Skip to main content

Fine mapping of two grain chalkiness QTLs sensitive to high temperature in rice

Abstract

Background

Grain chalkiness is one of important factors affected rice grain quality. It is known that chalkiness is affected by the high temperature during the seed filling period. Although a larger of QTLs for chalkiness were reported across all 12 chromosomes, only a few of the QTLs were fine mapped or cloned up to now. Here, we fine map two QTLs for chalkiness in two single-segment substitution lines (SSSLs), 11–09 with substitution segment from O. sativa and HP67–11 with substitution segment from O. glaberrima.

Results

The grain chalkiness of SSSLs 11–09 and HP67–11 was significantly lower than that in the recipient Huajingxian 74 (HJX74) in consecutive 8 cropping seasons. The regression correlation analysis showed that percentage of chalky grain (PCG) and percentage of chalky area (PCA) were significantly and positively correlated with percentage of grain chalkiness (PGC). Two QTLs for grain chalkiness were located on two chromosomes by substitution mapping. qPGC9 was mapped on chromosome 9 with an estimated interval of 345.6 kb. qPGC11 was located on chromosome 11 and delimited to a 432.1 kb interval in the O. sativa genome and a 332.9 kb interval in the O. glaberrima genome. qPGC11 is a QTL for grain chalkiness from O. glaberrima and was mapped in a new region of chromosome 11. The effect of two QTLs was incomplete dominance. The additive effects of two QTLs on chalkiness in second cropping season (SCS) were significantly greater than that in first cropping season (FCS).

Conclusions

qPGC11 is a new QTL for grain chalkiness. The two QTLs were fine mapped. The donor alleles of qPGC9 and qPGC11 were sensitive to the high temperature of FCS.

Background

Rice is a staple food that provides at least 20% of the daily caloric needs of more than half of the world’s people. To meet the demands of a growing global population, rice breeders have been aiming at the high yield of varieties (Peng et al. 2004). In recent years, with the improvement of people’s living standards, people pay more and more attention to rice quality. Rice varieties were required to have both a higher grain yield and a better grain quality. Rice quality includes the appearance quality, processing quality, nutritional quality, cooking and eating quality, and so on (Gao et al. 2016). Grain chalkiness not only affects the grain appearance, but also has adverse effects on milling and cooking properties. Varieties with higher head rice yield, higher transparency and less chalkiness are more popular in the market (Sreenivasulu et al. 2015; Misra et al. 2019).

Chalkiness is one of variable parameters that influence grain quality. It is defined as the opaque part of translucent endosperm in grains. In the early and middle stages of seed development, the occurrence of temperature stress causes uneven seed filling and storage biosynthesis obstacles, leading to the formation of chalkiness. The chalkiness is affected by the high temperature during the seed filling period (Masutomi et al. 2015; Sreenivasulu et al. 2015; Morita et al. 2016). Exposure to high temperature during the entire storage phase resulted in triggering of > 90% of chalky grains. When exposed during the early storage phase, nearly half of the grains had the chalky phenotype, while a much lower frequency was shown in the exposure during middle and late phases of storage (Ishimaru et al. 2019). The chalkiness of rice varieties varied greatly. Variety surveys showed that the proportion of chalky grains of newly developed varieties was higher than that of the old modern varieties, and the proportion of chalky grains of the hybrid varieties was higher than that of other modern varieties (Laborte et al. 2015). Therefore, high-yielding varieties usually have higher chalkiness levels (Misra et al. 2019).

Grain chalkiness is a complex polygenic quantitative trait (Sreenivasulu et al. 2015). Percentage of grain chalkiness (PGC) is a quantitative index of chalkiness phenotype (Misra et al. 2019). More than one hundred of QTLs for the chalkiness trait were reported across all 12 chromosomes (Sreenivasulu et al. 2015). A larger number of the QTLs for chalkiness were detected on chromosomes 5, 6 and 8 in different genetic backgrounds and environments. The QTL clusters were found on the hotspot regions of the three chromosomes (He et al. 1999; Tan et al. 2000; Wan et al. 2005; Hao et al. 2009; Chen et al. 2011; Guo et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2012; Li et al. 2014; Peng et al. 2014; Zhao et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2016; Gao et al. 2016; Yun et al. 2016; Zhao et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2017; Zhu et al. 2018a; Misra et al. 2019; Misra et al. 2020). Some QTLs were found to be related with chalkiness under high temperature stress (Nevame et al. 2018). Kobayashi et al. (2007) detected three QTLs for chalkiness under high temperature stress in japonica varieties. Tabata et al. (2007) identified four QTLs for chalkiness in a RIL population derived from a cross between a heat stress-tolerant variety and a heat stress-sensitive variety. Wada et al. (2015) and Miyahara et al. (2017) identified a set of QTLs for chalkiness under heat stress condition using a RIL population derived from a cross between a heat-tolerant variety and a heat stress-sensitive variety, and validated the effect of two QTLs qMW4.1 and qWB8 under heat stress during the ripening period. However, only a few QTLs for chalkiness were fine mapped or cloned up to now. Chalk5 on chromosome 5 is the firstly cloned QTL for chalkiness, which encodes a vacuolar H+-translocating pyrophosphatase (V-PPase) with inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi) hydrolysis and H+-translocation activity (Li et al. 2014).

