Skip to main content

Identification of Heterotic Loci with Desirable Allelic Interaction to Increase Yield in Rice

Abstract

Heterosis denotes the superiority of a hybrid plant over its parents. The use of heterosis has contributed significantly to yield improvement in crops. However, the genetic and molecular bases on heterosis are not fully understood. A large number of heterotic loci were identified for 12 yield-related traits in one parental population of chromosome segment substitution lines (CSSLs) and two test populations, which were interconnected by CSSLs derived from two rice genome-sequenced cultivars, Nipponbare and Zhenshan 97. Seventy-five heterotic loci were identified in both homozygous background of Zhenshan 97 and heterogeneous background of an elite hybrid cultivar Shanyou 63. Among the detected loci, at least 11 were colocalized in the same regions encompassing previously reported heterosis-associated genes. Furthermore, a heterotic locus Ghd8NIP for yield advantage was verified using transgenic experiments. Various allelic interaction at Ghd8 exhibited different heterosis levels in hetero-allelic combinations of five near-isogenic lines that contain a particular allele. The significant overdominance effects from some hetero-allelic combinations were found to improve yield heterosis in hybrid cultivars. Our findings support the role of allelic interaction at heterotic loci in the improvement of yield potential, which will be helpful for dissecting the genetic basis of heterosis and provide an optional strategy for the allele replacement in molecular breeding programs in hybrid rice.

Background

Heterosis or hybrid vigor refers to the phenomenon for which a hybrid markedly outperforms its parents. The use of heterosis in crops such as rice and maize have contributed significantly to the improvement of yield. Massive efforts have been made in exploring the genetic mechanisms of heterosis, leading to propose three main genetic models for heterosis (Chen 2013; Zhang et al. 2021), which include dominance (Xiao et al. 1995) and overdominance (Li et al. 2001; Gjuvsland et al. 2010; Larièpe et al. 2012) at a single-locus level and epistasis at two or more loci (Yu et al. 1997; Zhou et al. 2012). The dominance and overdominance effects reflected as an allelic interaction at a single locus in hybrids may result in an alteration of expression profiles or protein–protein interaction (Shao et al. 2019). At the same time, epistasis is referred to as the modification of a gene by one or several other genes (Birchler et al. 2010; Schnable and Springer 2013). However, the genetic and molecular mechanisms of heterosis in plants are not fully understood.

Numerous quantitative trait loci (QTLs) have been identified for heterosis in various plants (Li et al. 2001; Wang et al. 2012; Zhou et al. 2012; Huang et al. 2016; Zhu et al. 2016), indicating that complex genetic bases of heterosis. The advances of integrating multi-omics in the identification of heterotic loci or genes support the significant role of the allelic interactions at both single locus and multiple loci in plant heterosis (Huang et al. 2015; Li et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2020). For example, SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS (SFT) in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) is firstly identified as a single overdominant gene for yield (Krieger et al. 2010). In rice (Oryza sativa L.), Heading date 3a (Hd3a) has been identified to be responsible for heterosis in a large-scale F2 population (Huang et al. 2016). The gene Ideal Plant Architecture1 (IPA1) that regulates plant architecture enhancing yield heterosis in rice, displays a strong overdominance effect from IPA1 heterozygotes (Huang et al. 2016). Similarly, the ortholog gene of IPA1 in maize (Zea mays L.), unbranched 3 (ub3) has also been identified as the major candidate gene for heterosis advantage in three F2 populations (Liu et al. 2020). The other gene OsMADS1 showed an incomplete dominance for grain size in rice and near-isogenic lines containing a particular alleles could highly increase grain yield by more than 8% (Wang et al. 2019a). Since the development of genome re-sequencing of germplasms allows us capture various allelic variations at any gene of interest, the intriguing issue arises of how to explore optional allelic combinations that could produce higher heterosis performance in hybrids. However, few cases where diverse effects of various allelic interactions at a heterotic locus have been reported.

Rice is the staple crop, contributing for nearly half of worldwide population’s food consumption (Elert 2014). The increase of rice yield is critical to ensuring global food security. Exploitation of interspecies hybrid vigor between indica/xian and japonica/geng has been a promising approach to enhance rice yield potential (Qian et al. 2016; Tao et al. 2016). The genetic dissection of hybrid vigor could facilitate this efficient exploitation. However, the precisely identification of heterotic loci has been limited in many segregating populations such as F2 and recombinant inbred lines because of some epistatic or high-order gene interactions in a complex genetic background (Yu et al. 1997; Li et al. 2001). With the advantage of chromosome segment substitution lines (CSSLs), each containing only one or a few introduced donor segments in the same background, the genetic effect and contribution of a gene can be confirmed without the effect of other loci in genome (Ali et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 2021). Thus, CSSLs and their derived populations could provide one of the optimal approaches for dissecting the genetic factor of heterosis at the single-locus level (Zhang et al. 2019). In this study, the objectives are to detect heterotic loci using CSSLs and their derived testing populations of backcross and testcross, and to unravel allelic interaction at a given heterotic loci using near-isogenic lines in rice. As a result, a number of heterotic loci (HLs) were identified for yield and yield-related traits in the backcross (BC) and testcross (TC) populations. Among them, a major heterotic gene (Ghd8) was verified through transgenic experiments. Moreover, different interaction effects arose from various allelic combinations of Ghd8 were found associated with yield heterosis. Our findings of heterotic loci with favorable allelic combinations provide new insights into the genetic basis of heterosis. This will be useful for improving yield by hybrid rice breeding.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials

Three mapping populations were developed and used in this study. The first population of 146 CSSLs was developed from a cross between two genome-sequenced rice cultivars, japonica Nipponbare (NIP) as the donor and elite indica Zhenshan 97 (ZS97) as the recurrent parent, using a backcross scheme of at least four times backcrossing with a marker-assisted selection (MAS) approach. The backcross population contained 146 F1 hybrids (CSSL × ZS97) derived by backcrossing each CSSL with the recurrent parent ZS97. The elite restorer line Minghui 63 (MH63) as the male parent was testcrossed with each CSSL to generate the testcross population. The parental lines (MH63, NIP, and ZS97) and hybrid cultivar Shanyou 63 (SY63, MH63 × ZS97) were used as controls in the phenotype experiments.

