Diurnal Changes in Transcript and Metabolite Levels during the Iron Deficiency Response of Rice
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 25 July 2016
Accepted: 4 April 2017
Published: 20 April 2017
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is highly susceptible to iron (Fe) deficiency due to low secretion levels of the mugineic acid (MA) family phytosiderophore (PS) 2′-deoxymugineic acid (DMA) into the rhizosphere. The low levels of DMA secreted by rice have proved challenging to measure and, therefore, the pattern of DMA secretion under Fe deficiency has been less extensively studied relative to other graminaceous monocot species that secrete high levels of PS, such as barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).
Gene expression and metabolite analyses were used to characterise diurnal changes occurring during the Fe deficiency response of rice. Iron deficiency inducible genes involved in root DMA biosynthesis and secretion followed a diurnal pattern with peak induction occurring 3–5 h after the onset of light; a result consistent with that of other Strategy II plant species such as barley and wheat. Furthermore, triple quadrupole mass spectrometry identified 3–5 h after the onset of light as peak time of DMA secretion from Fe-deficient rice roots. Metabolite profiling identified accumulation of amines associated with metal chelation, metal translocation and plant oxidative stress responses occurring with peak induction 10–12 h after the onset of light.
The results of this study confirmed that rice shares a similar peak time of Fe deficiency associated induction of DMA secretion compared to other Strategy II plant species but has less prominent daily fluctuations of DMA secretion. It also revealed metabolic changes associated with the remediation of Fe deficiency and mitigation of damage from resulting stress in rice roots. This study complements previous studies on the genetic changes in response to Fe deficiency in rice and constitutes an important advance towards our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the rice Fe deficiency response.
KeywordsLC-MS DMA Strategy II Plant stress response Metal stress
Iron (Fe) is utilized in a variety of essential biological processes such as the respiratory (Park et al. 1996) and photosynthetic (Hung et al. 2010) electron-transport chain reactions (Connolly and Guerinot 2002; Reddy 2006), due to its stable redox properties, specifically an ability to donate and accept electrons between both Fe+2 (ferrous) and Fe+3 (ferric) redox states. Although Fe is the fourth most abundant element in the earth’s crust, it is not readily available to soil growing plants under aerobic conditions due to its tendency to form insoluble Fe3+ precipitates (Kim and Guerinot 2007). Insufficient Fe supply to plants leads to Fe depletion of both the mitochondria (Mori et al. 1991) and chloroplast (Stocking 1975; Terry and Low 1982), resulting in impaired efficiency of both cellular respiration and photosynthesis. Additionally, as Fe is required for the formation of the chlorophyll precursor δ-aminolevulinic acid (Marsh et al. 1963; Miller et al. 1984), Fe deficiency results in the characteristic yellowing or chlorosis of the youngest leaves (Terry and Low 1982). Furthermore, Fe deficiency is costly from an agronomic perspective (Hell and Stephan 2003) accounting for more than 25% of the crop yield losses of cereals, legumes and vegetables (Briat et al. 2015).
Iron is also the functional cofactor for the heme containing hemoprotein superfamily of enzymes involved in photosynthesis, respiration, DNA synthesis (Michel and Pistorius 2004) and antioxidants including peroxidases (Zaharieva and Abadía 2003). In cells, antioxidants quench reactive oxygen species (ROS) which are produced as an inevitable consequence of photosynthesis (Parida and Das 2005) and to a lesser extent due to respiration (Gill and Tuteja 2010). Cellular stress induced by Fe deficiency results in impaired antioxidant activity due to absence of the required catalytic Fe, leading to an increased abundance of cellular ROS (Becana et al. 1998; Iturbe-Ormaetxe et al. 1995). Accordingly Fe homeostasis must be tightly regulated in plants to prevent Fe-deficiency-induced oxidative damage to proteins and lipids (Sun et al. 2007).
Plants have evolved mechanisms to increase Fe uptake in response to conditions of limited Fe bioavailability. Dicots and non-graminaceous monocots employ Strategy I uptake, involving proton (H+) secretion to the rhizosphere and reduction of soil Fe3+ to Fe2+. Secretion of H+ reduces soil pH and promotes the solubility of Fe ions and reduction of Fe3+ to the more bioavailable Fe2+ promotes increased uptake of Fe2+ through iron-regulated transporters (IRT) in the plasma membrane of plant root cells (Lee & An 2009; Scholz et al. 1992). Graminaceous plant species (grass family Gramineae) utilize Strategy II uptake involving secretion of mugineic acid (MA) family phytosiderophores (PS) into the rhizosphere to chelate and solubilise the soil Fe3+, allowing for subsequent uptake of Fe3+-PS complexes through yellow stripe 1-like (YSL) transporters in the plasma membrane of plant root cells (Inoue et al. 2009; Nagasaka et al. 2009).
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is not only the model monocot species but also a staple food that contributes 35–59% of the daily caloric intake for approximately three billion people (Bhullar and Gruissem 2013). Rice is often grown in flooded paddies where microorganisms rapidly deplete dissolved oxygen levels, resulting in anoxic water where Fe has the tendency to be reduced to the more bioavailable Fe2+ form (Walker and Connolly 2008). Rice has therefore evolved the unusual ability amongst other Strategy II plant species to absorb Fe2+ via OsIRT transporters in a manner similar to Strategy I plant species (Bughio et al. 2002; Ishimaru et al. 2006). However, whilst genome sequencing demonstrates that the rice genome contains ferric reductase genes (Vasconcelos et al. 2004), rice does not show ferric reductase activity in roots nor the characteristic swelling of roots in response to Fe deficiency as seen in Strategy I plant species (Rong-li et al. 2012). The utilization of aspects from both Strategy I and Strategy II Fe uptake within the rice Fe deficiency response is commonly referred to as the ‘Combined Strategy’ (Ishimaru et al. 2006; Sperotto et al. 2012). The OsIRT homologous genes HvIRT1 in barley and ZmIRT1 in maize have been reported to be upregulated in response to Fe deficiency. Further, expression of these genes in Fe uptake-defective yeast mutants has been demonstrated to reverse growth defect associated with Fe uptake inability (Li et al. 2013; Pedas et al. 2008). However, in planta uptake of Fe2+ by Strategy II plants has so far only been confirmed in rice using tracer experiments (Ishimaru et al. 2006; Ricachenevsky and Sperotto 2014).
The amount of PS secreted by Strategy II plants corresponds with plant tolerance to growth on alkaline soils (soils with low Fe bioavailability) as identified by resistance to the onset of Fe-deficiency-associated chlorosis (Marschner et al. 1986). In response to Fe limiting conditions, barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), a plant species able to grow vigorously on high pH soils, secretes large amounts of PS including 2′-deoxymugineic acid (DMA) and the derivatives MA and 3-epihydroxymugineic acid (epiHMA). By contrast, rice, which is highly susceptible to Fe deficiency chlorosis on high pH soils, secretes only DMA in response to Fe deficiency and at much lower levels and shorter durations than barley (Higuchi et al. 1996; Mori et al. 1991). During Fe deficiency, barley (Marschner et al. 1986; Mori et al. 1987; Takagi et al. 1984; Walter et al. 1995), wheat (Oburger et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 1991), maize (Ueno et al. 2009), and red fescue (Ma et al. 2003) secrete PS following a diurnal pattern, with higher levels of PS secreted during day (light) periods and lower levels of PS secreted during night (dark) periods.