Like near-isogenic lines (NILs), chromosome single-segment substitution lines (SSSLs) carry only one substitution segment from donors in the recipient genetic background (Zhang et al. 2004; Keurentjes et al. 2007; Zhang 2019). We have developed a library of 2360 SSSLs, which were derived from 43 donors of 7 species of rice AA genome in the genetic background of Huajingxian 74 (HJX74), an indica elite variety in southern China (Zhang et al. 2004; Xi et al. 2006; Zhang 2019). These SSSLs were widely used to detect QTLs for complex traits (Zhang et al. 2012; Zhu et al. 2014; Yang et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2017; Zhu et al. 2018b), to clone QTLs of agronomic importance and to mine alleles of different functions (Zeng et al. 2006; Teng et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2012; Fang et al. 2019; Sui et al. 2019). Recently, the SSSLs were used to detect QTLs controlling stigma exsertion rate (SER) of rice. A total of 11 QTLs for SER were mapped on 6 chromosomes of rice genome (Tan et al. 2020; Tan et al. 2021). In present study, two QTLs for grain chalkiness on chromosomes 9 and 11, qPGC9 and qPGC11, were fine mapped. Both QTLs were sensitive to high temperature. Fine mapping of the two QTLs laid a foundation for cloning the genes and revealing the mechanism of chalkiness heat stress.

Results

Grain chalkiness in SSSLs

Two SSSLs 11–09 and HP67–11 with lower grain chalkiness were selected from the HJX74-SSSL library (Fig. 1). The SSSLs were used to investigate grain chalkiness in consecutive 8 cropping seasons from the first cropping season (FCS) of 2016 to the second cropping season (SCS) of 2019. On average, the percentage of grain chalkiness (PGC) of 11–09 and HP67–11 was 12.5% and 11.3% respectively, which was significantly lower than 21.0% of recipient HJX74, respectively (Fig. 1b and Additional file 1: Table S1). This meant that the two SSSLs each carried a QTL for PGC in their substitution segments.

Fig. 1
figure1

Grain chalkiness in HJX74 and SSSLs. a, Plant type of HJX74 and SSSLs 11–09 and HP67–11. Scale bar: 15 cm. b, Percentage of grain chalkiness (PGC) (%) in HJX74 and SSSLs. Data were presented as mean ± S.E. of eight cropping seasons. One-way ANOVA, two-tailed, Dunnett t-test was used to generate the differences. c, Chromosome locations of the two SSSLs. Physical distance (Mb) is shown as rulers on the right of chromosome. Black bars on the left of each chromosome represent the estimated length of substitution segments in the SSSLs. Chr. chromosome, Mb megabase

The substitution segments of 11–09 and HP67–11 were surveyed by densifying molecular markers (Additional file 1: Table S2). The estimated length of substitution segments was 4531.2 kb in 11–09 and 1135.4 kb in HP67–11 (Fig. 1c and Additional file 1: Table S3).

Eight agronomic traits of 11–09 and HP67–11 were investigated. All traits of HP67–11 had no significant difference with HJX74. For 11–09, plant height, number of panicles per plant, total number of grains per plant and 1000-grain weight had no significant difference with HJX74, while heading date, grain length, grain width and grain weight per plant had significant difference with HJX74 in two cropping seasons or in only one cropping season (Fig. 1a and Additional file 1: Table S4). The results showed that the genetic background of SSSLs was similar to that of HJX74 except for grain chalkiness.

Substitution mapping of qPGC9 for grain chalkiness

To map the QTL for grain chalkiness on the substitution segment of 11–09, the SSSL was used to develop secondary SSSLs or NILs. Seven NILs were developed from an F2:3 population derived from the cross of HJX74/11–09. The seven NILs were then investigated for grain chalkiness. PGC levels of four NILs, NIL11–09-6, NIL11–09-19, NIL11–09-31 and NIL11–09-114, were as low as 11–09, while PGC levels of three NILs, NIL11–09-4, NIL11–09-61 and NIL11–09-135, were as high as HJX74. Substitution segments of the four NILs with low PGC overlapped in the region between markers RM3855 and RM24030, while substitution segments of other three NILs with high PGC located outside the region. These results indicated that the QTL for grain chalkiness, qPGC9, was located in the region between markers RM3855 and RM24030 with the estimated interval length of 345.6 kb (Fig. 2a-b).

Fig. 2
figure2

Substitution mapping of qPGC9 for grain chalkiness. a, The head rice appearance of the HJX74 and 11–09. Scale bar: 1 cm. b, Substitution mapping of qPGC9. The positions of substitution segments and the PGC of 11–09 and its NILs are shown, with HJX74 as the control. The numbers under the chromosome are physical distance (Mb). White and black blocks represent the homozygous genotypes of HJX74 and 11–09, respectively. c, PGC effects of three genotypes of qPGC9 in an F2 population. qpgc9/qpgc9 represents homozygous genotype of HJX74 (n = 38); qPGC9/qpgc9 represents heterozygous genotype of HJX74/11–09 (n = 68); qPGC9/qPGC9 represents homozygous genotype of 11–09 (n = 34). Significant difference analysis in b and c was by one-way ANOVA, Duncan, two-tailed. Values in the lines among different letters are different at 1% level of significance

Using PSM157 marker in qPGC9 interval, Chi-square test was performed in 140 individuals of F2 population. The results showed that the segregation ratio of the three marker genotypes was 1:2:1 (χ2 = 0.34 < χ20.01,2 = 9.21) (Additional file 2: Fig. S1). The effect of heterozygous genotype (qPGC9/qpgc9) was significantly lower than that of dominant homozygous genotype (qPGC9/qPGC9) and significantly higher than that of recessive homozygous genotype (qpgc9/qpgc9). The result showed that qPGC9 was incomplete dominance (Fig. 2c).

