Skip to main content

Uncovering the Novel QTLs and Candidate Genes of Salt Tolerance in Rice with Linkage Mapping, RTM-GWAS, and RNA-seq

Abstract

Salinity is a major abiotic stress that limits plant growth and crop productivity. Indica rice and japonica rice show significant differences in tolerance to abiotic stress, and it is considered a feasible method to breed progeny with stronger tolerance to abiotic stress by crossing indica and japonica rice. We herein developed a high-generation recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from Luohui 9 (indica) X RPY geng (japonica). Based on the high-density bin map of this RILs population, salt tolerance QTLs controlling final survival rates were analyzed by linkage mapping and RTM-GWAS methods. A total of seven QTLs were identified on chromosome 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8. qST-3.1, qST-5.1, qST-6.1, and qST-6.2 were novel salt tolerance QTLs in this study and their function were functionally verified by comparative analysis of parental genotype RILs. The gene aggregation result of these four new QTLs emphasized that the combination of the four QTL synergistic genotypes can significantly improve the salt stress tolerance of rice. By comparing the transcriptomes of the root tissues of the parents’ seedlings, at 3 days and 7 days after salt treatment, we then achieved fine mapping of QTLs based on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identification and DEGs annotations, namely, LOC_Os06g01250 in qST-6.1, LOC_Os06g37300 in qST-6.2, LOC_Os05g14880 in qST-5.1. The homologous genes of these candidate genes were involved in abiotic stress tolerance in different plants. These results indicated that LOC_Os05g14880, LOC_Os06g01250, and LOC_Os06g37300 were the candidate genes of qST-5.1, qST-6.1, and qST-6.2. Our finding provided novel salt tolerance-related QTLs, candidate genes, and several RILs with better tolerance, which will facilitate breeding for improved salt tolerance of rice varieties and promote the exploration tolerance mechanisms of rice salt stress.

Introduction

Soil salinization seriously affects seed germination, plant growth, and crop production (Yang and Guo 2018a; Liu et al. 2021). According to statistics, saline-alkali land is widely distributed worldwide, with a total area of about one billion hectares, affecting 1/4 to 1/3 of crop production (Munns 2002). In recent years, climate change has increased soil salinization (Kong et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2021). As the most important food crop in the world, rice (Oryza sativa L.) provides a source of food for more than half of the world’s population (Kong et al. 2019). However, rice is a moderately salt-sensitive crop, and increasing soil salinization has become an important factor restricting rice production and threatening food security (Ganie et al. 2021). Therefore, it is of great significance to understand the physiological, biochemical and molecular mechanisms of salt tolerance in rice.

In plants, salt stress affects almost all developmental stages from germination to senescence including osmotic and ion stress, and the resulting reactive oxygen species (ROS) stress, and nutrient consumption (Hanana et al. 2011). When the salt content of the soil increases, the water potential of the soil solution will be lower than the water potential of the plant root cells, which results in the inhibition of root water absorption, and plants must perform osmotic adjustment to maintain cell expansion, growth, as well as water absorption (Fricke et al. 2004; Hakim et al. 2014). In addition, osmotic stress can cause stomatal closure, which inhibits the absorption of carbon dioxide by plants and leads to the decrease of photosynthesis (Wegner et al. 2011; Qin and Huang 2020; Zhao et al. 2020). Ion stress is mainly caused by the accumulation of sodium (Na+) and chlorine (Cl) in cells (Rana et al. 2008; Yang and Guo 2018b). The toxicity of sodium is mainly that sodium has an inhibitory effect on enzyme activity and negatively affects metabolism including the Calvin cycle and other pathways (Cheeseman 2013; Wu et al. 2018). What’s more, excessive sodium in the cytoplasm will also interfere with the absorption and transportation of potassium and mineral elements such as nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and zinc (Shabala and Pottosin 2014; Munns et al. 2016; Iqbal et al. 2018; Seifikalhor et al. 2019; Razzaq et al. 2020). Since the absorption channels of NO3, SO42−, and Cl are absorbed by the same non-selective anion transporter, excessive Cl will lead to the lack of key macronutrient nitrogen and sulfur (Rana et al. 2008; Liu et al. 2021). In addition to osmotic and ion stress, salt stress can also lead to the accumulation of ROS in cells, which can severely damage cell structures and macromolecules, such as DNA, lipids, and enzymes (Miller et al. 2010; Ahanger et al. 2017).

Rice salt tolerance is a comprehensive manifestation of a variety of physiological and biochemical reactions and is a quantitative trait controlled by multiple genes and has a complex genetic basis (Kong et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2021). However, due to the complexity of salt tolerance in rice, there are very few QTLs that have been finely mapped or cloned among the numerous salt tolerance QTLs. Lin et al. (2004) detected a major QTL that controls K+ content in the shoots, named qSKC1 in a F2 and an equivalent F3 population derived from a cross between a salt-tolerant cultivar Nona Bokra and a salt-sensitive cultivar Koshihikari (Lin et al. 2004). qSKC1 was located on chromosome 1 and encoded an ion transporter of the HKT family, which transported excess Na+ from the shoots back to the roots and improved the salt tolerance of rice (Lin et al. 2004; Hauser and Horie 2010). Other study identified a QTL that overlaps with qSKC1 in a F8-generation recombinant inbred line (RIL) derived from Pokkali and IR29, Saltol, which regulated the K+/Na+ balance of rice plants under salt stress, and they finally speculated that Saltol and qSKC1 may encode the same gene, OsHKT1 (Bonilla et al. 2002; Thomson et al. 2010; Niones 2013). Huang et al. (2009) cloned and characterized DST (drought and salt tolerance) encoding a zinc finger transcription factor that negatively regulates stomatal closure by directly regulating genes related to H2O2 homeostasis (Huang et al. 2009). He et al. (2019) fine mapped a qSE3 related to the rapid germination and seedling establishment of rice seeds under high salt stress. This gene encoded the potassium ion transporter OsHAK21, which promoted the accumulation of ABA during the germination stage of rice seeds (He et al. 2019). On the other hand, some salt tolerance genes were obtained by reverse genetics methods, namely, SNAC1, SNAC2, NAP, ZFP252, ZFP182, etc. (Hu et al. 2008; Xu et al. 2008; Huang et al. 2012; Chen et al. 2014).