As Fe is a cofactor in enzymes involved in photosynthesis, this secretion pattern may enable plant Fe uptake to coincide with increased photosynthetic rates during light periods (Takagi et al. 1984). Additionally, as PS are readily degraded by soil microbes as a carbon and/or nitrogen source, the diurnal pattern of PS release may help reduce the degree of PS loss by microbial populations in the rhizosphere (Römheld and Marschner 1990). During Fe deficiency, rice induces expression of DMA biosynthetic genes following a diurnal pattern (Inoue et al. 2009; Nozoye et al. 2004, 2011). Additionally, rice secretes higher levels of DMA in the morning than afternoon or night periods (Nozoye et al. 2014). However, the diurnal pattern of transcript and metabolite levels within the rice Fe deficiency response has not been as extensively investigated as the Fe deficiency response of barley.
We studied the diurnal changes of DMA, NA, transcripts and metabolite levels within the rice Fe deficiency response. Rice roots exposed to Fe deficiency were used to investigate diurnal changes in expression levels of genes involved in Strategy II Fe uptake and translocation. A highly sensitive detection method was utilized to quantify in planta NA and DMA levels as well as DMA secretion levels by Fe-deficient rice roots. Additionally, metabolite profiling of Fe-deficient root tissues was performed to understand the molecular mechanisms utilized within the rice Fe deficiency response.
Induction of Fe Deficiency Symptoms
Expression of Genes Involved in the Strategy II Response in Fe-deficient Rice Roots
Biosynthesis and Secretion of DMA in Fe-deficient Rice Roots
Quantification of DMA by LC-MS from root secretions collected after one week of Fe deficiency, identified that Fe-deficient roots secreted on average 2.4-fold more DMA (p = 0.009) than Fe-sufficient roots across the day (Fig. 3c). Whilst no significant diurnal variation was observed in DMA secretion by Fe-sufficient roots, a diurnal pattern with a peak during 11:00–13:00 (p = 0.001) was observed for DMA secretion by Fe-deficient roots. Accordingly, Fe deficiency promoted increased secretion of DMA following a diurnal pattern with a peak occurring 3–5 h after the onset of light.
Metabolite Profiles of Fe-deficient Rice Roots
Biochemical Pathway Mapping of the Rice Fe Deficiency Response
Concentrations of metabolites in the following pathways were significantly increased in the roots of Fe-deficient rice: α–ketoglutarate family amino acids, 3-phosphoglycerates (3-P-glycerates), pyruvate derivatives, aromatic amino acids, citrulline–nitric oxide (Cit-NO) cycle, oxaloacetate/aspartate family amino acids and the DMA biosynthetic pathway (Additional file 2: Table S2B). No metabolites were detected at significantly lower concentrations in the roots of the Fe-deficient rice.
Iron Deficiency Induces Expression of Genes Involved in Strategy II Fe Uptake Following a Diurnal Pattern
Detailed analysis of rice gene expression related to NA and DMA biosynthesis, as well as DMA secretion under Fe deficiency, has been described in several previous investigations (Inoue et al. 2003; Nozoye et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2013). Here we have identified diurnal patterns of expression for the OsNAS1, OsNAS2, OsNAAT1, OsDMAS1, and OsTOM1 genes in Fe-deficient rice roots with significant induction at the 6:00 and 11:00 sampling times (Fig. 2, Additional file 1: Table S1). These diurnal patterns are consistent with previous investigations (Nozoye et al. 2004, 2011), and may be summarised as a slight induction of expression prior to the onset of light, a peak of induction 3–5 h after the onset of light, and a return to expression levels similar to that of Fe-sufficient roots prior to dark. While the diurnal patterns reported in this study have been previously identified, other studies have reported much higher inductions ratios for Fe-deficiency-inducible genes including OsNAS1 and OsNAS2 (Inoue et al. 2003; Kobayashi et al. 2009). This may have been due to differences in growing conditions, age of plants and length of exposure to the Fe deficiency treatment. In this study we cultivated rice plants in Fe-sufficient hydroponic solution for 5 weeks before transferring to Fe-deficient solution for a period of 1 week prior to sampling. Inoue et al. (2003) exposed very young seedlings to Fe-sufficient nutrient solution for 2 weeks, whereas Kobayashi et al. (2009) cultivated seedlings in Fe-sufficient nutrient solution for 3 weeks, before transferring plants to Fe-deficient solution for 1 week. Considering that our plants were more established than these studies prior to Fe deficiency, it is possible that our six week old plants were not fully Fe limited at the time of sampling and this may have reduced the induction ratios that we observed. We also found that expression of OsYSL15 was significantly induced in response to Fe deficiency prior to the onset of light and 3–5 h after the onset of light (Fig. 2g, Additional file 1: Table S1A). However, the diurnal pattern of OsYSL15 in Fe-deficient roots differed from the diurnal pattern of OsNAS1, OsNAS2, OsNAAT1, OsDMAS1 and OsTOM1 by having a peak time of expression at 18:00–20:00 instead of 11:00–13:00 (Fig. 2). OsYSL15 is an Fe-regulated Fe3+-DMA transporter and is thought to be responsible for active uptake of Fe3+-DMA complexes during daylight hours (Inoue et al. 2009). Thus, its expression may be induced by the preferential biosynthesis of root DMA at night time (Fig. 3b) and coordinated by diurnal secretion of DMA (Fig. 3c). Whilst increased expression of OsYSL15 after the onset of light has been reported previously (Inoue et al. 2009), the diurnal pattern of OsYSL15 that we observed is not consistent with the daily fluctuations of OsYSL15 described by Inoue et al. (2009). This inconsistency could be explained by differences in rice genotype as well as experimental design. In this study we used rice cultivar Nipponbare whereas Inoue et al. (2009) utilized cultivar Tsukinohikari. These genotypic differences may influence OsYSL15 expression under Fe deficiency. Inoue et al. (2009) also characterised the induction of expression of OsYSL15 under Fe deficiency over a 27-h time period with tissue sampling intervals of 3 h, compared to our analysis over a 24-h time period with tissue sampling intervals of 4–7 h.
