Skip to main content

Florigen and the Photoperiodic Control of Flowering in Rice


Flowering time is a key trait for geographical and seasonal adaptation of plants and is an important consideration for rice breeders. Recently identified genetic factors provide new insights into this complex trait. The list of genes involved in flowering and their functions tells us that the molecular basis of day-length measurement includes both of the evolution of unique factors and the regulatory adaptation of conserved factors in rice. This information helped identify rice florigen, a mobile flowering signal. Our current view of flowering time regulation incorporates the presence of complex layers of gene networks integrated with the synthesis of florigen protein and its subsequent transport and perception.


Flowering time, often referred to as heading date in cereal crops, is a key agronomical determinant for adaptation to specific cropping locations and growing seasons for current varieties of cultivated rice. Developing early-flowering or photoperiod-insensitive cultivars has been a major objective of rice breeding for several decades. The molecular and developmental determinants of flowering time have thus also particularly important genetic targets for domestication or for breeding new varieties of rice. Flowering time is controlled by many genes, which are expressed or suppressed in close interaction with environmental factors such as day length and temperature. Progress in the molecular genetics has provided a clearer understanding of several pivotal mechanisms regulating flowering time determination in rice, and these studies have been summarized from genetic, molecular biological, or comparative biological perspectives [17, 24, 25, 43, 83]. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of rice flowering, considering the recent finding of a strong candidate for the long sought-after mobile flowering stimulus, florigen [74].

Hd3a protein as the rice florigen

Heading date 3a (Hd3a) was first detected as a quantitative trait locus (QTL), which promotes flowering of rice under short-day (SD) conditions [55, 80]. Hd3a encodes an ortholog of Arabidopsis FLOWRING LOCUS T (FT) [38]. Overexpression of Hd3a protein with the constitutive promoter [38] or vascular-specific promoters [74] results in an early-flowering phenotype, and suppression of Hd3a with RNA interference (RNAi) delays flowering [39]. Hd3a is a member of a large gene family consisting of at least 13 genes in rice genome [6] and at least two paralogs, Rice FLOWERING LOCUS T1 (RFT1) and FT-Like (FTL) promote flowering [28, 39]. Hd3a/FT proteins are about 22 kDa in size, and their overall structures are similar to mammalian phosphatidyl ethanolamine-binding proteins or Raf-kinase inhibitor proteins (RKIP) [3], although it is not known whether or not Hd3a/FT binds to phosphatidyl ethanolamine or inhibits kinase.

Recent progress in the molecular genetics of Arabidopsis indicates that FT has a strong flowering promotion effect downstream of the known photoperiodic flowering pathway [17, 21, 36]. Arabidopsis flowering is promoted by long day (LD), whereas rice flowering is promoted by SD. FT is a major floral activator that is expressed in the vascular tissues of leaves under inductive LD in Arabidopsis [32, 37, 71]. FT protein interacts with the bZIP transcription factor FLOWERING LOCUS D (FD), which is only expressed in the shoot apical meristem (SAM), and this interaction seems to be necessary for full activation of FT floral promotion [1, 76]. The anatomical separation of expression sites implies that FT product is a primary candidate for florigen. If FT encodes the florigen, it could act as a mobile agent either via protein or messenger RNA (mRNA), either of which could move to the SAM to interact with FD. Therefore, a major focus was whether transcripts or protein account for the mobile florigenic activity [85].

The question was answered with the introduction of rice as a paradigm for exploring the nature of florigen (Fig. 1) [74]. First, the precise sites of Hd3a transcription and mRNA accumulation were determined. The promoter activity of Hd3a was detected in transgenic plants expressing β-glucuronidase (GUS) under the control of the Hd3a promoter in the vascular cells of leaf blades. No GUS activity was detected in the SAM. This is consistent with the tissue specificity of FT expression in Arabidopsis, although expression is induced by LD for FT and by SD for Hd3a [32, 37]. Hd3a mRNA accumulates in leaf blades but is present at very low levels in leaf sheaths and is four orders of magnitude lower in the shoot apex than in leaf blades under SD conditions. Therefore, it is unlikely that Hd3a mRNA moves from leaves to the SAM in any significant amount. Hd3a expression is thus limited to the vascular tissues of leaf blades under SD conditions.

Fig. 1

Model of Hd3a/FT action in rice and Arabidopsis. Hd3a/FT protein is synthesized in the vascular tissue of the leaf and transported through phloem tissue. Hd3a/FT protein is unloaded from the end of the vascular tissue and enters into the SAM through the cells just below the SAM. Several lines of evidence suggest that Hd3a/FT protein interacts with the bZIP transcription factor FD, which directly binds promoter region of floral meristem identity gene AP1. Hd3a/FT is a strong candidate for florigen.

Secondly, the tissue localization of Hd3a protein was examined using transgenic rice plants expressing Hd3a-GFP fusion protein driven by the Hd3a promoter. Hd3a-GFP was present in vascular tissue from the leaf blade to the upper part of the stem, the region just below the meristem where nodes are present, and in the inner cone-like region of the SAM. Hd3a-GFP protein is thus synthesized in the vascular tissues of leaf blades and transported through the phloem. Hd3a protein is then unloaded from the end of the vascular tissue and enters the SAM through cells just beneath the SAM [74]. Essentially, the same localization of Hd3a-GFP was observed when other vascular-specific promoters were used to express Hd3a-GFP, confirming that Hd3a-GFP is translocated from leaf and stem vasculature to the SAM. These observations indicate that Hd3a protein is a mobile flowering signal in rice (Fig. 1). The ability of Hd3a/FT protein to move long distances is also suggested from a study of the rice phloem sap proteome [4]. Rice phloem sap contains a member of Hd3a/FT protein family, FT-LIKE12, along with RKIP-like proteins RICE CENTRORADIALIS3 (RCN3) and MOTHER OF FT1. Hd3a itself was not detected, probably because photoperiod conditions and timing of sampling was not suitable for detection of Hd3a. Hd3a/FT proteins, however, have been detected in the phloem sap of other plant species. CmFTL2, a functional ortholog of Hd3a/FT in Cucurbita maxima, has also been found in vascular sap and can move through graft unions to promote flowering [47]. Phloem sap obtained from the inflorescence stems of Brassica napus also contained FT protein [14]. These observations provide additional evidence that Hd3a/FT proteins are florigens. Evidence from Arabidopsis also supports the florigen activity of FT protein. Phloem-expressed FT-GFP and Myc-tagged FT move to the apex and cause early flowering, but FT protein with nuclear localization signal or 3xYFP do not, probably because of immobilization [8, 29, 52].