In order to better analyze the genetic mechanism of salt tolerance in rice, a high-generation population of 160 RILs derived from the cross between Luohui 9 (indica) and RPY geng (japonica) was employed to map the quantitative trait locus (QTLs) for salt tolerance under the salt stress simulated with 125 mM NaCl Yoshida solution, using survival rate as the index. We then determined the functions of the newly identified QTLs through comparing the survival rates of RTLs with different genotypes. RNA-seq analysis of root tissues from Luohui 9 and RPY geng treated with salt stress (100 mM NaCl Yoshida solution) for 3 days and 7 days was performed to identify differential genes (DEGs) within QTLs, which combined with genome annotation to predict candidate genes within QTLs.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials and Treatments

RPY geng, Luohui 9, and their derived high-generation recombinant inbred lines (RILs, F15, 160 lines) were used in this study. 14-day-old seedlings of every line were treated with 125 mM NaCl Yoshida solution for 7 days for salt treatment. After salt treatment, the seedlings were cultivated in Yoshida solution for 7 days and the survival rates of the seedlings were calculated. For each RIL, 30 seedlings were performed. All treatments were placed randomly with three replications.

For RNA-seq sequencing, rice seedlings were grown in 96-well PCR plates with Yoshida solution (Coolaber, Beijing, China) replaced every 2 days, 26 °C, and a 16/8 h light/dark photoperiod, 60% relative humidity in plant growth incubators (ZSX1500GS, Jingshen Instrument, Shanghai, China) for 14 days. Fourteen-day-old seedlings of RPY geng and Luohui 9 were changed into 100 mM NaCl Yoshida solution for salt stress treatment. Then, we sampled root tissues at 3-day (3d), and 7-day (7d), respectively. Three independent biological replicates were prepared for each treatment and at least 30 seedlings with uniform growth were sampled for each replicate. All samples were collected and immediately stored in liquid nitrogen for the next step of RNA extraction. In addition, we sampled root tissues on 0 days (control), 3 days, and 7 days after salt stress treatment to observe gene expression changes of candidate genes for qST-5.1, qST-6.1, and qST-6.2 under salt stress.

QTL Analysis

The genetic linkage map including 4578 bin blocks (the total bin-map distance was 2356.41 cM) of this RIL population have been previously constructed in our lab (Unpublished). The QTL mapping of survival rates was analyzed by R/qtl (Arends et al. 2010). The CIM interval mapping method was adopted, and the LOD threshold was set at 3.0. The confidence interval was calculated with the function ‘lodint’ (Dupuis and Siegmund 1999), and the drop value was set at 1.5. The genes in QTLs were identified based on the MSU v7.0 (from the Rice Genome Annotation Project, http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/index.shtml) and putative functions annotations of genes were also obtained from “Genome Annotation Batch Download” in the Rice Genome Annotation Project website (Kawahara et al. 2013).

RTM-GWAS Analysis

The vcf file composed of 4578 bins and the survival rate data of 160 RILs was used as the two input files of RTM-GWAS with operating parameters: significant level of 0.01, pre-selection threshold of 0.05, maximum model r-square of 0.95, and others defaults (He et al. 2017). The GWAS analysis results were visualized by CMplot (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/CMplot/). In this study, the region of 0.15 Mb upstream and downstream of the significant bin block/marker was regarded as the QTL interval.

Meta-QTLs Comparison and Known Genes Homology Analysis

41 Meta-QTLs related to salt tolerance were collected from Mansuri et al. study (Mansuri et al. 2020) and the genomic positions of these Meta-QTLs were obtained based on the method we previously described (Kong et al. 2020). Based on location information, Meta-QTLs and identified QTLs were visualized using TBtools (Additional file 2: Table S1) (Chen et al. 2020). On the other hand, 132 salt stress-related known genes involving developmental adjustment, hormonal regulation, ionic homeostasis, nutrient imbalance, osmotic adjustment, ROS scavenging, and salt stress signaling, were collected (Additional file 3: Table S2) (Liu et al. 2021). These known genes further were mapped into Meta-QTLs and our QTLs depending on gene position, respectively. In addition, we identified the homologous genes of the known genes in our QTLs by searching with blastP (Evalue of 1e-20). Of them, qST-4.1, qST-4.2, and qST-8.1 were overlapped with MQTL-4.3, MQTL-4.4, and MQTL-8.4, respectively.

RNA-seq Analysis

RNA extraction, cDNA library construction, and library sequencing on Illumina HiSeq2500 platform of 12 samples were strictly implemented by Biomarker Technologies (Beijing, China) in accordance with standard procedures (Kong et al. 2020). Raw data were filtered by fastp (Chen et al. 2018) and mapped to the Nipponbare genome (MSU v7.0) using hisat2 (Kim et al. 2015) with default parameters. The mapped reads were counted by featureCounts (Liao et al. 2014) and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in QTLs were identified by DEseq2 with |log2 fold change|≥ 1 and a False Discovery Rate (FDR) < 0.01 (Kong et al. 2020). The heatmap of DEGs was also conducted by TBtools (Chen et al. 2020).

