Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Review
  • Open Access

Shanyou 63: an elite mega rice hybrid in China

Rice201811:17

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-018-0210-9

Received: 5 January 2018

Accepted: 18 March 2018

Published: 9 April 2018

Abstract

Hybrid rice has been successfully used for commercial rice production for 40 years in China. Shanyou 63, a mega rice hybrid, derived from the parents Zhenshan 97A and Minghui 63, was a milestone for China’s hybrid rice development and production because of its high yield and wide adaptability. It was planted in 16 provinces of the country on 17% of the national hybrid rice area annually during the 29 years from 1984 to 2012. The hybrid and its parents have also been widely used for basic and agronomic studies related to rice heterosis, stress tolerance, molecular markers and genomics. We review the development of the hybrid and its parents and their major characteristics for the purpose of learning from the history and guiding future hybrid rice development. The history and development experience show that a successful hybrid rice variety should have multiple traits, including high yield, wide adaptability, resistances to major diseases, and high rice quality that meets the demands of consumers. From the breeding aspect, hybrid rice provides the advantage of combining elite traits or genes from different types of parents, such as those from subspecies of indica and japonica, into a single variety. Farmers prefer not only a variety with high yield potential, but also stable yields and local adaptability.

Keywords

  • Hybrid rice
  • Shanyou 63
  • Heterosis

Review

Application of hybrid heterosis in commercial rice production succeeded in 1974 when the essential genetic resources of the 3-line system (cytoplasmic male sterile or CMS, maintainer, and restorer lines) were successfully developed (Yuan and Virmani, 1988). Rice is a self-pollinated crop, which makes commercial hybridization difficult. The development of three lines provides a solution for commercial hybrid seed production through pollinating the CMS line with its corresponding maintainer to produce more CMS seeds, and hybridizing with a restorer line to produce commercial F1 hybrid seeds.

The first generation of 3-line rice hybrids was based on a wild abortive (WA) cytoplasm which was found to be a natural mutation from a wild rice (O. sativa f. spontanea) in Hainan, China (Lin and Yuan, 1980). The male parents of the first-generation hybrids were mostly imported from the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Philippines and these inbred rice varieties were used directly for producing hybrid combinations. Those inbred lines, including Taiying 1, IR24, IR661, IR26 and IR36, are indica germplasm with a good fertility restoration for the hybrids derived from the WA cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS) lines. However, these restorer lines (R-lines) had some obvious weaknesses such as low genetic divergence among themselves, which resulted in stagnant yield increase of the hybrids; lack of adaptation for various rice eco-systems and cropping systems in China, since all were from tropical Asia; and long growth duration because of photoperiod sensitivity. To further improve the R-lines, Chinese scientists started to develop locally adapted male parents using IRRI-developed inbred varieties as donor parents for the characteristics or genes of fertility restoration, grain quality, and disease and insect resistances (Wu et al., 2011). The parents used for the purpose included IR24, IR26, IR30, IR36, IR54, IR64, IR72, IR661, Milyang 46, and IR9761-19. The hybrids generated from those newly-improved male parents, such as Minghui 63 (MH63), Gui 33, and 26 Zhaizao, were significantly improved for hybrid yield and disease resistances, and rapidly increased hybrid rice production in China. MH63 is one of the most successfully developed male parents and played a key role for the promotion of hybrid rice production in China from the late 1980s.

Shanyou 63 (SY63) is the most widely cultivated hybrid rice ever. Both parents and the hybrid were milestones for the renewal of hybrid rice with strong superiority for yield, yield heterosis and wide adaptability. We review the historical development of the parents and the hybrid and describe their major characteristics with the purpose of learning from this history for further hybrid rice development.

