regulated expression in the mutant (Fig. 5C). It is suggested that these genes might be conferred to the resistance to blast. The activation of the JA signaling pathway improved resistance against disease in rice (Okada et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2021; Qiu et al. 2022). OsbHLH6, a transcription activator, negatively regulates rice blast resistance, which has been shown to play a pivotal role in modulating the JA and SA signaling pathways (Kiribuchi et al. 2004; Meng et al. 2020). Knock out of the OsbHLH6 mutant downregulates the expression of OsJAZ family genes, which exhibits severe damage upon exposure to herbivores (Valea et al. 2022). In our study, the OsbHLH6 gene transcript significantly decreased in oswrky70-7 and oswrky70-10 mutants before and after inoculation compared to the wild type (Fig. 5C, E). Given the finding that OsWRKY70 enhances rice herbivore resistance to SSB mediated by JA signaling (Li et al. 2015), we hypothesized that OsbHLH6 might be a potential downstream target of OsWRKY70. Then, we analyzed the promoter of OsbHLH6 and further confirmed the binding of OsWRKY70 using a semi-in vivo ChIP assay (Fig. 6). Therefore, it would be interesting in our future work to verify the interactions in vivo by ChIP and to generate their double mutant plants for exploring the regulatory relationships. Advanced thinking is that JA and SA signaling crosstalk commonly manifests as a reciprocal antagonism or adaptation (Thaler et al. 2012). In our work, the transcript level of OsUGT74H4 was decreased in mutant after infection by RNA-seq analysis (Fig. 5C). OsUGT74H4 may inactivate SA through glycosylation modification, negatively regulating the resistance of rice to bacterial diseases (Wu et al. 2022). Both positive and negative transcriptional regulations of SA biosynthesis are required to fine-tune the SA levels for optimal defense without causing unnecessary fitness costs (Ding et al. 2020). Therefore, we suspect that knock out of OsWRKY70 might affect SA content in response to fungal pathogen infection. Phenylpropanoids are considered to be secondary metabolites involved in plant defense responses (Kishi-Kaboshi et al. 2010). Previous research has revealed that CYP72A1, the cytochrome P450 gene, positively regulates the production of ROS and the accumulation of defense-related secondary metabolites in basic immune response (Zhang et al. 2022a). The Cinnamate-4-hydroxylase (C4H) belongs to the cytochrome monooxygenase, which is the second key enzyme in the phenylpropane metabolic pathway (Yang et al. 2005). According to our transcriptome analysis, there were more than 20 DEGs in Phenylpropanoids biosynthesis without and after inoculation (Fig. 5A). Among them, LOC_Os07g44130, which encodes putative cytochrome P450, was up-regulated more than 5.5-fold in mutants after infection (Fig. 5H). Thus, it is also worthy of further study and exploration of issues that OsWRKY70 participates in phenylpropanoids biosynthesis to adapt to biotic stress.
The loss-function of OsWRKY70 mutants reduced tolerance to cold stress (Fig. 7), suggesting that OsWRKY70 is a positive regulator of cold tolerance. It has been demonstrated that chilling usually causes excessive ROS accumulation in rice (Marchi et al. 2012; Zhang et al. 2022b; Zhai et al. 2024). OsWRKY63 and OsWRKY76 might affect ROS homeostasis in the regulation of cold tolerance (Yokotani et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2022b). We observed that knock out of OsWRKY70 mutants accumulated a large amount of H2O2 and superoxide anion under cold stress condition (Fig. 8A, B). This is consistent with the measurement of reduced activities of CAT and POD, as well as increased electrolyte leakage levels and MDA content (Figs. 7C and D and 8C and D). Cold tolerance is primarily regulated by cold-responsive (COR) regulon (Wani et al. 2021). Our findings revealed that the expression level of OsLti6b and OsICE1 was significantly down-regulated in mutants (Fig. 8E, F), which has been documented to positively regulate cold tolerance in rice (Kim et al. 2007; Nakamura et al. 2011; Xia et al. 2021). What is more, COR regulon also mediates the expression of AtWRKY6/22/30/40/32/187 (Banerjee et al. 2015; Wani et al. 2021), hinting that there may be feedback or cooperation between OsWRKY70 and COR regulon in chilling stress. Unlike cold-responsive genes, OsCOLD1 is involved in sensing cold to trigger Ca2+ signaling for chilling tolerance (Ma et al. 2015). There were no differences in the transcript level of OsCOLD1 between the mutants and wild type before and after cold treatment (Fig. 8G), suggesting that OsCOLD1 may be the upstream of OsWRKY70-mediated signaling. Additionally, the changes in OsCOLD1 protein structure and membrane fluidity in response to low temperature might initiate signaling (Ma et al. 2015). Thus, another possibility is that the mutation of OsWRKY70 affects the structure and dynamics of OsCOLD1 to regulate cold tolerance.
