Skip to main content

Table 3 Mean comparison of QTL classes of grain yield (kg ha−1) across BC1F3 to BC1F8 generations under reproductive-stage drought stress and irrigated non-stress control conditions in Samba Mahsuri background at IRRI, Philippines

From: Marker-assisted selection strategy to pyramid two or more QTLs for quantitative trait-grain yield under drought

QTL class

QTL

2013DS

2013DS

2014WS

2015WS

2015WS

2016DS

2016DS

  

NS

RS

NS

NS

RS

NS

RS

  

BC1F3

BC1F3

BC1F6

BC1F7

BC1F7

BC1F8

BC1F8

Population size

  

42

42

70

20

20

20

20

A

qDTY 2.2

2020 a

1069 bc

3405 b

3327 b

44 a

B

qDTY 4.1

1900 a

894 b

3340 b

4727 d

184 b

5643 b

33 a

C

qDTY 2.2  + qDTY 4.1

2916 b

1296 c

3270 b

4161 c

110 ba

4999 a

216 b

X

Parent

2742 b

0 a

2137 a

1945 a

15 a

4051 a

39 a

 

Trial Mean

2395

815

3038

3540

88

5198

96

F- value

 

31.22

46.37

11.18

43.03

2.12

19.98

62.66

p-value

 

0.0089

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

0.09

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

  1. The letter display are QTL class labels ordered by mean grain yield of QTL class. Means followed by the same letter (within a column) are not significantly different, DS dry season, WS wet season, NS non-stress, RS reproductive-stage drought stress, X recipient parent (no QTL), Mean data of only 2 lines