Substitution mapping of qPGC11 for grain chalkiness

To map the QTL for grain chalkiness on the substitution segment of HP67–11, the SSSL was used to develop NILs. Four NILs were developed from an F2:3 population derived from the cross of HJX74/HP67–11. Grain chalkiness of the four NILs were then investigated. PGC levels of two NILs, NIL67–11-125 and NIL67–11-40, were as low as HP67–11, while PGC levels of two NILs, NIL67–11-14 and NIL67–11-77, were as high as HJX74. Substitution segments of the two NILs with low PGC overlapped in the region between markers ID11M1 and RM37043, while substitution segments of other two NILs with high PGC located outside the region. These results indicated that the QTL for grain chalkiness, qPGC11, was located in the region between markers ID11M1 and RM37043 with the estimated interval length of 432.1 kb (Fig. 3a-b). Because the substitution segment of HP67–11 was derived from O. glaberrima, the estimated length between markers ID11M1 and RM37043 on the substitution segment was 332.9 kb in the O. glaberrima genome (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3
figure3

Substituted mapping of qPGC11 for grain chalkiness. a, The head rice appearance of the HJX74 and HP67–11. Scale bar: 1 cm. b, Substitution mapping of qPGC11. The positions of substitution segments and the PGC of HP67–11 and its NILs are shown, with HJX74 as the control. The numbers under the chromosome are physical distance (Mb). White and black blocks represent the homozygous genotypes of HJX74 and HP67–11, respectively. c, PGC effects of three genotypes of qPGC11 in an F2 population. qpgc11/qpgc11 represents homozygous genotype of HJX74 (n = 26); qPGC11/qpgc11 represents heterozygous genotype of HJX74/HP67–11 (n = 49); qPGC11/qPGC11 represents homozygous genotype of HP67–11 (n = 30). Significance analysis in b and c was by one-way ANOVA, Duncan, two-tailed. Values in the lines among different letters are different at 1% level of significance

In the F2 population of 105 individuals, PSM366 marker in qPGC11 region showed that the segregation ratio of the three marker genotypes was 1:2:1 (χ2 = 0.77 < χ20.01,2 = 9.21) (Additional file 2: Fig. S2). The effect of heterozygous genotype (qPGC11/qpgc11) was significantly different from that of the homozygous genotypes (qPGC11/qPGC11 and qpgc11/qpgc11). The result showed that qPGC11 was incomplete dominance (Fig. 3c).

Effects of percentage of chalky grain (PCG) and percentage of chalky area (PCA) on PGC

PGC is a quantitative index of grain chalkiness. PGC can be decomposed into PCG and PCA. The regression correlation analysis showed that PCG and PCA were significantly and positively correlated with PGC. Regression coefficients of PCG and PCA with PGC were 0.9741 and 0.9298 in 11–09 carrying qPGC9, and 0.9609 and 0.8321 in HP67–11 carrying qPGC11, respectively (Fig. 4). The results showed that both PCG and PCA had great contribution to PGC, and PCG contributed more to PGC than PCA.

Fig. 4
figure4

Regression correlation analysis between PCG and PGC and between PCA and PGC of SSSLs 11–09 and HP67–11. R2 represents the percentage of x contribution to y phenotype variation. PCG percentage of chalky grain, PCA percentage of chalky area, PGC percentage of grain chalkiness

Effects of different cropping seasons on grain chalkiness

The grain chalkiness was tested in two cropping seasons per year. During flowering to harvest of rice, the day and night temperatures of FCS and SCS were very different. In 2016–2019, the average values of maximum temperature, minimum temperature and mean temperature were respectively 32.6 °C, 25.9 °C and 29.2 °C in FCS, and 29.0 °C, 21.5 °C and 25.3 °C in SCS. The mean temperature in SCS was 3.9 °C lower than that in FCS (Additional file 1: Table S5).

The values of PCG, PCA and PGC in FCS were significantly higher than those in SCS in all lines. The PGC of HJX74, 11–09 and HP67–11 was 25.3%, 18.7% and 17.5% in FCS, and 16.7%, 6.4% and 5.2% in SCS, respectively. The PGC of all lines in FCS was higher than that in SCS at 0.001 level of significance (Fig. 5). It is obvious that the PGC of HJX74 and SSSLs was greatly affected by higher temperature during the seed filling period.

Fig. 5
figure5

The difference of chalky traits between first cropping seasons (FCS) and second cropping seasons (SCS) in HJX74, 11–09 and HP67–11. PCG percentage of chalky grain (a). PCA Percentage of chalky area (b). PGC Percentage of grain chalkiness (c)

Additive effects of qPGC9 and qPGC11

The effect of environment on grain chalkiness was reflected in the additive effect of the QTLs. According to the estimation of chalkiness phenotypes in 2016–2019, the additive effects of qPGC9 and qPGC11 on PCG, PCA and PGC in SCS were significantly greater than those in FCS. For qPGC9, the additive effects on PCG, PCA and PGC were − 13.6%, − 3.2% and − 6.7% in FCS, and − 25.0%, − 9.3% and − 10.3% in SCS, respectively. For qPGC11, the additive effects on PCG, PCA and PGC in FCS and SCS were − 14.3%, − 5.0% and − 7.8%, and − 28.0%, − 11.4% and − 11.5%, respectively (Fig. 6). The additive effects of qPGC9 and qPGC11 on chalkiness in SCS were almost twice of those in FCS. Obviously, the additive effects of the two QTLs on chalkiness were decreased by the high temperature of FCS.

