Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Rice

Fig. 2

From: Isolation and Characterization of an Aluminum-resistant Mutant in Rice

Fig. 2

Comparison of Al resistance phenotype between WT and ral1 mutant. a Evans blue staining. Roots of WT and the mutant were exposed to 20 μM Al for 24 h and then stained with 0.025 % Evans blue. Scale bar = 500 μm. b A dose-response experiment of Kasalath (WT), ral1 mutant, NPB and Koshi. Seedlings were exposed to a 0.5 mM CaCl2 solution (pH 4.5) containing 0, 10, 20, 50 or 100 μM Al for 48 h. Relative root elongation (RRE) was used to evaluate their resistance to Al. Data are means ± SD (n = 7). c, d Comparison of root growth between WT and the mutant on different soils. Germinated seeds were grown on neutral soil (pH 6.6) or acidic soil (pH 4.1) for 6 days. Scale bar = 1 cm. Data are means ± SD (n = 6). Means with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05, Tukey test)

Back to article page