We demonstrated that OsWRKY70 functions as a negative regulator of rice against M. oryzae while a positive regulator of cold tolerance in rice (Figs. 3 and 7). Previous findings showed that temperature is an important factor affecting the occurrence of rice blast. For instance, cold summers increase the frequency and severity of fungal pathogen disease and bring heavy yield losses in the northern regions of Japan (Hironori et al. 2004). The blast lesion area and fungal growth in the inoculated seedlings at a warm temperature, 22 °C, is greater than those at 28 °C (Qiu et al. 2022). Additionally, 22 °C compromises basal resistance in rice by reducing JA biosynthesis and signaling (Qiu et al. 2022), suggesting that JA are involved in temperature-modulated plant resistance. We found that knock out of OsWRKY70 mutants down-regulated OsbHLH6 expression in response to rice blast (Fig. 5E). However, the regulatory relationship between OsWRKY70 and OsbHLH6 whether involving temperature-mediated fungal pathogen resistance is yet to be clarified. In addition, more and more evidences imply that WRKY TFs are involved in the MAPK signaling pathway to adapt to biotic stress. For example, OsMKK10-20-OsMPK6 pathway is required for OsWRKY45-mediated resistance against M. oryzae (Ueno et al. 2013). OsWRKY31, which is phosphorylated by OsMPKs, elevates DNA-binding activity and confers enhanced blast resistance in rice (Wang et al. 2023c). Previously, OsMPK3 and OsMPK6 regulates OsWRKY70 in herbivore resistance (Li et al. 2015). OsMPK3, phosphorylated and activated by the calcium-dependent protein kinase CPK18, negatively regulates rice blast resistance (Xie et al. 2014). In addition to biotic stress, MAPK cascades have also been confirmed to confer abiotic stress responses, including chilling, salt and drought. For instance, OsICE1 is phosphorylated by OsMPK3, resulting in inhibition of OsICE1 ubiquitination and enhanced resistance to chilling damage (Zhang et al. 2017). Furthermore, OsMPK3 has positively modulated salt tolerance by attenuating the accumulation of ROS (Zhang et al. 2018). Consequently, further validation of the interaction with OsMPK3 and OsWRKY70 will contribute to aid in elucidating the molecular mechanism in response to fungal pathogen infection and cold stress.
Materials and methods
Plants and Pathogens
The wild type rice Oryza sativa L. japonica ‘Nipponbare’ (NIP) was used to generate knock out of OsWRKY70 mutants in this study. All rice seeds were soaked in culture dishes with water at 37℃ for one day. On the second day, the seeds were rinse for 2–3 times and added a small amount water to promote germination at 37 °C. Then, the seeds with same germination state were planted to the substrate soil. The plants were grown under normal conditions (25–28℃, 14 h light/10 h dark photoperiod, 50–75% relative humidity). For agronomic trait analysis, the tiller count, flag leaf, panicle length, grain length, grain width and 1000-grain weight of these plants were grown in the paddy fields of Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Magnaporthe oryzae strains 318-2 from College of Agronomy in Hunan Agricultural University, as well as M. oryzae strains 110-2, R01-1 and GFP-tagged RB22 from Institute of Plant Protection in Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, were cultured on oatmeal agar for 2 weeks at 28 °C and the spores were collected with sterile water containing 0.02% Tween-20. For M. oryzae strains treatment, 2-week-old seedlings of NIP were inoculated using M. strains 318-2, 110-2 and R01-1 for gene expression analysis of OsWRKY70. The plants were sprayed with spores of M. oryzae strains (2 × 105 spores/mL), covered with a plastic box in the dark for 24 h (25–28 °C, approximately 100% relative humidity) and transferred to normal alternation of light and dark (25–28 °C, approximately 100% relative humidity). Leaf samples were collected at 0, 24 and 48 h post-inoculation, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C until use. Each treatment was performed with three biological replicates. The control plants (0 h) were left blast-free.
Generation of OsWRKY70 Knock Out Mutants
For the construction of knock out of OsWRKY70 vector, the sequence (5’-GGACGAGCAGCAACAGTACT-3’) of OsWRKY70 genomic locus was conducted as the guide RNA through CRISPR Primer Designer v1.1.2. We designed two primers sequences (LP: 5’-TGGCGGGACGAGCAGCAACAGTACT-3’; RP: 5’-AAACAGTACTGTTGCTGCTCGTCCC-3’) to synthesized the sgRNA expression cassette. This sequence was inserted into the pHUN4c12 plasmid, which was linearized using Bsa I enzyme (NEB, USA). The vectors were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 through electroporation, which were further used to transform the rice callus. After screening with hygromycin and sequence confirmation, two homozygous knockouts oswrky70-7 and oswrky70-10 were obtained and the T3 generation seedlings were used for further analysis in this work. The primers used in the plant vector construction and identification are listed in Table S1.
Fungal Pathogen Resistance Experiment
For spraying with M. oryzae spores (2 × 105 spores/mL), 2-week-old transgenic seedlings were used for pathogen infection. Leaves were collected at 0 and 24 h post-inoculation for expression analysis of defense-related genes. After inoculation for 5 d, the lesions were scanned and leaves were collected for DNA extraction to evaluate the relative fungal growth. The qRT-PCR was measured to analyze and compare the genomic level of M. oryzae POT2 in wild type and the mutant leaves with that of the rice OsActin as an internal control. All of primers were listed in Table S1.
For detached leaf inoculation, leaves of 4-week-old rice seedlings were cut into pieces (about 5 cm × 1 cm) and float on the distilled water in culture dishes. Apply a drop of the spore suspension (10 µL of 4 × 105 spores/mL) to the wound of each leaf and keep the dishes at 25–28℃ for 5 days. (Darkness is not required). The lesions were photographed and measured at 5 d post-inoculation and leaves were collected for detecting relative biomass.
For punch inoculation, 4-week-old seedlings grown in the field were made a wound using a hole punch. 10 µL spore suspension (4 × 105 spores/mL) was dropped onto wound. The inoculated region was wrapped with tape to maintain humidity. At 5 d post-inoculation, the lesions were pictured and surveyed. Leaf samples were conducted for measuring relative growth of M. oryzae. Blast inoculation was performed as previously described (Gu et al. 2023). M. oryzae strain 318-2 was used for rice blast inoculation. All experiments were independently repeated at least three times.
