Open Access

Updating the elite rice variety Kongyu 131 by improving the Gn1a locus

Rice201710:35

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-017-0174-1

Received: 20 April 2017

Accepted: 12 July 2017

Published: 20 July 2017

Abstract

Background

Kongyu 131 is an elite japonica rice variety of Heilongjiang Province, China. It has the characteristics of early maturity, superior quality, high yield, cold tolerance and wide adaptability. However, there is potential to improve the yield of Kongyu 131 because of the relatively few grains per panicle compared with other varieties. Hence, we rebuilt the genome of Kongyu 131 by replacing the GRAIN NUMBER1a (Gn1a) locus with a high-yielding allele from a big panicle indica rice variety, GKBR. High-resolution melting (HRM) analysis was used for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping.

Results

Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of the BC3F2 population showed that the introgressed segment carrying the Gn1a allele of GKBR significantly increased the branch number and grain number per panicle. Using 5 SNP markers designed against the sequence within and around Gn1a, the introgressed chromosome segment was shortened to approximately 430 Kb to minimize the linkage drag by screening recombinants in the target region. Genomic components of the new Kongyu 131 were detected using 220 SNP markers evenly distributed across 12 chromosomes, suggesting that the recovery ratio of the recurrent parent genome (RRPG) was 99.89%. Compared with Kongyu 131, the yield per plant of the new Kongyu 131 increased by 8.3% and 11.9% at Changchun and Jiamusi, respectively.

Conclusions

To achieve the high yield potential of Kongyu 131, a minute chromosome fragment carrying the favorable Gn1a allele from the donor parent was introgressed into the genome of Kongyu 131, which resulted in a larger panicle and subsequent yield increase in the new Kongyu 131. These results indicate the feasibility of improving an undesirable trait of an elite variety by replacing only a small chromosome segment carrying a favorable allele.

Keywords

Rice Yield SNP marker Gn1a Qtl Linkage drag

Background

Rice is one of the most important cereal crops worldwide, and more than half of the global population depends on rice as a staple food. The continuously increasing population, decreasing arable land, global climate change and expanding demands for biofuels have challenged global food security (Takeda and Matsuoka 2008). During the past 60 years, the green revolution marked by the application of semi-dwarf genes in rice (Sasaki et al. 2002; Spielmeyer et al. 2002) and the application of hybrids in southeastern Asia have greatly improved rice yield. However, research has shown that the top three rice producers, India, China and Indonesia, experienced yield stagnation in more than 37%, 78% and 81% of their respective rice growing areas from 1961 to 2008 (Ray et al. 2012). Therefore, it is challenging, but there is also great potential, to increase rice yield using molecular breeding methods in the coming decades.

The grain yield of rice is a complex quantitative trait determined by three components: effective tillers per plant, grain number per panicle and grain weight (Sakamoto and Matsuoka 2008; Xing and Zhang 2010). Grain number per panicle is further composed of two subcomponents: spikelet number, which is mainly determined by the number of primary and second branches, and the seed setting rate of the spikelets (Xing and Zhang 2010). Since the rice genome was sequenced (Goff et al. 2002; International Rice Genome Sequencing Project 2005; Yu et al. 2002), significant advancements have been made in the functional genomics of this crop. In recent years, a number of genes and quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for yield-related traits were identified and characterized (Chen et al. 2013). Major QTLs for yield traits, such as Gn1a (Ashikari et al. 2005), Ghd7 (Xue et al. 2008), GS3 (Fan et al. 2006), GW5 (Weng et al. 2008), and GW7 (Wang et al. 2015), have been characterized. For instance, Gn1a encodes cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase (OsCKX2), an enzyme that degrades cytokinin. When the expression of OsCKX2 is reduced, cytokinin accumulates in inflorescence meristems and increases the number of reproductive organs, which enhances the number of grains and leads to increased grain yield (Ashikari et al. 2005). These genes, together with QTLs and their superior allelic variations, provide the basis for rice molecular breeding.

The rapid accumulation of rice genome resequencing data not only assisted in the identification of functional genes or QTLs but also provided numerous polymorphic genome sequences for molecular marker development (Huang et al. 2010, 2011, 2012; Xu et al. 2011). High-resolution markers, including restriction site-associated DNA (RAD) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), together with the analysis platforms, improve the efficiency of genotyping and reduce the cost (Miller et al. 2007; Simko 2016; Tung et al. 2010). Based on sexual hybridization, traditional variety breeding depends on genetic recombination and phenotypic selection but has the disadvantages of low selection efficiency of complex traits, vulnerability to environmental influence and a long breeding cycle. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) involves the transformation of phenotypic to genotype selection, which can improve the efficiency and accuracy of the selection of target traits, and has been widely used for crop genetic improvement (Chen et al. 2013; Jena and Mackill 2008; Xu and Crouch 2008).

Breeders have improved the resistance to rice blast, bacterial blight and brown planthopper with the aid of MAS (Jiang et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2016; Pradhan et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2016). Although MAS has been applied in the breeding of many crops, it has limitations. First, MAS selects the target traits through the molecular markers linked to the genes for the target traits, and the recombination between the molecular markers and target genes can reduce the selection accuracy. To date, almost all research on resistance breeding through MAS used markers linked to resistance genes, but reports on the selection of target genes through genic or functional markers (Andersen and Lubberstedt 2003) are rare. Second, introducing target genes through MAS can result in linkage drags. Third, introducing beneficial allelic genes cannot efficiently improve the target traits due to different genomic backgrounds. Solving these problems can make molecular breeding more accurate and efficient. In addition, there are many reports on improvements in disease and insect resistance, but reports on complex traits, such as yield improvement, are rare.