RFT1 also promotes flowering in rice

The RFT1 gene lies adjacent to Hd3a, separated by only 11.5 kb on chromosome 6 of rice [26]. Hd3a and RFT1 sequences are very similar, and they were likely produced by a recent tandem duplication event [6]. The corresponding chromosomal regions of the Hd3a/RFT1 locus in maize or wheat contain only a single Hd3a ortholog [10, 82]. RFT1 tissue-specific expression is similar to that of Hd3a in that it is expressed in vascular tissues of leaf blades in response to SD. Thus, RFT1 could possibly function redundantly with Hd3a in promoting rice flowering as another florigen. The interesting involvement of RFT1 was revealed from a detailed analysis of rice plants with RNAi-suppressed Hd3a expression [39]. Flowering of Hd3a RNAi plants was delayed by more than 30 days under SD conditions. Although flowering of RFT1 RNAi plants was normal, suggesting that RFT1 does not on its own promote flowering under SD conditions, double RNAi plants in which both Hd3a and RFT1 are suppressed did not flower up to 300 days after germination. Both Hd3a and RFT1 are thus involved in the normal regulation of flowering in rice. RFT1 expression is normally low in wild-type rice plants but is up-regulated in Hd3a RNAi plants and is correlated with reproductive transition of the SAM. This up-regulation is also correlated with an increase of histone-3-acetylation of nucleosomes around the transcription initiation site of RFT1. These results suggest that RFT1 expression increases in the absence of Hd3a and that RFT1 complements Hd3a function [39]. RFT1 thus serves as another flowering promotion activity in rice under certain conditions.

Hd3a/FT signaling in the shoot apical meristem

The identification of Hd3a/FT as florigen opens the door to studying the molecular mechanism(s) of Hd3a/FT signaling in the SAM. The current understanding of events downstream of Hd3a/FT activity focuses on FD, MADS-box transcription factors, and CENTRORADIALIS (CEN) /TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1). Corresponding genes of the proteins discussed below are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Genes that are Expected to be Involved in Hd3a/FT Signaling in SAM


In the SAM, Hd3a may interact with a bZIP transcription factor orthologous to Arabidopsis FD to induce phase transition from vegetative to reproductive states. In Arabidopsis, FD is expressed on the flanks of the SAM where flower primordia are initiated. FD is expressed during the vegetative phase so that it is present when FT arrives. In the presence of FT, FD induces the floral meristem identity gene APETALA1 (AP1) and its paralog FRUITFULL (FUL) [2, 76]. At present, there are no reports describing FD function in rice, whereas the maize late flowering mutant delayed flowering 1 (dlf1) provides a hint about FD function in rice and other cereals [58]. The DLF1 gene encodes an ortholog of FD. Loss-of-function mutants of maize DLF1 (dlf1) have a late flowering phenotype with some abnormal tassel branches. The most abundant DLF1 expression is found in the SAM, and it peaks during vegetative-to-reproductive phase transition, decreasing gradually during inflorescence development. DLF1 has also been shown to interact with maize Hd3a/FT. The maize genome contains at least 15 members of the Hd3a/FT gene family. Two of them, Zea mays CENTRORADIALIS 8 (ZCN8) and ZCN14, interact with DLF1 in yeast two-hybrid assays [10]. ZCN8 transcripts are present in leaf blades before floral transition, increases just before floral transition, and stays high afterward. Because of its expression pattern and interaction with DLF1, ZCN8 should be considered as a florigen candidate in maize. ZCN15, an ortholog of rice Hd3a, which resides in the syntenic chromosome region of rice Hd3a, is weakly expressed in leaf blades after phase transition and relatively highly expressed in the developing kernel. The activation of AP1 by Hd3a/FT and FD is operative in cereal crops. The dlf1 mutation of maize delayed the expression of maize AP1/FUL MADS-box gene ZMM4, an ortholog of OsMADS14/RAP1B, in the SAM [11], and TaFDL2, a wheat FD homolog, can interact with wheat FT protein VERNALIZATION3 (VRN3)/TaFT and directly binds the promoter region of wheat AP1 homologous gene in vitro [45].

There are at least seven orthologs of FD in the rice genome [60]. OsbZIP24 mRNA is relatively abundant in the SAM, and OsbZIP54 mRNA is distributed throughout the rice plant, including the SAM, whereas transcript accumulation of other FD-like bZIPs is below the microarray detection limit [60]. It is yet to be determined if there is some unresolved functional differentiation among these FD-like proteins of rice.