Finally, three randomly selected candidate DEGs in QTLs were verified by RT-PCR according to the previously described method (Kong et al. 2019). All primers of RT-PCR were designed by Primer 5.0 software (Additional file 4: Table S3). The qRT-PCR reaction (10 μL) was formulated using the 2 X SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (US Everbright®Inc., Suzhou, China). All qRT-PCRs were carried out on a CFX96 Touch™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The gene expression fold change was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCT method from three biological replicates.

Results

Salt Tolerance Performance of Parents and RILs

We found that RPY geng had a higher survival rate than Luohui 9 (81% vs 31%) (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The RILs showed differentiation of survival rate from 0 to 100% and 16 RILs exhibited high salt stress tolerance with 100% survival rate. These results indicated that japonica rice is more tolerant to salt stress than indica rice, and indica-japonica hybridization is a feasible strategy to breed new rice varieties that are tolerant to high salt stress.

QTL Mapping Result of Survival Rate

The QTL mapping of R/qtl identified two survival rate-related QTLs distributed on chromosome 5 and chromosome 6 with phenotypic variance explained of 11.05 and 8.90 and additive effect of 0.11 and − 0.07, respectively (Fig. 1 and Additional file 5: Table S4). On the other hand, seven quantitative trait bin blocks (QTBs) were identified by RTM-GWAS and the regions of 0.15 Mb upstream and downstream of seven QTBs were regarded as the confidence interval of QTLs (Table 1 and Fig. 2). Of them, qST-5.1 and qST-6.1 were redefined using the intersection result of RTM-GWAS and R/qtl’s QTL position (Table 1 and Additional file 5: Table S4).

Fig. 1
figure1

QTL mapping result of survival rate from R/qtl. A Lod values of QTLs; B additive values of QTLs

Table 1 Details of QTLs and QTBs from RTM-GWAS
Fig. 2
figure2

QTL mapping result of survival rate from RTM-GWAS. The black box represents the QTL repeatedly detected by R/qtl and RTM-GWAS

Identification of Novel QTLs Related to Salt Tolerance

In order to analyze whether the QTLs we identified are new salt-stressed QTLs, we made a comparative analysis between our QTLs and Meta-QTLs. As shown in Fig. 3, qST-4.1, qST-4.2, and qST-8.1 were completely/partially overlapped with MQTL-4.3, MQTL-4.4, and MQTL-8.4, respectively. Comparative analysis between our QTLs and Meta-QTLs implied that qST-3.1, qST-5.1, qST-6.1, and qST-6.2 were new salt stress tolerance QTLs.

Fig. 3
figure3

The positions of our QTLs and Meta-QTLs. Red and blue QTL represents Meta-QTLs and our QTLs. Note The green and blue boxes represent the Meta-QTLs and our QTLs intervals, respectively

Function Confirmation of the Four Novel QTLs for Seedling Survival Rate

We next wondered whether these four new QTLs (qST-3.1, qST-5.1, qST-6.1, and qST-6.2) have any effect on the rice seedling survival rate. We therefore divided all RILs into RPY geng (AA) and Luohui 9 (BB) genotype RILs and compared the survival rates of these two genotype RILs. Luohui 9 genotyping RILs showed higher survival rates than RPY geng genotyping RILs in qST-3.1 and qST-5.1 (Fig. 4A, B). Interestingly, qST-6.1, and qST-6.2 showed the opposite result relative to qST-3.1 and qST-5.1 (Fig. 4C, D). This situation implied that the synergistic genotypes of these four QTLs are not the same, and the aggregation of the synergistic genotypes of these four QTLs may promote the survival rate of rice seedlings. As expected, RILs aggregated by synergistic genotypes showed a higher survival rate compared to RILs aggregated by non-synergistic genotypes (Fig. 4E). These results not only indicated that the four novel QTLs we identified had regulatory effects on the survival rate of seedlings but also emphasized that their synergistic aggregation can enhance the survival rate of seedlings.

Fig. 4
figure4

The survival rate of rice seedlings with different genotyping of RILs. A. qST-3.1; B. qST-5.1; C. qST-6.1; D. qST-6.2; E. Aggregation of qST-3.1, qST-5.1, qST-6.1, and qST-6.2. Note AA means RPY geng and BB means Luohui 9

Mapping Known Genes into Meta-QTLs and our QTLs

We subsequently assessed the known genes of Meta-QTLs and our QTLs to preliminarily determine the candidate genes in QTLs. Of 41 Meta-QTLs, 19 contained a total of 37 known salt stress tolerance genes among chromosome 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, and 12 (Fig. 5A). Several Meta-QTLs contained more than one known gene, such as MQTL-9.1 had four known genes (Fig. 5B and Additional file 6: Table S5). Similarly, one known gene (OsCPK12) was found in qST-4.1 (Fig. 6). In addition, we identified three, four, and three homologous genes of known genes in qST-4.1, qST-4.2, and qST-8.1 (Fig. 6 and Additional file 7: Table S6). However, no known genes or homologous genes of known genes were found in the four newly discovered QTLs (qST-3.1, qST-5.1, qST-6.1, and qST-6.2).