Kongyu 131 ranked top among the elite rice varieties of the third accumulative temperature belt in Heilongjiang Province because of its superior traits such as early maturity, superior quality, cold tolerance and wide adaptability. In 2005, the planting area of Kongyu 131 reached 770,000 ha, accounting for more than half of the total rice planting area. We improved the resistance of Kongyu 131 to rice blast by improving its blast resistance gene locus (Zhang et al. 2017). We also found that Kongyu 131 has the disadvantage of relatively few grains per panicle compared with other varieties; therefore, the objective of this study was to improve the grain number per panicle and subsequent yield of Kongyu 131 by substituting the Gn1a locus in the genome of Kongyu 131 with a favorable allele from GKBR.

Results

Comparison of Gn1a sequences of the rice parents

The Gn1a sequences of Kongyu 131, GKBR, Koshihikari and Habataki were compared. Kongyu 131 had a coding DNA sequence (CDS), 5′-untranslated region (5′-UTR) and 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of Gn1a identical to Koshihikari, and the CDS, 5′-UTR and 3′-UTR of Gn1a from GKBR was the same as that from Habataki. Several nucleotide changes, including a 16-bp deletion in the 5′-UTR, a 6-bp deletion in the first exon, and three nucleotide changes resulting in amino acid variation in the first and fourth exons of the GKBR allele, were revealed (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Gn1a structure and allelic variation of Kongyu 131, GKBR, Koshihikari and Habataki. Three SNPs in the coding sequence that resulted in amino acid changes (in parentheses) were identified and are shown as black vertical lines. A 16-bp deletion in the 5′-untranslated region and a 6-bp deletion in the first exon were identified and are shown as triangles. Gray and white rectangles and black horizontal lines represent untranslated regions, exons and introns, respectively

Genotyping

One-hundred-and-sixty SNP markers evenly distributed over 12 chromosomes were used to genotype the BC3F1 population consisting of 127 lines. The RRPG ranged from 86.3% to 99.5% with an average of 92.83% (Fig. 2). This value is close to the theoretical RRPG of 93.75% in the BC3F1 generation, and the difference could be attributed to unidentified genotypes of some markers in certain lines. The line named BC3F1-22F01 carried 4 fragments of GKBR on chromosome 1, 5, 11 and 12, according to the 160 SNP markers, and the RRPG was 96.27% (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2

Distribution of the recovery ratio of the recurrent parent genome in the BC3F1 population

Fig. 3

Graphical genotype (GGT) of BC3F1-22F01. Green bars represent the chromosome fragments derived from Kongyu 131, red bars represent the chromosome fragments derived from GKBR, and white bars represent unknown fragments; the black horizontal lines indicate the SNP markers (the shorter, darker lines represent the centromeres)

Performance of the traits in Kongyu 131 and the BC3F2-LQ96 population

Panicle length (PL, cm), number of primary branches per panicle (NPB), grain number per panicle (GNP), density of the primary branches (DPB, /cm) and grain density per panicle (GDP, /cm) in Kongyu 131 and the BC3F2-LQ96 population are shown in Table 1. The means of the above five traits in the BC3F2-LQ96 population were higher than those of Kongyu 131, which indicated that the chromosome fragments derived from GKBR could increase the phenotypic value of yield-related traits.
Table 1

Performance of the traits in Kongyu 131 and the random subpopulation BC3F2-LQ96 derived from BC3F1-22F01 using Kongyu 131 as the recurrent parent and GKBR as the donor parent

Traits

KY131

BC3F2-LQ96 population

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Range

PL (cm)

16.8 ± 0.3

17.4 ± 1.5

14.7 ~ 20.1

NPB

12.8 ± 0.4

15.2 ± 1.8

12.0 ~ 19.0

DPB (/cm)

0.76 ± 0.02

0.88 ± 0.10

0.73 ~ 1.22

GNP

120.4 ± 5.9

172.4 ± 29.0

113.0 ~ 235.0

GDP (/cm)

7.16 ± 0.37

9.91 ± 0.20

7.09 ~ 13.81

Correlation analysis of the yield-related traits

Table 2 shows the correlation coefficients among the 5 yield-related traits. Positive and significant correlations were detected among these traits except for PL and DPB (r = −0.059). The strongest correlation was detected between GNP and GDP (r = 0.914), whereas the correlation between DPB and GNP was relatively low (r = 0.355).
Table 2

Correlation coefficients of the five yield-related traits investigated in the random subpopulation BC3F2-LQ96 derived from BC3F1-22F01 using Kongyu 131 as the recurrent parent and GKBR as the donor parent

 

PL

NPB

DPB

GNP

NPB

0.598**

   

DPB

−0.059

0.763**

  

GNP

0.768**

0.777**

0.355*

 