For leaf sheaths infection, detached sheaths of 4-week-old rice plants were inoculated with GFP-tagged M. oryzae strain RB22 spores (4 × 105 spores/mL) and kept on dished with approximately 100% humidity for 24 h and 48 h in the dark. Images of conidial germination, appressorium development and invasive hyphal growth were recorded using a fluorescence microscope (Mshot, China).
Evaluation of Cold Tolerance
For cold stress tolerance assay, 2-week-old knock out of OsWRKY70 mutants and wild type plants were grown under normal condition and then transferred into a growth chamber with the temperature set at 4 °C with a cycle of 14 h light/10 h dark for 3 days, followed by transferring to the growth room with the normal condition for recovery. Plants with green leaves and healthy young leaves after transferring to the normal growth condition were considered as survivals and surviving plants were evaluated at 7 days after recovery from cold treatment. Survival rate was calculated as the ratio of the number of survived plants over the total number of treated plants. Leaf samples at 0 and 24 h were used for determination of malondialdehyde (MDA) content and electric conductivity using the colorimetric method and electrical conductivity meter, respectively (Guan et al. 2012). Leaves at 0, 12 and 24 h were measured the enzyme activity catalase (CAT) and Leaves at 0 and 12 h were detected the peroxidase (POD) activity, as previously described (Wang et al. 2022). Leaves were collected at 0 and 24 h for expression analysis of cold-related genes. The specific primers were exhibited in Table S1. Cold treatment in each of the experiments included three biological replicates with at least 15 plants and the experiments were independently repeated three times.
Histochemical Staining Analysis
For fungal pathogen infection, 2-week-old seedlings of wild type and oswrky70 mutants were sprayed with M. oryzae 318-2 spores (2 × 105 spores/mL) for detection of ROS burst. Leaf samples were collected at 0 and 24 h post-inoculation to carry out Histochemical Staining. For cold stress treatment, 2-week-old transgenic plants were transferred to a growth chamber with temperature set at 4℃. Leaf samples were collected at 0 and 6 h after treatment. 3, 3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB) and nitro-blue tetrazolium (NBT) staining for H2O2 and superoxide anion accumulation in plants, respectively, were conducted as previously described (Jambunathan 2010).
DNA Extraction
Rice leaf genomic DNA was extracted, according to the CTAB method (Semagn et al. 2014).
RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real‑Time PCR
Total RNA was extracted using Ultrapure RNA Kit (Cwbio, China). RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using HiScript III 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Vazyme, China). Quantitative Real‑Time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, China). The reaction was carried out in the CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, USA). Rice OsActin gene was used as an internal standard to normalize. All of primers used for mRNA detection of target genes are shown in Table S1. Three replicate experiments were performed for each sample. The relative quantitation method (2−ΔΔCT) was used to evaluate quantitative variation among replicates.
Expression and Purification of Recombinant Protein
The full-length cDNA of OsWRKY70 was PCR-amplified and cloned into the pCold-TF vector (Takara, Japan). Specific primers used for PCR amplification for this gene are listed in Table S1. The constructs were transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) (Vazyme, China). OsWRKY70 recombinant protein was induced by adding 0.4 mM isopropyl-β-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 15˚C for 24 h. Cells were collected and the recombinant protein was purified using ProteinIso® Ni-NTA Resin for His (TransGen, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Transcriptome Analysis
Libraries for RNA-seq were constructed and sequenced by Biomarker Technologies Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). Briefly, RNAs were quantified by NanoDrop 2000c UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), agarose gel electrophoresis and Agient2100/LabChip GX. mRNAs were isolated from total RNAs by poly (A) selection, fragmented into short fragments and converted to cDNAs. cDNAs were ligated to adapters and the suitable fragments were selected for PCR amplification as templates. All the RNA-seq libraries were pair-end sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq6000 platform. mRNA sequencing data analysis were performed as reported (Love et al. 2014). Low-quality reads were removed and adapters were trimmed to obtain clean reads, which were mapped to the reference genome (Oryza_sativa.MSU_v7.0.genome.fa). Transcriptome analysis was performed using BMKCloud (www.biocloud.net). The expression level of each gene was calculated as the FPKM value (fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads). For differential gene expression analysis, fold change (FC) ≥ 2 and false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.01 as screening criteria. Fold Change represents the ratio of expression between two samples (groups). False Discovery Rate (FDR) is obtained by correcting for the difference significance p-value (p-value), indicating the significance of the difference.
Semi-Vivo Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assay
The analysis of ChIP was conducted as previously described (Li et al. 2017). Total DNA of Nipponbare and purified His-OsWRKY70 were used for a semi-vivo chromatin immunoprecipitation (semi-vivo ChIP) assay. 2-week-old seedlings were used for total DNA extraction. The total DNA was sheared into 200–800 bp fragments using ultrasonic crusher. The His fusion protein was affinity-purified on Ni-NTA Resin. His-OsWRKY70 and DNA fragments were co-incubated for 2 h. The incubation buffer includes: 50 mM Tris, 1mM EDTA, 100 mM KCl, adjust pH to 7.0 by HCl, 5% Glycerol, 0.1% Triton X-100; add freshly-made 100 mM DTT to reaction solution to make final concentration of DTT at 1 mM. After co-incubation, Ni-NTA Resin was washed three times using incubation buffer. Then 4 µL 5 M NaCl was added into the sample for each 100 µL volume and was incubated for 4 h to break down cross-linked His-OsWRKY70 and DNA fragments. The prepared DNA in ChIP was applied for qRT-PCR using respective primer pairs (Table S1) in a ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix with a CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System. PCR reactions were performed in triplicate for each sample and the expression levels were normalized to the input sample for enrichment detection. The fold enrichment was calculated against OsActin No addition of antibodies (NoAbs) served as a negative control.