Breeding history

SY63 is the rice hybrid derived from the female parent Zhenshan 97 A (ZS97A), a WA CMS line, and the male parent MH63 (Fig. 1). ZS97A was developed by continuous backcrosses of the inbred variety ZS97, a semi-dwarf variety developed in Jiangxi province of China for the early-season rice cropping, into a WA plant. The restorer line MH63 was derived from the cross of IR30×Gui 630. IR30 is an IRRI-bred semi-dwarf variety which is a restorer line for WA CMS A-lines with good plant type, high resistance to blast, bacterial blight, and brown planthoppers. The other parent of MH63 is Gui 630, which is an imported rice germplasm from Guyana with the traits of high grain weight, desirable grain quality and high yield potential (Xie et al., 1987).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Pedigree of the hybrid rice variety SY63

The cross of IR30×Gui 630 was made in the spring of 1978 at Yacheng of Hainan by the breeder from Sanming Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Fujian (Xie, et al. 1987). The F1 plants of the cross were grown in Sha county of Fujian and the progenies were selected using the pedigree method and shuttle breeding between Hainan and Fujian. Hybridization of testcrosses with the female parent of ZS97A started from the F4 individual plants in the winter of 1979 and one line (designated E6) among three F5 families (E6, E7 and E8) was selected and advanced to F7. During the generation advancement, all selected progenies were screened for combining ability of yield and blast resistance, both in the induced nurseries with multiple pathogen races and the field. The final line selected had a high resistance to blast, large panicle and grains, good plant type with erect and thick flag leaf, and maturity 3 days longer than IR24, which is an elite and popular restorer line for hybrid rice based on WA CMS cytoplasm. After different evaluations of combining abilities with different CMS A lines and various yield trials from 1980 to 1981, E6 was finally selected and designated as MH63 and the hybrid combination of ZS97A×MH63 was named as SY63 (Xie, et al. 1987). Since then, it went through various regional, provincial and national yield trials from 1982 to 1985. It performed well with grain yield and blast resistance with an average yield of 7325 kg/ha, 16.2% higher than the yield of hybrid check varieties.

Adoption and impact

SY63 combines the complementary advantages of its two parents and shows the superior agronomic traits including yield, resistance, wide adaptability and grain quality. It was the most widely cultivated hybrid variety in China over the past four decades. Data collected from the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture showed that SY63 had a large planting area during the years from 1985 to 2001 (Fig. 2) with an average area of 3.6 million hectares and 28.3% of the national hybrid rice growing areas annually. The hybrid was grown on the largest area in 1990, with 6.8 million hectares accounting for 44.8% of the total hybrid rice area in the country. SY63 had been grown in China on a cumulative 62.9 million hectares from 1984 to 2012 with an economic value of 3774 million US dollars corresponding to the increased grain production of 18.8 million tons based on a calculation of average yield increase of 300 kg/ha over check varieties and the rice grain priced as $0.2/kg.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Planting area of SY63 and its percentage as a total of all hybrid rice from 1984 to 2012 in China (Data source: Chinese Ministry of Agriculture and Wu, et al. 2011). Legend

The development of SY63 was regarded as a milestone for the renewal of hybrid rice with strong superiority and wide adaptability. The hybrid was approved for commercial rice production in 16 provinces of central and southern China, ranging from 1000 36′ E (Yunnan) to 1210 56′ E (Shanghai) and from 170 36’ N (Hainan) to 370 49′ N (Shandong) geographically, across 21.3 degrees of longitude and 20.2 latitude (Fig. 3).
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Provinces where SY63 is planted on a significant area in China (colored)

SY63 has not only the traits of high yield, acceptable grain quality, blast resistance and wide adaptability, but also is suitable for cultivation as a ratoon rice. It accounted for up to 85% of the total ratoon rice in the ratoon rice cropping areas in China from 1998 to 2005 with an accumulated area of 4 million hectares.

Major genetic and genomic characteristics

SY63 is a semi-dwarf hybrid with an average plant height of 100 to 110 cm at maturity. It has a weak sensitivity to photoperiod and temperature with total growth duration of about 138 days from seed to seed.