Iron Deficiency Promotes DMA Biosynthesis and Accumulation
In this study we observed significant upregulation of OsNAS1, OsNAS2, OsNAAT1 and OsDMAS1 under Fe-deficient conditions (Fig. 2), however, only DMA (not NA) concentrations were significantly increased in the Fe-deficient rice roots (Fig. 3a and b); a result that is consistent with previous studies in barley and rice (Higuchi et al. 2001). These results imply that OsNAS upregulation within the Strategy II Fe deficiency response is associated with increased NA production for DMA biosynthesis, rather than NA accumulation. These results also suggest that increased DMA, rather than NA, is utilized for the altered chelation of Fe in the roots of Fe-deficient rice. This is supported by predictive models indicating that at the rice root apoplastic pH of 4.9 (Nishiyama et al. 2008), DMA would outcompete NA as the predominant Fe complex (Hider et al. 2004). Recent speciation studies of metal ligands within chelation complexes in the xylem and phloem sap of rice have identified that DMA is a major chelator of Fe in the phloem sap (Nishiyama et al. 2012; Yoneyama et al. 2015), but neither DMA nor NA are major chelators of Fe in the xylem sap (Ariga et al. 2014). Accordingly DMA-mediated translocation of Fe within the rice Fe deficiency response may occur predominantly via the phloem.
Whilst NA and DMA concentrations in Fe-sufficient roots showed a distinct diurnal pattern with higher concentrations in dark periods than light periods, no significant diurnal pattern of NA or DMA concentrations were observed in Fe-deficient roots. In barley, a diurnal pattern is observed wherein root PS (DMA, MA and epiHMA) concentrations are reduced during periods of heightened PS secretions (Kawai et al. 1993; Nagasaka et al. 2009; Walter et al. 1995). In the current study, Fe deficiency induced a 1.5-fold increase in root DMA concentrations and a 2.4-fold increase in DMA secretions in rice plants (Fig. 3), accounting for root DMA concentrations changing minimally during periods of increased DMA secretion. By contrast in barley, the depletion of root PS concentrations may be explained by Fe deficiency inducing an 8.7-fold increase in root PS concentrations but up to a 250-fold increase in PS secretions (Walter et al. 1995). This difference may relate to the Combined Strategy utilized by rice grown in flooded conditions involving uptake of unbound Fe2+ via IRT transporters. As this mechanism of Fe uptake is not reliant on DMA secretion, rice may have evolved to retain a larger proportion of the increased DMA produced during Fe deficiency.
Iron Deficiency Promotes Increased Secretion of DMA Following a Diurnal Pattern
Successful modification of the DMA quantification method described in Kakei et al. (2009) from quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry to the more sensitive triple quadrupole mass spectrometry provided a 3-fold improvement in sensitivity. Accordingly the developed DMA quantification method was more sensitive than DMA quantification methods described in previous publications including: Fe solubilisation assay (Rong-li et al. 2012), high performance liquid chromatography (Nozoye et al. 2014), LC-MS (Oburger et al. 2014), capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry (Dell’mour et al. 2010) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (Ma et al. 1995). This improved sensitivity allowed avoidance of the false-negative result wherein DMA within rice root secretions was deemed ‘not detected’ as the concentration was below the method’s limit of detection as in previous publications utilizing nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy for analysis (Fan et al. 2001).
Previous studies have identified that rice secretes more DMA during the 6:00–13:00 ‘morning’ period than the 13:00–20:00 ‘afternoon’ or 20:00–6:00 ‘night’ periods (Nozoye et al. 2014). Consistent with this result, our study identified that the peak time of DMA secretions by Fe-deficient rice occurred during the 6:00–13:00 ‘morning’ period (Fig. 3). Additionally, the improved sensitivity of the developed method allowed for the analysis of root secretions collected during the ‘morning’ over two narrower time periods (6:00–8:00 and 11:00–13:00). The ability to analyse root secretion DMA concentrations collected over narrower time periods allowed for further characterisation of rice DMA secretions during this ‘morning’ period leading to the identification of 11:00–13:00 (3–5 h after the onset of light) as the peak time of DMA secretion from Fe-deficient rice roots (Fig. 3).
Whilst this diurnal pattern of the Fe deficiency response in rice is less distinct than that of other graminaceous plants, the peak time of DMA secretions by rice is consistent with the peak time of PS secretions observed under Fe deficiency in barley (Marschner et al. 1986; Mori et al. 1987; Takagi et al. 1984; Walter et al. 1995), wheat (Oburger et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 1991), maize (Ueno et al. 2009), and red fescue (Ma et al. 2003). Consistent with other graminaceous plant species, a major aspect of the rice Fe deficiency response appears to involve re-establishing Fe homeostasis via increased PS mediated Fe uptake and internal translocation with the time of peak secretions occurring 3–5 h after the onset of light.
Iron Deficiency in Rice Induces Changes to Carbon and Energy Metabolism
Previous proteome analyses have identified that the molecular mechanisms induced within plant Fe deficiency responses include changes to plant metabolism associated with: carbon and energy metabolism, S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM) metabolism, ion transport, ROS scavenging and cell signalling (Kosová et al. 2011). Proteome analyses of the rice Fe deficiency response specifically identified increased levels of the glycolytic enzyme glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in the roots of Fe-deficient rice (Chen et al. 2015). Results of the current study indicated increased glycolysis and respiration within the Fe deficiency response during light periods (11:00–20:00) based on the induced levels of 3-P-glycreate derivatives, branched chain amino acids, pyruvate derivatives (Fig. 5), and 3-P-glycerate (Additional file 3: Figure S1). This is consistent with previous studies on plant stress responses (Di Martino et al. 2003; Wingler et al. 2000; Zoghlami et al. 2011). The rice Fe deficiency response therefore involves changes to carbon and energy metabolism potentially to accommodate the increased energy demand required to drive mechanisms induced within the Fe deficiency response.
Methionine is the dominant precursor of DMA biosynthesis (Mori and Nishizawa 1987) via the intermediate SAM, which is derived from methionine by SAM synthetase within the methionine cycle (Suzuki et al. 2006). Transcript analysis of barley suggested that methionine and SAM biosynthesis were induced in response to Fe deficiency (Nagasaka et al. 2009; Negishi et al. 2002). Similarly, transcript analyses of rice suggested that activity of the methionine cycle and DMA biosynthesis are induced 24 h after the onset of Fe deficiency (Itai et al. 2013). In the current study, Fe-deficient rice roots showed induced levels of methionine during 6:00–20:00 (Fig. 5g). However, unlike the diurnal patterns of gene expression detected (Fig. 2), a clear peak of methionine concentrations was not observed during 11:00–13:00. Serine (via cysteine) and/or aspartate (via homoserine) are used by plants to produce homocysteine, the immediate precursor to methionine (Droux et al. 1995). Serine and cysteine levels were induced in Fe-deficient rice roots whilst levels of aspartate and homoserine were unchanged (Fig. 5b and f; Additional file 4: Figure S4). The co-accumulation of serine, cysteine and methionine suggested that serine may be the dominant precursor to the increased methionine biosynthesis within the rice Fe deficiency response. To confirm this hypothesis, further investigations will be required such as radioisotope tracer experiments previously used to confirm that methionine is the dominant precursor of PS biosynthesis within the Fe deficiency responses of graminaceous plants (Mori and Nishizawa 1987; Nakanishi et al. 1999).