Data Analysis
For qRT-PCR analyzes, disease assays, agronomic traits assessment and cold tolerance assays significant differences between samples/lines and the corresponding controls were analyzed using two-tailed Student’s t test for pairwise comparisons.
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Abbreviations
- JA:
-
Jasmonic acid
- SA:
-
Salicylic acid
- ABA:
-
Abscisic acid
- ROS:
-
Reactive oxygen species
- MAPK:
-
Mitogen-activated protein kinase
- DAB:
-
3, 3’-diaminobenzidine
- NBT:
-
Nitro-blue tetrazolium
- POD:
-
Peroxidase
- CAT:
-
Catalase
- MDA:
-
Malondialdehyde
- DEG:
-
Differentially expressed gene
- KEGG:
-
Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes
- PCA:
-
Principal component analysis
- PCR:
-
Polymerase chain reaction
- qRT-PCR:
-
Quantitative real‑time PCR
- ChIP:
-
Chromatin immunoprecipitation
References
Bakshi M, Oelmüller R (2014) WRKY transcription factors: Jack of many trades in plants. Plant Signal Behav 9:e27700. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.27700
Banerjee A, Roychoudhury A (2015) WRKY proteins: signaling and regulation of expression during abiotic stress responses. ScientificWorldJournal 2015:807560. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/807560
Bi Y, Wang H, Yuan X, Yan Y, Li D, Song F (2023) The NAC transcription factor ONAC083 negatively regulates rice immunity against Magnaporthe oryzae by directly activating transcription of the RING-H2 gene OsRFPH2-6. J Integr Plant Biol 65:854–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13399
Buscaill P, Rivas S (2014) Transcriptional control of plant defence responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 20:35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2014.04.004
Cai Y, Chen X, Xie K, Xing Q, Wu Y, Li J, Du C, Sun Z, Guo Z (2014) Dlf1, a WRKY transcription factor, is involved in the control of flowering time and plant height in rice. PLoS ONE 9:e102529. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102529
Chen X, Liu J, Lin G, Wang A, Wang Z, Lu G (2013) Overexpression of AtWRKY28 and AtWRKY75 in Arabidopsis enhances resistance to oxalic acid and sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant Cell Rep 32:1589–1599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-013-1469-3
Chen J, Clinton M, Qi G, Wang D, Liu F, Fu ZQ (2020) Reprogramming and remodeling: transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of salicylic acid-mediated plant defense. J Exp Bot 71:5256–5268. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa072
Chen S, Cao H, Huang B, Zheng X, Liang K, Wang G-L, Sun X (2022) The WRKY10-VQ8 module safely and effectively regulates rice thermotolerance. Plant Cell Environ 45:2126–2144. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14329
Cheng H, Liu H, Deng Y, Xiao J, Li X, Wang S (2015) The WRKY45-2 WRKY13 WRKY42 transcriptional regulatory cascade is required for rice resistance to fungal pathogen. Plant Physiol 167:1087–1099. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.256016
Chujo T, Takai R, Akimoto-Tomiyama C, Ando S, Minami E, Nagamura Y, Kaku H, Shibuya N, Yasuda M, Nakashita H, Umemura K, Okada A, Okada K, Nojiri H, Yamane H (2007) Involvement of the elicitor-induced gene OsWRKY53 in the expression of defense-related genes in rice. Biochim Biophys Acta 1769:497–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbaexp.2007.04.006
Ding P, Ding Y (2020) Stories of salicylic acid: a Plant Defense hormone. Trends Plant Sci 25:549–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2020.01.004
Ding ZJ, Yan JY, Li GX, Wu ZC, Zhang SQ, Zheng SJ (2014) WRKY41 controls Arabidopsis seed dormancy via direct regulation of ABI3 transcript levels not downstream of ABA. Plant J 79:810–823. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12597
Eulgem T, Rushton PJ, Robatzek S, Somssich IE (2000) The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci 5:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01600-9
Feng J-X, Cao L, Li J, Duan C-J, Luo X-M, Le N, Wei H, Liang S, Chu C, Pan Q, Tang J-L (2011) Involvement of OsNPR1/NH1 in rice basal resistance to blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Eur J Plant Pathol 131:221–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-011-9801-7
Goyal P, Devi R, Verma B, Hussain S, Arora P, Tabassum R, Gupta S (2023) WRKY transcription factors: evolution, regulation, and functional diversity in plants. Protoplasma 260:331–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-022-01794-7
Grunewald W, De Smet I, Lewis DR, Löfke C, Jansen L, Goeminne G, Vanden Bossche R, Karimi M, De Rybel B, Vanholme B, Teichmann T, Boerjan W, Van Montagu MCE, Gheysen G, Muday GK, Friml J, Beeckman T (2012) Transcription factor WRKY23 assists auxin distribution patterns during Arabidopsis root development through local control on flavonol biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:1554–1559. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121134109
Gu X, Si F, Feng Z, Li S, Liang D, Yang P, Yang C, Yan B, Tang J, Yang Y, Li T, Li L, Zhou J, Li J, Feng L, Liu J-Y, Yang Y, Deng Y, Wu XN, Zhao Z, Wan J, Cao X, Song X, He Z, Liu J (2023) The OsSGS3-tasiRNA-OsARF3 module orchestrates abiotic-biotic stress response trade-off in rice. Nat Commun 14:4441. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40176-2