The success of SY63 is mostly attributed to its male parent MH63, which is an elite indica variety that combines the traits of high yield, good quality, stress resistance and wide adaptability. SY63 yields high because of many favorable QTLs bred into the two parents. MH63 possesses a major gene for yield, Ghd7, which controls traits of grains per panicle, plant height and heading date (Xue et al. 2008). Several yield-related QTLs were also mapped on MH63, such as yd1a, yd1b and yd2 for grain yield (Yu et al. 1997; Xing et al. 2002), gp1b and gp5 for grains per panicle (Yu et al. 1997), and gw7, gw11, TGW3a and TGW3b for 1000-grain weight (Yu et al. 1997; Liu et al. 2010).

During the breeding process, the candidate line of MH63 was screened for resistance to blast disease (Magnaporthe grisea). Yang et al. (2008) reported that MH63 has a major QTL, rbr2, for blast resistance which is an allele of the Pib gene. Wang et al. (2006) cloned a dual functional rice disease resistance-responsive gene from a MH63 cDNA library, and the repressed expression of OsDR8 showed reduced resistance to bacterial blight (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae) and blast. Another gene, OsWRKY13 was also cloned from MH63 cDNA library and its overexpression can enhance rice resistance to bacterial blight and blast fungus at both seedling and adult stages (Qiu et al. 2007).

MH63 is moderately resistant to bacterial blight disease. In addition to the two aforementioned dual functional resistance genes OsWRKY13 and OsDR8, Xa25(t) for race-specific resistance and Xa3/Xa26 for broad-spectrum resistance were mapped in MH63 (Chen et al. 2002).

MH63 is relatively resistant to sheath blight. Zhang et al. (2008) reported that MH63 had the top resistance level of 2.19, and was the most resistance variety in the selected rice materials among 17 hybrid rice core parents for southern China. Han et al. (2002) identified two QTLs, qSB-5 and qSB-9 for sheath blight resistance from MH63.

MH63 is tolerant to potassium deficiency. Peng et al. (2002) reported that MH63 was the most potassium-tolerant variety based on evaluation of plant height, and dry weight of seedling and root.

MH63 is considered insensitive to heat. Fu et al. (2011) found that MH63 was the most tolerant variety to high temperate in a total of frequently-used 39 restorer and maintainer lines at flowering stage.

MH63 is moderately tolerant to salt stress based on evaluation at 5 different NaCl concentrations (Wang et al. 2004).

Hybrid SY63 has intermediate amylose content and a gel consistency of 77.4 mm (Table 1). The cooking and eating qualities are both acceptable to the Chinese consumers.
Table 1

Grain quality of SY63 and its parents

Variety

Brown rice

Head rice

Chalky grain

Chalky degree

Ratio of length/width

Gel consistency (mm)

Amylose content

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

MH63

79.8

49.1

13.2

12.2

3.04

91.0

16.2

ZS97B

76.3

49.3

97.5

31.5

2.3

58.0

23.0

SY63

80.7

28.3

82..5

23.6

2.5

77.4

23.4

Because of its popularity for hybrid rice production, both the parents and the hybrid have been extensively used for genetics and genomics studies during the past four decades. In the first report of resequencing multiple varieties, both parents of SY63 were used among 20 diverse varieties for resequencing of 100 Mb of the unique fraction of the genome (McNally et al. 2009). It was found that large components of the japonica genome were introgressed into both of the parents, specifically, on chromosome 1 of ZS97 and chromosome 6 of MH63. Those components contribute greatly to genes controlling heterosis (Yu et al. 1997; Hua et al. 2002; Li et al. 2008; Li et al. 2008; Zhou et al. 2012; Shen et al. 2014; Zhu et al. 2016). Other studies on the association of QTLs and traits included plant height (Xing et al. 2001; Guo et al. 2002; Yu et al. 2002; Guo et al. 2003; Shen et al. 2014), heading date (Xing et al. 2001; Guo et al. 2002; Guo et al. 2003; Yu et al. 2002; Zhu et al. 2016), fertility-restoring genes (He et al. 2002), seedling traits (Cui et al. 2002; Cui et al. 2002; Cui et al. 2010; Zhu et al. 2016), leaf shape (Li et al. 2008), grain quality (Tan et al. 1999; Tan et al. 2001; Xing et al. 2001; Ge et al. 2005; Zheng et al. 2008a; Zheng et al. 2008b), yield-related traits (Yu et al. 1997; Guo et al. 2002; Hua et al. 2002; Xing et al. 2002; Cui et al. 2003; Guo et al. 2003; Xue et al. 2008; Li et al. 2008; Xing et al. 2008; Liu et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2010; Zhou et al. 2012), disease resistance (Han et al. 2002; Chen et al. 2002; Yang et al. 2003; Li et al. 2010; Kou et al. 2010), tolerance of nitrogen deficiency (Lian et al. 2005; Wei et al. 2012), and drought tolerance (Lian et al. 2005; Wei et al. 2012).