Fig. 5
figure5

Known genes into Meta-QTLs. A Distribution of known genes and Meta-QTLs on 12 chromosomes; B The number of known genes in Meta-QTLs. Note Blue represents Meta-QTLs, and red represents genes that fall into Meta-QTLs in A

Fig. 6
figure6

Known genes and their homologous genes in our QTLs. Note Red represents known genes that fall into QTLs, and black represents homologous genes of known genes in QTLs

DEGs in our QTLs

We discovered that seven QTLs contained a total of 284 genes, of which there were only 8 genes in qST-6.1 (Fig. 7A and Additional file 8: Table S7). Then, we obtained DEGs of QTLs between Luohui 9 and RPY geng to predict the candidate genes of QTLs. There were varying amounts of DEGs in these 7 QTLs, from 1 to 12 (Fig. 7B–D). For example, LOC_Os03g30150, LOC_Os03g30160, and LOC_Os03g30240 showed a higher expression level in RPY geng than that in Luohui 9 (Fig. 7C). Notably, qST-6.1 contained only one DEG (LOC_Os06g01250) with a higher expression level in RPY geng than that in Luohui 9, which may play an important role in salt-tolerant species (Fig. 7D). Similarly, LOC_Os06g37300 was the only DEG in qST-6.2. qST-5.1 contained only two DEGs, LOC_Os05g14820 and LOC_Os05g14880. We accepted LOC_Os05g14880 as the candidate gene for qST-5.1 based on gene annotation, because LOC_Os05g14880 encodes a stress-related proline-rich protein (Additional file 9: Table S8). Interestingly, the two DEGs (LOC_Os04g57430 and LOC_Os04g57660) encoding receptor-like kinases in qST-4.2 were homologous genes of the known salt tolerance-related gene (Additional file 7: Table S6, Additional file 9: Table S8), OsSIK1, which supports these two genes as candidate genes for qST-4.2. The candidate genes of qST-3.1, qST-4.1, and qST-8.1 need to be further explored due to the inclusion of too many DEGs (> 7). It was worth mentioning that LOC_Os04g47620 was a homologous gene of OsSIK1 and SIT1 genes and showed differential expression level between RPY geng and Luohui 9 under salt stress (Additional file 7: Table S6, Additional file 9: Table S8), which suggested that LOC_Os04g47620 was very likely to be a candidate gene for qST-4.1. In summary, the integration of QTL mapping, RNA-seq analysis, and gene annotation provided credible candidate genes for the identified QTLs, which was very important for subsequent map-based cloning and gene function verification.

Fig. 7
figure7

DEGs analysis in QTLs. A Statistics of the number of genes in QTLs; B Statistics of the number of DEGs in QTLs; C, D Heat map of DEGs in QTLs. Note Sa3d and Sa7d mean salt treatment (100 mM NaCl Yoshida solution) for 3 days and for 7 days, respectively

Finally, three genes (LOC_Os03g30250, LOC_Os03g30290, and LOC_Os08g42720) were randomly selected for RT-PCR analysis to verify the accuracy of RNA-seq, and the RT-PCR results were consistent with the RNA-seq results (Additional file 1: Figure S2).

Expression Characterization, Sequence Comparison, Haplotype Analysis of Candidate Genes for qST-5.1, qST-6.1, and qST-6.2

To preliminarily explore the functions of candidate genes for qST-5.1, qST-6.1, and qST-6.2, we analyzed the expression profiles, sequence differences, and haplotypes of LOC_Os05g14880, LOC_Os06g01250, and LOC_Os06g37300 in rice populations. The results of qRT-PCR showed that these three genes showed different expression levels in the roots of RPY geng and Luohui 9 under salt stress. LOC_Os05g14880 showed a higher level of up-regulation in RPY geng than that of Luohui 9 (Fig. 8A). The expression level of LOC_Os06g01250 were significantly up-regulated in RPY geng on 3 days and 7 days after salt treatment, while LOC_Os06g01250 had a significant down-regulation in Luohui 9 on 7 days after salt treatment. Differently, LOC_Os06g37300 showed a higher level of up-regulated expression fold in Luohui 9 than that of RPY geng. In addition, the tissue expression profiles of these three genes were further characterized from MBKbase (http://www.mbkbase.org/rice) (Additional file 1: Figure S3). LOC_Os05g14880 showed superior expression in root-tip and shoot than other organizations. LOC_Os06g01250 has a higher level of expression in shoot, stem, and leaf relative to other tissues. LOC_Os06g37300 was the advantage expressed in leaf and panicle.

Fig. 8
figure8

Gene expression changes and sequence alignments of LOC_Os05g14880, LOC_Os06g01250, and LOC_Os06g37300 between RPY geng and Luohui 9. A Changes in gene expression levels in the roots of RPY geng and Luohui 9 after 3 and 7 days of salt stress treatment (100 mM NaCl Yoshida solution for salt stress treatment); B Sequence alignment result of LOC_Os05g14880; C Sequence alignment result of LOC_Os06g01250; D Sequence alignment result of LOC_Os06g37300. Note RPY means RPY geng; LH9 means Luohui 9; CK0d means control (0 day); Sa3d and Sa7d mean salt treatment for 3 days and for 7 days, respectively. The upper mutations belong to RPY geng and the lower mutations belong to Luohui 9 in BD

The alignment results of LOC_Os05g14880, LOC_Os06g01250, and LOC_Os06g37300 sequences revealed that RPY geng and Luohui 9 have multiple types of mutations in the 1.2-kilobase (Kb) promoter, coding sequence (CDS) (Fig. 8B–D). For example, one indel in CDS as well as two indels and one snp were found in LOC_Os05g14880 (Fig. 8B). Four non-synonymous snps were detected in CDS of LOC_Os06g01250 and 18 snp and one indel were found in 1.2 Kb promoter of LOC_Os06g01250 (Fig. 8C). Notably, there was no sequence variation between RPY geng and Luohui 9 in the CDS of LOC_Os06g37300, but three long-indels (> 5 bp) and one snp in the 1.2 Kb promoter (Fig. 8D). These four variations can be overlapped by the results of rice population variation detection (Additional file 1: Figure S4). In view of the significant difference in gene expression levels of these three genes in RPY geng and Luohui 9, we speculated that the variation in the promoter region, especially the transcription factor binding region, is the cause of the differential expression of these genes.