Guan Q, Takano T, Liu S (2012) Genetic transformation and analysis of rice OsAPx2 gene in Medicago sativa. PLoS ONE 7:e41233. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041233
Hironori K, Koji D, Masashi M (2004) Abscisic acid and low temperatures suppress the whole plant-specific resistance reaction of rice plants to the infection of Magnaporthe Grisea. Physiol Mol Plant P 65:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2004.11.002
Hou Y, Wang Y, Tang L, Tong X, Wang L, Liu L, Huang S, Zhang J (2019) SAPK10-Mediated phosphorylation on WRKY72 releases its suppression on Jasmonic Acid Biosynthesis and bacterial blight resistance. iScience 16:499–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2019.06.009
Hu L, Ye M, Li R, Zhang T, Zhou G, Wang Q, Lu J, Lou Y (2015) The Rice transcription factor WRKY53 suppresses Herbivore-Induced defenses by acting as a negative feedback modulator of Mitogen-activated protein kinase activity. Plant Physiol 169:2907–2921. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01090
Huang K, Wu T, Ma Z, Li Z, Chen H, Zhang M, Bian M, Bai H, Jiang W, Du X (2021) Rice transcription factor OsWRKY55 is involved in the Drought Response and Regulation of Plant Growth. Int J Mol Sci 22:4337. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094337
Jambunathan N (2010) Determination and detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS), lipid peroxidation, and electrolyte leakage in plants. Methods Mol Biol 639:292–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-702-0_18
Javed T, Gao S-J (2023) WRKY transcription factors in plant defense. Trends Genet 39:787–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2023.07.001
Kajla M, Roy A, Singh IK, Singh A (2023) Regulation of the regulators: transcription factors controlling biosynthesis of plant secondary metabolites during biotic stresses and their regulation by miRNAs. Front Plant Sci 14:1126567. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1126567
Kawano Y, Kaneko-Kawano T, Shimamoto K (2014) Rho family GTPase-dependent immunity in plants and animals. Front Plant Sci 5:522. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00522
Khan S-A, Li M-Z, Wang S-M, Yin H-J (2018) Revisiting the role of plant transcription factors in the battle against Abiotic stress. Int J Mol Sci 19:1634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061634
Khoso MA, Hussain A, Ritonga FN, Ali Q, Channa MM, Alshegaihi RM, Meng Q, Ali M, Zaman W, Brohi RD, Liu F, Manghwar H (2022) WRKY transcription factors (TFs): molecular switches to regulate drought, temperature, and salinity stresses in plants. Front Plant Sci 13:1039329. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1039329
Kim S-H, Kim J-Y, Kim S-J, An K-S, An G, Kim S-R (2007) Isolation of cold stress-responsive genes in the reproductive organs, and characterization of the OsLti6b gene from rice (Oryza sativa L). Plant Cell Rep 26:1097–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-006-0297-0
Kiribuchi K, Sugimori M, Takeda M, Otani T, Okada K, Onodera H, Ugaki M, Tanaka Y, Tomiyama-Akimoto C, Yamaguchi T, Minami E, Shibuya N, Omori T, Nishiyama M, Nojiri H, Yamane H (2004) RERJ1, a jasmonic acid-responsive gene from rice, encodes a basic helix-loop-helix protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 325:857–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.10.126
Kishi-Kaboshi M, Okada K, Kurimoto L, Murakami S, Umezawa T, Shibuya N, Yamane H, Miyao A, Takatsuji H, Takahashi A, Hirochika H (2010) A rice fungal MAMP-responsive MAPK cascade regulates metabolic flow to antimicrobial metabolite synthesis. Plant J 63:599–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04264.x
Lan J, Lin Q, Zhou C, Ren Y, Liu X, Miao R, Jing R, Mou C, Nguyen T, Zhu X, Wang Q, Zhang X, Guo X, Liu S, Jiang L, Wan J (2020) Small grain and semi-dwarf 3, a WRKY transcription factor, negatively regulates plant height and grain size by stabilizing SLR1 expression in rice. Plant Mol Biol 104:429–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-020-01049-0
Li J, Brader G, Kariola T, Palva ET (2006) WRKY70 modulates the selection of signaling pathways in plant defense. Plant J 46:477–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02712.x
Li S, Fu Q, Chen L, Huang W, Yu D (2011) Arabidopsis thaliana WRKY25, WRKY26, and WRKY33 coordinate induction of plant thermotolerance. Planta 233:1237–1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-011-1375-2
Li R, Zhang J, Li J, Zhou G, Wang Q, Bian W, Erb M, Lou Y (2015) Prioritizing plant defence over growth through WRKY regulation facilitates infestation by non-target herbivores. Elife 4:e04805. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04805
Li W, Zhu Z, Chern M, Yin J, Yang C, Ran L, Cheng M, He M, Wang K, Wang J, Zhou X, Zhu X, Chen Z, Wang J, Zhao W, Ma B, Qin P, Chen W, Wang Y, Liu J, Wang W, Wu X, Li P, Wang J, Zhu L, Li S, Chen X (2017) A natural allele of a transcription factor in Rice confers broad-spectrum Blast Resistance. Cell 170:114–126e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.008
Li Y, Wang L-F, Bhutto SH, He X-R, Yang X-M, Zhou X-H, Lin X-Y, Rajput AA, Li G-B, Zhao J-H, Zhou S-X, Ji Y-P, Pu M, Wang H, Zhao Z-X, Huang Y-Y, Zhang J-W, Qin P, Fan J, Wang W-M (2021) Blocking miR530 improves Rice Resistance, Yield, and Maturity. Front Plant Sci 12:729560. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.729560