Iron Deficiency in Rice Induces Molecular Mechanisms Associated with Plant Metal-stress Responses
Ion transport, chelation and sequestration are key mechanisms involved in plant metal tolerance and reestablishment of metal homeostasis (Clemens 2001). In response to Fe deficiency, induced levels of histidine, proline and asparagine were detected during 18:00–20:00 (Fig. 5a and f). These amines have been identified as chelators of copper, nickel and zinc and facilitate tolerance to these metal stresses via complexation and xylem-mediated translocation (Rai 2002; Sharma and Dietz 2006). Considering that DMA is able to bind a range of metals in the rhizosphere (Scholz et al. 1992), and Fe-deficient rice has previously been shown to uptake increased concentrations of calcium, cadmium and zinc (da Silveira et al. 2007; Zhang et al. 1998), the increased DMA secretions during 11:00–13:00 within the rice Fe deficiency response may promote increased uptake of micronutrients other than Fe. The induced levels of chelators (histidine, proline, asparagine and DMA) during 18:00–20:00 within the rice Fe deficiency response may be associated with increased chelation and translocation of off-target metals (other than Fe) during the 11:00–13:00 period due to increased DMA secretions.
Iron Deficiency in Rice Induces Molecular Mechanisms Involved in Mediation of Oxidative Stress
The increased concentration of ROS from abiotic stresses, including Fe deficiency, results in an “oxidative burst” which in-turn causes damage to cell proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and DNA (Gill and Tuteja 2010; Spinelli et al. 2011). Accordingly, the plant Fe deficiency response includes the induction of molecular mechanisms associated with mediation of the damage due to oxidative stress. Accumulation of amino acids within abiotic stress responses play a protective role as antioxidants which detoxify ROS and prevent damage to the plant cell (Joshi et al. 2010). The antioxidant proline was induced in roots of our Fe-deficient rice plants with a peak of induction occurring during 18:00–20:00 (Fig. 5a). This peak time may be associated with off-target metal uptake as the localized increase to metal concentrations may cause oxidative stress via formation of ROS (Ercal et al. 2001). Iron-deficient rice roots also showed induced levels of phenylalanine, tyrosine, serotonin and tryptophan (Fig. 5d) which are antioxidant aromatic amines (Nimalaratne et al. 2011; Ramakrishna and Ravishankar 2011; Stadtman and Levine 2003). Particularly, phenylalanine is the main precursor to a suite of phenolic compounds which have very high antioxidant activity (Ghasemzadeh and Ghasemzadeh 2011; Michalak 2006).
Iron deficiency was associated with a significant decrease in root accumulation of ascorbic acid (Additional file 3: Figure S2), which is typically the primary polar antioxidant in plants (Weber et al. 2008). Previous proteomic studies have identified decreased levels of ascorbate peroxidase in the roots of Fe-deficient rice (Chen et al. 2015). As ascorbate peroxidase is a hemoprotein, Fe deficiency results in a decrease in ascorbate peroxidase activity (Becana et al. 1998; Iturbe-Ormaetxe et al. 1995; Sun et al. 2007). Additionally, previous analyses identified that in rice, but not in other graminaceous plants, Fe deficiency resulted in decreased root activity of glutathione reductase, an enzyme required for the ascorbic acid-glutathione cycle to efficiently mediate oxidative stress (Bashir et al. 2007). Accordingly, the rice Fe deficiency response includes accumulation of non-Fe-dependant antioxidants to scavenge ROS and minimise ROS associated damage.
Nitric oxide (NO) is a highly reactive radical that acts as a chemical signal (Gechev et al. 2006) in multiple plant stress responses including; drought, salt, metal toxicity (Spinelli et al. 2011) and Fe deficiency (Arnaud et al. 2006; Vigani et al. 2013). However, NO may also act as an antioxidant to quench superoxide anion radicals (Arasimowicz and Floryszak-Wieczorek 2007). In this study, Fe deficiency was associated with induced levels of citrulline and arginine (Fig. 5e). These results indicate that the Cit-NO cycle was induced which in turn suggests that NO production was increased (Mori 2007). Treatment of Arabidopsis with putrescine has previously been shown to alleviate Fe deficiency via the accumulation of NO (Zhu et al. 2016). Similarly, treatment with NO directly has been demonstrated to mitigate the chlorosis associated with Fe deficiency in rice (Lee et al. 2009) and maize (Sun et al. 2007) by acting as an antioxidant. Accordingly, increased NO production may occur as part of the rice Fe deficiency response to signal induction of gene expression and/or mitigate damage associated with oxidative stress.
The Strategy II Fe deficiency response of rice has been more difficult to study than that of wheat or barley due to very low levels of DMA secretion. The development of a highly sensitive method for the quantification of DMA and NA in this study allowed for the quantification of DMA in rice root secretions which for many previously published methodologies is below the limit of detection. This study reported a thorough characterization of the rice Fe deficiency response. Gene expression and metabolite profiling identified that Fe deficiency induced DMA biosynthesis and DMA secretions followed a diurnal pattern with a peak of induction occurring during 11:00–13:00. The identification of this peak time period, equating to 3–5 h after the onset of light, verified that the peak time of the rice Fe deficiency response is similar to that of other Strategy II plant species such as barley and wheat. However, the diurnal variation in DMA secretion observed within the rice Fe deficiency response was less prominent than that of other graminaceous species described in previous studies. The results presented herein indicate that the mechanisms utilized by rice in response to Fe deficiency include increased DMA-mediated Fe uptake and accumulation of metabolites associated with plant oxidative stress responses. These results constitute an important progression in our understanding of the rice Fe deficiency response.
Plant Materials and Growth Conditions
Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nipponbare) grains were surface sterilized with 70% ethyl alcohol and 5% sodium hypochlorite and then germinated on filter paper wetted with 7 mL of reverse osmosis (RO) water in a controlled environment chamber with 12-h photoperiod at 24 °C. After 10 days, germinated rice seedlings were transferred to 13 L supported hydroponic tanks. The rice seedlings were grown for six weeks at a density of thirty plants per hydroponic tank in a growth room with 12-h photoperiod, and 28 °C/24 °C day/night temperature (8:00–20:00/20:00–8:00), with nutrient solution as described in Plett et al. (2010). Rice plants were initially acclimated for one week by growth in ¼ strength Fe-replete growth solution followed by ½ strength Fe-replete growth solution for an additional four days (Additional file 5: Table S3). Plants were grown for a further 4 weeks in full strength Fe-replete growth solution. Growth solutions were replaced every 3–4 days to maintain pH at 5.5. After the four week growth period, Fe-sufficient control plants were grown for an additional week in full strength Fe-replete growth solution while Fe-deficient treatment plants were grown in growth solution lacking NaFe3+EDTA.
Measurement of Plant Size and Chlorophyll Score
Whole plant fresh weight was measured after one week of Fe deficiency treatment. Soil Plant Analysis Development (SPAD) measurements were taken on the youngest leaf (YL) and 2nd youngest leaf (2nd YL) at day 0 and 7 of the Fe deficiency treatment using a Minolta SPAD-502Plus (Spectrum Technologies Inc., Plainfield, Illinois, USA) as an indicator of leaf chlorophyll content.