Population level variation sites in these three sequences, which covers the 1.2-Kb, CDS, and 3’ untranslated region (UTR), were obtain from the rice genome variation database (Rice Variation Map v2.0, http://ricevarmap.ncpgr.cn/) of 4,726 rice accessions. LOC_Os05g14880, LOC_Os06g01250, and LOC_Os06g37300 contained 150 (130 snps and 20 indels), 104 (94 snps and 10 indels), and 490 (378 snps and 112 indels) variation sites, respectively (Additional file 1: Figure S4A, S4C, S4E). Here, 28, 24, 29 variation sites in UTR and CDS of LOC_Os05g14880, LOC_Os06g01250, and LOC_Os06g37300 were used for haplotype analysis (Additional file 10: Table S9, Additional file 11: Table S10, Additional file 12: Table S11). LOC_Os05g14880 totally contained 12 haplotypes, which were named haplotypes I – XII (hap I – hap XII). Of them, Hap I was present mainly in japonica cultivars and Hap II mainly in indica cultivars (Additional file 1: Figure S4B and Additional file 10: Table S9). LOC_Os06g01250 had eight haplotypes, Hap I, Hap VI, and Hap VII were present mainly in japonica cultivars and Hap II, Hap III, Hap IV, and Hap V mainly in indica cultivars (Additional file 1: Figure S4D and Additional file 11: Table S10). LOC_Os06g37300 harbored 11 haplotypes, Hap III was the main haplotype including 2573 rice cultivars, namely, 1915 indica, 618 japonica, and 40 intermediate cultivars (Additional file 1: Figure S4F and Additional file 12: Table S11).

In summary, gene expression differences and gene sequence variations between RPY geng and Luohui 9 suggested that LOC_Os05g14880, LOC_Os06g01250, and LOC_Os06g37300 can be accepted as candidate genes for qST-5.1, qST-6.1, and qST-6.2. These results suggested that these genes have a potentially important role in salt stress tolerance, which provides confident targets for future validation through Crispr-Cas9 and overexpression methods.

Discussion

There are significant differences in the salt tolerance of rice at various growth stages. The seedling stage and young panicle differentiation stage are more sensitive to salt stress, while the bud stage, the tillering stage, and maturity stage are relatively strong in salt tolerance (Khan and Abdullah 2003). The survival rate under salt stress is a comprehensive performance of salt tolerance mechanisms, a reliable indicator to measure the strength of rice salt tolerance, and it is simple and convenient to observe (Liang et al. 2015). In this study, 2-week-old rice seedlings of Luohui 9, RPY geng, and RILs were selected for salt treatment. The difference in salt stress tolerance between Luohui 9 and RPY geng supported the previous studies that japonica rice is more tolerant to salt stress than indica rice (Islam et al. 2019; Kong et al. 2019). We speculated that this difference in salt tolerance between these subspecies may be due to the loss of more abiotic stress-related tolerance genes in indica than in japonica during the subspecies independent evolution, which was supported by our comparative family gene analysis between Luohui 9 and RPY geng (Unpublished data). Here, seven salt tolerance QTLs related to the seedling survival rate were identified. Compared with previous Meta-QTLs, four QTLs were previously unreported and were functionally validated by RILs (Fig. 4), which provided novel targets for rice salt stress tolerance breeding. On the other hand, our experiments demonstrated the feasibility of indica-japonica hybridization to breed stronger salt tolerant varieties and successfully selected several high salt-tolerant RILs. Our RILs genotyping results from four novel QTLs (Fig. 4) showed that the excellent performance in salt tolerance of high salt-tolerant RILs can be derived from synergistic genotype aggregation of the parental QTLs. These results emphasized that the QTLs we have identified are of great significance for improving the tolerance of rice to salt stress.

To analyze the QTLs of rice salt stress tolerance, this study adopted two analysis methods, namely, linkage mapping and RTM-GWAS. We found that RTM-GWAS was effective in identifying QTLs in a bi-parental RILs population and identified more QTLs that overlapped with previous Meta-QTLs than that in linkage mapping. Similarly, RTM-GWAS showed a more effective QTL detection rate in soybean bi-parental RILs populations, and lower false positives compared to linkage mapping or traditional GWAS (Pan et al. 2018; Khan et al. 2020; Chang et al. 2021; Zou et al. 2021). Our result proved that integration of linkage mapping and RTM-GWAS can highlight important QTLs, such as qST-5.1 and qST-6.1 in this study.

In the past 20 years, a large number of QTLs have been mapped in different rice populations by various methods, such as GWAS, QTL-seq, or BSA-seq, but only a little genes have been cloned and most candidate genes were uncertain due to the large QTL interval (Thomson et al. 2010; Kong et al. 2020). DEGs mapping in QTLs or Meta-QTLs can effectively highlight candidate genes (Yang et al. 2019; Kong et al. 2020). For example, Lei et al. (2020) reported that OsSAP16 was the candidate gene of qRSL7 under salt stress using QTL-Seq and RNA-Seq (Lei et al. 2020). In this study, we treated RPY geng and Luohui 9 with salt stress and performed RNA-seq analysis on their roots. We found that the number of DEGs in QTLs was extremely small, which greatly reduced the numbers of candidate genes, especially qST-6.1. Only one DEG (LOC_Os06g01250) was found in qST-6.1 or qST-6.2, encoding cytochrome P450 protein. Magwanga et al. (2019) reported that two cytochrome P450 genes (Gh_D07G1197 and Gh_A13G2057) played crucial roles in enhancing drought and salt stress tolerance in Gossypium hirsutum (Magwanga et al. 2019). CYP709B3, a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase gene involved in salt tolerance in Arabidopsis (Mao et al. 2013). In addition, a cytochrome P450, OsDSS1, was involved in growth and drought stress responses in rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Tamiru et al. 2015). These results proved that cytochrome P450s were important regulators of abiotic responses. We thus speculated that LOC_Os06g01250 was the candidate gene in qST-6.1, which was supported by DEG and previous studies. In addition, qST-5.1 only contained two genes, namely, LOC_Os05g14820 and LOC_Os05g14880. In Nicotiana tabacum, NtProRP1 encoding a novel proline-rich protein was an important osmotic stress-responsive factor and had specifically functions in pollen tube growth and early embryogenesis (Chen et al. 2013). An Arabidopsis zinc-finger gene, MEDIATOR OF ABA-REGULATED DORMANCY 1 (MARD1), with a proline-rich domain mediated ABA-regulated seed dormancy in Arabidopsis (He and Gan 2004). These results indicated that proline-rich proteins were stress-responsive factors involving phytohormone-related pathways. What’s more, qST-4.2, qST-4.1, qST-3.1, and qST-8.1 contained only 2, 7, 10, and 12 candidate genes, respectively, which greatly reduced the workload of later experimental functional verification.