Fig. 6
figure6

The additive effects of qPGC9 and qPGC11 on grain chalkiness in first cropping seasons (FCS) and second cropping seasons (SCS). PCG percentage of chalky grain (a). PCA Percentage of chalky area (b). PGC Percentage of grain chalkiness (c)

Discussion

Fine mapping of the QTLs for grain chalkiness

More than one hundred of QTLs for chalkiness trait were reported across all 12 chromosomes. However, only a few QTLs for chalkiness were fine mapped up to now (Sreenivasulu et al. 2015; Misra et al. 2020). On chromosome 9, several QTLs for chalkiness were identified (Wan et al. 2005; Chen et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2011; Gao et al. 2016; Zhao et al. 2016; Misra et al. 2020). Wan et al. (2005) identified qPGWC-9/qACE-9/qDEC-9 in the 1.8–10.8 Mb region of chromosome 9 with an interval about 9.0 Mb. Zhao et al. (2016) identified qPGWC9b/qDEC9 in the 7.9–12.3 Mb region of chromosome 9 with an interval about 4.4 Mb. In this study, we fine mapped qPGC9 on chromosome 9 in the 9.4–9.8 Mb region between markers RM3855 and RM24030 with the estimated interval length of 345.6 kb (Fig. 2). The mapping interval of qPGC9 was much narrower than that of QTLs reported previously. On chromosome 11, several QTLs for chalkiness were detected (Chen et al. 2011; Peng et al. 2014; Zhao et al. 2016). In this study, HP67–11 carrying the substitution segment on chromosome 11 from O. glaberrima was used to detect QTL for chalkiness. qPGC11 on the substitution segment was fine mapped in the 23.0–23.5 Mb region between markers ID11M1 and RM37043 with the estimated interval length of 432.1 kb in O. sativa genome and 332.9 kb in O. glaberrima genome (Fig. 3). This is the first QTL for chalkiness from O. glaberrima. The qPGC11 is also new in its mapping region, in which no QTLs for chalkiness was reported previously. Fine mapping of qPGC9 and qPGC11 laid a foundation for gene cloning.

Grain chalkiness and grain shape are two important traits for rice grain quality. Grain width was positively correlated with chalkiness (Zhao et al. 2015). It was found that some QTLs controlling grain width were overlapped with chalk QTLs (Wang et al. 2017). Misra et al. (2020) showed that the phenotypic variation for chalkiness had a weak positive correlation with grain width. In this study, 11–09 showed significant difference with HJX74 in grain length and grain width in FCS of 2019, but no significant difference in SCS of 2018. HP67–11 had no significant difference with HJX74 in grain length and grain width in the two cropping seasons (Additional file 1: Table S4). To analyze the relationship of grain shape and grain chalkiness, the NILs used to map the QTLs for grain chalkiness (Figs. 2 and 3b) were used to investigate grain shape. The results showed that the grain length and grain width were significant different in the NILs but no linkage between grain shape and grain chalkiness of qPGC9 (Additional file 1: Table S6), and were no significant different in the NILs of qPGC11 (Additional file 1: Table S7). The results indicated that the grain chalkiness of qPGC9 and qPGC11 was no relationship with grain shape.

Influence of high temperature on grain chalkiness

It is found that the high temperature during the seed filling period triggers non-uniform filling, leading to chalk formation (Masutomi et al. 2015; Sreenivasulu et al. 2015; Morita et al. 2016; Ishimaru et al. 2019). Some QTLs controlling chalkiness under high temperature stress were identified (Kobayashi et al. 2007; Tabata et al. 2007; Kobayashi et al. 2013; Wada et al. 2015; Miyahara et al. 2017). However, the genetic basis of chalkiness heat stress is still unclear. In Guandong province of China, rice is planted in two cropping seasons per year, FCS from late February to middle July and SCS from late July to middle November. During the seed filling period, the air temperature of FCS is usually higher than that of SCS. In 2016–2019, the mean temperature of FCS was 3.9 °C higher than that of SCS during the seed filling period (Additional file 1: Table S5). The PGC of HJX74, 11–09 and HP67–11 was 25.3%, 18.7% and 17.5% in FCS, and 16.7%, 6.4% and 5.2% in SCS, respectively. The PGC of all lines in FCS was higher than that in SCS at 0.001 level of significance (Fig. 5). Obviously, the grain chalkiness of HJX74 and SSSLs was greatly affected by higher temperature during the seed filling period. It is noted that the effect of high temperature on SSSLs, 11–09 and HP67–11, was greater than that on HJX74 (Fig. 5). We found that the additive effects of qPGC9 and qPGC11 on chalkiness in SCS were almost twice of those in FCS (Fig. 6). It indicates that the additive effects of qPGC9 and qPGC11 on chalkiness were decreased by the high temperature of FCS. The donor alleles of qPGC9 and qPGC11 were sensitive to high temperature. The results reveal the genetic basis of chalkiness heat stress. It laid a foundation for revealing the mechanism of chalkiness heat stress.

