Table 5 Ward’s cluster analysis using select aroma/flavor attributes to categorize varieties
From: Important Sensory Properties Differentiating Premium Rice Varieties
Variety | Country | Type | Cluster A–B (r2 = 0.58) | Cluster A1–A2 (r2 = 0.21) | Common characteristicsa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRGA-417 (2008) | Brazil | Premium | A | A1 | |
BRS Jaçanã (2008) | Brazil | 2nd best | A | A1 | |
Khazar | Iran | 2nd best | A | A1 | |
IR64 | Philippines | Premium | A | A1 | |
Pelde | Australia | Premium | A | A1 | |
Langi | Australia | 2nd best | A | A1 | |
Koshihikari | Japan | Premium | A | A1 | |
Sambha Mahsuri | India | Premium | A | A1 | |
Guodao 6 | China | 2nd best | A | A1 | |
Koshiibuki | Japan | 2nd best | A | A1 | |
Hashemi | Iran | Premium | A | A1 | |
Swarna | India | 2nd best | A | A2 | High sewer animal |
IRRI-132 | Philippines | 2nd best | A | A2 | |
IRGA-417 (2009) | Brazil | Premium | B | High popcorn | |
PTT1 | Thailand | 2nd best | B | High corn | |
BRS Primavera | Brazil | 2nd best | B | High hay-like musty | |
Zhongzheyou 1 | China | Premium | B | High grain/starchy | |
KDML105 | Thailand | Premium | B | High sweet aromatic |