GDP

0.459**

0.721**

0.533**

0.914**

*Significant at p<0.05; significant at **p<0.01

Marker-trait association analysis

Genetic analysis of the BC3F2-LQ96 population showed that the fragment located on chromosome 1 had significant and simultaneous effects on NPB, DPB, GNP and GDP (Fig. 4a-d). The interval SNP1-SNP5 containing the Gn1a locus contributed to 39.9%, 20.3%, 41.1% and 40.4% of the phenotypic variation of these traits, respectively (Table 3). The allele from GKBR contributed to the increases in NPB, DPB, GNP and GDP with additive effects of 2.0, 0.08, 34.95 and 1.65, respectively. This was consistent with these traits beingstrongly correlated. In addition, partial dominance was observed for these traits. The mean NPB, DPB, GNP and GDP values of Kongyu 131 and the three genotypic classes at the Gn1a locus (homozygote for Kongyu 131, heterozygote, homozygote for GKBR) were compared (Fig. 4e-h). The average phenotypic values of the homozygote for GKBR and the heterozygote were significantly higher than those of Kongyu 131, but no difference was observed between Kongyu 131 and the homozygote for Kongyu 131. In addition, the phenotypic value of the homozygote for GKBR was significantly higher than that of the heterozygote. These results show that the introgressed GKBR chromosome fragment carrying the favorable Gn1a allele significantly increased NPB, DPB, GNP, and GDP, and the increase in GNP was mainly due to the NPB as opposed to the PL.
Fig. 4

Marker-trait analysis of the random subpopulation BC3F2-LQ96 derived from BC3F1-22F01 using Kongyu 131 as the recurrent parent and GKBR as the donor parent. a-d LOD score of 4 yield-related traits; the horizontal axis represents the 160 SNP markers on 12 chromosomes. e-h Comparison of 4 yield-related traits of Kongyu 131 and three genotypic classes of the Gn1a locus. −/− represents homozygote for Kongyu 131, +/− represents heterozygote, and +/+ represents homozygote for GKBR. a and e Number of primary branches per panicle (NPB). b and f Density of primary branches (DPB, /cm). c and g Grain number per panicle (GNP). d and h Grain density per panicle (GDP, /cm). e-h A, B, C ranked by Student’s t-tests at P ≤ 0.01; a, b, c, ranked by Student’s t-tests at P ≤ 0.05

Table 3

Effects of the QTL (in the interval SNP1-SNP5) on yield-related traits detected in the random subpopulation BC3F2-LQ96 derived from BC3F1-22F01 using Kongyu 131 as the recurrent parent and GKBR as the donor parent

Traits

Chr

Nearest

Additive

Dominant

LOD

Var.%

marker

effect

effect

NPB

1

SNP3

2.00

0.50

5.0

39.9%

DPB

1

SNP3

0.08

0.02

2.2

20.3%

GNP

1

SNP3

34.95

14.05

5.2

41.1%

GDP

1

SNP3

1.65

0.74

5.1

40.4%

Var.% represents the percentage of total phenotypic variance explained by the QTL

Evaluation of the selected lines

Two-hundred-and-twenty SNP markers evenly distributed across the genome were used to genotype the line BC3F2-2B09. The average distance between adjacent markers was 1.7 Mb. Owing to the crossover between SNP1 and SNP2 in the region upstream of Gn1a, the target chromosome fragment was shortened to approximately 4 Mb. There were 4 non-target fragments on chromosomes 1, 4, 7 and 12, among which the fragments at the end of the long arm of chromosomes 1, 4 and 7 were detected by adding 60 SNP markers located in the large interval without markers. The RRPG of BC3F2-2B09 was 97.49% based on the 220 SNP markers (Fig. 5a). To further shorten the target chromosome fragment, BC3F3-652E09 produced from a crossover between SNP4 and SNP5 was selected, and the target chromosome fragment was shortened to approximately 430 Kb. In addition, two non-target fragments were observed on chromosomes 1 and 4. The RRPG of BC3F3-652E09 was 98.45% (Fig. 5b). Finally, the improved line named BC4F2-350C05 with the same genome as Kongyu 131 except near the Gn1a locus was developed. The RRPG of BC4F2-350C05 was 99.89% (Fig. 5c).
Fig. 5

GGT of the selected lines. a BC3F2-2B09. b BC3F3-652E09. c BC4F2-350C05. The green bars represent the chromosome fragments derived from Kongyu 131, the red bars represent the chromosome fragments derived from GKBR, and the horizontal black lines indicate the SNP markers(the shorter, darker lines represent the centromeres)

Evaluation of the agronomic traits of Kongyu 131 and the improved line

The plant type and main panicle of Kongyu 131 and its improved line BC4F2-350C05 are shown in Fig. 6, and the performance of the agronomic traits at the two locations is presented in Table 4. At Changchun, the DTH of BC4F2-350C05 was 4 days longer than Kongyu 131, while no significant difference was detected at Jiamusi, indicating that the DTH is vulnerable to the environment. Compared with Kongyu 131, the PH of BC4F2-350C05 increased by 4.0 cm and 5.4 cm at Changchun and Jiamusi, respectively. The YP of BC4F2-350C05 increased by 4.7 g and 6.9 g at Changchun and Jiamusi, i.e., increases of 8.3% and 11.9%, respectively. The lower YP response at Changchun can be explained by the fewer ETP and GNP and lower SSP. The NPB, DPB, GNP and GDP of BC4F2-350C05 were significantly higher than those of Kongyu 131 at both Changchun and Jiamusi, which contributed to the increase in YP. The reduced GT caused a reduction (1.3 g and 2.0 g) in the TGW of BC4F2-350C05 at Changchun and Jiamusi, respectively, compared with Kongyu 131. However, the ETP, PL, GL, GW and LWR of BC4F2-350C05 at the two locations were similar to those of Kongyu 131.
Fig. 6