Substitution mapping of QTLs for complex traits

Grain chalkiness is a complex polygenic quantitative trait and easily affected by environment (Sreenivasulu et al. 2015). Therefore, it is not easy to fine map QTLs for grain chalkiness. Chromosome segment substitution lines (CSSLs) carrying a small number of chromosome segments from one donor substituted into the genetic background of recipient are widely used in QTL analysis of complex traits (Howell et al. 1996; Doi et al. 1997; Kubo et al. 2002; Ebitani et al. 2005; Ebitani et al. 2008). When the CSSLs carry a single substitution segment from a donor, they are called SSSLs (Zhang et al. 2004; Xi et al. 2006), or NILs (Monforte and Tanksley 2000; Keurentjes et al. 2007). Through the development of SSSLs or NILs, the multiple QTLs of complex traits can be separated into a single QTL to accomplish the mendelization of QTL (Alonso-Blanco and Koornneef 2000). In the present study, the SSSLs with low grain chalkiness were selected to map the QTLs on the substitution segments. Through the development of secondary SSSLs, QTLs for grain chalkiness were limited in narrow intervals (Figs. 2 and 3). The SSSLs were tested for grain chalkiness in 8 cropping seasons of 4 years. The interaction of QTL by environment was detected in different environments of FCS and SCS (Figs. 5 and 6). The results indicate that substitution mapping is a powerful tool for the QTL analysis of complex traits.

Conclusion

Two QTLs for grain chalkiness were located on two chromosomes. qPGC9 was fine mapped on chromosome 9. qPGC11 was fine mapped on chromosome 11. qPGC11 is a new QTL for grain chalkiness from O. glaberrima. The effect of qPGC9 and qPGC11 was incomplete dominance. The additive effects of two QTLs on chalkiness in SCS were significantly greater than those in FCS. The donor alleles of qPGC9 and qPGC11 were sensitive to the high temperature of FCS. The results reveal the genetic basis of chalkiness heat stress in rice.

Methods

Plant materials and field experiments

Two SSSLs 11–09 and HP67–11 with lower grain chalkiness were selected from the SSSL library, in which HJX74, an indica variety of O. sativa in China was used as recipient. The substitution segment of 11–09 was derived from the donor Basmati 370, a Basmati variety of O. sativa. The substitution segment of HP67–11 was derived from the donor HP67, an accession of O. glaberrima. All plant materials were planted at the farm of South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China (23°07′N, 113°15′E) from 2016 to 2019. The materials were planted in two cropping seasons per year, FCS from late February to middle July and SCS from late July to middle November. Rice cultivation and controlling of diseases and insect pests were common practices in southern China.

Measurement of grain chalkiness

The seeds of each line were harvested after full maturity. The dried seeds of 10 plants of each line were processed into milled rice and then 200 head rice of each plant were randomly selected for measurement of chalkiness. Images of the head rice were captured and the chalkiness parameters were measured by Microtek ScanWizard EZ scanner and rice quality analyzer SC-E software (Hangzhou Wanshen Detection Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China, www.wseen.com). PCG refers to the percentage of chalky grains in total grains. PCA refers to the percentage of chalk area per chalky grain. PGC is the product of percentage of chalky grains multiplied by percentage of chalk area.

Genotyping of markers

Markers labeled “RM” were selected from online resources (https://archive.gramene.org/markers/). Markers of “PSM” and “InDel” were designed using the Primer Premier 5.0 software (Lalitha 2000) and the primer sequences of developed markers are listed in Additional file 1: Table S2. DNA samples were extracted from the fresh leaves of each plant by the method of Murray and Thompson (1980). DNA samples were amplified by PCR method. PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis on 6% denatured PAGE and detected by the silver staining method (Tan et al. 2020).

Phenotyping and statistical analysis

Heading date, plant height and panicle number per plant were investigated in the field. Grain traits were measured by the yield traits scorer (YTS), a rice phenotypic facility (Yang et al. 2014). The square root of the arcsine of the percentage was used for statistical analysis. The student’s t-test was used for comparison between two groups. Dunnett t-test was used to compare multiple groups with control group. Least significance range (LSR) was used for multiple range test among multiple groups (Duncan 1955). SPSS statistics 23.0 and Origin Pro 9.0 were used for data analysis and figure making (https://www.originlab.com).

Substitution mapping of QTLs for PGC

To develop secondary SSSLs or NILs, SSSLs 11–09 and HP67–11 were crossed with the recipient HJX74. The NILs were developed from F2:3 populations derived from the crosses. The minimum, maximum and estimated lengths of a substitution segment were estimated by the positions of markers (Tan et al. 2020). The QTLs were located by substitution mapping (Eshed and Zamir 1995; Tan et al. 2020). When PGC showed significant difference between SSSL genotype and HJX74 genotype, a QTL for PGC was detected on the substitution segment of SSSL. When multiple substitution segments in NILs with target trait overlapped, the QTL was located in the overlapping region (Tan et al. 2020). Additive effect of a QTL was defined as the phenotypic difference between SSSL and HJX74 (Zhou et al. 2020). QTLs were named followed the method of McCouch et al. (1997). MapChart2.3 (https://www.wur.nl/en/show/Mapchart.htm) was used to draw the linkage maps of markers.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article and its additional information files.

Abbreviations

PGC:

Percentage of grain chalkiness

PCG:

Percentage of chalky grain

PCA:

Percentage of chalky area

QTL:

Quantitative trait locus

CSSL:

Chromosome segment substitution line

SSSL:

Single-segment substitution line

NIL:

Near-isogenic line

FSC:

First cropping season

SCS:

Second cropping season

HJX74:

Huajingxian 74

References

  1. Alonso-Blanco C, Koornneef M (2000) Naturally occurring variation in Arabidopsis: an underexploited resource for plant genetics. Trends Plant Sci 5(1):22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(99)01510-1

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen H, Zhao Z, Jiang L, Wan X, Liu L, Wu X, Wan J (2011) Molecular genetic analysis on percentage of grains with chalkiness in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Afr J Biotechnol 10:6891–6903