Experimental Design and Phenotypic Evaluation

Two experiments were conducted to dissect of the genetic basis of heterosis in rice. First, three mapping populations were used to analyze the allelic effect at a single locus. A CSSL and BC were used to identify the mid-parent heterotic loci (HLMP) in the homozygous background of ZS97. At the same time, a TC along with a check (SY63) were used to detect the over-standard heterotic loci (HLOS) in a similar heterozygous background of SY63. Second, to determine the interaction of different allelic combinations at Ghd8, an half-diallel mating design was used to generate ten allelic combinations with five parental lines (NIL-Ghd8ZS97, NIL-Ghd8NIP, NIL-Ghd89311, NIL-Ghd8ACC10, and NIL-Ghd8MH63). The five near-isogenic lines (NILs) carrying different Ghd8 alleles were developed independently from the cross of four parents (NIP, 9311, ACC10, and MH63) as donors and ZS97 as the recurrent parent using a MAS backcross scheme. These NILs have the common background of ZS97.

All the lines were grown at the experimental station of Huazhong Agricultural University in Wuhan (30.48° N, 114.2° E), China. A randomized complete block design was carried out with two replications for three mapping populations in 2006 (E1) and 2007 (E2), respectively. The same field experimental design with three replications was used for the ten allelic combinations and NILs. Each line was planted in four rows with 10 individuals per row at a spacing of 16.7 × 26.6 cm. The eight plants in the middle of each row were harvested individually at maturity and used for scoring traits. The field was managed according to local standard practices.

Twelve quantitative traits were assayed: grain number (GN), heading date (HD), number of primary branches (PB), plant height (PH), panicle length (PL), panicles per plant (PP), panicle weight (PW), number of secondary branches (SB), spikelet number (SN), seed setting ratio (SS), thousand-grain weight (TGW), and grain yield per plant (YD).

Transgenic Test of Ghd8 Effects on Heterosis

The transgenic experiments were performed to analyze Ghd8 effects on heterosis. Homozygous complementary transgenic lines with the NIP alleles of Ghd8 (Ghd8NIP) introduced into ZS97 (here named as NIL-Ghd8ZS97) were developed previously (Yan et al. 2011). An F1 hybrid was then generated by crossing each transgenic line with the corresponding negative control line or ZS97.

DNA Extract and Genotype of Hybrids

Genomic DNA was extracted from young leaves using the CTAB method (Murray and Thompson, 1980) with minor modifications. Genotyping of the 146 CSSLs by using a RICE 6 K chip generated a total of 5,102 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which were evenly distributed on all 12 chromosomes (Sun et al. 2015). A genetic bin map with 518 bins was constructed based on the recombination breakpoints in the CSSLs. The genotypes of the BC and TC were deduced from each corresponding CSSL. The insertion/deletion (Indel) marker PID2 (F: TAGAGATGAAATGGAGGTG; R: GTCTCATGTTCTTCAACATG) was used to identify the genotypes of all the allelic combinations, except that NIP/ACC10 hybrid was determined by Indel marker PID3 (F: CTTATCTATCAAGGTGCTC; R: TGCACACATGTAATGCAAAC), and MH63/ZS97 hybrid was identified by simple sequence repeat (SSR) marker RM5556 (F: GTAAGCCATTTGCACGGACAAGG; R: GAGCTCAGGATCATCCCTACATGC). PID2 was also used to identify the genotypes of complementary transgenic hybrids. Polymerase chain reaction was performed following the procedure of Panaud et al (1996). The Indel and SSR markers were separated by 4% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and visualized by silver staining.

Data Analysis

The additive effect (a) was calculated using the following equation: a = (CSSL—ZS97)/2. The dominance effect (d) was estimated as d = F1—(CSSL + ZS97)/2. The mid-parent heterosis (MPH) was calculated as MPH = (F1—MP)/MP × 100%, MP = (CSSL + ZS97)/2, where F1 is the phenotypic value of the BC. The over-standard heterosis (OSH) value was calculated as OSH = (F1—SY63)/SY63 × 100%, where F1 is the phenotypic value of the TC. For allelic combinations at Ghd8, MPH = (F1—MP)/MP × 100%, MP = (NIL-Ghd8i + NIL-Ghd8j)/2, where the F1 represented the phenotypic value of the hybrid for two NILs (NIL-Ghd8i × NIL-Ghd8j, i and j denote different alleles of Ghd8). For complementary transgenic plants, the additive and dominance effects were calculated as a = (homozygous-positive transgenic line—negative line)/2, d = F1—(homozygous-positive transgenic line + negative line)/2. The estimated additive and dominance effects were used to calculate |d/a| for the classification of HLMP as additive effect (A) (|d/a|< 0.2), partial dominance (PD) (0.2 ≤|d/a|< 0.8), complete dominance (CD) (0.8 ≤|d/a|< 1.2), and overdominance (OD) (|d/a|≥ 1.2), as described previously (Stuber et al. 1987). The means and standard error of the phenotypic values were analyzed in Microsoft Excel 2010.

QTL Analyses

To decrease multicollinearity among the bin markers, the linear ridge regression method was used for the QTL analysis with the bin-map in the CSSLs as described previously (Sun et al. 2015) and for the QTL analysis of MPH and OSH values. A significance level of P < 0.05 was set as the threshold in the three mapping populations to declare the presence of a putative QTL in a given bin. If several adjacent bins showed P values lower than the threshold, the QTL was tentatively located in the bin (peak bin) with the lowest P value (Sun et al. 2015). The phenotypic variance explained by each QTL was decomposed using “relaimpo” package of R (“lmg” function). QTL nomenclature followed the principles suggested in a previous report by McCouch (2008).