Plant type and the main panicle of Kongyu 131 and its improved line BC4F2-350C05 at Changchun. a Plant type. Kongyu 131 (left), BC4F2-350C05 (right); scale bar represents 20 cm. b Main panicle. Kongyu 131 (left), BC4F2-350C05 (right); scale bar represents 5 cm

Table 4

Agronomic performance of Kongyu 131 and its improved line BC4F2-350C05 at two locations

Traits

Changchun

Jiamusi

KY131

BC4F2-350C05

KY131

BC4F2-350C05

DTH

93.2 ± 0.8

97.2 ± 1.5**

103.6 ± 0.8

103.1 ± 0.7

PH (cm)

70.7 ± 2.2

74.7 ± 1.1**

70.6 ± 1.8

76.0 ± 3.1**

ETP

27.3 ± 3.3

27.1 ± 3.1

31.5 ± 3.6

31.4 ± 2.4

PL (cm)

16.6 ± 0.5

17.4 ± 0.5

16.5 ± 0.9

17.2 ± 0.4

NPB

11.8 ± 0.6

14.7 ± 0.6**

12.2 ± 1.0

14.9 ± 0.5**

DPB (/cm)

0.71 ± 0.04

0.85 ± 0.06**

0.75 ± 0.09

0.86 ± 0.02**

GNP

119.3 ± 8.0

168.1 ± 2.6**

123.4 ± 8.3

186.2 ± 17.8**

GDP (/cm)

7.18 ± 0.45

9.79 ± 0.11**

7.50 ± 0.38

10.69 ± 0.79**

SSP (%)

97.0 ± 1.7

93.8 ± 1.9**

98.0 ± 0.3

97.4 ± 0.6

YP (g)

56.4 ± 1.1

61.1 ± 1.6**

57.8 ± 1.1

64.7 ± 1.8**

TGW (g)

27.6 ± 0.6

26.3 ± 0.6**

27.8 ± 0.0

25.8 ± 0.3**

GL (mm)

7.4 ± 0.2

7.6 ± 0.1

7.4 ± 0.1

7.3 ± 0.1

GW (mm)

3.6 ± 0.1

3.6 ± 0.0

3.6 ± 0.1

3.6 ± 0.1

LWR

2.06 ± 0.03

2.05 ± 0.01

2.05 ± 0.00

2.07 ± 0.02

GT (mm)

2.33 ± 0.00

2.28 ± 0.04**

2.33 ± 0.02

2.30 ± 0.01*

TYP (Kg)

5.41 ± 0.26

5.87 ± 0.32**

5.55 ± 0.31

6.21 ± 0.43**

AYP (Kg)

4.38 ± 0.21

4.72 ± 0.26**

4.55 ± 0.25

5.01 ± 0.35**

Data presented as the means with standard deviations were obtained from plants in a randomized complete block design with three replications under natural conditions in Changchun and Jiamusi in 2016. The planting density was 30 cm × 20 cm, with one plant per hill. AYP data were obtained from plants in 10 plots, and the area per plot was 5.76 m 2(2.4 m × 2.4 m)

*represents significance at p ≤ 0.05 based on Student’s t-tests; ** represents significance at p ≤ 0.01 based on Student’s t-tests

Discussion

As a preeminent rice variety, even though Kongyu 131 has potential for increased production, it is difficult to improve yield while maintaining other desirable traits using MAS. In this study, the genome of Kongyu 131 was rebuilt through crossing, backcrossing and self-crossing. During this process, non-target chromosome fragments were excluded by background selection, and linkage drag was minimized by recombinant selection from large populations. Subsequently, a new Kongyu 131 genome carrying the favorable allele of Gn1a was built. We termed this method “Variety Update”, which can be used to improve a less desirable trait of an elite variety by replacing only a minute chromosome fragment (Lin et al. 2009).

Limitations of MAS and solutions in this study

The recombination between the target gene and linked markers would affect the selection accuracy through MAS. In this study, the genic marker SNP3 was developed according to the polymorphic Gn1a sequence between Kongyu 131 and GKBR. Genic markers derived from target gene sequences co-segregate with the target gene, which can effectively prevent recombination between markers and genes for a target trait (Andersen and Lubberstedt 2003). Moreover, linkage drag often occurs during MAS (Lewis et al. 2007). To minimize possible linkage drag, we developed SNP1, SNP2, SNP4 and SNP5 around the Gn1a locus, aiming to shorten the target introgressed chromosome fragment by screening the recombinant lines between SNP1 and SNP2 as well as between SNP4 and SNP5.

Introducing beneficial allelic genes through MAS may not improve the target traits efficiently due to different genomic backgrounds. In this study, Kongyu 131 was used as the recurrent parent, and GKBR as the donor parent, to develop an advanced backcrossed population. Advanced backcross QTL analysis (AB-QTL) (Naz et al. 2008; Sayed et al. 2012) was performed using the BC3F2 population to confirm that the introgressed fragment carrying Gn1a could significantly increase the branch number and grain number per panicle. Consequently, the new Kongyu 131 carrying the favorable Gn1a was developed.