Root tissue and root secretions were collected for gene expression and metabolite analyses during the time periods 6:00–8:00 (2–0 h prior to the onset of light), 11:00–13:00 (3–5 h after the onset of light), 18:00–20:00 (10–12 h after the onset of light) and 22:00–24:00 (2–4 h after the change to dark), after one week of Fe deficiency treatment.
Root Gene Expression Analyses
Extraction of RNA was performed from frozen tissue using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions with the exception that 8 μL of the reducing agent dithiothreitol was substituted for 3.5 μL of β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich). Purified RNA was reverse transcribed using the iScript Select cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Richmond, California, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The expression of OsNAS1 (LOC_Os03g1942), OsNAS2 (LOC_Os03g19420), OsNAS3 (LOC_Os07g48980), OsNAAT1 (LOC_Os02g20360), OsDMAS1 (LOC_Os03g13390), OsTOM1 (LOC_Os11g04020), and OsYSL15 (LOC_Os02g43410) genes were analysed by quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR). The 30 μL reactions contained 6 μL MyTaq Reaction Buffer (Bioline), 7.5 pmol of each primer (Additional file 5: Table S4), 0.15 μL MyTaq polymerase, 25 ng of cDNA and 21.35 μL deionized MilliQ water (dH2O). Reactants were initially denatured at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension of 72 °C for 5 min. Expression analyses were performed relative to a three gene normalization factor (3GNF) from expression of the three housekeeping genes: OsActin (LOC_Os03g50885), OsGAPDH (LOC_Os02g38920), and OsELF1 (LOC_Os03g29260).
Root Metabolite Extraction
Frozen root tissue was freeze dried using a Labconco Lyph-lock 6 freeze-dry system (Labconco Corp., Kansas City, Missouri, USA), transferred into 2 mL cryo-mill tubes (Lysing Matrix tube, MP Biomedicals, Solon, Ohio, USA), then 200 μL of methanol (MeOH) was added (containing the internal standards: 13C-Sorbitol at 20 μg/mL, 13C5-15N Valine at 20 μg/mL, 2-aminobutyric acid at 10 μg/mL and pentafluorobenzoic acid at 10 μg/mL). The root tissue was then homogenized using a Precellys 24 cryo-mill coupled to a Cryolys (Bertin Technologies, Villeurbanne, France) using the following setting: 3 cycles involving 30 s of milling at 6,800 rpm followed by a 30 s rest period between cycles. The MeOH supernatant was removed and 200 μL of deionized MilliQ water was then added to the cryo-mill tube containing the homogenized root tissue pellet and vortexed for 30 s. The water supernatant was combined with the removed MeOH supernatant and 100 μL of dichloromethane (DCM) was added to the MeOH-water supernatant mixture.
Root Secretion Collection, Purification and Concentration
Root secretions were collected using the method described in Astolfi et al. (2012) with the following modifications: roots from three plants were briefly rinsed with RO water, transferred into 400 mL of autoclaved dH2O in 1 L plastic containers, and then wrapped with aluminium foil to prevent exposure to light. After two hours of root secretion collection, 40 μL of Micropur Forte (Katadyn Products Inc.) was immediately added and filtered through Whatman filter discs. Root secretions were purified using cation exchange Amberlite IR120 H resin (Rohm and Haas Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA) with a bed volume (BV) of 50 mL. Sample solutions were eluted through the column at two BV per hour, and this eluate was discarded. Recovery of exchangeable cations (including DMA) was performed by eluting 100 mL of 2 M ammonium hydroxide solution through the Amberlite resin at two BV per hour and stored at −80 °C. Concentration of root secretions was performed through centrifugal evaporation using a RVC 2–25 (Martin Christ Corporation, Osterode, Germany) at 30 °C.
LC-MS Quantification of Amines
Flow rate (μL/min)
During MS analyses, all metabolites were quantified based on formation of the m/z = 171 Amq product ion. Metabolites were quantified by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) according to previously published transitions (Boughton et al. 2011; Callahan et al. 2007).
LC-MS Quantification of DMA and NA
Flow rate (μL/min)
Collision energy (V)
[DMA+(2 × FMOC) + H]+
[NA+(2 × FMOC) + H]+
[2-AA+(FMOC) + H] +
Instrument parameters were set to: high pressure RF 210 V, low pressure RF 150 V, sheath gas temperature 400 °C, sheath gas flow 12 L/min, gas temperature 290 °C, gas flow 16 L/min, nebulizer 20 psi, capillary 4500 V, nozzle voltage 2000 V, cell accelerator voltage 2 V, and delta EMV 250 V.
Data Processing and Statistical Analyses
Spectra gathered during LC-MS analyses were initially processed using the MassHunter Workstation software package vB.06 (Agilent Technologies Inc.). For LC-MS analyses, compounds were identified by retention time and MRM match to an authentic standard, integrated peak areas were used for quantification relative to external calibration curves. General linear model and Tukey’s test 95% confidence grouping analyses were performed in Minitab 16 statistical software (Minitab Inc., State College, Pennsylvania, USA). Pair-wise statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-tests between sets of biological replicates from different treatments collected during the same time period only. The metabolomics data analysis server Metaboanalyst 3.0 (Wishart Research Group, the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) was used to identify clustering of metabolites profiles between samples based on PCA. Autoscaling and cube-root normalization was performed on analyte levels prior to Metaboanalyst analyses. Permutational ANOVA (PERMANOVA) was used to test for significant differences (p < 0.05) in metabolite profiles between Fe treatments and collection times. PERMANOVA tests were run using unrestricted permutation of data and 999 permutations on a resemblance matrix of autoscaled metabolite profiles based on Euclidean distances (Anderson 2005). PERMANOVA tests were performed using PRIMER software (v.6.0) with the PERMANOVA+ add-on (v.1.0.6) (PRIMER-E, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, UK). The Visualization and Analysis of NeTworks with related Experimental Data program, VANTED v2.1.0 was used to map the log base 2 transformations of Fe deficiency associated induction factors of metabolite data on to custom made biochemical pathways maps developed from pathway maps available at the KEGG pathway database (available at http://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway.html).
- 2nd YL:
2nd youngest leaf
3 gene normalization factor
- Cit-NO cycle:
Citrulline-nitric oxide cycle
deionized MilliQ water
2′-deoxymugineic acid synthase
9-fluorenyl methoxycarboxyl chloride
Genes of interest
- H+ :
Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry
Multiple reaction monitoring
Principal component analysis
parts per million
Quantitative real time PCR
- RO water:
Reverse osmosis water
Reactive oxygen species
- RP chromatography:
Reverse phase chromatography
Soil plant analysis development
Transporter of mugineic acid family phytosiderophores
- Tukey’s HSD test:
Tukey’s honest significant difference test
Visualization and analysis of networks with related experimental data program
This research was supported by grants from the Australian Research Council (LP130100785) and the HarvestPlus Challenge Program. Metabolite analyses were conducted at Metabolomics Australia, a NCRIS initiative under Bioplatforms Australia Pty Ltd. The authors would like to thank Alice Chia Feen Ng, Priyanka Reddy, Dr. Thusitha Rupasinghe and Yuan Li for their assistance during metabolite and gene expression analyses.