In a new study for rice heterosis, Zhang et al. (2016) performed map-based sequencing of both parents of SY63 with coverages of 90.6% (ZS97B) and 93.2% (MH63) of estimated genome sizes. Comparative analyses of these two indica genomes uncovered surprising structural differences, specifically with respects to inversions, translocations, presence/absence variations, and segmental duplications. The number of genes expressed in the hybrid was higher by 1059–2217 than those of parents in three tissues of seedling shoot, panicle and flag leaf, but also very different from the parents, which shows a complementary gene action between the parental genomes for superior field performance.

Both the parents and the hybrid are the most widely used materials for genetic and genomic research. Genomes of both parents have been resequenced for further studies of heterosis and other agronomic traits and associations of genes and traits (McNally et al. 2009; Xu et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2016).

Important progeny

Because of its excellent traits of strong restoring ability and capacity of restoring fertility to a wide range of CMS female parents, good combining ability and disease resistance, MH63 is not only an excellent combiner with ZS97A, but it has also been used to develop hybrids using CMS A-lines of different sterile cytoplasms, such as Dian, Gam, Indonesia Paddy, Honglien, and Dwarf Abortion. A total of 34 hybrids at provincial level and 4 hybrids at national level were approved for commercial production up to 2014 with different cytoplasmic A-lines other than WA cytoplasm. Recently, MH63 has also even been used as male parents for two-line hybrids based on themo- or photo-sensitive genic male sterile lines. Statistics showed that the planting area of hybrids using MH63 as male parent has cumulatively reached 84.5 million hectares and accounted for 20.6% of the total hybrid rice in China from 1984 to 2014.

The hybrids derived from MH63 were also being planted in other countries such as Myanmar, Vietnam, India, Laos and Cambodia with good performance in demonstration trials (Wu et al. 2011).

At the same time, MH63 has been used greatly in hybrid rice breeding programs for improving R-lines. It is the most widely used germplasm contributing to the improvement of hybrid rice male parents in China. Data showed that a minimum of 594 new restorer lines were developed from MH63 with 978 hybrids approved for commercial rice production at the provincial level, and 170 at the national level up to 2010. From 1990 to 2015, the hybrids with male parents that were progenies of MH63 were planted on 105 million hectares, which was 28.7% of the total national hybrid rice area.

Conclusions

The success of development of the hybrid rice cultivar SY63 led to increased adoption of hybrid rice by the Chinese farmers. MH63, the male parent of SY63, played a key role for the hybrid rice because of its well-combined traits of high yield, resistance to diseases and insects, and adaptability to diverse growing environments. The planting area of SY63 started to gradually decline from the 1990’s because better and high-yielding hybrids based on the two-line hybrid rice system are developed and high quality of rice is more required by consumers. Also, as more and better rice varieties are being developed, farmers have more opportunities of choices for a hybrid variety based on yield, disease resistance, location adaption, as well as grain quality. However, MH63 has still been used widely for development of male parents for two-line hybrids because of its excellent agronomic, yield and disease resistance traits. Since SY63 was developed, no other hybrid rice variety has been planted at such a large scale. SY63 has contributed tremendously to the security of the food supply in China, and has greatly promoted hybrid rice development.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