Conclusion

In the present study, the salt stress tolerance differences of Luohui9, RPY geng, and their derived high-generation RILs were observed. We have successfully bred several high salt tolerance RILs through the hybrid breeding strategy of indica x japonica rice. Integrating linkage mapping, RTM-GWAS, Meta-QTLs comparison results identified of seven salt stress tolerance QTLs, including four new QTLs with extremely small physical intervals. The survival rate results of RILs demonstrate the functional effectiveness of the four new QTLs. The comparative transcriptome analysis of RPY geng and Luohui 9 highlighted the candidate genes in QTLs, namely, LOC_Os06g01250 in qST-6.1, LOC_Os06g37300 in qST-6.2, LOC_Os05g14880 in qST-5.1. Several randomly selected candidate genes can be further improved by qRT-PCR verification. Our results provided a new source for cloning of genes associated with salt resistance and molecular breeding in rice.

Availability of data and materials

The RNA-seq data used in the study are publicly available from the NCBI (BioProject ID PRJNA732136).

Abbreviations

GWAS:

Genome-wide association study

ST:

Salt tolerance

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

QTLs:

Quantitative trait locus

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

RILs:

Recombinant inbred lines

FDR:

False discovery rate

QTBs:

Quantitative trait bin blocks

References

  1. Ahanger MA, Tomar NS, Tittal M, Argal S, Agarwal RM (2017) Plant growth under water/salt stress: ROS production; antioxidants and significance of added potassium under such conditions. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 23:731–744

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Arends D, Prins P, Jansen RC, Broman KW (2010) R/qtl: high-throughput multiple QTL mapping. Bioinformatics 26:2990–2992

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonilla P, Dvorak J, Mackill D, Deal K, Gregorio G (2002) RFLP and SSLP mapping of salinity tolerance genes in chromosome 1 of rice (Oryza sativa L.) using recombinant inbred lines. Philipp Agric Sci 85:68–76

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chang FG, Lv WH, Lv PY, Xiao YT, Yan WL, Chen S, Zheng LY, Xie P, Wang L, Karikari B, Abou-Elwafa SF, Jiang HY, Zhao TJ (2021) Exploring genetic architecture for pod-related traits in soybean using image-based phenotyping. Mol Breed 41:21

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheeseman JM (2013) The integration of activity in saline environments: problems and perspectives. Funct Plant Biol 40:759–774

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen J, Zhao J, Ning J, Liu Y, Jing XU, Tian S, Zhang L, Sun MX (2013) NtProRP1, a novel proline-rich protein, is an osmotic stress-responsive factor and specifically functions in pollen tube growth and early embryogenesis in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Cell Environ 37:499–511

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen X, Wang YF, Lv B, Li J, Luo LQ, Lu SC, Zhang X, Ma H, Ming F (2014) The NAC family transcription factor OsNAP confers abiotic stress response through the ABA pathway. Plant Cell Physiol 55:604–619

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen SF, Zhou YQ, Chen YR, Gu J (2018) Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:884–890

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen CJ, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He YH, Xia R (2020) TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant 13:1194–1202

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dupuis J, Siegmund D (1999) Statistical methods for mapping quantitative trait loci from a dense set of markers. Genetics 151:373–386

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fricke W, Akhiyarova G, Veselov D, Kudoyarova G (2004) Rapid and tissue-specific changes in ABA and in growth rate in response to salinity in barley leaves. J Exp Bot 55:1115–1123

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ganie SA, Wani SH, Henry RJ, Hensel G (2021) Improving rice salt tolerance by precision breeding in a new era. Curr Opin Plant Biol 60:1996

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hakim MA, Juraimi AS, Hanafi MM, Ismail MR, Rafii MY, Islam MM, Selamat A (2014) The effect of salinity on growth, ion accumulation and yield of rice varieties. J Anim Plant Sci 24:874–885

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hanana M, Hamrouni L, Cagnac O, Blumwald E (2011) Mechanisms and strategies of cellular tolerance to salinity (NaCl) in plants. Environ Rev 19:121–140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hauser F, Horie T (2010) A conserved primary salt tolerance mechanism mediated by HKT transporters: a mechanism for sodium exclusion and maintenance of high K+/Na+ ratio in leaves during salinity stress. Plant Cell Environ 33:552–565

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. He Y, Gan S (2004) A novel zinc-finger protein with a proline-rich domain mediates ABA-regulated seed dormancy in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 54:1–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. He JB, Meng S, Zhao TJ, Xing GN, Yang SP, Li Y, Guan RZ, Lu JJ, Wang YF, Xia QJ, Yang B, Gai JY (2017) An innovative procedure of genome-wide association analysis fits studies on germplasm population and plant breeding. Theor Appl Genet 130:2327–2343