JS, AJ, BB, and UR conceived and designed the experiments. JS, BB and AL developed and conducted the physiological and biochemical analyses. AJ and UR acquired the funds. JS, AJ and LM wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed, revised and approved the manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Anderson MJ (2005) Permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland 26:32–46.
- Arasimowicz M, Floryszak-Wieczorek J (2007) Nitric oxide as a bioactive signalling molecule in plant stress responses. Plant Sci 172(5):876–87View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ariga T, Hazama K, Yanagisawa S, Yoneyama T (2014) Chemical forms of iron in xylem sap from graminaceous and non-graminaceous plants. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 60(4):460–9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arnaud N, Murgia I, Boucherez J, Briat J-F, Cellier F, Gaymard F (2006) An iron-induced nitric oxide burst precedes ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation for Arabidopsis AtFer1 ferritin gene expression. J Biol Chem 281(33):23579–88View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Astolfi S, Zuchi S, Neumann G, Cesco S, Di Toppi LS, Pinton R (2012) Response of barley plants to Fe deficiency and Cd contamination as affected by S starvation. J Exp Bot 63(3):1241–50View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bashir K, Nagasaka S, Itai RN, Kobayashi T, Takahashi M, Nakanishi H, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2007) Expression and enzyme activity of glutathione reductase is upregulated by Fe-deficiency in graminaceous plants. Plant Mol Biol 65(3):277–84View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Becana M, Moran JF, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Escuredo PR (1998) Iron-dependent oxygen free radical generation in plants subjected to environmental stress: toxicity and antioxidant protection. Plant Soil 201(1):137–47View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhullar NK, Gruissem W (2013) Nutritional enhancement of rice for human health: the contribution of biotechnology. Biotechnol Adv 31(1):50–7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boughton BA, Callahan DL, Silva C, Bowne J, Nahid A, Rupasinghe T, Tull DL, McConville MJ, Bacic A, Roessner U (2011) Comprehensive profiling and quantitation of amine group containing metabolites. Anal Chem 83(19):7523–30View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Briat J-F, Dubos C, Gaymard F (2015) Iron nutrition, biomass production, and plant product quality. Trends Plant Sci 20(1):33–40View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bughio N, Yamaguchi H, Nishizawa NK, Nakanishi H, Mori S (2002) Cloning an iron-regulated metal transporter from rice. J Exp Bot 53(374):1677–82View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Callahan DL, Kolev SD, O’Hair RAJ, Salt DE, Baker AJM (2007) Relationships of nicotianamine and other amino acids with nickel, zinc and iron in Thlaspi hyperaccumulators. New Phytol 176(4):836–48View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen L, Ding C, Zhao X, Xu J, Mohammad AA, Wang S, Ding Y (2015) Differential regulation of proteins in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under iron deficiency. Plant Cell Rep 34(1):83–96View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clemens S (2001) Molecular mechanisms of plant metal tolerance and homeostasis. Planta 212(4):475–86View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Connolly EL, Guerinot ML (2002) Iron stress in plants. Genome Biol 3(8):1024.1–1024.4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- da Silveira VC, de Oliveira AP, Sperotto RA, Espindola LS, Amaral L, Dias JF, da Cunha JB, Fett JP (2007) Influence of iron on mineral status of two rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Braz J Plant Physiol 19(2):127–39View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dell’mour M, Koellensperger G, Quirino JP, Haddad PR, Stanetty C, Oburger E, Puschenreiter M, Hann S (2010) Complexation of metals by phytosiderophores revealed by CE-ESI-MS and CE-ICP-MS. Electrophoresis 31(7):1201–7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Di Martino C, Delfine S, Pizzuto R, Loreto F, Fuggi A (2003) Free amino acids and glycine betaine in leaf osmoregulation of spinach responding to increasing salt stress. New Phytol 158(3):455–63View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Droux M, Ravanel S, Douce R (1995) Methionine biosynthesis in higher plants. II. Purification and characterization of cystathionine β-lyase from spinach chloroplasts. Arch Biochem Biophys 316(1):585–95View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ercal N, Gurer-Orhan H, Aykin-Burns N (2001) Toxic metals and oxidative stress part I: mechanisms involved in metal-induced oxidative damage. Curr Top Med Chem 1(6):529–39View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fan TW-M, Lane AN, Shenker M, Bartley JP, Crowley D, Higashi RM (2001) Comperhensive chemical profiling of gramineous plant root exudates using high-resolution NMR and MS. Phytochemistry 57(2):209–21View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gechev TS, Breusegem FV, Stone JM, Denev I, Laloi C (2006) Reactive oxygen species as signals that modulate plant stress responses and programmed cell death. BioEssays 28(11):1091–101View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ghasemzadeh A, Ghasemzadeh N (2011) Flavonoids and phenolic acids: role and biochemical activity in plants and human. J Med Plants Res 5(31):6697–703Google Scholar
- Gill SS, Tuteja N (2010) Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 48(12):909–30View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hell R, Stephan UW (2003) Iron uptake, trafficking and homeostasis in plants. Planta 216(4):541–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hider RC, Yoshimura E, Khodr H, von Wirén N (2004) Competition or complementation: the iron-chelating abilities of nicotianamine and phytosiderophores. New Phytol 164(2):204–8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Higuchi K, Kanazawa K, Nishizawa N-K, Mori S (1996) The role of nicotianamine synthase in response to Fe nutrition status in Gramineae. Plant Soil 178(2):171–7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Higuchi K, Watanabe S, Takahashi M, Kawasaki S, Nakanishi H, Nishizawa NK, Mori S (2001) Nicotianamine synthase gene expression differs in barley and rice under Fe-deficienct conditions. Plant J 25(2):159–67View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hung C-H, Hwang HJ, Chen Y-H, Chiu Y-F, Ke S-C, Burnap RL, Chu H-A (2010) Spectroscopic and functional characterizations of cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC 6803 mutants on and near the heme axial ligand of cytochrome b559 in photosystem II. J Biol Chem 285(8):5563–663View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Inoue H, Higuchi K, Takahashi M, Nakanishi H, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2003) Three rice nicotianamine synthase genes, OsNAS1, OsNAS2, and OsNAS3 are expressed in cells involved in long-distance transport of iron and differentially regulated by iron. Plant J 36(3):366–81View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inoue H, Kobayashi T, Nozoye T, Takahashi M, Kakei Y, Suzuki K, Nakazono M, Nakanishi H, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2009) Rice OsYSL15 is an iron-regulated iron(III)-deoxymugineic acid transporter expressed in the roots and is essential for iron uptake in early growth of the seedlings. J Biol Chem 284(6):3470–9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ishimaru Y, Suzuki M, Tsukamoto T, Suzuki K, Nakazono M, Kobayashi T, Wada Y, Watanabe S, Matsuhashi S, Takahashi M, Nakanishi H, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2006) Rice plants take up iron as an Fe3+ phytosiderophore and as Fe2+. Plant J 45(3):335–46View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Itai