Results

Phenotypic Performance of CSSLs, BC, and TC Populations

Three mapping populations (CSSLs, BC, and TC) exhibited wide phenotypic variances with continuous distribution for 12 yield-related traits (Fig. 1; Additional file 1: Table S1), showing a quantitative trait inheritance pattern. Most of the lines in the CSSLs and BC populations had similar phenotypic performance as ZS97, except for several lines that showed significantly higher or lower values than ZS97 (Fig. 1; Additional file 1: Table S1), indicating that these lines carry either the introduced homozygous NIP or heterozygous NIP segments associated with the measured traits. Moreover, wide variation and continuous distribution of MPH and OSH values were observed (Fig. 2; Additional file 1: Table S1). Several hybrids (of BC and TC) also exhibited heterosis values in two directions significantly higher or lower than corresponding controls for yield-related traits (Fig. 2). The TC population within the complex heterozygous background revealed similar variation in heterosis values to BC population within the background of ZS97 (Fig. 2; Additional file 1: Table S1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Boxplots of 12 yield-related traits among chromosome segment substitution lines (CSSLs), backcross population (BC), and testcross population (TC). Box edges indicate the range of the 25th to 75th percentiles, with the median value shown as the bold middle line. The whiskers represent the range of 5% to 95% of the data, and dots are outliers. The different lowercase letters in the boxplots denote significance among the medians of three populations at P < 0.05

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of mid-parent heterosis (MPH) and over-standard heterosis (OSH) for yield-related traits. The MPH and OSH of the yield-related traits were evaluated in 2006 (E1) and 2007 (E2), which are on the left and right of each plot, respectively. The y-axis represents the density (%). The x-axis represents the MPH value (%) and OSH value (%) for each trait. The median of each trait is indicated by the the colored triangle. GN, grain number; PB, number of primary branches; PL, panicle length; PP, panicles per plant; PW, panicle weight; SB, the number of secondary branches; SN, spikelet number; TGW, thousand-grain weight; YD, grain yield per plant

Correlation analysis was performed for these 12 traits among three populations (Additional file 2: Figure S1). Significantly positive correlations were observed in all of the pairwise traits except for seed setting ratio between the CSSLs and BC. Similarly, significantly positive correlations were found in seven traits (HD, PB, PH, PL, SB, SN, and TGW) between the CSSL and TC. However, only four traits (HD, PH, PL, and SB) exhibited significantly positive correlations but with low values between the BC and TC. These results indicate that different genetic bases exist for trait performances among the three populations.

Detection of QTLs in CSSLs

The linear ridge regression method was used for the QTL mapping in CSSLs to decrease multicollinearity among markers. A total of 341 QTLs for 12 yield-related traits were identified in the CSSLs across two environments (E1 and E2) (Fig. 3a), and they were distributed on all 12 chromosomes (Additional file 1: Table S2). Among them, 114 QTLs were detected in both two environments and 40.4% of the loci suggested that the homozygous NIP alleles increased the phenotypic values. The total phenotypic variances ranging from 47.5 to 79.2% were explained by 14 to 24 QTLs for different traits (Additional file 1: Table S2). In the case of HD, 20 QTLs were detected across two-year trials; among them, qHD7.4 on chromosome 7 had the largest effect, explaining 9.5% and 16.1% of the phenotypic variance in E1 and E2, respectively. Twenty-seven QTLs for PH were identified; of these, qPH1.4 on chromosome 1 explaining 40.6% of the phenotypic variance, exhibited the greatest effect on PH. For panicle traits, 28, 24, 32, and 30 QTLs were identified for PB, PL, PP, and PW, respectively. Among them, the QTL regions (qPB7.5/qPL7.6/qPW7.4) on chromosome 7 (29.62–29.70 Mb) overlapped for three panicle traits with NIP alleles increasing the phenotypic values. For spikelet traits, 35, 25, and 27 QTLs were identified for GN, SB, and SN, respectively, of which three QTLs (qGN7.6/qSB7.5/qSN7.4) mapped on the same region (29.62–29.70 Mb) exhibited the most significant effect on these three traits in both two environments (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

QTLs and heterotic loci for mid-parent heterosis (MPH) and over-standard heterosis (OSH) detected in the CSSLs, BC, and TC populations. a The quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and HLs were co-localized in the same or overlapping regions among the three populations. b The proportions of the different genetic effects at mid-parent heterotic loci (HLMP). OD, overdominance; CD, complete dominance; PD, partial dominance; A, additive. c, d Genome-wide distribution of QTLs, HLMP and over-standard heterotic loci (HLOS) for spikelet number (SN) in 2006 (E1) and 2007 (E2). Rice chromosomes with bins are indicated in the outer circle. The circles from inward to outward show QTLs (a), HLOS (b), and HLMP (c), respectively. For each bar diagram, the x-axis represents the physical location along each numbered chromosome. The y-axis represents the P value for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) association. Dashed lines indicate the declaration thresholds. Some major heterosis-related genes reported in previous studies are indicated by red dots in c, d

Detection of HLMP for Yield Traits

The CSSL and BC populations were used to identify HLMP in the homozygous background of ZS97. Every line in BC population contains only one or a few introduced heterozygous NIP segments (NIP/ZS97) within the homozygous background of ZS97. Therefore, the HLMP mainly present a non-additive genetic effect between NIP and ZS97 alleles at a given single locus. A total of 307 HLMP were detected for 12 traits across two environments (Fig. 3a). Among them, 42 QTLs were detected in both two environments. Most of HLMP (57.0%) increased MPH for yield and yield-related traits (Additional file 1: Table S3). For HD, 25 HLMP were detected; among these, qBHD2.2 and qBHD7.4 had the most significant effect, explaining 10.3% and 12.9% of the phenotypic variance in E1 and E2, respectively. For PH, 32 HLMP were identified; of these, qBPH1.3 revealed the most significant effect, explaining 8.3% of the phenotypic variance. For panicle traits, 21, 31, 19, and 20 HLMP were detected for PB, PL, PP, and PW across the two-year trials. Among them, the QTL overlapping region (qBPL1.1/qBPW1.1/qBPB1.1) on chromosome 1 (3.04–5.72 Mb) was detected with a positive effect on multiple panicle traits. Seven-three loci were identified for three spikelet traits across two environments, with 21 HLMP for GN, 25 for SB, and 27 for SN. Among these, qBSB8.1/qBSN8.1 on chromosome 8 (3.80–4.37 Mb) was detected in both two environments and was located in the same region of Ghd8 that was reported to regulate heading date and grain number (Yan et al. 2011). For SS, 36 HLMP were detected; among these, qBSS9.2 had the most significant effect, explaining 6.8% of the phenotypic variance. A total of 28 HLMP were detected for thousand-grain weight (TGW) in two environments. Among these, qBTGW8.1 had the largest effect and explained 16.4% of the phenotypic variance in E1. Twenty-two HLMP were detected for YD in E1 and E2 and 14 of them showed positive effects (Additional file 1: Table S3).