Not applicable

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Authors’ contributions

Both authors (JZ and FX) contributed the manuscript equally on conception and design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, and were involved in drafting the manuscript revising it critically for important intellectual content, and have given final approval of the version to be published. Both authors have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for all portions of the content.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Yuan Longping High-Tech Agriculture Co. Ltd., Changsha, China
(2)
Rice Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, China

References

  1. Chen H, Wang S, Zhang Q (2002) New gene for bacterial blight resistance in rice located on chromosome 12 identified from Minghui 63, an elite restorer line. Phytopathology 92:750–754View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cui K, Huang J, Xing Y, Yu S, Xu C, Peng S (2010) Mapping QTLs for seedling characteristics under different water supply conditions in rice (Oryza sativa). Physiol Plantarum 132:53–68Google Scholar
  3. Cui K, Peng S, Xing Y, Xu C, Yu S, Zhang Q (2002) Molecular dissection of seedling-vigor and associated physiological traits in rice. Theor Appl Genet 105:745–753View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cui K, Peng S, Xing Y, Yu S, Xu C (2002) Molecular dissection of relationship between seedling characteristics and seed size in rice. Acta Bot Sin 44:702–707Google Scholar
  5. Cui KH, Peng SB, Xing YZ, Yu SB, Xu CG, Zhang Q (2003) Molecular dissection of the genetic relationships of source, sink and transport tissue with yield traits in rice. Theor Appl Genet 106:649–658View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fu G, Song J, Liao X, Zhang X, Xiong J, Wang X, Le M, Tao L (2011) Thermal resistance of common rice maintainer and restorer lines to high temperature stress during flowering and early grain filling stage. Chin J Rice Sci 25:495–500Google Scholar
  7. Ge X, Xing Y, Xu C, He Y (2005) QTL analysis of cooked rice grain elongation, volume expansion, and water absorption using a recombinant inbred population. Plant Breed 124:121–126View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Guo L, Luo L, Xing Y, Xu C, Mei H, Wang Y, Yu X, Ying C, Shi C (2002) Genetic analysis and utilization of the important agronomic traits on Zhenshan 97×Minghui 63 recombinant inbred lines (RIL) in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Acta Agron Sin 28:644–649Google Scholar
  9. Guo L, Luo L, Xing Y, Xu C, Mei H, Wang Y, Zhong D, Qian Q, Ying C, Shi C (2003) Dissection of QTLs in two years for important agronomic traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Chin J Rice Sci 17:211–218Google Scholar
  10. Han Y, Xing Y, Chen Z, Gu S, Pan X, Chen X, Zhang Q (2002) Mapping QTLs for horizontal resistance to sheath blight in an elite rice restorer line, Minghui 63. Acta Genet Sin 29:622–626PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. He G, Wang W, Liu G, Hou L, Xiao Y, Tang M, Yang Z, Pei Y (2002) Mapping of two fertility-restoring gene for WA cytoplasmic male sterility in minghui63 using SSR markers. Acta Genet Sin 29:798–802PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hua J, Xing Y, Xu C, Sun X, Yu S, Zhang Q (2002) Genetic dissection of an elite rice hybrid revealed that heterozygotes are not always advantageous for performance. Genetics 162:1885–1895PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Kou Y, Li X, Xiao J, Wang S (2010) Identification of genes contributing to quantitative disease resistance in rice. Sci China 53:1263–1273View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Li L, Lu K, Chen Z, Mu T, Hu Z, Li X (2008) Dominance, overdominance and epistasis condition the heterosis in two heterotic rice hybrids. Genetics 180:1725–1724View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Li L, Lu K, Mou T, Hu Z (2008) Heterosis of flag and second leaf shape traits in rice. J Wuhan Univ 54:472–478Google Scholar