Li J, Chen Y, Zhang R, Wu B, Xiao G (2023) Expression identification of three OsWRKY genes in response to abiotic stress and hormone treatments in rice. Plant Signal Behav 18:2292844. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2023.2292844
Liu XQ, Bai XQ, Qian Q, Wang XJ, Chen MS, Chu CC (2005) OsWRKY03, a rice transcriptional activator that functions in defense signaling pathway upstream of OsNPR1. Cell Res 15:593–603. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cr.7290329
Liu Q, Li X, Yan S, Yu T, Yang J, Dong J, Zhang S, Zhao J, Yang T, Mao X, Zhu X, Liu B (2018) OsWRKY67 positively regulates blast and bacteria blight resistance by direct activation of PR genes in rice. BMC Plant Biol 18:257. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1479-y
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of Fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
Ma Y, Dai X, Xu Y, Luo W, Zheng X, Zeng D, Pan Y, Lin X, Liu H, Zhang D, Xiao J, Guo X, Xu S, Niu Y, Jin J, Zhang H, Xu X, Li L, Wang W, Qian Q, Ge S, Chong K (2015) COLD1 confers chilling tolerance in rice. Cell 160:1209–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.046
Marchi S, Giorgi C, Suski JM, Agnoletto C, Bononi A, Bonora M, De Marchi E, Missiroli S, Patergnani S, Poletti F, Rimessi A, Duszynski J, Wieckowski MR, Pinton P (2012) Mitochondria-Ros crosstalk in the control of cell death and aging. J Signal Transduct 2012:329635. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/329635
Meng F, Yang C, Cao J, Chen H, Pang J, Zhao Q, Wang Z, Qing Fu Z, Liu J (2020) A bHLH transcription activator regulates defense signaling by nucleo-cytosolic trafficking in rice. J Integr Plant Biol 62:1552–1573. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12922
Nakamura J, Yuasa T, Huong TT, Harano K, Tanaka S, Iwata T, Phan T, Iwaya M (2011) Rice homologs of inducer of CBF expression (OsICE) are involved in cold acclimation. Plant Biotechnol 28:303–309. https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.11.0421a
Nejat N, Mantri N (2017) Plant Immune System: crosstalk between responses to biotic and abiotic stresses the missing link in understanding Plant Defence. Curr Issues Mol Biol 23:1–16. https://doi.org/10.21775/cimb.023.001
Ng DW-K, Abeysinghe JK, Kamali M (2018) Regulating the regulators: the Control of Transcription Factors in Plant Defense Signaling. Int J Mol Sci 19:3737. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123737
Okada K, Abe H, Arimura G (2015) Jasmonates induce both defense responses and communication in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants. Plant Cell Physiol 56:16–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu158
Qiu D, Xiao J, Ding X, Xiong M, Cai M, Cao Y, Li X, Xu C, Wang S (2007) OsWRKY13 mediates rice disease resistance by regulating defense-related genes in salicylate- and jasmonate-dependent signaling. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20:492–499. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-20-5-0492
Qiu J, Xie J, Chen Y, Shen Z, Shi H, Naqvi NI, Qian Q, Liang Y, Kou Y (2022) Warm temperature compromises JA-regulated basal resistance to enhance Magnaporthe oryzae infection in rice. Mol Plant 15:723–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2022.02.014
Rushton PJ, Somssich IE, Ringler P, Shen QJ (2010) WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci 15:247–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.02.006
Saha B, Nayak J, Srivastava R, Samal S, Kumar D, Chanwala J, Dey N, Giri MK (2023) Unraveling the involvement of WRKY TFs in regulating plant disease defense signaling. Planta 259:7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-023-04269-y
Semagn K (2014) Leaf tissue sampling and DNA extraction protocols. Methods Mol Biol 1115:53–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-767-9_3
Song H, Cao Y, Zhao L, Zhang J, Li S (2023) Review: WRKY transcription factors: understanding the functional divergence. Plant Sci 334:111770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2023.111770
Tang J, Mei E, He M, Bu Q, Tian X (2022a) Functions of OsWRKY24, OsWRKY70 and OsWRKY53 in regulating grain size in rice. Planta 255:92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-022-03871-w
Tang J, Tian X, Mei E, He M, Gao J, Yu J, Xu M, Liu J, Song L, Li X, Wang Z, Guan Q, Zhao Z, Wang C, Bu Q (2022b) WRKY53 negatively regulates rice cold tolerance at the booting stage by fine-tuning anther gibberellin levels. Plant Cell 34:4495–4515. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koac253
Tao Z, Liu H, Qiu D, Zhou Y, Li X, Xu C, Wang S (2009) A pair of allelic WRKY genes play opposite roles in rice-bacteria interactions. Plant Physiol 151:936–948. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.145623
Tao Z, Kou Y, Liu H, Li X, Xiao J, Wang S (2011) OsWRKY45 alleles play different roles in abscisic acid signalling and salt stress tolerance but similar roles in drought and cold tolerance in rice. J Exp Bot 62:4863–4874. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err144
Thaler JS, Humphrey PT, Whiteman NK (2012) Evolution of jasmonate and salicylate signal crosstalk. Trends Plant Sci 17:260–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.02.010
Tian X, Li X, Zhou W, Ren Y, Wang Z, Liu Z, Tang J, Tong H, Fang J, Bu Q (2017) Transcription factor OsWRKY53 positively regulates Brassinosteroid Signaling and Plant Architecture. Plant Physiol 175:1337–1349. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00946