In addition, all three genetic components (additive, dominance, and overdominance effects) at HLMP were estimated (Fig. 3b). The majority (97%) of HLMP exhibited an overdominance or dominance effect (Fig. 3b; Additional file 1: Table S3). These data indicate that overdominance and dominance effects play a crucial role in MPH.

Detection of HLOS for Yield Traits

Each line in the TC population contains one or a few introduced heterozygous (NIP/MH63) segments in the otherwise uniform heterozygous background of a widely used hybrid cultivar SY63. Therefore, each HLOS effect represents an interaction effect between NIP and MH63 alleles at a given locus. HLOS detected in TC are summarized in Table S4 (Additional file 1: Table S4). A total 310 HLOS were identified for the 12 traits across two environments, which were distributed on all 12 chromosomes. Fifty-seven loci were detected in both two environments. Among them, 55.4% of the loci showed that NIP/MH63 hetero-allelic interaction increased over-standard heterosis. Twenty-eight HLOS for HD were detected across two environments. Twenty-five HLOS affecting PH was identified; among these, qTPH1.6 on chromosome 1 (38.10–38.47 Mb) had the largest effect, explaining 40.8% and 39.9% of the phenotypic variance in both E1 and E2, respectively. For panicle traits, 26, 27, 26, and 26 HLOS were detected for PB, PL, PP, and PW, respectively. Among them, three HLOS (qTPL4.1/qTPW4.1/qTPB4.1) were localized in the same region (19.60–19.89 Mb) of chromosome 4, with the heterozygote increasing the phenotypic values. For spikelet traits, a total of 22, 26, and 28 HLOS were identified for GN, SB, and SN, respectively. Three loci (qTGN1.4/qTSB1.2/qTSN1.4) overlapped in the same region (38.10–38.47 Mb) and exhibited the largest effect, which explained 11.1%, 8.0% and 11.3% of the phenotypic variance of GN, SB, and SN in E2, with the heterozygote increasing the phenotypic values. Twenty-five loci were detected for SS, with 16 of them showing that the heterozygous alleles decreased the phenotypic values. For TGW, a major locus qTTGW5.3 explained 8.5% of the phenotypic variance in E1. For YD, 24 HLOS were identified, explaining 45.1% and 38.9% of the phenotypic variance in E1 and E2, respectively. qTYD1.2 had the most significant effect (Additional file 1: Table S4), explaining 16.2% of the phenotypic variance.

Positive Effect of Ghd8 on Yield Heterosis

Among the HLs, a major loci on chromosome 8 (3.80–4.37 Mb) was identified for MPH and OSH of four traits (Fig. 3c, d; Additional file 1: Table S3-4), and it was located in the same region of the QTL for six yield-related traits detected in the CSSLs (Additional file 1: Table S2), which contains a known functional gene (Ghd8NIP) (Yan et al. 2011). To validate the effect of this HL, NIL-Ghd8NIP that carries an introduced NIP segment encompassing Ghd8 (Fig. 4a) was selected and crossed with NIL-Ghd8ZS97 to produce F1 hybrids. The MPH effects at Ghd8 were assayed in 11 yield-related traits. The heterozygotes at Ghd8 showed significant MPH for GN, PW, SN, and YD over the two parental lines (NIL-Ghd8NIP and NIL-Ghd8ZS97) across two-year trials (Fig. 4b). As GN and PW are highly dependent on SS, but SS is easily affected by high temperature in summer during the experiments, a representative yield component, SN, which is highly correlated with GN and PW, is used as the example to assess the heterotic effect. The heterozygous Ghd8 showed high MPH for YD (9.7%) and SN (6.9%) across the two-year trials (Fig. 4b). Moreover, an overdominance effect (|d/a|= 2.94) of Ghd8 on YD and a complete dominance effect (|d/a|= 0.99) on SN were found in the NIL- Ghd8ZS97/NIL-Ghd8NIP hybrid (Fig. 4c). These results confirm that Ghd8 is a heterotic locus with an overdominance or dominance effect increasing yield and yield traits.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Validation of the Ghd8 effect on mid-parent heterosis (MPH) using near-isogenic lines (NILs) and complementation transgenic lines. a Graphical genotype of NIL-Ghd8NIP showing a single introduced Nipponbare segment encompassing Ghd8 in the ZS97 background. b The heterosis advantage of Ghd8 for the yield traits in hybrids of NIL-Ghd8NIP and NIL-Ghd8ZS97 in a two-year trial. Error bar represents the mean ± SE (n = 3). c The dominance degree of Ghd8 effect on spikelet number (SN) and grain yield per plant (YD) in hybrids. If the effect has an excessive degree of dominance, it is set to a score of 5.0. d Phenotypes of the complementation transgenic lines and their hybrids at maturity. Ghd8+, homozygous-positive transgenic line containing the alleles Ghd8NIP; Ghd8, homozygous-negative control lines; F1 denotes the hybrid derived from the cross of the independent complementation transgenic plant and corresponding negative plant. Scale bars, 10 cm. e, f MPH of Ghd8 for SN (E) and YD (F) in the F1 hybrids across a two-year trial. The error bar represents the mean ± SE (n = 3)

Validation the Heterotic Effect of Ghd8 by Transgenic Experiment

To validate the heterotic effect of Ghd8, the complementary transgenic line (Ghd8+) carried the Ghd8NIP alleles were crossed with NIL-Ghd8ZS97 (Ghd8) to generate the heterozygote (named F1) containing a hetero-allelic combination (Ghd8ZS97 and Ghd8NIP alleles) (Fig. 4d). The F1 hybrid increased average MPH of YD and SN by 17.1% and 8.4% across the two-year trials, respectively (Fig. 4e, f; Additional file 1: Table S5). For YD, the heterozygous genotype (Ghd8NIP/Ghd8ZS97) exhibited high MPH (e.g. 14.5% ~ 19.7%). The combination showed moderate heterosis for SN (e.g. 5.3% ~ 11.5%) (Fig. 4e, f; Additional file 1: Table S5). Moreover, the heterozygous Ghd8 showed a positive overdominance effect on YD and partial dominance effect on SN (Fig. 4c; Additional file 1: Table S5). These results indicate that Ghd8 affecting heterosis in yield components, and the two alleles (Ghd8NIP and Ghd8ZS97) exhibited a strong interaction on MPH in the ZS97 background.