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen L, Gao W, Chen S, Wang L, Zou J, Liu Y, Wang H, Chen Z, Guo T (2016) High-resolution QTL mapping for grain appearance traits and co-localization of chalkiness-associated differentially expressed candidate genes in rice. Rice 9(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-016-0121-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Doi K, Iwata N, Yoshimura A (1997) The construction of chromosome substitution lines of African rice (Oryza glaberrima Steud.) in the background of japonica rice (O.sativa L.). Rice Genet Newsl 14:39–41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Duncan DB (1955) Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11(1):1–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478

  6. Ebitani T, Takeuchi Y, Nonoue Y, Yamamoto T, Takeuchi K, Yano M (2005) Construction and evaluation of chromosome segment substitution lines carrying overlapping chromosome segments of indica rice cultivar 'kasalath' in a genetic background of japonica elite cultivar 'koshihikari'. Breed Sci 55(1):65–73. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.55.65

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ebitani T, Yamamoto Y, Yano M, Funane M (2008) Identification of quantitative trait loci for grain appearance using chromosome segment substitution lines in rice. Breed Res 10(3):91–99. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbr.10.91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eshed Y, Zamir D (1995) An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141(3):1147–1162. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/141.3.1147

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fang C, Li L, He R, Wang D, Wang M, Hu Q, Ma Q, Qin K, Feng X, Zhang G, Fu X, Liu Z (2019) Identification of S23 causing both interspecific hybrid male sterility and environment-conditioned male sterility in rice. Rice 12(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-019-0271-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao Y, Liu C, Li Y, Zhang A, Dong G, Xie L, Zhang B, Ruan B, Hong K, Xue D, Zeng D, Guo L, Qian Q, Gao Z (2016) QTL analysis for chalkiness of rice and fine mapping of a candidate gene for qACE9. Rice 9(1):41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-016-0114-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo T, Liu X, Wan X, Weng J, Liu S, Liu X, Chen M, Li J, Su N, Wu F, Cheng Z, Guo X, Lei C, Wang J, Jiang L, Wan J (2011) Identification of a stable quantitative trait locus for percentage grains with white chalkiness in rice (Oryza sativa). J Integr Plant Biol 53(8):598–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2011.01041.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hao W, Zhu M, Gao J, Sun S, Lin H (2009) Identification of quantitative trait loci for rice quality in a population of chromosome segment substitution lines. J Integr Plant Biol 51(5):500–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2009.00822.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. He P, Li SG, Qian Q, Ma YQ, Li JZ, Wang WM, Chen Y, Zhu LH (1999) Genetic analysis of rice grain quality. Theor Appl Genet 98(3-4):502–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051098

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Howell PM, Lydiate DJ, Marshall DF (1996) Towards developing intervarietal substitution lines in brassica napus using marker-assisted selection. Genome 39(2):348–358. https://doi.org/10.1139/g96-045

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ishimaru T, Parween S, Saito Y, Shigemitsu T, Yamakawa H, Nakazono M, Masumura T, Nishizawa NK, Kondo M, Sreenivasulu N (2019) Laser microdissection-based tissue-specific transcriptome analysis reveals a novel regulatory network of genes involved in heat-induced grain chalk in rice endosperm. Plant Cell Physiol 60(3):626–642. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcy233

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Keurentjes JJB, Bentsink L, Alonso-Blanco C, Hanhart CJ, Vries HBD, Effgen S, Vreugdenhil D, Koornneef M (2007) Development of a near-isogenic line population of Arabidopsis thaliana and comparison of mapping power with a recombinant inbred line population. Genetics 175(2):891–905. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.066423

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kobayashi A, Genliang B, Shenghai Y, Tomita K (2007) Detection of quantitative trait loci for white-back and basal-white kernels under high temperature stress in japonica rice varieties. Breed Sci 57(2):107–116. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.57.107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kobayashi A, Sonoda J, Sugimoto K, Kondo M, Iwasawa N, Hayashi T, Tomita K, Yano M, Shimizu T (2013) Detection and verification of QTLs associated with heat-induced quality decline of rice (Oryza sativa L.) using recombinant inbred lines and near-isogenic lines. Breed Sci 63(3):339–346. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.63.339

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kubo T, Aida Y, Nakamura K, Tsunematsu H, Doi K, Yoshimura A (2002) Reciprocal chromosome segment substitution series derived from japonica and indica cross of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Breed Sci 52(4):319–325. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.52.319

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Laborte AG, Paguirigan NC, Moya PF, Nelson A, Sparks AH, Gregorio GB (2015) Farmers’ preference for rice traits: insights from farm surveys in Central Luzon, Philippines, 1966-2012. PLoS One 10:e136562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lalitha S (2000) Primer premier 5. Biotech Software Internet Rep 1(6):270–272. https://doi.org/10.1089/152791600459894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li Y, Fan C, Xing Y, Yun P, Luo L, Yan B, Peng B, Xie W, Wang G, Li X, Xiao J, Xu C, He Y (2014) Chalk5 encodes a vacuolar H+-translocating pyrophosphatase influencing grain chalkiness in rice. Nat Genet 46(4):398–404. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2923

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu X, Wan X, Ma X, Wan J (2011) Dissecting the genetic basis for the effect of rice chalkiness, amylose content, protein content, and rapid viscosity analyzer profile characteristics on the eating quality of cooked rice using the chromosome segment substitution line population across eight environments. Genome 54:64–80

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu X, Wang Y, Wang SW (2012) QTL analysis of percentage of grains with chalkiness in japonica rice (Oryza sativa). Genet Mol Res 11(1):717–724. https://doi.org/10.4238/2012.March.22.1