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. He YQ, Yang B, He Y, Zhan C, Cheng YH, Zhang JH, Zhang HS, Cheng JP, Wang ZF (2019) A quantitative trait locus, qSE3, promotes seed germination and seedling establishment under salinity stress in rice. Plant J 97:1089–1104

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hu HH, You J, Fang YJ, Zhu XY, Qi ZY, Xiong LZ (2008) Characterization of transcription factor gene SNAC2 conferring cold and salt tolerance in rice. Plant Mol Biol 67:169–181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang XY, Chao DY, Gao JP, Zhu MZ, Shi M, Lin HX (2009) A previously unknown zinc finger protein, DST, regulates drought and salt tolerance in rice via stomatal aperture control. Genes Dev 23:1805–1817

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang J, Sun SJ, Xu DQ, Lan HX, Sun H, Wang ZF, Bao YM, Wang JF, Tang HJ, Zhang HS (2012) A TFIIIA-type zinc finger protein confers multiple abiotic stress tolerances in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Mol Biol 80:337–350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Iqbal MN, Rasheed R, Ashraf MY, Ashraf MA, Hussain I (2018) Exogenously applied zinc and copper mitigate salinity effect in maize (Zea mays L.) by improving key physiological and biochemical attributes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:23883–23896

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Islam MS, Ontoy J, Subudhi PK (2019) Meta-analysis of quantitative trait loci associated with seedling-stage salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plants-Basel 8:18

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kawahara Y, De La Bastide M, Hamilton JP, Kanamori H, Mccombie WR, Ouyang S, Schwartz DC, Tanaka T, Wu JZ, Zhou SG, Childs KL, Davidson RM, Lin HN, Quesada-Ocampo L, Vaillancourt B, Sakai H, Lee SS, Kim J, Numa H, Itoh T, Buell CR, Matsumoto T (2013) Improvement of the Oryza sativa Nipponbare reference genome using next generation sequence and optical map data. Rice 6:10

    Google Scholar 

  25. Khan MA, Abdullah Z (2003) Salinity–sodicity induced changes in reproductive physiology of rice (Oryza sativa) under dense soil conditions. Environ Exp Bot 49:145–157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Khan MA, Tong F, Wang WB, He JB, Zhao TJ, Gai JY (2020) Molecular characterization of QTL-allele system for drought tolerance at seedling stage and optimal genotype design using multi-locus multi-allele genome-wide association analysis in a half-sib population of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Plant Genet Resour Charact Util 18:295–306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim D, Landmead B, Salzberg SL (2015) HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods 12:357-U121

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kong WL, Zhong H, Gong ZY, Fang XY, Sun T, Deng XX, Li YS (2019) Meta-analysis of salt stress transcriptome responses in different rice genotypes at the seedling stage. Plants-Basel 8:16

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kong WL, Zhang CH, Qiang YL, Zhong H, Zhao GQ, Li YS (2020) Integrated RNA-seq analysis and Meta-QTLs mapping provide insights into cold stress response in rice seedling roots. Int J Mol Sci 21:14

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lei L, Zheng HL, Bi YL, Yang LM, Liu HL, Wang JG, Sun J, Zhao HW, Li XW, Li JM, Lai YC, Zou DT (2020) Identification of a major qtl and candidate gene analysis of salt tolerance at the bud burst stage in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using QTL-Seq and RNA-Seq. Rice 13:14

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liang JL, Qu YP, Yang CG, Ma XD, Cao GL, Zhao ZW, Zhang SY, Zhang T, Han LZ (2015) Identification of QTLs associated with salt or alkaline tolerance at the seedling stage in rice under salt or alkaline stress. Euphytica 201:441–452

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W (2014) featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30:923–930

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin HX, Zhu MZ, Yano M, Gao JP, Liang ZW, Su WA, Hu XH, Ren ZH, Chao DY (2004) QTLs for Na+ and K+ uptake of the shoots and roots controlling rice salt tolerance. Theor Appl Genet 108:253–260

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu C, Mao B, Yuan D, Chu C, Duan M (2021) Salt tolerance in rice: physiological responses and molecular mechanisms. Crop J 9:10

    Google Scholar 

  35. Magwanga RO, Lu P, Kirungu JN, Dong Q, Cai X, Zhou Z, Wang X, Hou Y, Xu Y, Peng R (2019) Knockdown of cytochrome P450 genes Gh_D07G1197 and Gh_A13G2057 on chromosomes D07 and A13 reveals their putative role in enhancing drought and salt stress tolerance in Gossypium hirsutum. Genes 10:226

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Mansuri RM, Shobbar Z-S, Jelodar NB, Ghaffari M, Mohammadi SM, Daryani P (2020) Salt tolerance involved candidate genes in rice: an integrative meta-analysis approach. BMC Plant Biol 20:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mao G, Seebeck T, Schrenker D, Yu O (2013) CYP709B3, a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase gene involved in salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol 13:169–169

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Miller G, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R (2010) Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ 33:453–467

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Munns R (2002) Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ 25:239–250

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:651–681

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Munns R, James RA, Gilliham M, Flowers TJ, Colmer TD (2016) Tissue tolerance: an essential but elusive trait for salt-tolerant crops. Funct Plant Biol 43:1103–1113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Niones JM (2013) Five mapping of the salinity tolerance gene on chromosome 1 of rice (Oryza sativa L.) using near-isogenic lines. International Rice Research Institute Repository

  43. Pan LY, He JB, Zhao TJ, Xing GN, Wang YF, Yu DY, Chen SY, Gai JY (2018) Efficient QTL detection of flowering date in a soybean RIL population using the novel restricted two-stage multi-locus GWAS procedure. Theor Appl Genet 131:2581–2599