Allelic Interaction of Ghd8 Associated with Heterosis

In a previous study, three alleles (Ghd8NIP, Ghd89311 and Ghd8ACC10) were reported to be functional, while Ghd8ZS97 and Ghd8MH63 being loss-of-function alleles due to a premature stop codon occurred (Fig. 5a) (Wang et al. 2019b). To investigate the interaction effect of Ghd8 on yield MPH, five NILs (NIL-Ghd8ZS97, NIL-Ghd8NIP, NIL-Ghd89311, NIL-Ghd8ACC10, and NIL-Ghd8MH63) were developed, with each carrying an introduced segment covering Ghd8 from a particular donor in the same background of ZS97 (Fig. 5b), and a half-diallel mating design with five NILs that contain a particular allele (Ghd8ZS97, Ghd8NIP, Ghd89311, Ghd8ACC10, and Ghd8MH63) was used to generate 10 hetero-allelic combinations. The combination (Ghd8ACC10/Ghd8MH63) revealed the highest MPH for YD (29.0%) and SN (20.4%) (Fig. 5c, d; Additional file 1: Table S6). Another five combinations (Ghd8ZS97/Ghd8ACC10, Ghd8ZS97/Ghd8NIP Ghd89311/Ghd8ACC10, Ghd89311/Ghd8MH63, Ghd8NIP/Ghd8ACC10) showed significantly higher YD heterosis over the check Ghd8ZS97/Ghd8MH63 (Fig. 5d). However, three allelic combinations (Ghd8NIP/Ghd89311, and Ghd8ZS97/Ghd89311, Ghd8NIP/Ghd8MH63) produced low or no YD and/or SN advantage over the check Ghd8ZS97/Ghd8MH63 (Fig. 5c, d; Additional file 1: Table S6). These results indicate that the interaction of various Ghd8 alleles could cause different heterosis levels of yield.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Yield mid-parent heterosis (MPH) of 10 allelic combinations at Ghd8 in heterozygotes within the background of ZS97. a Schematic gene mode showing nucleotide variations in the coding region of Ghd8 among five parents (NIP, ZS97, 9311, ACC10 and MH63). NIP (Nipponbare) is used as a reference. Polymorphic nucleotides are indicated by different color lines. “F” and “N” denote functional and non-functional alleles, respectively. b Plant image of five NILs (NIL-Ghd8ZS97, NIL-Ghd8NIP, NIL-Ghd89311, NIL-Ghd8ACC10, and NIL-Ghd8MH63). The images were taken at the maturity of NIL-Ghd8ZS97; scale bar, 10 cm. c, d MPH of Ghd8 for spikelet number (SN) and yield per plant (YD) in ten hybrids with different allelic combinations. The error bar represents the mean ± SE (n = 3). NIL-Ghd8NIP, NIL-Ghd89311, NIL-Ghd8ACC10, and NIL-Ghd8MH63 represent those NILs carrying corresponding Ghd8 alleles from different donors within the same ZS97 background, respectively. The different letters denote significant differences by LSD test at P < 0.05. The error bar represents the mean ± SE (n = 3)

Discussion

In the present study, we identified 98 QTLs for yield traits and HLMP for MPH in the same or overlapping regions in both CSSLs and BC population with the homozygous background of ZS97 (Fig. 3a). These commonly detected loci are in the accordance with the high correlations among the yield-related traits (Additional file 2: Fig. S1). As comparison, a larger number of loci were found only in the CSSLs not in the BC or TC (Fig. 3a; Additional file 1: Table S2-S4), suggesting that most HLs were caused by allelic interaction from heterozygotes. These results also suggest that independent genetic effects (a, d) at that loci are reflected in the homozygous NIP in CSSLs and heterozygous NIP alleles in BC. Seventy-five heterotic loci (HLOS) were found co-localized in the same or overlapping regions of HLMP, indicating that both heterozygous NIP/ZS97 and NIP/MH63 alleles at the detected loci significantly affect heterosis in rice, although the interaction effects were influenced by different genetic backgrounds. Of these heterotic loci for MPH and OSH, 32 also revealed major effects on the trait performances in the CSSLs (Fig. 3a).

Under comparison of the QTLs detected in the CSSLs with those in previous reports, at least 81 loci co-localized in the same or overlapping regions harboring the genes associated with yield-related traits (Additional file 1: Table S2). For example, qPH1.4 for PH detected in the CSSLs was located near sd1, a gibberellin synthesis gene (OsGA20ox2) regulating plant height (Sasaki et al. 2002). Five loci (qGN7.2/qHD7.1/qPH7.2/qSN7.2/qYD7.1) were localized in the region that contains the known yield gene Ghd7 (Xue et al. 2008). Five QTLs (qGN7.6/qHD7.4/qPH7.5/qSN7.6/qYD7.5) were mapped in the same region where Ghd7.1 was reported to affect grain number, plant height, and heading date (Yan et al. 2013). Six loci (qGN8/qPB8/qPH8.1/qPW8.1/qSB8/qSN8.1) were detected in the region encompassing Ghd8, a yield-related gene with a pleiotropic effect on grain number, plant height, and heading date (Yan et al. 2011).