Size of the introgressed chromosome fragment and marker number to detect the donor’s fragments in the background

A large introgressed target chromosome fragment and the donor’s chromosomal fragments remaining in the background can lead to undesirable traits in an improved line with a new genome. To solve this problem, on the one hand, we attempted to reduce the size of the introgressed chromosome fragment with the target gene, and on the other hand, to exclude all of the donor’s chromosomal fragments from the background. In this study, the target introgressed chromosomal fragment was shortened to less than 856 Kb, and the actual length needed to be identified by adding markers between SNP1 and SNP2 as well as between SNP4 and SNP5. It remains to be determined whether this size is appropriate, but it does not matter if no adverse traits are identified in the production test. Whether there are unfavorable genes within the target introgressed chromosome fragment can be determined through a production test and also speculated theoretically. If wild rice is used as the donor parent, the introgressed chromosome fragment is more likely to carry unfavorable genes without artificial selection. Then, the target introgressed fragment should be smaller than that when cultivated rice is used as the donor parents to prevent interaction between the foreign genes and the background. Furthermore, if cultivated rice with a close genetic relationship is used as the donor parents, then a relatively large target introgressed fragment is also acceptable. In this study, 220 SNP markers evenly distributed across the genome were used to detect the donor’s chromosome fragments in the background. However, it is unclear whether this number of markers is sufficient. Both the genotyping cost and a practical production test need to be taken into account. The new variety also needs to be observed for a certain period of time, and the production test results will reflect whether this number of markers is sufficient.

Agronomic traits in the new Kongyu 131 were improved

The YP of the improved line increased significantly at both Changchun and Jiamusi compared to Kongyu 131, and the improvement in YP was mainly because of the increase in NPB and GNP. This result indicates that incorporating the GKBR allele of Gn1a into the genome of Kongyu 131 increased the YP, and the improved line can be used as a new variety for rice production.

The DTH of the improved line at Jiamusi was 10 days longer, and 4 more ETP were produced compared with Changchun, which may be caused by the different photoperiods and temperatures of the two locations. The increase in the PH of the improved line, BC4F2-350C05, may be caused by the pleiotropy of Gn1a or undetected donor chromosome fragments. The reduced GT of the improved line caused the TGW to decrease by 1.3 g and 2.0 g at the two locations compared with Kongyu 131. This result may be explained by the fact that the GNP of the improved line increased, but the DTH did not, resulting in insufficient accumulation of photosynthetic products. It is generally believed that rice plants with a delayed heading date produce relatively more biomass than early heading plants, such as Ghd7 (Xue et al. 2008), DTH8 (Wei et al. 2010), Hd1 (Yano et al. 2000) and DTH7 (Gao et al. 2014). In the future, we will verify whether the yield may increase further by delaying the heading date through pyramiding certain genes for a late heading date.

The foundation for elite variety updating

To improve the Gn1a locus of Kongyu 131, we rebuilt the genome of Kongyu 131 through crossing and backcrossing. The new Kongyu 131 possessed the same genome as Kongyu 131 except close to the Gn1a locus, based on 220 SNP markers across the whole genome. The Variety Update method will probably become an increasingly more popular approach for the following reasons: farmers in developed and developing countries prefer to grow their ‘tried and tested’ varieties. In addition, farmers have already determined the optimum sowing rates and date, fertilizer application rates and timing of irrigation events for these varieties.

QTL analysis was carried out to confirm the target traits, and the results showed that selecting target traits entirely by genotype was reliable using this method. In this study, a chromosome fragment smaller than 856 Kb from donor parents was introgressed; therefore, in addition to Gn1a, other genes in the vicinity were also included in the genome of Kongyu 131. Whether these genes changed the genome composition and structure of Kongyu 131 or whether there were other undetected donor chromosome fragments in the background leading to undesirable traits is still not fully understood. However, the new variety bred using this method possesses genome information; if adverse traits appear in production, we can easily trace the causative genes or donor chromosome fragments in the background. In addition, if the adverse traits are caused by the loci of Kongyu 131, this problem can be solved using the same method. Therefore, the results from this study can be compiled and used to lay the foundation for future variety update studies.

Prospects

The elite rice variety Kongyu 131 was used as the recurrent parent, and only the Gn1a locus was improved to increase the grain number per panicle and subsequent yield in this study. Traits such as heading date, quality, disease and insect resistance, stress tolerance and nutrient efficiency can be improved using the same method in the future. Consequently, a series of new Kongyu 131 varieties meeting local needs could be developed by pyramiding two or more favorable genes. In addition, HRM is a method that allows polymorphism detection in double-stranded DNA by comparing the profiles of melting curves (Simko 2016). Only 6 ~ 10 min are needed to perform SNP genotyping through HRM after PCR; thus, this approach will become increasingly popular in molecular breeding.

Conclusions

To improve the yield of the elite rice variety Kongyu 131 and reserve its other desirable agronomic traits, we attempted a new approach, i.e., the rebuilding of the Kongyu 131 genome. During the process of genome reconstruction, the favorable allele Gn1a from the donor parent was introgressed into the genome of Kongyu 131. The yield per plant of the new Kongyu131 increased by 8.3% and 11.9% in two locations, and this new variety can be deployed in Heilongjiang Province instead of Kongyu131.

Methods

Rice materials

The recurrent parent Kongyu 131, an early maturity japonica rice variety grown in the high latitude zone, has strong tillering ability, is lodging resistant and cold tolerant, and requires an active accumulated temperature of 2330 °C. The average yield in Heilongjiang Province is 7684.5 kg/ha. The donor parent GKBR is an indica rice variety selected from the progenies derived from crossing 93–11 with IR64 and from self-crossing several times. GKBR has large panicles and dense spikelets and is blast resistant. The growth period of GKBR in Guangzhou, China, is 113 days in late season, but normal heading does not occur in Heilongjiang Province due to unsuitable photoperiod and temperature conditions.