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Qin H, Huang RF (2020) The phytohormonal regulation of Na+/K+ and reactive oxygen species homeostasis in rice salt response. Mol Breed 40:13

    Google Scholar 

  45. Razzaq A, Ali A, Bin Safdar L, Zafar MM, Rui Y, Shakeel A, Shaukat A, Ashraf M, Gong WK, Yuan YL (2020) Salt stress induces physiochemical alterations in rice grain composition and quality. J Food Sci 85:14–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Seifikalhor M, Aliniaeifard S, Shomali A, Azad N, Hassani B, Lastochkina O, Li T (2019) Calcium signaling and salt tolerance are diversely entwined in plants. Plant Signal Behav 14:15

    Google Scholar 

  47. Shabala S, Pottosin I (2014) Regulation of potassium transport in plants under hostile conditions: implications for abiotic and biotic stress tolerance. Physiol Plant 151:257–279

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Tamiru M, Undan JR, Takagi H, Abe A, Yoshida K, Undan JQ, Natsume S, Uemura A, Saitoh H, Matsumura H (2015) A cytochrome P450, OsDSS1, is involved in growth and drought stress responses in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Mol Biol 88:85–99

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Thomson MJ, Ocampo M, Egdane J, Rahman MA, Sajise AG, Adorada DL, Tumimbang-Raiz E, Blumwald E, Seraj ZI, Singh RK (2010) Characterizing the saltol quantitative trait locus for salinity tolerance in rice. Rice 3:148–160

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wegner LH, Stefano G, Shabala L, Rossi M, Mancuso S, Shabala S (2011) Sequential depolarization of root cortical and stelar cells induced by an acute salt shock - implications for Na+ and K+ transport into xylem vessels. Plant Cell Environ 34:859–869

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wu H, Zhang X, Pablo GJ, Sergey S (2018) It is not all about sodium: revealing tissue specificity and signalling roles of potassium in plant responses to salt stress. Plant Soil 431:1–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Xu DQ, Huang J, Guo SQ, Yang X, Bao YM, Tang HJ, Zhang HS (2008) Overexpression of a TFIIIA-type zinc finger protein gene ZFP252 enhances drought and salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). FEBS Lett 582:1037–1043

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Yang YQ, Guo Y (2018a) Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt-stress responses. New Phytol 217:523–539

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Yang YQ, Guo Y (2018b) Unraveling salt stress signaling in plants. J Integr Plant Biol 60:796–804

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Yang J, Sun K, Li DX, Luo LX, Liu YZ, Huang M, Yang GL, Liu H, Wang H, Chen ZQ, Guo T (2019) Identification of stable QTLs and candidate genes involved in anaerobic germination tolerance in rice via high-density genetic mapping and RNA-Seq. BMC Genom 20:15

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zhao C, Zhang H, Song C, Zhu JK, Shabala S (2020) Mechanisms of plant responses and adaptation to soil salinity. The Innovation 1:100017

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Zou JA, Li WJ, Zhang YT, Song W, Jiang HP, Zhao JY, Zhan YH, Teng WL, Qiu LJ, Zhao X, Han YP (2021) Identification of glutathione transferase gene associated with partial resistance to Sclerotinia stem rot of soybean using genome-wide association and linkage mapping. Theor Appl Genet 134:2699–2709

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the anonymous referees whose constructive comments were helpful in improving the quality of this work.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0100400), the National Special Key Project for Transgenic Breeding (Grant No. 2016ZX08001001).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WK performed all of the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared the figures and tables, and wrote the paper. WK and YL conceived and designed the experiments. CZ performed qRT-PCR experiments. CZ, YQ, and YZ conducted the parts of salt stress experiments. SZ provided some technical support in bioinformatics analysis. HZ provided some suggestions for writing. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yangsheng Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests for this research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Figure S1. The survival rate of rice seedlings (Luohui 9, RPY geng, and RILs) after 7 days of salt stress treatment and 7 days of recovery; Figure S2. Three randomly selected candidate genes were verified by RT-PCR. Figure S3. Expression levels of LOC_Os05g14880, LOC_Os06g01250, and LOC_Os06g37300 in rice tissues from http://www.mbkbase.org/rice. Figure S4. Variant sites and haplotype results of LOC_Os05g14880, LOC_Os06g01250, and LOC_Os06g37300 from the rice genome variation database of 4,726 rice accessions (Rice Variation Map v2.0, http://ricevarmap.ncpgr.cn/).

Additional file 2

. Table S1. Meta-QTLs used in this study.

Additional file 3

. Table S2. Known genes used in this study.

Additional file 4

. Table S3. Primers of DEGs were used in this study.

Additional file 5

. Table S4. QTLs from R/qtl analysis.

Additional file 6

. Table S5. Known genes in Meta-QTLs.

Additional file 7

. Table S6. Known genes and their homologous genes in our identified QTLs

Additional file 8

. Table S7. Genes in our QTLs.

Additional file 9

. Table S8. Candidate genes in our QTLs.

Additional file 10

. Table S9. Haplotype analysis result of LOC_Os05g14880.

Additional file 11

. Table S10. Haplotype analysis result of LOC_Os06g01250.

Additional file 12

. Table S11. haplotype analysis result of LOC_Os06g37300.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, W., Zhang, C., Zhang, S. et al. Uncovering the Novel QTLs and Candidate Genes of Salt Tolerance in Rice with Linkage Mapping, RTM-GWAS, and RNA-seq. Rice 14, 93 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-021-00535-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Salt stress
  • Rice (Oryza sativa L.)
  • Linkage mapping
  • RTM-GWAS
  • RNA-seq