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Masutomi Y, Arakawa M, Minoda T, Yonekura T, Shimada T (2015) Critical air temperature and sensitivity of the incidence of chalky rice kernels for the rice cultivar “sai-no-kagayaki”. Agric For Meteorol 203:11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McCouch SR, Cho YG, Yano M, Paul E, Blinstrub M, Mor-ishima H, Kinosita T (1997) II. Report from coordinators. (1) report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genet Newsl 14:11–12

    Google Scholar 

  27. Misra G, Anacleto R, Badoni S, Butardo V, Molina L, Graner A, Demont M, Morell MK, Sreenivasulu N (2019) Dissecting the genome-wide genetic variants of milling and appearance quality traits in rice. J Exp Bot 70(19):5115–5130. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz256

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Misra G, Badoni S, Parween S, Singh RK, Leung H, Ladejobi O, Mott R, Sreenivasulu N (2020) Genome-wide association coupled gene to gene interaction studies unveil novel epistatic targets among major effect loci impacting rice grain chalkiness. Plant Biotechnol J. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13516

  29. Miyahara K, Wada T, Sonoda J, Tsukaguchi T, Miyazaki M, Tsubone M, Yamaguchi O, Ishibashi M, Iwasawa N, Umemoto T, Kondo M (2017) Detection and validation of QTLs for milky-white grains caused by high temperature during the ripening period in Japonica rice. Breed Sci 67(4):333–339. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.16203

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Monforte AJ, Tanksley SD (2000) Development of a set of near isogenic and backcross recombinant inbred lines containing most of the Lycopersicon hirsutum genome in a L. esculentum genetic background: a tool for gene mapping and gene discovery. Genome 43:803–813

  31. Morita S, Wada H, Matsue Y (2016) Countermeasures for heat damage in rice grain quality under climate change. Plant Prod Sci 19(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2015.1128114

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Murray M, Thompson W (1980) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8(19):4321–4325. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/8.19.4321

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nevame AYM, Emon RM, Malek MA, Hasan MM, Alam MA, Muharam FM, Aslani F, Rafii MY, Ismail MR (2018) Relationship between high temperature and formation of chalkiness and their effects on quality of rice. Biomed Res Int 2018:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  34. Peng B, Wang L, Fan C, Jiang G, Luo L, Li Y, He Y (2014) Comparative mapping of chalkiness components in rice using five populations across two environments. BMC Genet 15(1):49. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-15-49

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Peng S, Huang J, Sheehy JE, Laza RC, Visperas RM, Zhong X, Centeno GS, Khush GS, Cassman KG (2004) Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(27):9971–9975. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403720101

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sreenivasulu N, Butardo VM, Misra G, Cuevas RP, Anacleto R, Kavi Kishor PB (2015) Designing climate-resilient rice with ideal grain quality suited for high-temperature stress. J Exp Bot 66(7):1737–1748. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru544

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sui F, Zhao D, Zhu H, Gong Y, Tang Z, Huang X, Zhang G, Zhao F (2019) Map-based cloning of a new total loss-of-function allele of OsHMA3 causes high cadmium accumulation in rice grain. J Exp Bot 70(10):2857–2871. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz093

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tabata M, Hirabayashi H, Takeuchi Y, Ando I, Iida Y, Ohsawa R (2007) Mapping of quantitative trait loci for the occurrence of white-back kernels associated with high temperatures during the ripening period of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Breed Sci 57(1):47–52. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.57.47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tan Q, Wang C, Luan X, Zheng L, Ni Y, Yang W, Yang Z, Zhu H, Zeng R, Liu G, Wang S, Zhang G (2021) Dissection of closely linked QTLs controlling stigma exsertion rate in rice by substitution mapping. Theor Appl Genet 134(4):1253-1262.

  40. Tan Q, Zou T, Zheng M, Ni Y, Luan X, Li X, Yang W, Yang Z, Zhu H, Zeng R, Liu G, Wang S, Fu X, Zhang G (2020) Substitution mapping of the major quantitative trait loci controlling stigma exsertion rate from Oryza glumaepatula. Rice 13(1):37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-020-00397-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Tan YF, Xing YZ, Li JX, Yu SB, Xu CG, Zhang Q (2000) Genetic bases of appearance quality of rice grains in Shanyou 63, an elite rice hybrid. Theor Appl Genet 101(5-6):823–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051549

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Teng B, Zeng R, Wang Y, Liu Z, Zhang Z, Zhu H, Ding X, Li W, Zhang G (2012) Detection of allelic variation at the Wx locus with single-segment substitution lines in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Breed 30(1):583–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-011-9647-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wada T, Miyahara K, Sonoda J, Tsukaguchi T, Miyazaki M, Tsubone M, Ando T, Ebana K, Yamamoto T, Iwasawa N, Umemoto T, Kondo M, Yano M (2015) Detection of QTLs for white-back and basal-white grains caused by high temperature during ripening period in japonica rice. Breed Sci 65(3):216–225. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.65.216

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wan XY, Wan JM, Weng JF, Jiang L, Bi JC, Wang CM, Zhai HQ (2005) Stability of QTLs for rice grain dimension and endosperm chalkiness characteristics across eight environments. Theor Appl Genet 110(7):1334–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-1976-x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang S, Wu K, Yuan Q, Liu X, Liu Z, Lin X, Zeng R, Zhu H, Dong G, Qian Q, Zhang G, Fu X (2012) Control of grain size, shape and quality by OsSPL16 in rice. Nat Genet 44(8):950–954. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2327

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang X, Pang Y, Wang C, Chen K, Zhu Y, Shen C, Ali J, Xu J, Li Z (2017) New candidate genes affecting rice grain appearance and milling quality detected by genome-wide and gene-based association analyses. Front Plant Sci 7:1998