Population development, field experiments and traits measurement

GKBR was crossed and backcrossed with Kongyu 131 to produce a BC3F1 population that included 127 lines. A line named BC3F1-22F01 with a chromosome segment carrying the Gn1a locus and the highest recovery ratio of the recurrent parent genome (RRPG) was selected to produce a BC3F2 population. From the BC3F2 population, 96 plants were randomly selected to form a BC3F2-LQ96 subpopulation for QTL analysis (Fig. 7). The BC3F2-LQ96 population was planted at the experimental farm of Jiamusi (130°57′E, 46°23′N), Heilongjiang Province, in the rice-growing season of 2015. Sowing and raising seedlings were conducted in a 96-well polymerase chain reaction (PCR) plate with a hole (Φ = 2.5 mm) at the bottom; one seed was placed in each well with the embryo pointing upward, and seedlings at the 3 ~ 4 leaf stage were transplanted to a paddy field. Each plot included 8 rows with 12 plants in each row; the plant spacing was 20 cm within rows and 30 cm between adjacent rows. The field management was the same as the normal local paddy field. At harvesting, the panicle length (PL, cm), number of primary branches per panicle (NPB) and grain number per panicle (GNP) were measured. The density of primary branches (DPB, /cm) and grain density per panicle (GDP, /cm) were calculated as DPB = NPB / PL and GDP = GNP / PL.
Fig. 7

Procedure for the genome reconstruction of Kongyu 131 (KY131)

Resequencing, comparison of Gn1a and marker design

The Kongyu 131 and GKBR rice varieties were sequenced using a HiSeq 2000 sequencing system. We downloaded the Gn1a DNA sequence of Koshihikari and Habataki (Ashikari et al. 2005) from GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank) and compared the Gn1a DNA sequences of Kongyu 131, GKBR, Koshihikari and Habataki using DNAMAN. SNP markers were developed according to the SNPs between Kongyu 131 and GKBR. The SNPs and their flanking 22 ~ 24- nt special sequences were used to design locus-specific and allele-specific primers; the amplicons were approximately 50 ~ 100 bp. Five SNP markers named SNP1-SNP5 were designed(Table 5). SNP3 was located in Gn1a, SNP1 and SNP2 were located upstream of Gn1a, while SNP4 and SNP5 were located downstream of Gn1a. SNP2 was close to the 5′-UTR of Gn1a and SNP4 was close to the 3′-UTR of Gn1a. The distance of SNP2 and SNP4 was 5761 bp, while the distance between SNP1 and SNP5 was 856 Kb.
Table 5

Sequences of the SNP markers developed for the selection of Gn1a

Markers

Chr

Position

Forward primer

Reverse primer

SNP1

1

5,006,541

ATGCGTGTGGCCCTTGAAAATG

AGATCTTCAAGGACGATTAAG

SNP2

1

5,269,396

ATTCAAGCATGCCGTACGTTTG

AGCCTTCATATGCATGTCGATC

SNP3

1

5,272,491

TCCAAAACAGTGAAAAGCATGC

TCTAGCTACTACCTACACTAGC

SNP4

1

5,275,157

ACTTGGGCCTAATGGCTAGCAG

TAGGGTGGCTATACTAACCAGT

SNP5

1

5,862,787

AGCATGCAAATAACGAGATGTC

CTATTTTAAATTCTTGAGAGGT

Position refers to the physical location of IRGSP-1.0

DNA extraction, PCR and HRM analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh rice leaves following the high-throughput protocol of plant genomic DNA preparation (Wang et al. 2013). PCR reactions were performed using a 96-well plate with a 10-μL reaction mixture that contained approximately 50 ng genomic DNA, 1 μL 10× Easy Taq buffer (Transgen Biotech Inc., Beijing, China), 0.2 μL 2.5 mM dNTPs (Transgen Biotech Inc., Beijing, China), 0.5 U Easy Taq DNA Polymerase (Transgen Biotech Inc., Beijing, China), and 0.125 μL 20× EvaGreen (Biotium Inc., USA); the reactions were covered with 10 μL mineral oil (Amresco Inc., USA). The PCR amplification program consisted of one cycle of denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s and 55°Cfor 30 s. Subsequently, the PCR plates were subjected to HRM analysis using a LightCycler®96 (Roche Inc., Swit), SNP genotyping analysis using HRM was carried out as described by Hofinger et al. (2009).

Data analysis

A total of 160 SNP markers distributed evenly over 12 chromosomes were used to genotype the BC3F1 population, and heterozygous markers were used to detect the BC3F2-LQ96 population. QTL analysis was performed using Mapmaker/QTL 1.1b (Lincoln et al. 1992) at a threshold LOD of 2.0. Correlation analysis among traits was conducted using SAS 9.3.

Selecting the line with the improved genome

To shorten the introgressed target chromosome fragment and to minimize linkage drag, 90 recombinant lines with crossovers between SNP1 and SNP5 were selected from 960 BC3F2 plants derived from BC3F1-22F01. Then, the markers heterozygous for BC3F1-22F01 and 60 newly added markers located in the large interval without markers were used to genotype the 90 recombinant lines, from which a line named BC3F2-2B09, heterozygous at SNP2-SNP4 but homozygous Kongyu 131-type at SNP1 and with the highest RRPG, was selected (Fig. 7). Second, 20 lines with the chromosome fragment carrying GKBR’s Gn1a allele and crossing over between SNP4 and SNP5 were selected from 1240 BC3F3 plants derived from BC3F2-2B09. Then, the markers heterozygous for BC3F2-2B09 were used to genotype the 20 recombinant lines, from which a line named BC3F3-652E09 with the highest RRPG was selected (Fig. 7). Third, BC3F3-652E09 was crossed with Kongyu 131 to develop the BC4F1 population consisting of 23 lines, among which a line named BC4F1-255A01 was selected. From 281 BC4F2 plants derived from BC4F1-255A01, the improved line BC4F2-350C05 with the homozygous GKBR chromosome fragment at the Gn1a locus and excluding other non-target fragments was selected (Fig. 7). The genome of BC4F2-350C05 was the same as Kongyu 131 except in the vicinity of the Gn1a locus according to the 220 SNP markers.

Evaluation of agronomic traits

The improved line and Kongyu 131 were planted at Changchun (125°18′E, 44°43′N), Jilin Province, and at Jiamusi with three replications. Each replication consisted of 8 rows with 12 plants per row. At the time of harvest, 10 plants in the middle of each plot were selected randomly to investigate the phenotypic data; every selected plant had to meet the condition that its surrounding 8 plants exhibited normal growth vigor. Days to heading (DTH) were calculated from the time of seed soaking to when 50% of the plants flowered in the plots. Plant height (PH), effective tillers per plant (ETP), panicle length (PL), number of primary branches per panicle (NPB), grain number per panicle (GNP), grain length (GL), grain width (GW), grain thickness (GT), thousand grain weight (TGW), yield per plant (YP) and the moisture content of the grain were investigated. The yield per plant at a moisture content of 15%, the density of primary branches (DPB), grain density per panicle (GDP), seed setting percentage (SSP) and grain length to width ratio (LWR) were calculated.

Abbreviations

AYP: 

Actual yield per plot

CDS: 

Coding DNA sequence

DPB: 

Density of primary branches

DTH: 

Days to heading

ETP: 

Effective tillers per plant

GDP: 

Grain density per panicle

GGT : 

Graphical genotype

GL: 

Grain length

GNP: 

Grain number per panicle

GT: 

Grain thickness

GW: 

Grain width

HRM: 

High-resolution melting

LWR: 

Length to width ratio

MAS: 

Marker-assisted selection

NPB: 

Number of primary branches per panicle

PH: 

Plant height

PL: 

Panicle length

QTL: 

Quantitative trait loci

RAD: 

Restriction site-associated DNA

RFLP: 

Restriction fragment length polymorphism

RRPG: 

Recovery ratio of recurrent parent genome

SNP: 

Single nucleotide polymorphism

SSP: 

Seed setting percentage

SSR: 

Simple sequence repeat

TGW: 

Thousand grain weight

TYP: 

Theoretical yield per plot

UTR: 

Un-translated regions

YP : 

Yield per plant

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the “Strategic Priority Research Program” of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA08030102-1) and the Talent Introduction Subject of the State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (2014C0227-01).

Authors’ contributions

SYL designed the experiments. XMF carried out the genotyping and evaluation of agronomic traits, performed the statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript. CW, JZN, RSW participated in the primer design. XHZ identified SNPs by sequencing Kongyu 131 and GKBR. GQJ and QBY performed rice hybridization and field management. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

  1. Andersen JR, Lübberstedt T (2003) Functional markers in plants. Trends Plant Sci 8:554–560View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashikari M, Sakakibara H, Lin SY, Yamamoto T, Takashi T, Nishimura A, Angeles ER, Qian Q, Kitano H, Matsuoka M (2005) Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science 309:741–745View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen H, He H, Zhou F, Yu H, Deng XW (2013) Development of genomics-based genotyping platforms and their applications in rice breeding. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16:247–254View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fan C, Xing Y, Mao H, Lu T, Han B, Xu C, Li X, Zhang Q (2006) GS3, a major QTL for grain length and weight and minor QTL for grain width and thickness in rice, encodes a putative transmembrane protein. Theor Appl Genet 112:1164–1171View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gao H, Jin M, Zheng XM, Chen J, Yuan D, Xin Y, Wang M, Huang D, Zhang Z, Zhou K, Sheng P et al (2014) Days to heading 7, a major quantitative locus determining photoperiod sensitivity and regional adaptation in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:16337–16342View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan TH, Presting G, Wang R, Dunn M et al (2002) A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza Sativa L. Ssp. japonica). Science 296:92–100View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hofinger BJ, Jing HC, Hammond-Kosack KE, Kanyuka K (2009) High-resolution melting analysis of cDNA-derived PCR amplicons for rapid and cost-effective identification of novel alleles in barley. Theor Appl Genet 119:851–865View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang X, Wei X, Sang T, Zhao Q, Feng Q, Zhao Y, Li C et al (2010) Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat Genet 42:961–967View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang X, Zhao Y, Wei X, Li C, Wang A, Zhao Q et al (2011) Genome-wide association study of flowering time and grain yield traits in a worldwide collection of rice germplasm. Nat Genet 44:32–39View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang X, Kurata N, Wei X, Wang Z, Wang A, Zhao Q et al (2012) A map of rice genome variation reveals the origin of cultivated rice. Nature 490:497–501View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project (2005) The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 436:793–800View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Jena KK, Mackill DJ (2008) Molecular markers and their use in marker-assisted selection in rice. Crop Sci 48:1266View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jiang H, Feng Y, Bao L, Li X, Gao G, Zhang Q, Xiao J, Xu C, He Y (2012) Improving blast resistance of Jin 23B and its hybrid rice by marker-assisted gene pyramiding. Mol Breed 30:1679–1688View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewis RS, Linger LR, Wolff MF, Wernsman EA (2007) The negative influence of N-mediated TMV resistance on yield in tobacco: linkage drag versus pleiotropy. Theor Appl Genet 115:169–178View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin SY, Takashi T, Nishimura A (2009) Update for elite japonica variety. Paper presented at the international symposium on rice research in the Era of Global Warming, Taiwan Agriculture Research Institute, Taiwan, 5-11 Oct 2009Google Scholar
  16. Lincoln S, Daly M, Lander E (1992) Constructing genetics maps with MAPMAKER/EXP 3.0. Whitehead Institute Technical Report, Whitehead Institute, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu Y, Chen L, Liu Y, Dai H, He J, Kang H et al (2016) Marker assisted pyramiding of two brown planthopper resistance genes, Bph3 and Bph27 (t), into elite rice cultivars. Rice 9:27–33View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller MR, Dunham JP, Amores A, Cresko WA, Johnson EA (2007) Rapid and cost-effective polymorphism identification and genotyping using restriction site associated DNA (RAD) markers. Genome Res 17:240–248View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Naz AA, Kunert A, Lind V, Pillen K, Leon J (2008) AB-QTL analysis in winter wheat: II. Genetic analysis of seedling and field resistance against leaf rust in a wheat advanced backcross population. Theor Appl Genet 116:1095–1104View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Pradhan SK, Nayak DK, Mohanty S, Behera L, Barik SR, Pandit E, Lenka S, Anandan A (2015) Pyramiding of three bacterial blight resistance genes for broad-spectrum resistance in deepwater rice variety, Jalmagna. Rice 8:19–32View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Ray DK, Ramankutty N, Mueller ND, West PC, Foley JA (2012) Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation. Nat Commun 3:1293–1299View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sakamoto T, Matsuoka M (2008) Identifying and exploiting grain yield genes in rice. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:209–214View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sasaki A, Ashikari M, Tanaka U, Itoh H, Nishimura A, Swapan D, Ishiyama K, Saito T, Kobayashi M, Khush GS, Kitano H, Matsuoka M (2002) Green revolution: a mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice. Nature 416:701–702View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sayed MA, Schumann H, Pillen K, Naz AA, Léon J (2012) AB-QTL analysis reveals new alleles associated to proline accumulation and leaf wilting under drought stress conditions in barley. BMC Genet 13:1471–1482View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Simko I (2016) High-resolution DNA melting analysis in plant research. Trends Plant Sci 21:528–537View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Spielmeyer W, Ellis MH, Chandler PM (2002) Semidwarf (sd-1), “green revolution” rice, contains a defective gibberellin 20-oxidase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:9043–9048View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Takeda S, Matsuoka M (2008) Genetic approaches to crop improvement: responding to environmental and population changes. Nat Rev Genet 9:444–457View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Tung CW, Zhao K, Wright MH, Ali ML, Jung J, Kimball J et al (2010) Development of a research platform for dissecting phenotype–genotype associations in Rice (Oryza spp.) Rice 3:205–217View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang HN, Chu ZZ, Ma XL, Li RQ, Liu YG (2013) A high through-put protocol of plant genomic DNA preparation for PCR. Acta Agron Sin 39:1200–1205View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang S, Li S, Liu Q, Wu K, Zhang J, Wang S, Wang Y, Chen X, Zhang Y, Gao C, Wang F, Huang H, Fu X (2015) The OsSPL16-GW7 regulatory module determines grain shape and simultaneously improves rice yield and grain quality. Nat Genet 47:949–954View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang H, Ye S, Mou T (2016) Molecular breeding of rice restorer lines and hybrids for brown planthopper (BPH) resistance using the Bph14 and Bph15 genes. Rice 9:53–61View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Wei X, Xu J, Guo H, Jiang L, Chen S, Yu C, Zhou Z, Hu P, Zhai H, Wan J (2010) DTH8 suppresses flowering in rice, influencing plant height and yield potential simultaneously. Plant Physiol 153:1747–1758View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Weng J, Gu S, Wan X, Gao H, Guo T, Su N, Lei C, Zhang X, Cheng Z, Guo X, Wang J, Jiang L, Zhai H, Wan J (2008) Isolation and initial characterization of GW5, a major QTL associated with rice grain width and weight. Cell Res 18:1199–1209View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Xing Y, Zhang Q (2010) Genetic and molecular bases of rice yield. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:421–442View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Xu Y, Crouch JH (2008) Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding: from publications to practice. Crop Sci 48:391–407View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu X, Liu X, Ge S, Jensen JD, Hu F, Li X, Dong Y et al (2011) Resequencing 50 accessions of cultivated and wild rice yields markers for identifying agronomically important genes. Nat Biotechnol 30:105–111View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Xue W, Xing Y, Weng X, Zhao Y, Tang W, Wang L, Zhou H, Yu S, Xu C, Li X, Zhang Q (2008) Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet 40:761–767View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, Yamanouchi U, Monna L, Fuse T, Baba T, Yamamoto K, Umehara Y, Nagamura Y, Sasaki T (2000) Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 12:2473–2483View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Yu J, Hu S, Wang J, Wong GKS, Li S, Liu B et al (2002) A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza Sativa L. Ssp. indica). Science 296:79–92View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang XH, Feng XM, Lin SY (2017) Scanning for Pi loci and rebuilding an improved genome of elite rice variety Kongyu 131. Chin Bull Bot 52:30–42Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017