Tian F, Yang D-C, Meng Y-Q, Jin J, Gao G (2020) PlantRegMap: charting functional regulatory maps in plants. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D1104–D1113. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz1020
Ueno Y, Yoshida R, Kishi-Kaboshi M, Matsushita A, Jiang C-J, Goto S, Takahashi A, Hirochika H, Takatsuji H (2013) MAP kinases phosphorylate rice WRKY45. Plant Signal Behav 8:e24510. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.24510
Valea I, Motegi A, Kawamura N, Kawamoto K, Miyao A, Ozawa R, Takabayashi J, Gomi K, Nemoto K, Nozawa A, Sawasaki T, Shinya T, Galis I, Miyamoto K, Nojiri H, Okada K (2022) The rice wound-inducible transcription factor RERJ1 sharing same signal transduction pathway with OsMYC2 is necessary for defense response to herbivory and bacterial blight. Plant Mol Biol 109:651–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-021-01186-0
Viana VE, Busanello C, da Maia LC, Pegoraro C, Costa de Oliveira A (2018) Activation of rice WRKY transcription factors: an army of stress fighting soldiers? Curr Opin Plant Biol 45:268–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2018.07.007
Wang N, Zhao P, Ma Y, Yao X, Sun Y, Huang X, Jin J, Zhang Y, Zhu C, Fang R, Ye J (2019) A whitefly effector Bsp9 targets host immunity regulator WRKY33 to promote performance. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 374:20180313. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0313
Wang Y, Cui X, Yang B, Xu S, Wei X, Zhao P, Niu F, Sun M, Wang C, Cheng H, Jiang Y-Q (2020) WRKY55 transcription factor positively regulates leaf senescence and the defense response by modulating the transcription of genes implicated in the biosynthesis of reactive oxygen species and salicylic acid in Arabidopsis. Development 147:dev189647. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.189647
Wang Y, Mostafa S, Zeng W, Jin B (2021) Function and mechanism of Jasmonic Acid in Plant responses to Abiotic and Biotic stresses. Int J Mol Sci 22:8568. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168568
Wang L, Zhang X, She Y, Hu C, Wang Q, Wu L, You C, Ke J, He H (2022) Physiological Adaptation Mechanisms to Drought and Rewatering in Water-Saving and Drought-Resistant Rice. Int J Mol Sci 23:14043. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232214043
Wang H, Chen W, Xu Z, Chen M, Yu D (2023a) Functions of WRKYs in plant growth and development. Trends Plant Sci 28:630–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2022.12.012
Wang L, Fu J, Shen Q, Wang Q (2023b) OsWRKY10 extensively activates multiple rice diterpenoid phytoalexin biosynthesis genes to enhance rice blast resistance. Plant J 115:758–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16259
Wang S, Han S, Zhou X, Zhao C, Guo L, Zhang J, Liu F, Huo Q, Zhao W, Guo Z, Chen X (2023c) Phosphorylation and ubiquitination of OsWRKY31 are integral to OsMKK10-2-mediated defense responses in rice. Plant Cell 35:2391–2412. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koad064
Wang X, Xu Y, Fan H, Cui N, Meng X, He J, Ran N, Yu Y (2023d) Research progress of plant nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat protein. Horticulturae 9:122. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9010122
Wani SH, Anand S, Singh B, Bohra A, Joshi R (2021) WRKY transcription factors and plant defense responses: latest discoveries and future prospects. Plant Cell Rep 40:1071–1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-021-02691-8
Wu T, Zhang H, Yuan B, Liu H, Kong L, Chu Z, Ding X (2022) Tal2b targets and activates the expression of OsF3H03g to hijack OsUGT74H4 and synergistically interfere with rice immunity. New Phytol 233:1864–1880. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17877
Wu B, Chen S, Cheng S, Li C, Li S, Chen J, Zha W, Liu K, Xu H, Li P, Shi S, Yang G, Chen Z, Liu K, You A, Zhou L (2023) Transcriptome analysis revealed the dynamic and Rapid Transcriptional Reprogramming Involved in cold stress and related core genes in the Rice Seedling Stage. Int J Mol Sci 24(1914). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24031914
Xi X, Hu Z, Nie X, Meng M, Xu H, Li J (2021) Cross Inhibition of MPK10 and WRKY10 participating in the growth of Endosperm in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci 12:640346. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.640346
Xia C, Gong Y, Chong K, Xu Y (2021) Phosphatase OsPP2C27 directly dephosphorylates OsMAPK3 and OsbHLH002 to negatively regulate cold tolerance in rice. Plant Cell Environ 44:491–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13938
Xie K, Chen J, Wang Q, Yang Y (2014) Direct phosphorylation and activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase by a calcium-dependent protein kinase in rice. Plant Cell 26:3077–3089. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.126441
Xie W, Ke Y, Cao J, Wang S, Yuan M (2021) Knock out of transcription factor WRKY53 thickens sclerenchyma cell walls, confers bacterial blight resistance. Plant Physiol 187:1746–1761. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiab400
Xu X, Hayashi N, Wang C-T, Fukuoka S, Kawasaki S, Takatsuji H, Jiang C-J (2014) Rice blast resistance gene Pikahei-1(t), a member of a resistance gene cluster on chromosome 4, encodes a nucleotide-binding site and leucine-rich repeat protein. Mol Breed 34:691–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-014-0067-6