  16. Li Y, Wu C, Xing Y, Chen H, He Y (2010) Dynamic QTL analysis for rice blast resistance under natural infection conditions. Aus J Crop Sci 2:73–82Google Scholar
  17. Lian X, Xing Y, Yan H, Xu C, Li X, Zhang Q (2005) QTLs for low nitrogen tolerance at seedling stage identified using a recombinant inbred line population derived from an elite rice hybrid. Theor Appl Genet 112:85–96View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin S, Yuan L (1980) Hybrid rice breeding in China. In: Innovative approaches to rice breeding. International Rice Research Institute, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu T, Shao D, Kovi MR, Xing Y (2010) Mapping and validation of quantitative trait loci for spikelets per panicle and 1000-grain weight in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Theor Appl Genet 120:933–942View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu T, Zhang Y, Xue W, Xu C, Li X, Xing Y (2010) Comparison of quantitative trait loci for 1000-grain weight and spikelets per panicle across three connected rice populations. Euphytica 175:383–394View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. McNally KL, Childs KL, Bonert R, Davidson RM, Zhao K, Ulat VJ, Zeller G, Clark RM, Hoen DR, Bureau TE, Stokowski R, Ballinger DG, Frazer KA, Cox DR, Padhukasahasram B, Bustamante CD, Weigel D, Mackill DJ, Bruskiewich RM, Ratsch G, Buell CR, Leung H, Leach JE (2009) Genomewide SNP variation reveals relationships among landraces and modern varieties of rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:12273–12278View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Peng Z, Peng K, Hu J, Xiao L (2002) Screening of K-deficit tolerant offspring from different rice varieties introduced DNA of K-sufficiency plant. J Hunan Agric Univ 28:463–466Google Scholar
  23. Qiu D, Xiao J, Ding X, Xiong M, Cai M, Cao Y, Li X, Xu C, Wang S (2007) OsWRKY13 mediates rice disease resistance by regulating defense-related genes in salicylate- and jasmonate-dependent signaling. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 20:492View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Shen G, Zhan W, Chen H, Xing Y (2014) Dominance and epistasis are the main contributors to heterosis for plant height in rice. Plant Sci 215–216:11–18View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Tan Y, Li J, Yu S, Xing Y, Xu C, Zhang Q (1999) The three important traits for cooking and eating quality of rice grains are controlled by a single locus in an elite rice hybrid Shanyou 63. Theor Appl Genet 99:642–648View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Tan YF, Sun M, Xing YZ, Hua JP, Sun XL, Zhang QF, Corke H (2001) Mapping quantitative trait loci for milling quality, protein content and color characteristics of rice using a recombinant inbred line population derived from an elite rice hybrid. Theor Appl Genet 103:1037–1045View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang G, Ding X, Yuan M, Qiu D, Li X, Xu C, Wang S (2006) Dual function of rice OsDR8 gene in disease resistance and thiamine accumulation. Plant Mol Biol 60:437–449View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang J, Chen H, Yang Q, Yao M, Zhou G, Zhang H (2004) Effects of salt concentration and temperature on the screening of salt-tolerance in rice. Chin J. Rice Sci 18:449–454Google Scholar
  29. Wei D, Cui K, Ye G, Pan J, Xiang J, Huang J, Nie L (2012) QTL mapping for nitrogen-use efficiency and nitrogen-deficiency tolerance traits in rice. Plant Soil 359:281–295View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Wu F, Cai Q, Zhu Y, Zhang J, Xie H (2011) Application of indica restorer line, Minghui 63, for rice hybridization. Fujian J Agric Sci 26(6):1101–1112 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  31. Xie H, Zheng J, Zhang S (1987) Rice breeding for the hybrid combination of Shanyou 63 and its restorer line Minghui 63. Fujian J Agric Sci 2(1):32–38 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  32. Xing Y, Tan Y, Hua J, Sun X, Xu C, Zhang Q (2002) Characterization of the main effects, epistatic effects and their environmental interactions of QTLs on the genetic basis of yield traits in rice. Theor Appl Genet 105:248–257View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Xing Y, Tan Y, Xu C, Hua J, Sun X (2001) Mapping quantitative traits loci for grain appearance traits of rice using a recombinant inbred line population. Acta Bot Sin 43:840–845Google Scholar