We have further identified that 42 HLMP and 59 HLOS located in the same or overlapping regions, where harbor many heterotic genes previously reported associated with yield-related traits (Additional file 1: Table S3-S4), such as the genes Gn1a, LAX1, sd1, OsMADS22, NAL1, Hd1, Ghd7, Ghd7.1, Ghd8, IPA1, and Ehd1 (Huang et al. 2015, 2016; Li et al. 2016). Particularly, three HLOS (qTHD7.1/qTPW7.2/qTYD7.2) were co-localized in the region of Ghd7, which was reported exhibiting a strong heterotic effect on heading date and spikelet number in hybrids (Liu et al. 2015; Huang et al. 2016). Three HLMP (qBPH7.4/qBHD7.4/qBSN7.4) and four HLOS (qTHD7.4/qTPH7.2/qTSB7.3/qTYD7.4) were all co-localized in the Ghd7.1 region. Three HLOS (qTPB1.1/qTSN1.2/qTPW1.1) were identified overlapping in the same region of Gn1a, which was reported as a grain number gene (Ashikari et al. 2005). Three HLOS (qTPL1.3/qTPW1.3/qTSN1.3) were mapped in the region surrounding a lax panicle gene, LAX1 (Komatsu et al. 2011). Three HLMP (qBPW10/qBPH10.2/qBHD10.2) were mapped in the region containing Ehd1, which is a flowering time gene (Doi et al. 2004). Thus, the data on heterotic loci encompassing candidate genes associated with yield or yield components in both homozygous and heterozygous backgrounds could be immediately exploited for improving yield heterosis in hybrid rice breeding programs.

Notably, many studies reported that Ghd8 could be an important candidate gene that affects heterosis for yield-related traits (Li et al. 2016; Huang et al. 2015, 2016; Chen et al. 2019; Lin et al. 2020). However, it lacked transgenic validation. In the present study, we identified four HLMP (qBHD8.1/qBPL8.2/qBSB8.1/qBSN8.1) and one HLOS (qTHD8.1) (Additional file 1: Table S3-S4) that were commonly detected in the Ghd8 region and validated them as the major heterotic locus for yield and spikelet number using transgenic experiments (Fig. 4). Moreover, the interaction effects arose from some hetero-allelic combinations of Ghd8 caused different levels of YD and SN heterosis. Three functional alleles (Ghd8NIP, Ghd89311, and Ghd8ACC10), when interacting with non-functional allele Ghd8ZS97, significantly increased heterosis for YD and SN compared with the combination of two non-functional alleles (Ghd8ZS97 and Ghd8MH63) (Fig. 5). The hetero-allelic combinations, such as Ghd8ACC10/Ghd8MH63 and Ghd89311/Ghd8MH63, also exhibited much significantly higher MPH for YD and SN than the check combination Ghd8ZS97/Ghd8MH63. These data suggest that the allelic interaction effect arose from the functional and non-functional alleles at Ghd8 could produce more spikelet number and grain yield in heterozygotes than in the corresponding homozygotes or the check combination. However, the molecular mechanisms for the varied heterosis levels led by allelic combinations require further investigation. It has been reported that various allelic interactions may lead to novel hybrid expression patterns (He et al. 2010; Groszmann et al. 2015; Shao et al. 2019), protein metabolism (Goff, 2011; Chen, 2013), and epigenetic changes such as small RNAs and histone modification (Springer and Stupar, 2007; Lauss et al. 2019). In this regard, the transcriptional or post-transcriptional regulations, or polymer/dimer products from the allelic interaction may be causes of the heterosis variation. The developed NILs each contains a particular allele at the heterotic locus will provide an excellent stock to dissect the underlying mechanisms.

In addition, the elite rice hybrid SY63 has been successfully used for commercial hybrid production with the largest cultivated area in China during the past three decades (Xie and Zhang, 2018). In the present study, we found that the original hetero-allelic combination Ghd8ZS97/Ghd8MH63 in SY63 did not contribute to yield heterosis. However, the hetero-allelic combinations between Ghd8ZS97 (or Ghd8MH63) and any other alleles like Ghd8NIP, Ghd89311, or Ghd8ACC10 in heterozygotes could produce a significant positive yield heterosis compared with the combination between Ghd8ZS97 and Ghd8MH63. Thus, the replacement of either allele Ghd8ZS97 or Ghd8MH63 of SY63 with those identified desirable Ghd8 alleles with a marker-assisted selection approach can be used to improve the yield potential of hybrid cultivars.

Conclusion

A large number of HLs for yield-related traits were identified using three rice CSSL interconnected populations. Of these loci, Ghd8 was validated as a major HL for spikelet number and grain yield by transgenic experiments. Moreover, the investigation of 10 hetero-allelic combinations at Ghd8 exhibited several desirable allelic interactions in heterozygotes that can enhance yield heterosis. These data provide new insights into understanding the genetic basis of heterosis and will be exploited for increasing yield potential in hybrid rice breeding programs to meet the demand of growing population.

Availability of Data and Materials

The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article and its supporting files.

Abbreviations

A:

Additive effect

BC:

Backcross

CD:

Complete dominance

CSSLs:

Chromosome segment substitution lines

HLs:

Heterotic loci

HLMP :

Mid-parent heterotic loci

HLOS :

Over-standard heterotic loci

Indel:

Insertion/deletion

MPH:

Mid-parent heterosis

NIL:

Near-isogenic line

OD:

Overdominance

OSH:

Over-standard heterosis

PD:

Partial dominance

QTLs:

Quantitative trait loci

SNP:

Single nucleotide polymorphism

SSR:

Simple sequence repeat

TC:

Testcross

References

  1. Ali ML, Sanchez PL, Yu S, Lorieux M, Eizenga GC (2010) Chromosome segment substitution lines: a powerful tool for the introgression of valuable genes from Oryza wild species into cultivated rice (O. sativa). Rice 3:218–234

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashikari M, Sakakibara H, Lin SY, Yamamoto T, Takashi T, Nishimura A, Angeles ER (2005) Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science 309:741–745

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Birchler JA, Yao H, Chudalayandi S, Vaiman D, Veitia RA (2010) Heterosis. Plant Cell 22:2105–2112