Yang DH, Chung BY, Kim JS, Kim JH, Yun PY, Lee YK, Lim YP, Lee MC (2005) cDNA cloning and sequence analysis of Rice Cinnamate-4-Hydroxylase Gene, a cytochrome P450-Dependent monooxygenase, involving in the General Phenylpropanoid Pathway. J Plant Biol 48:311–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03030528
Ye M, Glauser G, Lou Y, Erb M, Hu L (2019) Molecular Dissection of Early Defense Signaling underlying volatile-mediated defense regulation and Herbivore Resistance in Rice. Plant Cell 31:687–698. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.18.00569
Yokotani N, Sato Y, Tanabe S, Chujo T, Shimizu T, Okada K, Yamane H, Shimono M, Sugano S, Takatsuji H, Kaku H, Minami E, Nishizawa Y (2013) WRKY76 is a rice transcriptional repressor playing opposite roles in blast disease resistance and cold stress tolerance. J Exp Bot 64:5085–5097. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert298
Yokotani N, Shikata M, Ichikawa H, Mitsuda N, Ohme-Takagi M, Minami E, Nishizawa Y (2018) OsWRKY24, a blast-disease responsive transcription factor, positively regulates rice disease resistance. J Gen Plant Pathol 84:85–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-018-0768-5
Yu J, Zhu C, Xuan W, An H, Tian Y, Wang B, Chi W, Chen G, Ge Y, Li J, Dai Z, Liu Y, Sun Z, Xu D, Wang C, Wan J (2023) Genome-wide association studies identify OsWRKY53 as a key regulator of salt tolerance in rice. Nat Commun 14:3550. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39167-0
Yuan Y, Zhong S, Li Q, Zhu Z, Lou Y, Wang L, Wang J, Wang M, Li Q, Yang D, He Z (2007) Functional analysis of rice NPR1-like genes reveals that OsNPR1/NH1 is the rice orthologue conferring disease resistance with enhanced herbivore susceptibility. Plant Biotechnol J 5:313–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00243.x
Zhai M, Chen Y, Pan X, Chen Y, Zhou J, Jiang X, Zhang Z, Xiao G, Zhang H (2024) OsEIN2-OsEIL1/2 pathway negatively regulates chilling tolerance by attenuating OsICE1 function in rice. Plant Cell Environ 47:2561–2577. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14900
Zhang L, Gu L, Ringler P, Smith S, Rushton PJ, Shen QJ (2015) Three WRKY transcription factors additively repress abscisic acid and gibberellin signaling in aleurone cells. Plant Sci 236:214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.04.014
Zhang Z, Li J, Li F, Liu H, Yang W, Chong K, Xu Y (2017) OsMAPK3 phosphorylates OsbHLH002/OsICE1 and inhibits its Ubiquitination to activate OsTPP1 and enhances Rice Chilling Tolerance. Dev Cell 43:731–743e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2017.11.016
Zhang Z, Liu H, Sun C, Ma Q, Bu H, Chong K, Xu Y (2018) A C2H2 zinc-finger protein OsZFP213 interacts with OsMAPK3 to enhance salt tolerance in rice. J Plant Physiol 229:100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2018.07.003
Zhang F, Fang H, Wang M, He F, Tao H, Wang R, Long J, Wang J, Wang G-L, Ning Y (2022a) APIP5 functions as a transcription factor and an RNA-binding protein to modulate cell death and immunity in rice. Nucleic Acids Res 50:5064–5079. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac316
Zhang M, Zhao R, Huang K, Huang S, Wang H, Wei Z, Li Z, Bian M, Jiang W, Wu T, Du X (2022b) The OsWRKY63-OsWRKY76-OsDREB1B module regulates chilling tolerance in rice. Plant J 112:383–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15950
Zhang M, Zhao R, Wang H, Ren S, Shi L, Huang S, Wei Z, Guo B, Jin J, Zhong Y, Chen M, Jiang W, Wu T, Du X (2023) OsWRKY28 positively regulates salinity tolerance by directly activating OsDREB1B expression in rice. Plant Cell Rep 42:223–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-022-02950-2
Zhou J, Wang X, He Y, Sang T, Wang P, Dai S, Zhang S, Meng X (2020) Differential Phosphorylation of the transcription factor WRKY33 by the protein kinases CPK5/CPK6 and MPK3/MPK6 cooperatively regulates Camalexin Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 32:2621–2638. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.19.00971
Acknowledgements
First of all, the authors would like to appreciate to all those who have contributed to this study. The authors are grateful to Pro Yuese Ning and Pro Ruyi Wang (Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences), Pro Wei Li (College of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University), as well as College of Agronomy in Hunan Agricultural University for providing fungal pathogens and valuable suggestions.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (31701781 and 32171950), the Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education (22A0163), the Hebei Technology Innovation Center for Green Management of Soil-borne Diseases (Baoding University, Grant No. 2022K04) and the Postgraduate Scientific Research Innovation Project of Hunan Province (CX20230687).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JL, GX, and HZ considered the project and designed the study. JL experimented and measured the data. YC, RZ, RW and BW reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, R. et al. OsWRKY70 Plays Opposite Roles in Blast Resistance and Cold Stress Tolerance in Rice. Rice 17, 61 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-024-00741-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-024-00741-9