  34. Xing Y, Tang W, Xue W, Xu C, Zhang Q (2008) Fine mapping of major quantitative trait loci, qSSP7, controlling the number of spikelets per panicle as a single Mendelian factor in rice. Theor Appl Genet 116:789–796View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Xing Y, Xu C, Hua J, Tan Y, Sun X (2001) Mapping and isolation of quantitative trait loci controlling plant height and heading date in rice. Acta Bot Sin 43:721–726Google Scholar
  36. Xu S, Zhu D, Zhang Q (2014) Predicting hybrid performance in rice using genomic best linear unbiased prediction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:12456–12461View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Xue W, Xing Y, Weng X, Zhao Y, Tang W, Wang L, Zhou H, Yu S, Xu C, Li X, Zhang Q (2008) Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet 40:761–767View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang H, Chu Z, Fu J, Wang S (2008) The major blast resistance QTL rbr2 is an allele of Pib gene. Mol Plant Breed (Chinese) 6(2):213–219Google Scholar
  39. Yang Z, Sun X, Wang S, Zhang Q (2003) Genetic and physical mapping of a new gene for bacterial blight resistance in rice. Theor Appl Genet 106:1467–1472View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Yu S, Li J, Xu C, Tan Y, Gao Y, Li X, Zhang Q, Saghai Maroof MA (1997) Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:9226–9231View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Yu S, Li J, Xu C, Tan Y, Li X, Zhang Q (2002) Identification of quantitative trait loci and epistatic interactions for plant height and heading date in rice. Theor Appl Genet 104:619–625View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Yuan L, Virmani S (1988) Status of hybrid rice research and development. In: Hybrid Rice. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, pp 7–24Google Scholar
  43. Zhang J, Chen L, Sun S, Kudrna D, Copetti D, Li W, Mu T, Jiao W, Xing F, Lee S, Talag J, Song J, Du B, Xie W, Luo M, Maldonado CE, Goicoechea JL, Xiong L, Wu C, Xing Y, Zhou D, Yu S, Zhao Y, Wang G, Yu Y, Luo Y, Hurtado BE, Danowitz A, Wing RA, Zhang Q (2016) Building two indica rice reference genomes with PacBio long-read and IIIumina paired-end sequencing date. Sci Data. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016
  44. Zhang J, Chen L, Xing F, Kudrna DA, Yao W, Copetti D, Mu T, Li W, Song JM, Xie W (2016) Extensive sequence divergence between the reference genomes of two elite indica rice varieties Zhenshan 97 and Minghui 63. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:5163–5171View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang K, Ming H, Li P (2008) Identification and analysis of core rice parents’ resistance to rice sheath blight in south rice production regions of China. Plant Prot 34(1):45–48Google Scholar
  46. Zheng X, Wu J, Lou X, Xu H, Shi C (2008a) The QTL analysis on maternal and endosperm genome and their environmental interactions for characters of cooking quality in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Theor Appl Genet 116:335–342View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Zheng X, Wu J, Lou X, Xu H, Shi C (2008b) Mapping and analysis of QTLs on maternal and endosperm genomes for histidine and arginine in rice (Oryza sativa L.) across environments. Acta Agron Sin 34:369–375View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhou G, Chen Y, Yao W, Zhang C, Xie W, Hua J, Xing Y, Xiao J, Zhang Q (2012) Genetic composition of yield heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:15847–15852View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhu D, Zhou G, Xu C, Zhang Q (2016) Genetic components of heterosis for seedling traits in an elite rice hybrid analyzed using an immortalized F2 population. J Genet Genomics 43:87–97View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement