Open Access

Gene targeting using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated CRISPR-Cas system in rice

Rice20147:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-014-0005-6

Received: 31 December 2013

Accepted: 14 April 2014

Published: 2 May 2014

Abstract

Background

The type II clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/ CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system is a novel molecular tool for site-specific genome modification. The CRISPR-Cas9 system was recently introduced into plants by transient or stable transformation.

Findings

Here, we report gene targeting in rice via the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated CRISPR-Cas9 system. Three 20-nt CRISPR RNAs were designed to pair with diverse sites followed by the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) of the rice herbicide resistance gene BEL. After integrating the single-guide RNA (sgRNA) and Cas9 cassette in a single binary vector, transgenic rice plants harboring sgRNA:Cas9 were generated by A. tumefaciens-mediated stable transformation. By analyzing the targeting site on the genome of corresponding transgenic plants, the mutations were determined. The mutagenesis efficiency was varied from ~2% to ~16%. Furthermore, phenotypic analysis revealed that the biallelic mutated transgenic plant was sensitive to bentazon.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that the agricultural trait could be purposely modified by sgRNA:Cas9-induced gene targeting. CRISPR-Cas9 system could be exploited as a powerful tool for trait improvements in crop breeding.

Keywords

Gene targeting CRISPR/Cas9 Rice Agrobacterium Stable transformation Genome editing

Findings

Increases in the human population as well as in extreme weather events require the sustaining improvement of crop varieties. A directed, rapid, and low-cost method is critical for updating high-yield, multi-stress resistant varieties. Molecular marker-assisted selection (MAS) and genetic modification (GM) methods have advantages in capturing favorable agricultural traits. However, the targeted editing technology of key functional genes promises to be a powerful tool in accelerating varietal improvement. Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcriptional activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) have proven to be effective in plant-targeted genome editing (Chen and Gao [2013]; Li et al. [2012]; Shan et al. [2013a]; Zhang et al. [2013]); however, a simple, affordable, and high-throughput method is still needed. Recently, the bacterial type II clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) system has attracted attention due to its ability to induce sequence-specific genome editing. The site specificity is defined by the complementary base pairing of a small CRISPR RNA (crRNA). After annealing to a trans-activating crRNA (tracrRNA), the crRNA directly guides the Cas9 endonuclease to cleave the target DNA sequence. In humans, zebrafish, Drosophila, mice, and rats, genome editing can be achieved by simply combining an engineered Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) and a synthetic single-guide RNA (sgRNA) consisting of the crRNA and the tracrRNA (Cong et al. [2013]; Feng et al. [2013]; Gratz et al. [2013]; Li et al. [2013a]; Wang et al. [2013]; Xiao et al. [2013]). The CRISPR/Cas9-induced genome editing was also recently performed in model plants (e.g., Arabidopsis, Nicotiana benthamiana) and crops (including wheat, rice and sorghum) by transient or stable transformation (Belhaj et al. [2013]; Feng et al. [2013]; Jiang et al. [2013]; Li et al. [2013b]; Mao et al. [2013]; Miao et al. [2013]; Nekrasov et al. [2013]; Shan et al. [2013b]; Xie and Yang [2013]). Here, we demonstrate that the CRISPR/Cas9 system could achieve efficient gene targeting in rice and modify the corresponding agricultural trait by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated stable transformation.

The rice Bentazon Sensitive Lethal (BEL, LOC_Os03g0760200) gene confers resistance to bentazon and sulfonylurea herbicides. The loss-of-function mutant bel is sensitive to the herbicides (Pan et al. [2006]). In two-line hybrid rice production, when male sterile lines are developed in the bel background, the problem of hybrid seed contamination by the selfing of sterile lines can be solved by simply spraying bentazon at the seedling stage. Although BEL has the potential to improve hybrid rice production safety, the limited natural genetic resources greatly restrict its application. Therefore, we selected BEL gene as the target for sgRNA:Cas9-based disruption. A 20-nucleotide (nt) region (target-1) at the 5’ end of a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) in the second exon of BEL was selected as the editing target (Additional file 1: Method, Additional file 2: Figure S1). Complementary oligonucleotides were synthesized and were fused to the default sgRNA scaffold (Mali et al. [2013]) under control of an Arabidopsis U6-26 gene promoter (U6-26p). A double 35S promoter (pd35s) was used to drive a plant codon-optimized SpCas9 (pSpCas9) coding region. In order to improve the efficiency of delivery, both of the sgRNA and Cas9 expression cassette were subcloned into a single binary vector (Figure 1a, Additional file 3: Figure S2). The construct was introduced into the embryonic calli of japonica rice cv. Nipponbare via A. tumefaciens, and independent transgenic events were isolated in the presence of hygromycin (Additional file 1: Method). The target region was amplified from the genomic DNA of transgenic plants and was Sanger-sequenced to detect sequence alterations. 15 mutations, including nucleotide deletions and substitutions, were identified in 14 lines from 90 independent transgenic plants (Figure 1b), indicating sgRNA:Cas9-induced gene targeting in rice.
Figure 1

Gene editing in rice using the stably expressed sgRNA:Cas9 system. (a) Diagram of the sgRNA:Cas9 complex targeting the rice BEL gene at the target-1 site. PAM, the protospacer adjacent motif. gRNA, the guide RNA scaffold (Mali et al. [2013]). (b) sgRNA:Cas9-induced rice BEL gene mutations at the target-1 site. Upper: 14 mutants were identified in 90 independent lines transformed the target-1 sgRNA:pSpCas9. Lower: 2 mutants were identified in 96 independent lines transformed the target-1 sgRNA:hSpCas9. The yellow shadow marks the target sequence that is recognized by the crRNA. The deletions, insertions, and nucleotide substitutions are marked in red. (c) The phenotypes of the bel mutants. The leaves were sprayed with 1.5 g/L bentazon for 7 days. Upper: the transgenic plant without the target mutation; lower: the biallelic mutant with the site-specific mutation. Scale bar = 1 cm. (d) sgRNA:Cas9-induced rice BEL gene mutations at the target-2 site. 2 mutants were identified in 94 independent lines transformed the target-2 sgRNA:pSpCas9.

To determine the effect of sgRNA:Cas9-directed gene targeting, we investigated the herbicide resistance of the mutated plants. A transgenic line with biallelic mutations (a 1-nt deletion of the 17th “C” and a 4-nt deletion of the 14th “CATC”, as shown in the first and the fourth mutated sequence in Figure 1b) was selected. The biallelic mutated plant and non-mutated transgenic lines were sprayed with bentazon. After 7-day incubation, the control leaves from the non-mutated transgenic plants remained green; however, the biallelic mutated leaves became severely wrinkled and yellowed (Figure 1c), confirming the functional disruption of the BEL gene.

To investigate influencing factors of the rice sgRNA:Cas9 mutagenesis efficiency, the gene targeting on 2 regions (a 20 nt region located in the first exon of BEL referred as the target-2 v.s. the target-1, Additional file 2: Figure S1) were performed using 2 codon types of Cas9 (humanized SpCas9, hSpCas9 v.s. pSpCas9). After stably transformed by Agrobacterium, target regions of transgenic plants were screened. On the target-1, only 2 mutants were identified from 96 independent lines using hSpCas9 (2.1% mutated), compared to the 15.6% mutagenesis frequency using pSpCas9 (Figure 1b). The significant different on the mutagenesis frequency at the target-1 (P < 0.01, χ2 test) might be related to the higher level of Cas9 protein accumulation in the pSpCas9 transgenic plants than in the hSpCas9 transgenic plants (Additional file 3: Figure S2), similar to previous results that were obtained by transient assays (Li et al. [2013b]). Although sgRNA expression is considered as the limiting factor for effective mutagenesis (Li et al. [2013b]), our result suggests that the accumulation of Cas9 could also increase the targeting efficiency. The mutagenesis efficiencies were further determined on the target-2. For the target-2 sgRNA-pSpCas9 construct, 94 independent transgenic lines were generated, and 2 mutants were identified (2.1% mutated). Meanwhile, transgenic plants harboring the target-2 sgRNA-hSpCas9 were generated; however, no mutant was found among all of 96 transgenic lines (Figure 1d). Theoretically, every (N)20-NGG in genome could be recognized as the target site for sgRNA:Cas9-based gene targeting; however, the mutagenesis efficiency markedly varied between the 2 targeted sites using the same pSpCas9 (P < 0.01, χ2 test). The target-2 was located in a GC-rich region (85% GC content at the target site and 71% within the 100-bp region comprising the target), whereas the GC content of the target-1 was relatively lower (65% at the target site and 60% within the 100-bp region comprising the target). In the absence of further statistical data, we speculate that the mutagenesis efficiency might be correlated with the nucleotide composition or the epigenetic state of target regions.

Several reports have suggested that the first nucleotide of the target sequence should be ‘G’, if the U6 promoter was used to drive sgRNA expression (Li et al. [2013b]; Mali et al. [2013]). This limitation would largely restrict potential mutation sites in genome editing. Therefore, we tested the stringency of the nucleotide on the first position. A 20-nt sequence beginning with ‘A’ was selected and was marked as the target-3 (Additional file 2: Figure S1). The gene targeting was performed with the binary vector containing pSpCas9. Among 96 independent transgenic lines, we identified 2 mutants (Additional file 4: Figure S3), suggesting that the ‘G’ is not absolutely required on the first position of the target sequence driven by the U6 promoter.

Since the specificity of sgRNA:Cas9 system became a major concern of the application (Hsu et al. [2013]), the off-target efficiency was further investigated. After searching rice genome using the target-1 sequence, three highly identical sites were found. Their sequences had 1-base or 3-base mismatches to the target-1 sequence. All of three genomic regions were examined in the target-1 sgRNA-pSpCas9 transgenic lines. However, we did not observe any mutation at these sites by sequencing (Additional file 5: Table S1).

The delivery method of CRISRP/Cas system would be an important part of the potential application for crop improvement. The efficiency of gene targeting using the biolistic transformation method is relatively higher than the efficiency obtained in this study (Shan et al. [2013b]). Biolistic transformations frequently lead to multi-insertion copies insertion in transgenic plants, and possibly cause higher expression levels of sgRNA and Cas9 protein. However, the transgenes induced by A. tumefaciens usually exhibit a much higher single-site insertion frequency (Dai et al. [2001]), and the insertions should be easier to locate in the plant genome. Therefore, the genome would be easier to be identified in progenies of A. tumefaciens-mediated sgRNA:Cas9-targeting rice. In the near future, the direct application of A. tumefaciens- mediated sgRNA:Cas9-induce gene targeting on key functional genes would become a promising biotechnological strategy to facilitate the breeding of rice and other major crops which transgenic technologies are available.

Accession codes

The accession number of BEL gene is NCBI GeneBank: DQ341412.

Additional files

Abbreviations

CRISPR: 

Clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeat:

Cas: 

CRISPR-associated protein:

PAM: 

Protospacer adjacent motif:

sgRNA: 

Single-guide RNA:

MAS: 

Molecular-assisted selection:

GM: 

Genetic modification:

ZFNs: 

Zinc finger nucleases:

TALENs: 

Transcriptional activator-like effector nucleases:

BEL: 

Bentazon Sensitive Lethal:

Pd35s: 

double 35S promoter:

U6-26p: 

Arabidopsis U6-26 gene promoter:

crRNA: 

CRISPR RNA:

tracrRNA: 

trans-activating crRNA:

SpCas9 Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9

:

hSpCas9 Humanized SpCas9

:

pSpCas9 Plant codon-optimized SpCas9

:

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grant No. 31100216) and the National Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (AHNSF Grant No. 1408085QC53).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory of Rice Genetics Breeding of Anhui Province, Rice Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences
(2)
Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences
(3)
College of Life Sciences, Anhui University

References

  1. Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, Nekrasov V: Plant genome editing made easy: targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant Methods 2013, 9(1):39. 10.1186/1746-4811-9-39PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen K, Gao C: TALENs: customizable molecular DNA scissors for genome engineering of plants. J Genet Genomics 2013, 40(6):271–279. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2013.03.009] 10.1016/j.jgg.2013.03.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, Hsu PD, Wu X, Jiang W, Marraffini LA, Zhang F: Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 2013, 339(6121):819–823. 10.1126/science.1231143PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dai S, Zheng P, Marmey P, Zhang S, Tian W, Chen S, Beachy R, Fauquet C: Comparative analysis of transgenic rice plants obtained by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and particle bombardment. Mol Breed 2001, 7(1):25–33. 10.1023/A:1009687511633View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Feng Z, Zhang B, Ding W, Liu X, Yang D-L, Wei P, Cao F, Zhu S, Zhang F, Mao Y, Zhu J-K: Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res 2013, ᅟ: ᅟ.Google Scholar
  6. Gratz SJ, Cummings AM, Nguyen JN, Hamm DC, Donohue LK, Harrison MM, Wildonger J, O’Connor-Giles KM: Genome engineering of Drosophila with the CRISPR RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease. Genetics 2013, ᅟ: ᅟ.Google Scholar
  7. Hsu PD, Scott DA, Weinstein JA, Ran FA, Konermann S, Agarwala V, Li Y, Fine EJ, Wu X, Shalem O, Cradick TJ, Marraffini LA, Bao G, Zhang F: DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotech 2013, 31(9):827–832. [http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n9/abs/nbt.2647.html#supplementary-information] http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n9/abs/nbt.2647.html#supplementary-information http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n9/abs/nbt.2647.html#supplementary-information 10.1038/nbt.2647View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiang W, Zhou H, Bi H, Fromm M, Yang B, Weeks DP: Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41(20):e188. 10.1093/nar/gkt780PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Li D, Qiu Z, Shao Y, Chen Y, Guan Y, Liu M, Li Y, Gao N, Wang L, Lu X, Zhao Y, Liu M: Heritable gene targeting in the mouse and rat using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotech 2013, 31(8):681–683. [http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n8/full/nbt.2661.html#supplementary-information] http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n8/full/nbt.2661.html#supplementary-information http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n8/full/nbt.2661.html#supplementary-information 10.1038/nbt.2661View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Li J-F, Norville JE, Aach J, McCormack M, Zhang D, Bush J, Church GM, Sheen J: Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat Biotech 2013, 31(8):688–691. [http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n8/full/nbt.2654.html#supplementary-information] http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n8/full/nbt.2654.html#supplementary-information http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n8/full/nbt.2654.html#supplementary-information 10.1038/nbt.2654View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Li T, Liu B, Spalding MH, Weeks DP, Yang B: High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice. Nat Biotech 2012, 30(5):390–392. [http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v30/n5/abs/nbt.2199.html#supplementary-information] http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v30/n5/abs/nbt.2199.html#supplementary-information http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v30/n5/abs/nbt.2199.html#supplementary-information 10.1038/nbt.2199View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, Aach J, Guell M, DiCarlo JE, Norville JE, Church GM: RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 2013, 339(6121):823–826. 10.1126/science.1232033PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mao Y, Zhang H, Xu N, Zhang B, Gao F, J-k Z: Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants. Mol Plant 2013, ᅟ: ᅟ.Google Scholar
  14. Miao J, Guo D, Zhang J, Huang Q, Qin G, Zhang X, Wan J, Gu H, Qu L-J: Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system. Cell Res 2013, 23(10):1233–1236. 10.1038/cr.2013.123PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nekrasov V, Staskawicz B, Weigel D, Jones JDG, Kamoun S: Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat Biotech 2013, 31(8):691–693. [http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n8/full/nbt.2655.html#supplementary-information] http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n8/full/nbt.2655.html#supplementary-information http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n8/full/nbt.2655.html#supplementary-information 10.1038/nbt.2655View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Pan G, Zhang X, Liu K, Zhang J, Wu X, Zhu J, Tu J: Map-based cloning of a novel rice cytochrome P450 gene CYP81A6 that confers resistance to two different classes of herbicides. Plant Mol Biol 2006, 61(6):933–943. 10.1007/s11103-006-0058-zView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Shan Q, Wang Y, Chen K, Liang Z, Li J, Zhang Y, Zhang K, Liu J, Voytas DF, Zheng X, Zhang Y, Gao C: Rapid and efficient gene modification in rice and brachypodium using TALENs. Mol Plant 2013, ᅟ: ᅟ.Google Scholar
  18. Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Chen K, Liang Z, Zhang K, Liu J, Xi JJ, Qiu J-L, Gao C: Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotech 2013, 31(8):686–688. [http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n8/full/nbt.2650.html#supplementary-information] http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n8/full/nbt.2650.html#supplementary-information http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v31/n8/full/nbt.2650.html#supplementary-information 10.1038/nbt.2650View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang H, Yang H, Shivalila Chikdu S, Dawlaty Meelad M, Cheng Albert W, Zhang F, Jaenisch R: One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 2013, 153(4):910–918. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.025PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Xiao A, Wang Z, Hu Y, Wu Y, Luo Z, Yang Z, Zu Y, Li W, Huang P, Tong X, Zhu Z, Lin S, Zhang B: Chromosomal deletions and inversions mediated by TALENs and CRISPR/Cas in zebrafish. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, ᅟ: ᅟ.Google Scholar
  21. Xie K, Yang Y: RNA-guided genome editing in plants using a CRISPR-cas system. Mol Plant 2013, ᅟ: ᅟ.Google Scholar
  22. Zhang Y, Zhang F, Li X, Baller JA, Qi Y, Starker CG, Bogdanove AJ, Voytas DF: Transcription activator-like effector nucleases enable efficient plant genome engineering. Plant Physiol 2013, 161(1):20–27. 10.1104/pp.112.205179PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Xu et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.