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen ZJ (2013) Genomic and epigenetic insights into the molecular bases of heterosis. Nat Rev Genet 14:471–482

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen E, Huang X, Tian Z, Wing R, Han B (2019) The genomics of Oryza species provides insights into rice domestication and heterosis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 70:639–665

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Doi K, Izawa T, Fuse T, Yamanouchi U, Kubo T, Shimatani Z, Yano M, Yoshimura A (2004) Ehd1, a B-type response regulator in rice, confers short-day promotion of flowering and controls FT-like gene expression independently of Hd1. Gene Dev 18:926–936

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Elert E (2014) Rice by the numbers: a good grain. Nature 514:50–51

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gjuvsland AB, Plahte E, Adnoy T, Omholt SW (2010) Allele interaction–single locus genetics meets regulatory biology. PLoS ONE 5:e9379

  9. Goff SA (2011) A unifying theory for general multigenic heterosis: energy efficiency, protein metabolism, and implications for molecular breeding. New Phytol 189:923–937

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Groszmann M, Gonzalez-Bayon R, Lyons RL, Greaves IK, Kazan K, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (2015) Hormone-regulated defense and stress response networks contribute to heterosis in Arabidopsis F1 hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:6397–6406

    Google Scholar 

  11. He GM, Zhu XP, Elling AA, Chen LB, Wang XF, Guo L, Liang MZ, He H, Zhang HY, Chen FF, Qi YJ, Chen RS, Deng XW (2010) Global epigenetic and transcriptional trends among two rice subspecies and their reciprocal hybrids. Plant Cell 22:17–33

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang XH, Yang SH, Gong JY, Zhao Y, Feng Q, Gong H, Li WJ, Zhan QL, Cheng BY, Xia JH, Chen N, Hao ZN, Liu KY, Zhu CR, Huang T, Zhao Q, Zhang L, Fan DL, Zhou CC, Lu YQ, Weng QJ, Wang ZX, Li JY, Han B (2015) Genomic analysis of hybrid rice varieties reveals numerous superior alleles that contribute to heterosis. Nat Commun 6:6258

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang XH, Yang SH, Gong JY, Zhao Q, Feng Q, Zhan QL, Zhao Y, Li WJ, Cheng BY, Xia JH, Chen N, Huang T, Zhang L, Fan DL, Chen JY, Zhou CC, Lu YQ, Weng QJ, Han B (2016) Genomic architecture of heterosis for yield traits in rice. Nature 537:629–633

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Komatsu M, Maekawa M, Shimamoto K, Kyozuka J (2011) The LAX1 and FRIZZY PANICLE 2 genes determine the inflorescence architecture of rice by controlling rachis-branch and spikelet development. Dev Biol 231:364–373

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krieger U, Lippman ZB, Zamir D (2010) The flowering gene SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS drives heterosis for yield in tomato. Nat Genet 42:459–463

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin Z, Qin P, Zhang X, Fu CJ, Deng HC, Fi XX, Huang Z, Jiang SQ, Li C, Tang XY, Wang XF, He GM, Yang YZ, He H, Deng XW (2020) Divergent selection and genetic introgression shape the genome landscape of heterosis in hybrid rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:4623–4631

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Larièpe A, Mangin B, Jasson S, Combes V, Dumas F, Jamin P, Lariagon C, Jolivot D, Madur D, Fiévet J, Gallais A, Dubreuil P, Charcosset A, Moreau L (2012) The genetic basis of heterosis: multi parental quantitative trait loci mapping reveals contrasted levels of apparent overdominance among traits of agronomical interest in maize (Zea mays L.). Genetics 190:795–811

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lauss K, Wardenaar R, Oka R, Hulten MHA, Guryev V, Keurentjes JJB, Stam M, Johannes F (2019) Parental DNA methylation states are associated with heterosis in epigenetic hybrids. Plant Physiol 176:1627–1645

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li DY, Huang ZY, Song SH, Xin YY, Mao DH, Lv QM, Zhou M, Tian DM, Tang MF, Wu Q, Liu X, Chen TT, Song XW, Fu XQ, Zhao BR, Liang CZ, Li AH, Liu GZ, Li SG, Hu SN, Cao XF, Yu J, Yuan LP, Chen CY, Zhu LH (2016) Integrated analysis of phenome, genome, and transcriptome of hybrid rice uncovered multiple heterosis-related loci for yield increase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:6026–6035

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li ZK, Luo LJ, Mei HW, Wang DL, Shu QY, Tabien R, Zhong DB, Ying CS, Stansel JW, Khush GS (2001) Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I Biomass and Grain Yield Genetics 158:1737–1753

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu C, Song GY, Zhou YH, Qu XF, Guo ZB, Liu ZW, Jiang DM, Yang DC (2015) OsPRR37 and Ghd7 are the major genes for general combining ability of DTH, PH and SPP in rice. Sci Rep 5:12803

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu HJ, Wang Q, Chun MJ, Yang XR, Liu J, Li XH, Zhou CC, Tian QL, Lu YQ, Fan DL, Shi SP, Zhang L, Kan CB, Sun MF, Li FY, Wu YJ, Zhang YZ, Liu BS, Zhao XY, Feng Q, Yang JL, Han B, Lai JS, Zhang XS, Huang XH (2020) Genome-wide identification and analysis of heterotic loci in three maize hybrids. Plant Biotechnol J 18:185–194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McCouch SR (2008) Gene nomenclature system for rice. Rice 1:72–84

    Google Scholar 

  24. Murray MG, Thompson WF (1980) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucl Acids Res 8:4321

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Panaud O, Chen X, McCouch SR (1996) Development of microsatellite markers and characterization of simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Gen Genet 252:597–607

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Qian Q, Guo L, Smith S, Li JY (2016) Breeding high-yield superior quality hybrid super rice by rational design. Natl Sci Rev 3:283–294

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sasaki A, Ashikari M, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Itoh H, Nishimura A, Swapan D, Ishiyama K, Saito T, Kobayashi M, Khush GS, Kitano H, Matsuoka M (2002) A mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice. Nature 416:701–702