MADS-box transcription factors

The gene network, which acts downstream of FT in the SAM, involves MADS-box genes in Arabidopsis. Both FT and FD, together with LEAFY, are required for inducing expression of AP1 and FUL in the SAM [2, 53, 75]. FT-dependent gene regulation is also observed in Arabidopsis leaves. Expression of FUL and SEPALATA3 was induced in leaves overexpressing FT and was reduced in ft and fd mutants [75]. Thus, leaves and the SAM may share similar regulatory mechanisms. In rice, the expression of OsMADS14/RAP1B, an ortholog of AP1, and OsMADS15/RAP1A are up-regulated by Hd3a in leaf blades under SD conditions [39], suggesting that the same regulatory network is involved in the SAM of rice. OsMADS14/RAP1B is expressed in the SAM during the reproductive phase [13, 41], and its ectopic expression strongly promotes rice flowering [31]. Interestingly, a mutant of the OsMADS14/RAP1B ortholog in einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum), maintained vegetative phase (mvp), cannot show transition from vegetative to reproductive phases [67]. The mvp phenotype is caused by a deletion of the promoter and coding region of Wheat AP1 (WAP1)/VERNALIZATION1 (VRN1), a gene that lies within the wheat chromosome region corresponding to the region containing OsMADS14/RAP1B in rice [81]. Reduced levels of VRN3/TaFT, an ortholog of rice Hd3a, are associated with lower levels of VRN1 transcripts, consistent with the observation in rice [82]. Although AP1 in Arabidopsis is unlikely to be the FT target in the SAM for flowering control because ap1 mutants are not late flowering [62], AP1 MADS-box proteins are likely to function as important mediators of Hd3a/FT activity in flowering of cereals. OsMADS14/RAP1B is also an activator of Hd3a expression in leaves [34, 43]. Consistent with this, reduced levels of VRN1 are also correlated with reduced levels of VRN3 in barley [20].

Suppressor of Overexpression of Constans1 (SOC1) in Arabidopsis is a MADS-box protein, and a recent genetic study suggests that FT mediates the activation of SOC1 downstream of CONSTANS (CO) [44]. SOC1 directly interacts with AGAMOUS-LIKE24 (AGL24) MADS-box protein in the shoot apex, and direct binding of the SOC1-AGL24 complex to the promoters of both SOC1 and AGL24 upregulates their expression [48]. On the other hand, the regulatory hierarchy and the site of action seem to be different in rice; a T-DNA insertion mutation of OsMADS50/OsSOC1 results in a reduction of Hd3a transcription in leaves, whereas RNAi suppression of Hd3a or of both Hd3a and RFT1 does not result in any change in OsMADS50/OsSOC1 expression. Thus, in rice, OsMADS50/OsSOC1 acts upstream of Hd3a expression in leaf blades [39, 44].


CENTRORADIALIS (CEN)/TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1) proteins provide interesting insights into Hd3a/FT signaling in the SAM. CEN/TFL1 are homologs of Hd3a/FT and encode RKIP proteins, but CEN/TFL1 proteins repress flowering. Arabidopsis TFL1 mRNA is limited to the central cells of the inflorescence shoot meristem, and the TFL1 protein migrates to outer cells [7]. Repression of flowering has been thoroughly investigated using Arabidopsis FT and TFL1 [3, 16]. Proteins carrying replacements of individual residues or specific regions of FT and TFL1 were overexpressed in a ft tfl1 double mutant to map the residues or regions that confer specific activity on the two proteins. The crystal structures of FT and TFL1 were also compared to map the region of specificity. These analyses suggest that His88 in TFL1 and the corresponding Tyr85 in FT are important for the opposite activities of FT and TFL1 [16] and that the region responsible for the difference is localized in a 14 amino acid segment in the external loop at the C-termini of the proteins [3].

There are at least four CEN/TFL1-like genes in the rice genome [6]. RICE CENTRORADIALS1 (RCN1), RCN2, and RCN3/Oscen1 are able to delay flowering and affect panicle architecture when overexpressed [59, 87]. Interestingly, RCN3 protein can be detected in the phloem sap of rice, suggesting that this protein signals to communicate between distant organs, much like Hd3a [4]. An attractive hypothesis to explain the difference between Hd3a/FT and CEN/TFL1 regulatory activity is that the external loops bring different partners to Hd3a/FT or CEN/TFL1, thus defining the function of the complex. Screening for interacting proteins using specific external loop regions may provide further insights into Hd3a/FT signaling for floral promotion.

Molecular-genetic pathways of the photoperiodic flowering in rice

From an understanding of the molecular nature of Hd3a/FT proteins, it can be inferred that the timing of rice flowering is basically determined by the expression levels of the two essential flowering promotion genes, Hd3a and RFT1 in leaf blades, and by the competency of the SAM for Hd3a/FT activity. Recent molecular genetic studies provide important insights into the day-length regulation of Hd3a expression. The crucial aspect of this regulation is SD induction and LD repression of Hd3a (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Regulatory network of rice flowering time. Under short-day conditions, Hd3a is mainly up-regulated by Hd1 and Ehd1. Hd1 is up-regulated by OsGI, and Ehd1 is up-regulated by OsMADS51, whose expression is up-regulated by OsGI. OsGI is regulated by the circadian clock. Under long-day conditions, Hd1 function is converted to repress Hd3a in response to a signal from phytochrome. Ehd1 is repressed by Ghd7, a regulatory component that is up-regulated under long-day conditions, resulting in Hd3a repression. SD or LD in parentheses indicate short-day- or long-day-specific regulation, respectively.

Short-day promotion of Hd3a expression

Under SD conditions, Hd3a expression is induced gradually and peaks at about 30 days before flowering, about the time floral transition occurs [39]. The diurnal peak of Hd3a promoter activity and mRNA accumulation coincide at dawn, suggesting the major point of Hd3a regulation is transcriptional [23, 38, 74]. The most important factors for this Hd3a expression are Heading date1 (Hd1) and Early heading date1 (Ehd1, see below) [24]. Hd1 was first detected as the major photoperiod-sensitivity QTL, and it encodes a B-box zinc finger protein with a C-terminal CCT (CONSTANS, CONSTANS-LIKE and TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION1) domain [84]. Under SD conditions, loss-of-function alleles of Hd1 delay flowering and reduce Hd3a mRNA accumulation [23, 28, 38, 84]. Detailed phylogenetic analyses showed that Hd1 is the sole ortholog of Arabidopsis CONSTANS (CO), which is also an important activator of FT [26]. Arabidopsis CO is expressed in leaf phloem tissues [71], and CO protein seems to directly regulate FT and its paralog TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF) because both FT and TSF are up-regulated by dexamethasone-induced activation of CO in the presence of the translation inhibitor cycloheximide [65, 78]. Whether Hd1 directly regulates Hd3a transcription is not clear, but differences in the temporal patterns of Hd1 and Hd3a mRNA accumulation suggest the involvement of a somewhat more complex regulatory mechanism. Hd1 mRNA levels peak at midnight, but Hd3a mRNA levels peak about 4–6 h after Hd1 [19, 23, 28].

In addition to transcriptional regulation, Hd1 activity may be regulated by protein stability because Arabidopsis CO is subject to the regulation at the protein accumulation level. CO protein is destabilized in darkness by CONSTITUTIVELY PHOTOMORPHOGENIC1, which is counteracted by the blue-light photoreceptor CRYPTOCHROME. A PhyB-mediated signal also destabilizes CO at dawn [30, 42, 49].

Phytochromes also affect the expression of Hd3a under SD conditions. Hd3a expression under SD conditions is significantly up-regulated in an early-flowering photoperiodic sensitivity 5 (se5) mutant, which has a mutation in the gene encoding heme oxygenase, which is required for phytochrome chromophore biogenesis [27, 28]. Flowering under SD conditions is also promoted in phyB mutants that have loss-of-function alleles in one of the three rice phytochromes[73]. Hd1 expression is not affected by se5 or phyB mutations [23, 28]; thus, phytochrome represses Hd3a expression downstream or independent of Hd1 expression under SD conditions. These phytochrome effects may be reminiscent of the activator-to-repressor conversion of a subset of Hd1 proteins that is observed under LD (see below; Izawa et al. [28]).

The primary upstream regulator of Hd1 expression is OsGI, an ortholog of GIGANTEA (GI) in Arabidopsis [18]. OsGI is a large protein that is present in both the nucleus and cytosol of rice cells [1]. Suppression of OsGI expression by RNAi or antisense expression caused late flowering and reduced Hd1 mRNA accumulation under SD conditions [19, 34]. Arabidopsis GI plays important roles in CO expression through the degradation of a repressor of CO transcription [22, 66]. Thus, it is possible that OsGI is part of a similar mechanism in rice, even though the peak in OsGI expression at dusk is quite different from the Hd1 expression peak at midnight, suggesting the intervention of an unknown mechanism, which caused the difference in timing of expression.

OsGI expression shows circadian daily oscillation, implying upstream regulation by the circadian clock [18]. Circadian clock mutants of Arabidopsis have aberrant GI expression [54, 61], and GI itself is also considered to be a clock-associated protein [35, 50, 86].

Another major Hd3a activator, Ehd1, was identified from a QTL of a cross between the cultivar T65 and Nipponbare [12]. Ehd1 encodes a B-type response regulator, and a functional mutation is found in the GARP (maize GOLDEN2, the ARR B-class proteins from Arabidopsis, and Chlamydomonas Psr1) domain, which decreased affinity to the target DNA sequence. Mutations or RNAi suppression of Ehd1 decreased Hd3a expression under SD conditions, indicating that Ehd1 is the upstream regulator of Hd3a expression [12, 34]. Ehd1 is preferentially expressed under SD conditions, peaking twice, before and after dawn, and Hd3a expression is essentially the same as Ehd1 in the absence of functional Hd1 [12].

Ehd1 is regulated by at least two factors, OsMADS51 and Ghd7 (for grain number, plant height, and heading date 7) [34, 77]. OsMADS51 acts as the activator of Ehd1 expression under both SD and LD, while Ghd7 mainly acts as a suppressor of Ehd1 under LD (see below). An osmads51 T-DNA insertion mutation reduced Ehd1 expression under both SD and LD. OsMADS51 expression is also up-regulated by OsGI because OsGI antisense repression reduced OsMADS51 and Ehd1 expression. OsGI and OsMADS51 show similar daily expression oscillation, peaking at dusk in SD.

Long-day suppression of Hd3a expression

Under LD conditions, Hd3a expression is very low in any developmental stage [39]. Diurnal expression is also lower than under inductive SD conditions [38]. Hd1 also has an important role in this suppression, although it works as activator of Hd3a expression under SD. Before the molecular cloning of Hd1, it was demonstrated that near-isogenic lines containing hd1 mutant alleles exhibited not only delayed flowering under SD conditions but also early flowering under LD conditions, indicating that Hd1 could repress flowering under LD and that Hd1 function is modified depending on day length [46]. Phytochrome signaling affects this day-length-dependent conversion of Hd1 activity because this conversion is not observed in the phytochrome-deficient mutant; flowering of the double mutant se5 hd1 (which lacks both phytochrome and functional Hd1) was slightly later than that of the se5 single mutant (which lacks only phytochrome) [28]. Consistent with this observation, Hd3a mRNA accumulation is lower in se5 hd1 than in se5 mutant lines. The involvement of functional modification of Hd1 by day length is further supported by the direct manipulation of OsGI expression and the resulting change in Hd1 and Hd3a expression levels [19]. Overexpression of OsGI delays flowering under both SD and LD, indicating that OsGI can act as a suppressor of flowering signals when it is constitutively expressed. In OsGI overexpressing plants, Hd1 mRNA levels increase under both SD and LD, whereas Hd3a mRNA levels are negatively correlated with Hd1 mRNA, indicating that Hd1 can act as a suppressor of Hd3a when it is highly induced by OsGI constitutive expression. OsGI overexpression could also be expected to increase Hd3a expression through Ehd1 up-regulation by the OsGI-OsMADS51 pathway (see above, Kim et al. [34]), but this effect was not observed, probably because of strong Hd1 suppressive activity. A comparison of daily temporal expression patterns of Hd1 and Hd3a indicate that higher expression levels of Hd1 during light periods might suppress Hd3a. Under SD conditions, wild-type Hd1 expression starts to increase at the beginning of the dark period, thus keeping Hd1 as an activator. OsGI overexpressors, however, express a significant level of Hd1 during light periods, thus converting Hd1 into a repressor. Under LD, wild-type Hd1 expression starts to increase in the light, resulting in the conversion of Hd1 into a suppressor [19]. Thus, the external coincidence model could be applied to rice: Circadian clock-regulated Hd1 expression and an external light signal mediated by phytochrome generate the specific response to day length [25].

The repressor function of Hd1 is not observed in connection with Arabidopsis CO, indicating that there is a different mechanism that provides this function. The photoperiod-sensitivity QTL Hd2 may provide information for understanding this mechanism. Hd2 is detected as a QTL in crosses between japonica cultivar Nipponbare and indica cultivar Kasalath [80]. A functional allele of Hd1 is required for Nipponbare allele of Hd2 to delay flowering in response to LD [46]. In addition, this Hd2 allele is required for Hd6, another photoperiod-sensitivity QTL, to delay flowering under LD [79]. Map-based cloning of this QTL revealed that it encodes an α-subunit of casein kinase II (CK2α) [72]. Plant CK2 is composed of two catalytic (α) subunits and two regulatory (β) subunits. CK2α is mainly localized in nucleus in maize [64], and several nuclear proteins are identified as substrates of CK2α in maize and barley [40, 68], suggesting that rice Hd6 also functions in nucleus. In Arabidopsis, CK2 activity affects the timing of floral transition through phosphorylation of CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 (CCA1) and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) proteins, which are the components of central oscillators of plant circadian clock [9, 63, 69, 70]. Thus, the functional interaction between rice LHY and Hd6 will be an interesting issue. Rice genome contains a single ortholog of CCA1 and LHY, OsLHY [26]. When overexpressed in Arabidopsis, both OsLHY and Arabidosps CCA1 delay flowering. However, OsLHY overexpression showed only subtle effect on the rhythmic expression of PRR1 compared with the dramatic effect of CCA1 overexpression, suggesting functional difference between them [57].

Ehd1 expression is suppressed under LD, which also results in reduced Hd3a expression. Ghd7 is responsible for the suppression of Ehd1 [77]. Ghd7 protein contains a CCT domain with about 60% identity to Hd1, but Ghd7 lacks the zinc finger motif, which is present in Hd1. Ghd7 expression is significantly higher under LD in leaf vascular tissue, and its diurnal expression peaks at dusk. Ghd7 expression does not affect Hd1 expression, but it strongly suppresses Ehd1.

Night-break suppression of Hd3a expression

A short light exposure during the dark period can significantly delay flowering of SD plants. This night-break effect has long been discussed in the context of day-length measurement in SD plants, but detailed understanding of the molecular mechanism of night break has been very limited. Like other SD plants, rice shows significant response to night break [23]. Night break suppresses Hd3a at the transcription level without affecting the expression patterns of Hd1 and OsGI. The effect of illumination varies depending on its timing within the dark period. The night-break effect is most significant in the middle of the dark period. This night-break effect dependence on timing is correlated with the expression pattern of Hd1. Because Hd3a expression is mainly governed by the activity of Hd1 and Ehd1, the night-break signal may affect both of the activities, which repress Hd3a transcription. The night-break effect on Hd3a expression was abolished by mutations of phyB, thus the night-break signal is mediated by phyB, which probably acts via the activities of Hd1 and Ehd1 [23].


Research on flowering time regulation in rice expands the field of mobile molecular signaling in plants. Florigen is also referred to as a flowering hormone because of its mobile nature and the universality of its flowering promotion activity. Using the analogy of the canonical plant hormone studies, the next step in florigen research would be understanding Hd3a/FT synthesis, transport, identification of receptors, and subsequent cellular signaling. Virtually nothing is known about Hd3a long-distance trafficking. How Hd3a in companion cells is transferred to sieve element systems, how the direction of movement in phloem is determined, and how Hd3a targets the SAM after unloading from the upper end of the phloem are all open questions. Flowering time research has also identified many important genes as resources for breeding. The genetic basis of natural variation or artificial selection in flowering time genes, including genes that are or were lost through the process of domestication, should contribute not only to a further understanding of the mechanism of flowering but also to future breeding applications.


  1. 1.

    Abe M, Fujiwara M, Kurotani K, Yokoi S, Shimamoto K. Identification of dynamin as an interactor of rice GIGANTEA by tandem affinity purification (TAP). Plant Cell Physiol. 2008;49:420–32.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Abe M, Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto S, Daimon Y, Yamaguchi A, Ikeda Y, Ichinoki H, Notaguchi M, Goto K, Araki T. FD, a bZIP protein mediating signals from the floral pathway integrator FT at the shoot apex. Science 2005;309:1052–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ahn JH, Miller D, Winter VJ, Banfield MJ, Lee JH, Yoo SY, Henz SR, Brady RL, Weigel D. A divergent external loop confers antagonistic activity on floral regulators FT and TFL1. EMBO J. 2006;25:605–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Aki T, Shigyo M, Nakano R, Yoneyama T, Yanagisawa S. Nano scale proteomics revealed the presence of regulatory proteins including three FT-like proteins in Phloem and Xylem saps from rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008;49:767–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bradley D, Ratcliffe O, Vincent C, Carpenter R, Coen E. Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science. 1997;275:80–3.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chardon F, Damerval C. Phylogenomic analysis of the PEBP gene family in cereals. J Mol Evol. 2005;61:579–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Conti L, Bradley D. TERMINAL FLOWER1 is a mobile signal controlling Arabidopsis architecture. Plant Cell. 2007;19:767–78.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Corbesier L, Vincent C, Jang S, Fornara F, Fan Q, Searle I, Giakountis A, Farrona S, Gissot L, Turnbull C, Coupland G. FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science. 2007;316:1030–3.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Daniel X, Sugano S, Tobin EM. CK2 phosphorylation of CCA1 is necessary for its circadian oscillator function in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:3292–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Danilevskaya ON, Meng X, Hou ZL, Ananiev EV, Simmons CR. A genomic and expression compendium of the expanded PEBP gene family from maize. Plant Physiol. 2007;146:250–64.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Danilveskaya ON, Meng X, Selinger DA, Deschamps S, Hermon P, Vansant G, Gupta R, Ananiev EV, Muszynski MG. Involvement of the MADS-box gene ZMM4 in floral induction and inflorescence development in Zea mays. Plant Physiol. 2008. doi:10.1104/pp.107.115261.

  12. 12.

    Doi K, Izawa T, Fuse T, Yamanouchi U, Kubo T, Shimatani Z, Yano M, Yoshimura A. Ehd1, a B-type response regulator in rice, confers short-day promotion of flowering and controls FT-like gene expression independently of Hd1l. Genes Dev. 2004;18:926–36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Furutani I, Sukegawa S, Kyozuka J. Genome-wide analysis of spatial and temporal gene expression in rice panicle development. Plant J. 2006;46:503–11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Giavalisco P, Kapitza K, Kolasa A, Buhtz A, Kehr J. Towards the proteome of Brassica napus phloem sap. Proteomics. 2006;6:896–909.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gu Q, Ferrándiz C, Yanofsky MF, Martienssen R. The FRUITFULL MADS-box gene mediates cell differentiation during Arabidopsis fruit development. Development. 1998;125:1509–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hanzawa Y, Money T, Bradley D. A single amino acid converts a repressor to an activator of flowering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:7748–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hayama R, Coupland G. The molecular basis of diversity in the photoperiodic flowering responses of Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:677–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hayama R, Izawa T, Shimamoto K. Isolation of rice genes possibly involved in the photoperiodic control of flowering by a fluorescent differential display method. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002;43:494–504.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hayama R, Yokoi S, Tamaki S, Yano M, Shimamoto K. Adaptation of photoperiodic control pathways produces short-day flowering in rice. Nature. 2003;422:719–22.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hemming MN, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES, Trevaskis B. Low-temperature and daylength cues are integrated to regulate FLOWERING LOCUS T in barley. Plant Physiol. 2008;14:355–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Imaizumi T, Kay SA. Photoperiodic control of flowering: not only by coincidence. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11:550–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Imaizumi T, Schultz TF, Harmon FG, Ho LA, Kay SA. FKF1F-BOX protein mediates cyclic degradation of a repressor of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Science. 2005;309:293–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ishikawa R, Tamaki S, Yokoi S, Inagaki N, Shinomura T, Takano M, Shimamoto K. Suppression of the floral activator Hd3a is the principal cause of the night break effect in rice. Plant Cell. 2005;17:3326–36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Izawa T. Daylength measurements by rice plants in photoperiodic short-day flowering. Int Rev Cytol. 2007a;256:191–222.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Izawa T. Adaptation of flowering-time by natural and artificial selection in Arabidopsis and rice. J Exp Bot. 2007b;58:3091–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Izawa T, Takahashi Y, Yano M. Comparative biology comes into bloom: genomic and genetic comparison of flowering pathways in rice and Arabidopsis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2003;6:113–20.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Izawa T, Oikawa T, Tokutomi S, Okuno K, Shimamoto K. Phytochromes confer the photoperiodic control of flowering in rice (a short-day plant). Plant J. 2000;22:391–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Izawa T, Oikawa T, Sugiyama N, Tanisaka T, Yano M, Shimamoto K. Phytochrome mediates the external light signal to repress FT orthologs in photoperiodic flowering of rice. Genes Dev. 2002;16:2006–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jaeger KE, Wigge PA. FT protein acts as a long-range signal in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol. 2007;17:1050–4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Jang S, Marchal V, Panigrahi KCS, Wenkel S, Soppe W, Deng XW, Valverde F, Coupland G. Arabidopsis COP1 shapes the temporal pattern of CO accumulation conferring a photoperiodic flowering response. EMBO J. 2008;27:1277–88.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jeon JS, Lee S, Jung KH, Yang WS, Yi GH, Oh BG, An GH. Production of transgenic rice plants showing reduced heading date and plant height by ectopic expression of rice MADS-box genes. Mol Breed. 2000;6:581–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kardailsky I, Shukla VK, Ahn JH, Dagenais N, Christensen SK, Nguyen JT, Chory J, Harrison MJ, Weigel D. Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Science 1999;286:1962–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kempin SA, Savidge B, Yanofsky MF. Molecular basis of the cauliflower phenotype in Arabidopsis. Science. 1995;267:522–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kim SL, Lee SY, Kim HJ, Nam HG, An GH. OsMADS51 is a short-day flowering promoter that functions upstream of Ehd1, OsMADS14, and Hd3a(1[W][OA]). Plant Physiol. 2007a;145:1484–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kim WY, Fujiwara S, Suh SS, Kim J, Kim Y, Han LQ, David K, Putterill J, Nam HG, Somers DE. ZEITLUPE is a circadian photoreceptor stabilized by GIGANTEA in blue light. Nature. 2007b;449:356–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kobayashi Y, Weigel D. Move on up, it's time for change—mobile signals controlling photoperiod-dependent flowering. Genes Dev. 2007;21:2371–84.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kobayashi Y, Kaya H, Goto K, Iwabuchi M, Araki T. A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. Science. 1999;286:1960–2.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kojima S, Takahashi Y, Kobayashi Y, Monna L, Sasaki T, Araki T, Yano M. Hd3a, a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowering downstream of Hd1 under short-day conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002;43:1096–105.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Komiya R, Ikegami A, Tamaki S, Yokoi S, Shimamoto K. Hd3a and RFT1 are essential for flowering in rice. Development. 2008;135:767–74.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kramer A, Feilner T, Possling A, Radchuk V, Weschke W, Burkle L, Kersten B. Identification of barley CK2 alpha targets by using the protein microarray technology. Phytochemistry. 2004;65:1777–84.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kyozuka J, Kobayashi T, Morita M, Shimamoto K. Spatially and temporally regulated expression of rice MADS box genes with similarity to Arabidopsis class A, B and C genes. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000;41:710–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Laubinger S, Marchal V, Gentilhomme J, Wenkel S, Adrian J, Jang S, Kulajta C, Braun H, Coupland G, Hoecker U. Arabidopsis SPA proteins regulate photoperiodic flowering and interact with the floral inducer CONSTANS to regulate its stability. Development. 2006;133:3213–22.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lee S, An G. Diversified mechanisms for regulating flowering time in a short-day plant rice. J Plant Biol. 2007;50:241–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lee SY, Kim J, Han JJ, Han MJ, An GH. Functional analyses of the flowering time gene OsMADS50, the putative SUPPRESSOR OFOVEREXPRESSION OFCO 1/AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 (SOC1/AGL20) ortholog in rice. Plant J. 2004;38:754–64.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Li C, Dobcovsky J Wheat FT protein regulates VRN1 transcription through interactions with FDL2. Plant J. 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03526.x

  46. 46.

    Lin HX, Yamamoto T, Sasaki T, Yano M. Characterization and detection of epistatic interactions of 3 QTLs, Hd1, Hd2, and Hd3, controlling heading date in rice using nearly isogenic lines. Theor Appl Genet. 2000;101:1021–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lin MK, Belanger H, Lee YJ, Varkonyi-Gasic E, Taoka KI, Miura E, Xoconostle-Cazares B, Gendler K, Jorgensene RA, Phinney B, Lough TJ, Lucas WJ. FLOWERING LOCUS T protein may act as the long-distance florigenic signal in the cucurbits. Plant Cell. 2007;19:1488–506.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Liu C, Chen H, Er HL, Soo HM, Kumar PP, Han JH, Liou YC, Yu H. Direct interaction of AGL24 and SOC1 integrates flowering signals in Arabidopsis. Development. 2008a;135:1481–91.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Liu LJ, Zhang YC, Li QH, Sang Y, Mao J, Lian HL, Wang L, Yan HQ. COP1-mediated ubiquitination of CONSTANS is implicated in cryptochrome regulation of flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2008b;20:292–306.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Locke JCW, Kozma-Bognar L, Gould PD, Feher B, Kevei E, Nagy F, Turner MS, Hall A, Millar AJ. Experimental validation of a predicted feedback loop in the multi-oscillator clock of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:59.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Mandel MA, Gustafson-Brown C, Savidge B, Yanofsky MF. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature. 1992;360:273–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Mathieu J, Warthmann N, Küttner F, Schmid M. Export of FT protein from phloem companion cells is sufficient for floral induction in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol. 2007;17:1055–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Michaels SD, Himelblau E, Kim SY, Schomburg FM, Amasino RM. Integration of flowering signals in winter-annual Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2005;137:149–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Mizoguchi T, Wright L, Fujiwara S, Cremer F, Lee K, Onouchi H, Mouradov A, Fowler S, Kamada H, Putterill J, Coupland G. Distinct roles of GIGANTEA in promoting flowering and regulating circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005;17:2255–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Monna L, Lin HX, Kojima S, Sasaki T, Yano M. Genetic dissection of a genomic region for a quantitative trait locus, Hd3, into two loci, Hd3a and Hd3b, controlling heading date in rice. Theor Appl Genet. 2002;104:772–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Murai K, Miyamae M, Kato H, Takumi S, Ogihara Y. WAP1, a wheat APETALA1 homolog, plays a central role in the phase transition from vegetative to reproductive growth. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003;44:1255–65.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Murakami M, Tago Y, Yamashino T, Mizuno T. Comparative overviews of clock-associated genes of Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48:110–21.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Muszynski MG, Dam T, Li B, Shirbroun DM, Hou ZL, Bruggemann E, Archibald R, Ananiev EV, Danilevskaya ON. Delayed flowering1 encodes a basic leucine zipper protein that mediates floral inductive signals at the shoot apex in maize. Plant Physiol. 2006;142:1523–36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Nakagawa M, Shimamoto K, Kyozuka J. Overexpression of RCN1 and RCN2, rice TERMINAL FLOWER 1/CENTRORADIALIS homologs, confers delay of phase transition and altered panicle morphology in rice. Plant J. 2002;29:743–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Nijhawan A, Jain M, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP. Genomic survey and gene expression analysis of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family in rice. Plant Physiol. 2008;146:333–50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Niwa Y, Ito S, Nakamichi N, Mizoguchi T, Niinuma K, Yamashino T, Mizuno T. Genetic linkages of the circadian clock-associated genes, TOC1, CCA1 and LHY, in the photoperiodic control of flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48:925–37.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Page T, Macknight R, Yang CH, Dean C. Genetic interactions of the Arabidopsis flowering time gene FCA, with genes regulating floral initiation. Plant J. 1999;17:231–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Portoles S, Mas P. Altered oscillator function affects clock resonance and is responsible for the reduced day-length sensitivity of CKB4 overexpressing plants. Plant J. 2007;51:966–77.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Riera M, Figueras M, Lopez C, Goday A, Pages M. Protein kinase CK2 modulates developmental functions of the abscisic acid responsive protein Rab17 from maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:9879–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Samach A, Onouchi H, Gold SE, Ditta GS, Schwarz-Sommer Z, Yanofsky MF, Coupland G. Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis. Science. 2000;288:1613–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Sawa M, Nusinow DA, Kay SA, Imaizumi T. FKF1 and GIGANTEA complex formation is required for day-length measurement in Arabidopsis. Science. 2007;318:261–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Shitsukawa N, Ikari C, Shimada S, Kitagawa S, SakaMoto K, Saito H, Ryuto H, Fukunishi N, Abe T, Takumi S, Nasuda S, Murai K. The einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum) mutant, maintained vegetative phase, is caused by a deletion in the VRN1 gene. Genes Genet Syst. 2007;82:167–70.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Stemmer C, Schwander A, Bauw G, Fojan P, Grasser KD. Protein kinase CK2 differentially phosphorylates maize chromosomal high mobility group B (HMGB) proteins modulating their stability and DNA interactions. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:1092–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Sugano S, Andronis C, Green RM, Wang ZY, Tobin EM. Protein kinase CK2 interacts with and phosphorylates the Arabidopsis circadian clock-associated 1 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:11020–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Sugano S, Andronis C, Ong MS, Green RM, Tobin EM. The protein kinase CK2 is involved in regulation of Circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:12362–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Takada S, Goto K. TERMINAL FLOWER2, an Arabidopsis homolog of HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1, counteracts the activation of FLOWERING LOCUS T by CONSTANS in the vascular tissues of leaves to regulate flowering time. Plant Cell. 2003;15:2856–65.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Takahashi Y, Shomura A, Sasaki T, Yano M. Hd6, a rice quantitative trait locus involved in photoperiod sensitivity, encodes the alpha subunit of protein kinase CK2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:7922–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Takano M, Inagaki N, Xie XZ, Yuzurihara N, Hihara F, Ishizuka T, Yano M, Nishimura M, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Shinomura T. Distinct and cooperative functions of phytochromes A, B, and C in the control of deetiolation and flowering in rice. Plant Cell. 2005;17:3311–25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Tamaki S, Matsuo S, Wong HL, Yokoi S, Shimamoto K. Hd3a protein is a mobile flowering signal in rice. Science. 2007;316:1033–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Teper-Bamnolker P, Samach A. The flowering integrator FT regulates SEPALLATA3 and FRUITFULL accumulation in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell. 2005;17:2661–75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Wigge PA, Kim MC, Jaeger KE, Busch W, Schmid M, Lohmann JU, Weigel D. Integration of spatial and temporal information during floral induction in Arabidopsis. Science. 2005;309:1056–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Xue W, Xing Y, Weng X, Zhao Y, Tang W, Wang L, Zhou H, Yu S, Xu C, Li X, Zhang Q. Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet. 2008;40:761–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Yamaguchi A, Kobayashi Y, Goto K, Abe M, Araki T. TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF) acts as a floral pathway integrator redundantly with FT. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005;46:1175–89.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Yamamoto T, Lin HX, Sasaki T, Yano M. Identification of heading date quantitative trait locus Hd6 and characterization of its epistatic interactions with Hd2 in rice using advanced backcross progeny. Genetics. 2000;154:885–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Yamamoto T, Kuboki Y, Lin SY, Sasaki T, Yano M. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci Hd-1, Hd-2 and Hd-3, controlling heading date of rice, as single Mendelian factors. Theor Appl Genet. 1998;97:37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Yan L, Loukoianov A, Tranquilli G, Helguera M, Fahima T, Dubcovsky J. Positional cloning of the wheat vernalization gene VRN1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:6263–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Yan L, Fu D, Li C, Blechl A, Tranquilli G, Bonafede M, Sanchez A, Valarik M, Yasuda S, Dubcovsky J. The wheat and barley vernalization gene VRN3 is an orthologue of FT. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:19581–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Yano M, Kojima S, Takahashi Y, Lin HX, Sasaki T. Genetic control of flowering time in rice, a short-day plant. Plant Physiol. 2001;127:1425–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, Yamanouchi U, Monna L, Fuse T, Baba T, Yamamoto K, Umehara Y, Nagamura Y, Sasaki T. Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell. 2000;12:2473–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Zeevaart JAD. Florigen coming of age after 70 years. Plant Cell. 2006;18:1783–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Zeilinger MN, Farre EM, Taylor SR, Kay SA, Doyle FJ. A novel computational model of the circadian clock in Arabidopsis that incorporates PRR7 and PRR9. Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Zhang SH, Hu WJ, Wang LP, Lin CF, Cong B, Sun CR, Luo D. TFL1/CEN-like genes control intercalary meristem activity and phase transition in rice. Plant Science. 2005;168:1393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the members of our laboratory for helpful comments or other assistance. The work described is supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (grant 10182102 and 19090013) of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (to K.S.).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ko Shimamoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsuji, H., Tamaki, S., Komiya, R. et al. Florigen and the Photoperiodic Control of Flowering in Rice. Rice 1, 25–35 (2008).

Download citation


  • Florigen
  • Flowering time
  • Genetic pathways