Fig. 6

Analysis of alternative spliced transcription factors (TFs). a Venn diagram showed number of alternative spliced TFs in three developmental stages. b Co-like TF was predicted to interact with CKI, and expression levels of its two isoforms at three stages. c Expression levels of two GRF4 isoforms. d MYBAS2 TF was interacted with MYBS2 and expression levels of its two differentially expressed isoforms at three stages. e MADS2 was predicted to interact with DL and MADS16, and expression levels of all the six differentially expressed isoforms at three stages, among which ONT.1529.1, ONT.1529.2, ONT.1529.3, and ONT.1529.5. were the novel isoforms. Transcript levels of DL and MADS16 were showed. f G2-like was predicted to interact with GAMYB and its expression levels at three stages. One novel isoform of ONT.9772.1was identified. The targeted gene expression level of GAMYB was showed. The prediction was conducted in the website of https://string-db.org/cgi/input.pl. Error bar represents mean ± SD with three biological replicates. Significance of *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 were determined by Student’s t-test. colored nodes: query proteins and first shell of interactors. white nodes: second shell of interactors. empty nodes: proteins of unknown 3D structure. filled nodes: some 3D structure is known or predicted. known interactions from curated databases. known interactions from experimentally determined. predicted interactions from gene neighborhood. predicted interactions from gene fusions. predicted interactions from gene co-occurrence. others from textmining. others from co-expression. others from protein homology