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Xi Z, He F, Zeng R, Zhang Z, Ding X, Li W, Zhang G (2006) Development of a wide population of chromosome single-segment substitution lines in the genetic background of an elite cultivar of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genome 49(5):476–484. https://doi.org/10.1139/g06-005

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang T, Zhang S, Zhao J, Liu Q, Huang Z, Mao X, Dong J, Wang X, Zhang G, Liu B (2016) Identification and pyramiding of QTLs for cold tolerance at the bud bursting and the seedling stages by use of single segment substitution lines in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Breed 36:96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yang W, Guo Z, Huang C, Duan L, Chen G, Jiang N, Fang W, Feng H, Xie W, Lian X, Wang G, Luo Q, Zhang Q, Liu Q, Xiong L (2014) Combining high-throughput phenotyping and genome-wide association studies to reveal natural genetic variation in rice. Nat Commun 5(1):5087. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6087

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Yun P, Zhu Y, Wu B, Gao G, Sun P, Zhang Q, He Y (2016) Genetic mapping and confirmation of quantitative trait loci for grain chalkiness in rice. Mol Breed 36(12):162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-016-0600-x

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zeng R, Zhang Z, He F, Xi Z, Talukdar A, Shi J, Qin L, Huang C, Zhang G (2006) Identification of multiple alleles at the Wx locus and development of single segment substitution lines for the alleles in rice. Rice Sci 13:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang G (2019) The platform of breeding by design based on the SSSL library in rice. Hereditas (Beijing) 41:754–760 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang G, Zeng R, Zhang Z, Ding X, Li W, Liu G, He F, Tulukdar A, Huang C, Xi Z, Qin L, Shi J, Zhao F, Feng M, Shan Z, Chen L, Guo X, Zhu H, Lu Y (2004) The construction of a library of single segment substitution lines in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice Genet Newsl 21:85–87

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang Y, Yang J, Shan Z, Chen S, Qiao W, Zhu X, Xie Q, Zhu H, Zhang Z, Zeng R, Ding X, Zhang G (2012) Substitution mapping of QTLs for blast resistance with SSSLs in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 184(1):141–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0601-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhao X, Daygon VD, McNally KL, Hamilton RS, Xie F, Reinke RF, Fitzgerald MA (2016) Identification of stable QTLs causing chalk in rice grains in nine environments. Theor Appl Genet 129(1):141–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-015-2616-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhao X, Zhou L, Ponce K, Ye G (2015) The usefulness of known genes/QTLs for grain quality traits in an indica population of diverse breeding lines tested using association analysis. Rice 8(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-015-0064-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhou H, Yang W, Ma S, Luan X, Zhu H, Wang A, Huang C, Rong B, Dong S, Meng L, Wang S, Zhang G, Liu G (2020) Unconditional and conditional analysis of epistasis between tillering QTLs based on single segment substitution lines in rice. Sci Rep 10(1):15912. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73047-7

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhou Y, Xie Y, Cai J, Liu C, Zhu H, Jiang R, Zhong Y, Zhang G, Tan B, Liu G, Fu X, Liu Z, Wang S, Zhang G, Zeng R (2017) Substitution mapping of QTLs controlling seed dormancy using single segment substitution lines derived from multiple cultivated rice donors in seven cropping seasons. Theor Appl Genet 130(6):1191–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-017-2881-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhu A, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Wang B, Xue P, Cao Y, Chen Y, Li Z, Liu Q, Cheng S, Cao L (2018a) Genetic dissection of qPCG1 for a quantitative trait locus for percentage of chalky grain in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Front Plant Sci 9:1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhu H, Li Y, Liang J, Luan X, Xu P, Wang S, Zhang G, Liu G (2018b) Analysis of QTLs on heading date based on single segment substitution lines in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Sci Rep 8:13232

  61. Zhu Y, Zuo S, Chen Z, Chen X, Li G, Zhang Y, Zhang G, Pan X (2014) Identification of two major rice sheath blight resistance QTLs, qSB1-1HJX74 and qSB11HJX74, in field trials using chromosome segment substitution lines. Plant Dis 98(8):1112–1121. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-13-1095-RE

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91735304 and 91435207).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GZ and SW designed and supervised the works. WY performed most of the experiments and analyzed the experimental data. JL, QH, XL, QT, SL, ZL, SB, HZ, and GL conducted a part of experiments. GZ analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shaokui Wang or Guiquan Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Phenotypes of grain chalkiness in HJX74 and SSSLs. Table S2. Markers developed to detect the substitution segments of SSSLs. Table S3. Substitution segments of SSSLs. Table S4. Phenotypes of agronomic traits in SSSLs. Table S5. Average temperatures for 30 days after flowering of rice in two cropping seasons. Table S6. The grain shape of 11–09 and its NILs in the SCS of 2018. Table S7. The grain shape of HP67–11 and its NILs in the SCS of 2019.

Additional file 2: Figure S1

. Frequency distribution of PGC in the F2 population derived from the cross of HJX74/11–09. PGC percentage of grain chalkiness. Figure S2. Frequency distribution of PGC in the F2 population derived from the cross of HJX74/HP67–11. PGC percentage of grain chalkiness.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, W., Liang, J., Hao, Q. et al. Fine mapping of two grain chalkiness QTLs sensitive to high temperature in rice. Rice 14, 33 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-021-00476-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Grain chalkiness
  • Grain quality
  • Single-segment substitution line
  • Substitution mapping
  • Heat stress
  • Rice