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schnable PS, Springer NM (2013) Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64:71–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Shao L, Xing F, Xu CH, Zhang QH, Che J, Wang XM, Song JM, Li XH, Xiao JH, Chen LL, Ouyang YD, Zhang QF (2019) Patterns of genome-wide allele-specific expression in hybrid rice and the implications on the genetic basis of heterosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:5653–5658

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stuber CW, Edwards MD, Wendel JF (1987) Molecular marker-facilitated investigation of quantitative trait loci in maize. II. Factors influencing yields and its component traits. Crop Sci 27:639–648

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sun WQ, Zhou QL, Yao Y, Qiu XJ, Xie K, Yu S (2015) Identification of genomic regions and the isoamylase gene for reduced grain chalkiness in rice. PLoS ONE 10:e0122013

  32. Tao YJ, Zhu JY, Xu JJ, Wang LJ, Gu HW, Zhou RH, Yang ZF, Liang GH (2016) Exploitation of heterosis loci for yield and yield components in rice using chromosome segment substitution lines. Sci Rep 6:36802

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang CS, Tang SC, Zhan QL, Hou QQ, Zhao Y, Zhao Q, Feng Q, Zhou CC, Lyu DF, Cui LL, Li Y, Miao JS, Zhu CR, Lu YQ, Wang YC, Wang ZQ, Zhu JJ, Shangguan YY, Gong JY, Yang SH, Wang WQ, Zhang JF, Xie HA, Huang XH, Han B (2019a) Dissecting a heterotic gene through GradedPoolSeq mapping informs a rice-improvement strategy. Nat Commun 10:2982

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang P, Xiong Y, Gong R, Yang Y, Fan K, Yu S (2019b) A key variant in the cis-regulatory element of flowering gene Ghd8 associated with cold tolerance in rice. Sci Rep 9:9603

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang ZQ, Yu CY, Liu X, Liu SJ, Yin CB, Liu LL, Lei JG, Jiang L, Yang C, Chen LM, Zhai HQ, Wan JM (2012) Identification of indica rice chromosome segments for the improvement of japonica inbreds and hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 124:1351–1364

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Xiao JH, Li JM, Yuan LP, Tanksley SD (1995) Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140:745–754

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Xie FM, Zhang JF (2018) Shanyou 63: an elite mega rice hybrid in China. Rice 11:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  38. Xue WY, Xing YZ, Weng XY, Zhao Y, Tang WJ, Wang L, Zhou HJ, Yu S, Xu CG, Li XH, Zhang Q (2008) Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet 40:761–767

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yan WH, Wang P, Chen HX, Zhou HJ, Li QP, Wang CR, Ding ZH, Zhang YS, Yu S, Xing Y, Zhang Q (2011) A major QTL, Ghd8, plays pleiotropic roles in regulating grain productivity, plant height, and heading date in rice. Mol Plant 4:319–330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Yan WH, Liu HY, Zhou XC, Li QP, Zhang J, Lu L, Liu TM, Liu HJ, Zhang CJ, Zhang ZY, Shen GJ, Yao W, Chen HX, Yu S, Xie WB, Xing YZ (2013) Natural variation in Ghd7.1 plays an important role in grain yield and adaptation in rice. Cell Res 7:969–971

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yu S, Li JX, Xu CG, Tan YF, Gao YJ, Li XH, Zhang Q, Saghai-Maroof MA (1997) Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9226–9231

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang B, Shang LG, Ruan BP, Zhang AP, Yang SL, Jiang HZ, Liu CL, Hong K, Lin H, Gao ZY, Hu J, Zeng DL, Guo LB, Qian Q (2019) Development of three sets of high-throughput genotyped rice chromosome segment substitution lines and QTL mapping for eleven traits. Rice 12:33

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang SN, Huang XH, Han B (2021) Understanding the genetic basis of rice heterosis: Advances and prospects. Crop J 9:688–692

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhou G, Chen Y, Yao W, Zhang CJ, Xie WB, Hua JP, Zhang Q (2012) Genetic composition of yield heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:15847–15852

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhu D, Zhou G, Xu CG, Zhang Q (2016) Genetic components of heterosis for seedling traits in an elite rice hybrid analyzed using an immortalized F2 population. J Genet Genomics 43:87–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Kun Xie for assistance in data analysis.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971864), the Major Project of Science and Technology of Hubei (2019ABA104), and the National High Technology Research and Development of China (2014AA10A604). Also, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) is acknowledged for providing a research grant on Green Super Rice Project under ID OPP1130530.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YS designed and conceived the research; XY, ZH, QX and WD developed the populations and NILs; XY and WP developed the transgenic lines; ZC and SW performed genotyping; ZC and XY analyzed data; YS, ZC and AJ wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sibin Yu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

Table S1. Phenotypic performances of 12 traits among the parents, CSSLs, BC, and TC across two environments. Table S2. QTLs were detected for 12 traits in CSSLs across two-year trials. Table S3. Mid-parent heterotic loci (HLMP) were detected for 12 traits in BC across two environments. Table S4. Over-standard heterotic loci (HLOS) were detected for 12 traits in TC population across two environments. Table S5. The degree of dominance and mid-parent heterosis for spikelet number and grain yield in transgenic hybrids. Table S6 The degree of dominance and mid-parent heterosis for spikelet number and grain yield in 10 allelic combinations.

Additional file 2

Figure S1. Correlation coefficients for 12 traits among CSSLs, BC and TC populations in 2007. GN, grain number; HD, heading date; PB, number of primary branches; PH, plant height; PL, panicle length; PP, panicles per plant; PW, panicle weight; SB, the number of secondary branches; SN, spikelet number; SS, seed setting ratio; TGW, thousand-grain weight; and YD, grain yield per plant.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiong, Y., Zhang, C., Zhou, H. et al. Identification of Heterotic Loci with Desirable Allelic Interaction to Increase Yield in Rice. Rice 14, 97 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-021-00539-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-021-00539-z

Keywords

  • Heterotic loci
  • Allelic interaction
  • Grain yield
  • Overdominance
  • Ghd8
  • Rice