RN, Ogo Y, Kobayashi T, Nakanishi H, Nishizawa NK (2013) Rice genes involved in phytosiderophore biosynthesis are synchronously regulated during the early stages of iron deficiency in roots. Rice 6(1):1–13View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Moran JF, Arrese-Igor C, Gogorcena Y, Klucas RV, Becana M (1995) Activated oxygen and antioxidant defenses in iron-deficient pea plants. Plant Cell Environ 18(4):421–9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Joshi V, Joung J-G, Fei Z, Jander G (2010) Interdependence of threonine, methionine and isoleucine metabolism in plants: accumulation and transcriptional regulation under abiotic stress. Amino Acids 39(4):933–47View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kakei Y, Yamaguchi I, Kobayashi T, Takahashi M, Nakanishi H, Yamakawa T, Nishizawa NK (2009) A highly sensitive, quick and simple quantification method for nicotianamine and 2′-deoxymugineic acid from minimum samples using LC/ESI-TOF-MS achieves functional analysis of these components in plants. Plant Cell Physiol 50(11):1988–93View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kawai S, Itoh K, Takagi SI (1993) Incorporation of 15N and 14C of methionine into the mugineic acid family of phytosiderophores in iron-deficient barley roots. Physiol Plant 88(4):668–74View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim SA, Guerinot ML (2007) Mining iron: iron uptake and transport in plants. FEBS Lett 581(12):2273–80View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kobayashi T, Itai RN, Ogo Y, Kakei Y, Nakanishi H, Takahashi M, Nishizawa NK (2009) The rice transcription factor IDEF1 is essential for the early response to iron deficiency, and induces vegetative expression of late embryogenesis abundant genes. Plant J 60(6):948–61View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kosová K, Vítámvás P, Prášil IT, Renaut J (2011) Plant proteome changes under abiotic stress - Contribution of proteomics studies to understanding plant stress response. J Proteome 74(8):1301–22View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee S, An G (2009) Over-expression of OsIRT1 leads to increased iron and zinc accumulations in rice. Plant, Cell and Environment 32(4):408–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee S, Chiecko JC, Kim SA, Walker EL, Lee Y, Guerinot ML, An G (2009) Disruption of OsYSL15 leads to iron inefficiency in rice plants. Plant Physiol 150(2):786–800View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Li S, Zhou X, Huang Y, Zhu L, Zhang S, Zhao Y, Guo J, Chen J, Chen R (2013) Identification and characterization of the zinc-regulated transporters, iron-regulated transporter-like protein (ZIP) gene family in maize. BMC Plant Biol 13(1):1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ma JF, Shinada T, Matsuda C, Nomoto K (1995) Biosynthesis of phytosiderophores, mugineic acids, associated with methionine cycling. J Biol Chem 270(28):16549–54View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ma JF, Ueno H, Ueno D, Rombolà AD, Iwashita T (2003) Characterization of phytosiderophore secretion under Fe deficiency stress in Festuca rubra. Plant Soil 256(1):131–7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marschner H, Römheld V, Kissel M (1986) Different strategies in higher plants in mobilization and uptake of iron. J Plant Nutr 9(3–7):695–713View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marsh HV Jr, Evans HJ, Matrone G (1963) Investigations of the role of iron in chlorophyll metabolism I. Effect of iron deficiency on chlorophyll and heme content and on the activities of certain enzymes in leaves. Plant Physiol 38(6):632–8View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Michalak A (2006) Phenolic compounds and their antioxidant activity in plants growing under heavy metal stress. Pol J Environ Stud 15(4):523–30Google Scholar
- Michel K-P, Pistorius EK (2004) Adaptation of the photosynthetic electron transport chain in cyanobacteria to iron deficiency: the function of IdiA and IsiA. Physiol Plant 120(1):36–50View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller GW, Pushnik JC, Welkie GW (1984) Iron chlorosis, a world wide problem, the relation of chlorophyll biosynthesis to iron. J Plant Nutr 7(1–5):1–22View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mori M (2007) Regulation of nitric oxide synthesis and apoptosis by arginase and arginine recycling. J Nutr 137(6):1616S–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mori S, Nishizawa NK (1987) Methionine as a dominant precursor of phytosiderophores in Graminaceae plants. Plant Cell Physiol 28(6):1081–92Google Scholar
- Mori S, Nishizawa N, Kawai S, Sato Y, Takagi S (1987) Dynamic state of mugineic acid and analogous phytosiderophores in Fe‐deficient barley. J Plant Nutr 10(9–16):1003–11View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mori S, Nishizawa N, Hayashi H, Chino M, Yoshimura E, Ishihara J (1991) Why are young rice plants highly susceptible to iron deficiency? Plant Soil 130(1):143–56View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nagasaka S, Takahashi M, Nakanishi-Itai R, Bashir K, Nakanishi H, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2009) Time course analysis of gene expression over 24 h in Fe-deficient barley roots. Plant Mol Biol 69(5):621–31View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakanishi H, Bughio N, Matsuhashi S, Ishioka N-S, Uchida H, Tsuji A, Osa A, Sekine T, Kume T, Mori S (1999) Visualizing real time [11C] methionine translocation in Fe-sufficient and Fe-deficient barley using a Positron Emitting Tracer Imaging System (PETIS). J Exp Bot 50(334):637–43View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Negishi T, Nakanishi H, Yazaki J, Kishimoto N, Fujii F, Shimbo K, Yamamoto K, Sakata K, Sasaki T, Kikuchi S, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2002) cDNA microarray analysis of gene expression during Fe-deficiency stress in barley suggests that polar transport of vesicles is implicated in phytosiderophore secretion in Fe-deficient barley roots. Plant J 30(1):83–94View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nimalaratne C, Lopes-Lutz D, Schieber A, Wu J (2011) Free aromatic amino acids in egg yolk show antioxidant properties. Food Chem 129(1):155–61View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nishiyama H, Ohya T, Tanoi K, Nakanishi TM (2008) A simple measurement of the pH of root apoplast by the fluorescence ratio method. Plant Root 2:3–6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nishiyama R, Kato M, Nagata S, Yanagisawa S, Yoneyama T (2012) Identification of Zn–Nicotianamine and Fe–2′-Deoxymugineic acid in the phloem sap from rice plants (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Physiol 53(2):381–90View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nozoye T, Itai RN, Nagasaka S, Takahashi M, Nakanishi H, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2004) Diurnal changes in the expression of genes that participate in phytosiderophore synthesis in rice. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 50(7):1125–31View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nozoye T, Nagasaka S, Kobayashi T, Takahashi M, Sato Y, Sato Y, Nakanishi NUH, Nishizawa NK (2011) Phytosiderophore efflux transporters are crucial for iron acquisition in graminaceous plants. J Biol Chem 286(7):5446–54View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nozoye T, Nagasaka S, Bashir K, Takahashi M, Kobayashi T, Nakanishi H, Nishizawa NK (2014) Nicotianamine synthase 2 localizes to the vesicles of iron-deficient rice roots, and its mutation in the YXXφ or LL motif causes the disruption of vesicle formation or movement in rice. Plant J 77(2):246–60View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oburger E, Gruber B, Schindlegger Y, Schenkeveld WDC, Hann S, Kraemer SM, Wenzel WW, Puschenreiter M (2014) Root exudation of phytosiderophores from soil-grown wheat. New Phytol 203(4):1161–74View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Parida AK, Das AB (2005) Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 60(3):324–49View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park S, Pan L-P, Chan SI, Alben JO (1996) Photoperturbation of the heme a3-CuB binuclear center of cytochrome c oxidase CO complex observed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Biophys J 71(2):1036–47View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pedas P, Ytting CK, Fuglsang AT, Jahn TP, Schjoerring JK, Husted S (2008) Manganese efficiency in barley: identification and characterization of the metal ion transporter HvIRT1. Plant Physiol 148(1):455–66View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Plett D, Safwat G, Gilliham M, Møller IS, Roy S, Shirley N, Jacobs A, Johnson A, Tester M (2010) Improved salinity tolerance of rice through cell type-specific expression of AtHKT1;1. PLoS ONE 5(9):e12571View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rai VK (2002) Role of amino acids in plant responses to stresses. Biol Plant 45(4):481–7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ramakrishna A, Ravishankar GA (2011) Influence of abiotic stress signals on secondary metabolites in plants. Plant Signal Behav 6(11):1720–31View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Reddy KJ (2006) Nutrient Stress. In: Rao KVM, Raghavendra AS, Reddy KJ (eds) Physiology and molecular biology of stress tolerance in plants. Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht, pp 187–219View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ricachenevsky FK, Sperotto RA (2014) There and back again, or always there? The evolution of rice combined strategy for Fe uptake. Front Plant Sci 5:189View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Römheld V, Marschner H (1990) Genotypical differences among graminaceous species in release of phytosiderophores and uptake of iron phytosiderophores. Plant Soil 123(2):147–53View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rong-li S, Hong-mei H, Xiao-yun F, Karim MR, Fu-suo Z, Chun-qin Z (2012) Responses of aerobic rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron deficiency. J Integr Agric 11(6):938–45View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scholz G, Becker R, Pich A, Stephan UW (1992) Nicotianamine - a common constituent of strategies I and II of iron acquisition by plants: a review. J Plant Nutr 15(10):1647–65View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sharma SS, Dietz K-J (2006) The significance of amino acids and amino acid-derived molecules in plant responses and adaptation to heavy metal stress. J Exp Bot 57(4):711–26View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sperotto RA, Ricachenevsky FK, De Abreu Waldow V, Fett JP (2012) Iron biofortification in rice: it’s a long way to the top. Plant Sci 190:24–39View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spinelli F, Cellini A, Marchetti L, Nagesh KM, Piovene C (2011) Emission and function of volatile organic compounds in response to abiotic stress. In: Shanker A, Venkateswarlu B (eds) Abiotic stress in plants - mechanisms and adaptations. InTech, RijekaGoogle Scholar
- Stadtman ER, Levine RL (2003) Free radical-mediated oxidation of free amino acids and amino acid residues in proteins. Amino Acids 25(3):207–18View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stocking CR (1975) Iron deficiency and the structure and physiology of maize chloroplasts. Plant Physiol 55(4):626–31View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sun B, Jing Y, Chen K, Song L, Chen F, Zhang L (2007) Protective effect of nitric oxide on iron deficiency-induced oxidative stress in maize (Zea mays). J Plant Physiol 164(5):536–43View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki M, Takahashi M, Tsukamoto T, Watanabe S, Matsuhashi S, Yazaki J, Kishimoto N, Kikuchi S, Nakanishi H, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2006) Biosynthesis and secretion of mugineic acid family phytosiderophores in zinc-deficient barley. Plant J 48(1):85–97View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takagi SI, Nomoto K, Takemoto T (1984) Physiological aspect of mugineic acid, a possible phytosiderophore of graminaceous plants. J Plant Nutr 7(1–5):469–77View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Terry N, Low G (1982) Leaf chlorophyll content and its relation to the intracellular localization of iron. J Plant Nutr 5(4–7):301–10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ueno D, Yamaji N, Ma JF (2009) Further characterization of ferric—phytosiderophore transporters ZmYS1 and HvYS1 in maize and barley. J Exp Bot 60(12):3513–20View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Vasconcelos M, Musetti V, Li C-M, Datta SK, Grusak MA (2004) Functional analysis of transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) transformed with an Arabidopsis thaliana ferric reductase (AtFR02). Soil Sci Plant Nutr 50(7):1151–7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vigani G, Zocchi G, Bashir K, Philippar K, Briat J-F (2013) Signals from chloroplasts and mitochondria for iron homeostasis regulation. Trends Plant Sci 18(6):305–11View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walker EL, Connolly EL (2008) Time to pump iron: iron-deficiency-signaling mechanisms of higher plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11(5):530–5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walter A, Pich A, Scholz G, Marschner H, Römheld V (1995) Diurnal variations in release of phytosiderophores and in concentrations of phytosiderophores and nicotianamine in roots and shoots of barley. J Plant Physiol 147(2):191–6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang L, Ying Y, Narsai R, Ye L, Zheng L, Tian J, Whelan J, Shou H (2013) Identification of OsbHLH133 as a regulator of iron distribution between roots and shoots in Oryza sativa. Plant Cell Environ 36(1):224–36View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weber G, von Wirén N, Hayen H (2008) Investigation of ascorbate-mediated iron release from ferric phytosiderophores in the presence of nicotianamine. BioMetals 21(5):503–13View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wingler A, Lea PJ, Quick WP, Leegood RC (2000) Photorespiration: metabolic pathways and their role in stress protection. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 355(1402):1517–29View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yoneyama T, Ishikawa S, Fujimaki S (2015) Route and regulation of Zinc, Cadmium, and Iron transport in rice plants (Oryza sativa L.) during vegetative growth and grain filling: Metal transporters, metal speciation, grain Cd reduction and Zn and Fe biofortification. Int J Mol Sci 16(8):19111–29View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zaharieva TB, Abadía J (2003) Iron deficiency enhances the levels of ascorbate, glutathione, and related enzymes in sugar beet roots. Protoplasma 221(3–4):269–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang F-S, Römheld V, Marschner H (1991) Diurnal rhythm of release of phytosiderophores and uptake rate of zinc in iron-deficient wheat. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 37(4):671–8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang X, Zhang F, Mao D (1998) Effect of iron plaque outside roots on nutrient uptake by rice (Oryza sativa L.). Zinc uptake by Fe-deficient rice. Plant Soil 202(1):33–9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhu XF, Wang B, Song WF, Zheng SJ, Shen RF (2016) Putrescine alleviates iron deficiency via NO-dependent reutilization of root cell-wall Fe in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 170(1):558–67View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zoghlami LB, Djebali W, Abbes Z, Hediji H, Maucourt M, Moing A, Brouquisse R, Chaïbi W (2011) Metabolite modifications in Solanum lycopersicum roots and leaves under cadmium stress. Afr J Biotechnol 10(4):567–79Google Scholar